Skip to main content
Log in

Re-induction with modified CLAG regimen in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia in children bridging to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The prognosis for relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia (RR-AML) in children is poor, and the preferred salvage chemotherapy is unclear. One regimen is cladribine, cytarabine, and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (CLAG), but little is known about its efficacy and safety in children with RR-AML.

Methods

We enrolled RR-AML patients aged 0–18 years who received modified CLAG regimen for re-induction between July 1, 2015 and April 1, 2018, or conventional induction between August 1, 2011 and April 1, 2018. Patients were followed up to March 31, 2019. Patients underwent allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) or chemotherapy after the induction of complete remission (CR). The CR rate, survival, and side effects were analyzed.

Results

The CR rate for induction was 66.7% after one cycle and 75.0% after two cycles of the CLAG regimen in 12 children. The nine children who received conventional chemotherapy had a CR rate of 22.2% after one cycle and 33.3% after two cycles (P = 0.087 vs. CLAG). The 3-year event-free survival (EFS) of the CLAG group and the conventional treatment group were 44.4 ± 15.7% and 22.2 ± 13.8% (P = 0.112). The 3-year overall survival of the two groups were 59.5 ± 16.2% and 22.2% ± 13.8% (P = 0.057). The 3-year EFS for allo-SCT and chemotherapy after CLAG regimen was 66.7 ± 19.2% and 25.0 ± 21.7% (P = 0.015). A single case of chemotherapy-related death was recorded.

