Characterising the potential of sheep wool for ancient DNA analyses

  • Luise Ørsted Brandt
  • Lena Diana Tranekjer
  • Ulla Mannering
  • Maj Ringgaard
  • Karin Margarita Frei
  • Eske Willerslev
  • Margarita Gleba
  • M. Thomas P. Gilbert
Original Paper

Abstract

The use of wool derived from sheep (Ovis aries) hair shafts is widespread in ancient and historic textiles. Given that hair can represent a valuable source of ancient DNA, wool may represent a valuable genetic archive for studies on the domestication of the sheep. However, both the quality and content of DNA in hair shafts are known to vary, and it is possible that common treatments of wool such as dyeing may negatively impact the DNA. Using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR), we demonstrate that in general, short fragments of both mitochondrial and single-copy nuclear DNA can be PCR-amplified from wool derived from a variety of breeds, regardless of the body location or natural pigmentation. Furthermore, although DNA can be PCR-amplified from wool dyed with one of four common plant dyes (tansy, woad, madder, weld), the use of mordants such as alum or iron leads to considerable DNA degradation. Lastly, we demonstrate that mtDNA at least can be PCR-amplified, cloned and sequenced from a range of archaeological and historic Danish, Flemmish and Greenlandic wool textile samples. In summary, our data suggest that wool offers a promising source for future ancient mitochondrial DNA studies.

Keywords

Ancient DNA Mitochondria Nuclear Sheep Textile Wool 

References

  1. Andersen H (1991) Dendrokronologisk datering af Mammengraven. In: Iversen M (ed) Mammen. Grav, kunst og samfund i vikingetid. Jysk Arkæologisk Selskab, Højbjerg, pp 43–44Google Scholar
  2. Barber EJW (1991) Prehistoric Textiles. The Development of Cloth in the Neolithic and Bronze Ages. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  3. Bender Jørgensen L (1986) Forhistoriske textiler i Sandinavien. Det Kongelige Nordiske Oldskriftselskab, KøbenhavnGoogle Scholar
  4. Bender Jørgensen L, Walton P (1986) Dyes and fleece types in prehistoric textiles from Scandinavia and Germany. J Dan Archaeol 5:177–188Google Scholar
  5. Beneckes N (1994) Der Mensch und seine Haustiere. Die Geschichte einer jarhuntausendealten Bezieung. Konrad Theiss Verlag GmbH & Co, StuttgartGoogle Scholar
  6. Binladen J, Wiuf C, Gilbert MTP, Bunce M, Barnett R, Larson G, Greenwood AD, Haile J, Ho SYW, Hansen AJ, Willerslev E (2006) Assessing the fidelity of ancient DNA sequences amplified from nuclear genes. Genetics 172:733–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bonnichsen R, Hodges L, Ream W, Field K, Kirner DL, Selsor K, Taylor RE (2001) Methods for the study of ancient hair: radiocarbon dates and gene sequences from individual hairs. J Archaeol Sci 28:775–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Breuning-Madsen H, Holst MK, Rasmussen M (2001) The chemical environment in a burial mound shortly after construction—an archaeological-pedological experiment. J Archaeol Sci 28:691–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Breuning-Madsen H, Holst MK, Rasmussen M, Elberling B (2003) Preservation within log coffins before and after barrow construction. J Archaeol Sci 30:343–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Broholm HC, Hald M (1940) Costumes of the Bronze Age in Denmark. Nyt Nordisk Forlag, KøbenhavnGoogle Scholar
  11. Burger J, Pfeiffer I, Hummel S, Fuchs R, Brenig B, Herrmann B (2001) Mitochondrial and nuclear DNA from (pre)historic hide-derived material. Anc Biomol 3:227–238Google Scholar