Conclusion

Our data suggest a promising CR rate using CLAG salvage treatment in childhood RR-AML. Allo-SCT after CR may improve the long-term outcome in these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Creutzig U, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Gibson B, Dworzak MN, Adachi S, de Bont E, et al. Diagnosis and management of acute myeloid leukemia in children and adolescents: recommendations from an international expert panel. Blood. 2012;120:3187–205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Pession A, Masetti R, Rizzari C, Putti MC, Casale F, Fagioli F, et al. Results of the AIEOP AML 2002/01 multicenter prospective trial for the treatment of children with acute myeloid leukemia. Blood. 2013;122:170–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rubnitz JE. Current management of childhood acute myeloid leukemia. Paediatr Drugs. 2017;19:1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Kairiene I, Pasauliene R, Lipunova N, Vaitkeviciene G, Rageliene L, Rascon J. Improved outcome of childhood acute myeloid leukemia in an Eastern European country: lithuanian experience. Eur J Pediatr. 2017;176:1329–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Robak T, Wierzbowska A. Cladribine in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Res. 2014;38:425–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kornblau SM, Gandhi V, Andreeff HM, Beran M, Kantarjian HM, Koller CA, et al. Clinical and laboratory studies of 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine +/− cytosine arabinoside for relapsed or refractory acute myelogenous leukemia in adults. Leukemia. 1996;10:1563–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Robak T. Purine nucleoside analogues in the treatment of myeloid leukemias. Leuk Lymphoma. 2003;44:391–409.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Seymour JF, Huang P, Plunkett W, Gandhi V. Influence of fludarabine on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cytarabine: implications for a continuous infusion schedule. Clin Cancer Res. 1996;2:653–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Estey E, Thall P, Andreeff M, Beran M, Kantarjian H, O'Brien S, et al. Use of G-CSF before, during and after fludarabine plus Cytarabine induction therapy of newly diagnosed AML or MDS: comparison with fludarabine plus Cytarabine without G-CSF. J Clin Oncol. 1994;14:671–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gandhi V, Estey E, Keating MJ, Chucrallah A, Plunkett W. Chlorodeoxyadenosine and arabinosylcytosine in patients with acute myelogenous leukemia: pharmacokinetic, pharmacodynamic, and molecular interactions. Blood. 1996;87:256–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gordon MS, Young ML, Tallman MS, Cripe LD, Bennett JM, Paietta E, et al. Phase II trial of 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine in patients with relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia: a study of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG), E5995. Leuk Res. 2000;24:871–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Krance RA, Hurwitz CA, Head DR, Raimondi SC, Behm FG, Crews KR, et al. Experience with 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine in previously untreated children with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia and myelodysplastic diseases. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:2804–11.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Park H, Youk J, Kim I, Yoon SS, Park S, Lee JO, et al. Comparison of cladribine- and fludarabine-based induction chemotherapy in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukaemia. Ann Hematol. 2016;95:1777–866.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Price SL, Lancet JE, George TJ, Wetzstein GA, List AF, Ho VQ, et al. Salvage chemotherapy regimens for acute myeloid leukemia: is one better? Efficacy comparison between CLAG and MEC regimens. Leuk Res. 2011;35:301–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shen Y, Chen J, Liu Y, Wu D. Addition of cladribine to idarubicin and cytarabine during induction increases the overall efficacy rate in adult patients with acute myeloid leukemia: a matched-pair retrospective comparison. Chemotherapy. 2014;60:368–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Santana VM, Mirro J Jr, Harwood FC, Cherrie J, Schell M, Kalwinsky D, et al. A phase I clinical trial of 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine in pediatric patients with acute leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 1991;9:416–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Santana VM, Mirro J Jr, Kearns C, Schell MJ, Crom W, Blakley RL. 2-Chlorodeoxyadenosine produces a high rate of complete hematologic remission in relapsed acute myeloid leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 1992;10:364–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rubnitz JE, Razzouk BI, Srivastava DK, Pui CH, Ribeiro RC, Santana VM. Phase II trial of cladribine and cytarabine in relapsed or refractory myeloid malignancies. Leuk Res. 2004;28:349–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Inaba H, Stewart CF, Crews KR, Yang S, Pounds S, Pui CH, et al. Combination of cladribine plus topotecan for recurrent or refractory pediatric acute myeloid leukemia. Cancer. 2010;116:98–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Chaleff S, Hurwitz CA, Chang M, Dahl G, Alonzo TA, Weinstein H. Phase II study of 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine plus idarubicin for children with acute myeloid leukaemia in first relapse: a paediatric oncology group study. Br J Haematol. 2012;156:649–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Rubnitz JE, Crews KR, Pounds S, Yang S, Campana D, Gandhi VV, et al. Combination of cladribine and cytarabine is effective for childhood acute myeloid leukemia: results of the St Jude AML97 trial. Leukemia. 2009;23:1410–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Robak T, Wrzesień-Kuś A, Lech-Marańda E, Kowal M, Dmoszyńska A. Combination regimen of cladribine (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine), cytarabine and G-CSF (CLAG) as induction therapy for patients with relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia. Leuk Lymphoma. 2000;39:121–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Wiedower E, Jamy O, Martin MG. Induction of acute myeloid leukemia with idarubicin, cytarabine and cladribine. Anticancer Res. 2015;35:6287–90.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Wrzesień-Kuś A, Robak T, Lech-Marańda E, Wierzbowska A, Dmoszyńska A, Kowal M, et al. A multicenter, open, non-comparative, phase II study of the combination of cladribine (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine), cytarabine, and G-CSF as induction therapy in refractory acute myeloid leukemia—a report of the Polish Adult Leukemia Group (PALG). Eur J Haematol. 2003;71:155–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fridle C, Medinger M, Wilk MC, Seipel K, Passweg J, Manz MG, et al. Cladribine, cytarabine and idarubicin (CLA-Ida) salvage chemotherapy in relapsed acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Leuk Lymphoma. 2017;58:1068–75.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Jaglal MV, Duong VH, Bello CM, Al Ali NH, Padron E, Fernandez HF, et al. Cladribine, cytarabine, filgrastim, and mitoxantrone (CLAG-M) compared to standard induction in acute myeloid leukemia from myelodysplastic syndrome after azanucleoside failure. Leuk Res. 2014;38:443–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Wierzbowska A, Robak T, Pluta A, Wawrzyniak E, Cebula B, Hołowiecki J, et al. Cladribine combined with high doses of arabinoside cytosine, mitoxantrone, and G-CSF (CLAG-M) is a highly effective salvage regimen in patients with refractory and relapsed acute myeloid leukemia of the poor risk: a final report of the Polish Adult Leukemia Group. Eur J Haematol. 2008;80:115–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wrzesień-Kuś A, Robak T, Wierzbowska A, Lech-Marańda E, Pluta A, Wawrzyniak E, et al. A multicenter, open, noncomparative, phase II study of the combination of cladribine (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine), cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and mitoxantrone as induction therapy in refractory acute myeloid leukemia: a report of the Polish Adult Leukemia Group. Ann Hematol. 2005;84:557–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Woelich SK, Braun JT, Schoen MW, Ramlal R, Freter CE, Petruska PJ, et al. Efficacy and toxicity of induction therapy with cladribine, idarubicin, and cytarabine (IAC) for acute myeloid leukemia. Anticancer Res. 2017;37:713–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Schoen MW, Woelich SK, Braun JT, Reddy DV, Fesler MJ, Petruska PJ, et al. Acute myeloid leukemia induction with cladribine: outcomes by age and leukemia risk. Leuk Res. 2018;68:72–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Qasrawi A, Bahaj W, Qasrawi L, Abughanimeh O, Foxworth J, Gaur R. Cladribine in the remission induction of adult acute myeloid leukemia: where do we stand? Ann Hematol. 2019;98:561–79.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kaspers GJ, Zimmermann M, Reinhardt D, Gibson BE, Tamminga RY, Aleinikova O, et al. Improved outcome in pediatric relapsed acute myeloid leukemia: results of a randomized trial on liposomal daunorubicin by the International BFM Study Group. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:599–607.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Mustafa O, Abdalla K, AlAzmi AA, Elimam N, Abrar MB, Jastaniah W. FLAG/FLAG-IDA regimen for children with relapsed/refractory acute leukemia in the era of targeted novel therapies. J Oncol Pharm Pract. 2018;5:1078155218817816 (Epub ahead of print).