  12. Cai D-W, Han L, Zhang X-L, Zhou H, Zhu H (2007) DNA analysis of archaeological sheep remains from China. J Archaeol Sci 34:1347–1355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Campana MG, Bower MA, Bailey MJ, Stock F, O’Connell TC, Edwards CJ, Checkley-Scott C, Knight B, Spencer M, Howe CJ (2010) A flock of sheep, goats and cattle: ancient DNA reveals complexities of historical parchment manufacture. J Archaeol Sci 37:1317–1325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cardon D (2007) Natural dyes – sources, tradition, technology, science. Archetype Publications Ltd, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Christiansen K (2006) Dendrochronological dating of Bronze Age oak coffins from Denmark & Schleswig. In: Randsborg K (ed) Bronze Age oak-coffin graves. Archaeology & Dendrodating. Acta Achaeologica 77:163–246Google Scholar
  16. Clutton-Brock J (1999) A natural history of domesticated mammals. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  17. Forbes RJ (1956) Studies in ancient technology, vol IV. Leiden, BrillGoogle Scholar
  18. Frei KM, Vanden Berghe I, Frei R, Mannering U, Lyngstrøm H (2010) Removal of natural organic dyes from wool—implications for ancient textile provenance studies. J Archaeol Sci 37:2135–2145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gilbert MTP, Hansen AJ, Willerslev E, Rudbeck L, Barnes I, Lynnerup N, Cooper A (2003) Characterisation of genetic miscoding lesions caused by postmortem damage. Am J Hum Genet 72:48–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gilbert MTP, Wilson AS, Bunce M, Hansen AJ, Willerslev E, Shapiro B, Higham TFG, Richards MP, O’Connell TC, Tobin DJ, Janaway RC, Cooper A (2004) Ancient mitochondrial DNA from hair. Curr Biol 14:R463–R464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gilbert MTP, Janaway RC, Tobin DJ, Cooper A, Wilson AS (2006) Histological correlates of post mortem DNA damage in degraded hair. Forensic Sci Int 156:201–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gilbert MTP, Tomsho LP, Rendulic S, Packard M, Drautz DI, Sher A, Tikhonov A, Dalén L, Kuznetsova T, Kosintsev P, Campos PF, Higham T, Collins MJ, Wilson AS, Shidlovskiy F, Buigues B, Ericson PG, Germonpré M, Götherström A, Iacumin P, Nikolaev V, Nowak-Kemp M, Willerslev E, Knight JR, Irzyk FP, Perbost CS, Fredrikson KM, Harkins TT, Sheridan S, Miller W, Schuster S (2007) Whole-genome shotgun sequencing of mitochondria from ancient hair shafts. Science 317:1927–1930CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gilbert MTP, Drautz DI, Lesk AM, Ho SYW, Qi J, Ratan A, Hsu C-H, Sher A, Dalén L, Götherström A, Tomsho LP, Rendulic S, Packard M, Campos PF, Kuznetsova T, Shidlovskiy F, Tikhonov A, Willerslev E, Iacumin P, Buigues B, Ericson PGP, Germonpré M, Kosintsev P, Nikolaev V, Nowak-Kemp M, Knight JR, Irzyk GP, Perbost CS, Fredrikson KM, Harkins TT, Sheridan S, Miller W, Schuster SC (2008) Intraspecific phylogenetic analysis of Siberian woolly mammoths using complete mitochondrial genomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:8327–8332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gräslund A (1991) Var Mammen-mannen Kristen? In: Iversen M (ed) Mammen. Grav, kunst og samfund i vikingetid. Jysk Arkæologisk Selskab, Højbjerg. pp 205–210Google Scholar
  25. Guo J, Du L-X, Ma Y-H, Guan W-J, Li H-B, Zhao Q-J, Li X, Rao S-Q (2005) A novel maternal lineage revealed in sheep (Ovis aries). Anim Genet 36:331–336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Haile J, Holdaway R, Oliver K, Bunce M, Gilbert MTP, Nielsen R, Munch K, Ho SYW, Shapiro B, Willerslev E (2007) Ancient DNA chronology within sedimentary deposits: are paleobiological reconstructions possible and is DNA leaching a factor? Mol Biol Evol 24:982–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Haile J, Froese DG, MacPhee RDE, Roberts RG, Arnold LJ, Reyes AV, Rasmussen M, Nielsen R, Brook BW, Robinson S, Demuro M, Gilbert MTP, Munch K, Austin JJ, Cooper A, Barnes I, Möller P, Willerslev E (2009) Ancient DNA reveals late survival of mammoth and horse in interior Alaska. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:22352–22357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hald M (1980) Ancient Danish textiles from bogs and burials. The National Museum of Denmark, KøbenhavnGoogle Scholar