    Google Scholar 

  34. van Eijkelenburg NKA, Rasche M, Ghazaly E, Dworzak MN, Klingebiel T, Rossig C, et al. Clofarabine, high-dose cytarabine and liposomal daunorubicin in pediatric relapsed/refractory acute myeloid leukemia: a phase IB study. Haematologica. 2018;103:1484–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Messinger Y, Boklan J, Goldberg J, DuBois SG, Oesterheld J, Abla O, et al. Combination of clofarabine, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide for relapsed or refractory childhood and adolescent acute myeloid leukemia. Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2017;34:187–98.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang J, Sun Y, Zhang X, Long B, Lu Y, Li X. Treatment of high-risk acute myeloid leukemia with cladribine, cytarabine, mitoxantrone, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor then subsequent bridging to myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a case series. Transplant Proc. 2018;50:246–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Wang L, Xu J, Tian X, Lv T, Yuan G. Analysis of efficacy and prognostic factors of CLAG treatment in chinese patients with refractory or relapsed acute myeloid leukemia. Acta Haematol. 2019;141:43–53.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was supported by a grant from Shanghai Science and Technology Committee Projects No. 14411950602 and No. 18ZR1431200.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

ZN was responsible for the design of the study, wrote the first draft, and reviewed the final version. JH was the guarantor and revised the whole paper critically for important intellectual content. SJB reviewed and revised the manuscript. LH and YJW collected the patients’ data. ZJS and CK completed the statistical analysis and interpreted the data. All the authors contributed to the design and approved the final version to be published.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hui Jiang.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Children’s Hospital (No. 2015035).

Conflict of interest

None declared.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, N., Shao, JB., Li, H. et al. Re-induction with modified CLAG regimen in relapsed or refractory acute myeloid leukemia in children bridging to allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. World J Pediatr 16, 152–158 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-019-00321-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-019-00321-8

Keywords

Navigation