  29. Hansen AJ, Willerlev E, Wiuf C, Mourier T, Arctander P (2001) Statistical evidence for miscoding lesions in ancient DNA templates. Mol Biol Evol 18:262–265Google Scholar
  30. Hebsgaard MB, Arneborg J, Gilbert MTP, Heyn P, Allentoft ME, Bunce M, Munch K, Schweger C, Willerslev E (2009) “The farm beneath the sand”—an archaeological case study on ancient ‘dirt’ DNA. Antiquity 83:430–444Google Scholar
  31. Heindleder S, Mainz K, Plante Y, Lewalski H (1998) Analysis of mitochondrial DNA indicates domestic sheep are derived from two different ancestral maternal sources: no evidence for contributions from Urial and Argali sheep. Heredity 89:113–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Heindleder S, Kaupe B, Wassmuth R, Janke A (2002) Molecular analysis of wild and domestic sheep questions current nomenclature and provides evidence for domestication from two different subspecies. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 269:893–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hofmann-de Keijzer R, van Bommel MR, Joosten I (2007) Naturwissenschaftliche Untersuchungen der Farbungen und Fasern von bronzezeitlichen Textilien aus dem prahistorischen Salzbergbau in Hallstatt. In: K. Gromer, Bronzezeitliche Gewebefunde aus Hallstatt—Ihr Kontext in der Textilkunde Mitteleuropas und die Entwicklung der Textiltechnologie zur Eisenzeit. Dissertation Universitat Wien, pp. 314–320Google Scholar
  34. Hofreiter M, Jaenicke V, Serre D, von Haeseler A, Pääbo S (2001) DNA sequences from multiple amplifications reveal artifacts induced by cytosine deamination in ancient DNA. Nucleic Acids Res 29:4793–4799CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hughes MA, Jones DS, Connolly RC (1986) Body in the bog but no DNA. Nature 323:208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Iversen M (1991) Genudgravningen af Bjerringhøj 1986. In: Iversen M (ed) Mammen. Grav, kunst og samfund i vikingetid. Jysk Arkæologisk Selskab, Højbjerg, pp27–42Google Scholar
  37. Jaenike-Despres V, Buckler E, Smith BD, Gilbert MTP, Cooper A, Doebley J, Pääbo S (2003) Early allelic selection in maize as revealed by ancient DNA. Science 302:1206–1208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kaul F (1990) Endnu en grav fra Vrangstrup. Aarbøger for Nordisk Oldkyndighed og Historie, 7–12Google Scholar
  39. Lamers R, Hayter S, Matheson CD (2009) Postmortem miscoding lesions in sequence analysis of human ancient mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol 68:40–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lindahl T (1993) Instability and decay of the primary structure of DNA. Nature 362:709–715CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lund Hansen U (1987) Römischer Import im Norden. Det Kongelige Nordiske Oldskriftselskab, KøbenhavnGoogle Scholar
  42. Mannering U, Gleba M, Possnert G, Heinemeier J (2009) Om datering af mosefundne lig og beklædningsdele. Kuml 2009:103–125Google Scholar
  43. Mannering U, Possnert G, Heinemeier J, Gleba M (2010) Dating Danish textiles and skins from bog finds by 14C-AMS. J Archaeol Sci 37:261–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Miller W, Drautz DI, Janecka JE, Lesk AM, Ratan A, Tomsho LP, Packard M, Zhang Y, McClellan LR, Qi J, Zhao F, Gilbert MTP, Dalén L, Arsuaga JL, Ericson PGP, Huson DH, Helgen LM, Murphy WJ, Götherström A, Schuster SC (2009) The mitochondrial genome sequence of the Tasmanian tiger (Thylacinus cynocephalus). Genome Res 19:1–8Google Scholar
  45. Østergård E (2004) Woven into the Earth. Aarhus University Press, AarhusGoogle Scholar
  46. Østergård E (1991) Textilfragmenterne fra Mammengraven. In: Iversen M (ed) Mammen. Grav, kunst og samfund i vikingetid. Jysk Arkæologisk Selskab, Højbjerg, pp 123–138Google Scholar
  47. Pääbo S (1989) Ancient DNA: extraction, characterization, molecular cloning, and enzymatic amplification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 86:1939–1943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Painter TJ (1995) Chemical and microbiological aspects of the preservation process in sphagnum peat. In: Turner RC, Scaife RG (eds) Bog bodies. New Discoveries and New Perspectives, London, pp 88–99Google Scholar
  49. Painter TJ (1998) Carbohydrate polymers in food preservation: an integrated view of the Maillard reaction with special reference to discoveries of preserved foods in Sphagnum—dominated peat bogs. Carbohyd Polym 36:335–347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pedrosa S, Uzun M, Arranz JJ, Gutiérrez-Gil B, San Primitivo F, Bayón Y (2005) Evidence of three maternal lineages in Near Eastern sheep supporting multiple domestication events. Proc Roy Soc Lond B Biol Sci 272:2211–2217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Peters J, von den Driesch A, Helmer D (2005) The upper Euphrates-Tigris basin: cradle of agro-pastoralism. In: Vigne J-D, Peters J, Helmer D (eds) First steps of animal domestication. New archaeological approaches. Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the International Council of Archaeozoology, Durham, August 2002. Oxbow Books, Oxford, pp 96–124Google Scholar
  52. Rasmussen M, Li Y, Lindgreen S, Skou Pedersen J, Albrechtsen A, Moltke I, Metspalu M, Metspalu E, Kivisild T, Gupta R, Bertalan M, Nielsen K, Gilbert MTP, Wang Y, Raghavan M, Campos PF, Munkholm Kamp H, Wilseon AS, Gledhill A, Tridico S, Bunce M, Lorenzen E, Binladen J, Guo X, Zhao J, Zhang X, Zhang H, Li Z, Chen M, Orlando L, Kristiansen K, Bak M, Tommerup N, Bendixen C, Pierre TL, Grønnow B, Meldgaard M, Andreasen C, Dedorova SA, Osipova LP, Higham TFG, Bronk Ramsay C, Hansen TVO, Nielsen FC, Crawford MH, Brunak S, Sicheritz-Pontén T, Villems R, Nielsen R, Krogh A, Wang J, Willerslev E (2010) Ancient human genome sequence of an extinct Palaeo-Eskimo. Nature 463:757–762CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Ringgaard M (2010) To par strixstrømper oc en nattrøie naccarat. University of Copenhagen, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  54. Rostholm H (2009) Herning Museums arkæologiske virksomhed. Herning Museum Midtjyske fortællinger 2009:27–36Google Scholar
  55. Ryder ML (1983) Sheep and Man. Duckworth, LondonGoogle Scholar
  56. Scherf BD (2000) World watch list for domestic animal diversity, 3rd edn. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, FAO, RomeGoogle Scholar
  57. Schneider MR, Schmidt-Ullrich R, Paus R (2009) The hair follicle as a dynamic miniorgan. Curr Biol 19:132–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Svensson EM, Anderung C, Baubliene J, Persson P, Malmström H, Smith C, Vretemark M, Daugnora L, Götherström A (2007) Tracing genetic change over time using nuclear SNPs in ancient and modern cattle. Anim Genet 38:378–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Tapio M (2006) Origin and maintenance of genetic diversity in northern European sheep, PhD dissertation, University of OuluGoogle Scholar
  60. Tapio M, Marzanov N, Ozerov M, Cinkulov M, Gonzarenko G, Kiselyova T, Murawski M, Viinalass H, Kantanen J (2006) Sheep mitochondrial DNA variation in European, Caucasian, and Central Asian areas. Mol Biol Evol 23:1776–1783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Thrane H (1984) Lusehøj ved Voldtofte. Odense Bys Museer, OdenseGoogle Scholar
  62. van der Sanden WAB (1996) Through nature to eternity—the bog bodies of northwest Europe. Batavian Lion International, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  63. Vanden Berghe I, Gleba M, Mannering U (2009) Towards the identification of dyesstuffs in Early Iron Age Scandinavian peat bog textiles. J Archaeol Sci 36:1910–1921CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vellev J (1991) Bjerringhøjundersøgelsen 1868 - og hvad der senere hændte. In: Iversen M (ed) MAMMEN. Grav, kunst og samfund i vikingetid. Jysk Arkæologisk Selskab, Højbjerg, pp11–25Google Scholar
  65. Vellev J (1991) Bjerringhøjundersøgelsen 1868 - og hvad der senere hændte, In: Iversen M (ed) Mammen. Grav, kunst og samfund i vikingetid. Jysk Arkæologisk Selskab, Højbjerg, pp 11–25Google Scholar
  66. Vives S, Gilbert MTP, Arenas C, Gigli E, Lao O, Lalueza-Fox C (2008) Statistical analysis of post mortem DNA damage-derived miscoding lesions in Neandertal mitochondrial DNA. BMC Res Notes 1:40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Vuissoz A, Worobey M, Odegaard N, Bunce M, Machado CA, Lynnerup N, Peacock E, Gilbert MTP (2007) The survival of PCR-amplifiable DNA in cow leather. J Archeol Sci 34:823–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Walton P (1988) Dyes and wools in Iron Age textiles from Norway and Denmark. J Dan Archaeol 7:144–158Google Scholar
  69. Walton P (1991) Dyes and wools in textiles from Mammen (Bjerringhøj), Denmark. In: Iversen M (ed) Mammen. Grav, kunst og samfund i vikingetid. Jysk Arkæologisk Selskab, Højbjerg, pp139–145Google Scholar
  70. Walton Rogers P (2003) Dyes and dyeing. In: Jenkins D (ed) The Cambridge History of Western Textiles, vol I. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 25–29Google Scholar
  71. Willerslev E, Gilbert MTP, Binladen J, Ho SYW, Campos P, Ratan A, Tomsho L, da Fonseca R, Sher A, Nowak-Kemp M, Roth T, Miller W, Schuster S (2009) Analysis of complete mitochondrial genomes from extinct and extant rhinoceroses reveals lack of phylogenetic resolution. BMC Evol Biol 9:95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wilson AS, Gilbert MTP (2007) Identification from hair and nail. In: Black S, Thompson T (eds) Introduction to biological human identification. CRC Press, Boca Ratan, pp 147–174Google Scholar
  73. Wilson AS, Dixon RA, Dodson HI, Janaway RC, Pollard AM, Stern B, Tobin DJ (2001) Yesterday’s hair—human hair in archaeology. Biologist 48:213–217Google Scholar
  74. Wood NJ, Phua SH (1996) Variation in the control region sequence of the sheep mitochondrial genome. Anim Genet 27:25–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Yang DY, Eng B, Waye JS, Dudar JC, Saunders SR (1998) Technical note: improved DNA extraction from ancient bones using silica-based spin columns. Am J Phys Anthropol 105:539–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zeder MA (2005) A view from the Zagros: new perspectives on livestock domestication in the Fertile Crescent. In: Vigne J-D, Peters J, Helmer D (eds) First steps of animal domestication. New archaeological approaches. Proceedings of the 9th Conference of the International Council of Archaeozoology, Durham, August 2002. Oxbow Books, Oxford, pp 125–147Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luise Ørsted Brandt
    • 1
  • Lena Diana Tranekjer
    • 1
  • Ulla Mannering
    • 2
  • Maj Ringgaard
    • 3
  • Karin Margarita Frei
    • 4
  • Eske Willerslev
    • 1
  • Margarita Gleba
    • 5
  • M. Thomas P. Gilbert
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for GeoGenetics, Natural History Museum of DenmarkUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagen KDenmark
  2. 2.Centre for Textile Research, The National Museum of DenmarkCopenhagen KDenmark
  3. 3.Conservation Department, National Museum of DenmarkKongens LyngbyDenmark
  4. 4.Centre for Textile Research, SAXO InstituteUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagen SDenmark
  5. 5.Institute of ArchaeologyUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations