Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Rasch validation of the Chinese parent–child interaction scale (CPCIS)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Proper parent–child interaction is crucial for child development, but an assessment tool in Chinese is currently lacking. This study aimed to develop and validate a parent-reported parent–child interaction scale for Chinese preschool children.

Methods

The Chinese parent–child interaction scale (CPCIS) was designed by an expert panel based on the literature and clinical observations in the Chinese context. The initial CPCIS had 14 parent–child interactive activity items. Psychometric properties of the CPCIS were examined using the Rasch model and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Convergent validity was investigated by the associations between CPCIS and family income, maternal education level, and children’s school readiness.

Results

The study recruited 567 Chinese parent–child pairs from diverse socioeconomic backgrounds, who completed the CPCIS. Six out of the 14 items in the initial CPCIS were dropped due to suboptimal fit values. The refined 8-item CPCIS was shown to be valid and reliable by Rasch models and CFA. The person separation reliability and Cronbach’s α of the CPCIS were 0.81 and 0.82, respectively. The CPCIS scores were positively associated with family’s socioeconomic status (η2 = 0.05, P < 0.001), maternal education level (η2 = 0.08, P < 0.001), and children’s school readiness (η2 = 0.01, P < 0.01).

Conclusion

CPCIS is an easily administered, valid, and reliable tool for the assessment of parent–child interactions in Chinese families.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ronfani L, Brumatti LV, Mariuz M, Tognin V, Bin M, Ferluga V, et al. The complex interaction between home environment, socioeconomic status, maternal iq and early child neurocognitive development: a multivariate analysis of data collected in a newborn cohort study. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0127052.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Moss E, Rousseau D, Parent S, St-Laurent D, Saintonge J. Correlates of attachment at school age: maternal reported stress, mother-child interaction, and behavior problems. Child Dev. 1998;69:1390–405.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nieuwesteeg AM, Pouwer F, van Bakel HJ, Emons WH, Aanstoot HJ, Odink R, et al. Quality of the parent-child interaction in young children with type 1 diabetes mellitus: study protocol. BMC Pediatr. 2011;11:28.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Biringen Z, Easterbrooks MA. Emotional availability: concept, research, and window on developmental psychopathology. Dev Psychopathol. 2012;24:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jaeger E. Child care and mother-child interaction in the first 3 years of life. NICHD early child care research network. Dev Psychol. 1999;35:1399–413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nieuwesteeg A, Hartman E, Pouwer F, Emons W, Aanstoot HJ, Van Mil E, et al. Qualitative observation instrument to measure the quality of parent-child interactions in young children with type 1 diabetes mellitus. BMC Pediatr. 2014;14:145.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Robinson EA, Eyberg SM. The dyadic parent-child interaction coding system: standardization and validation. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1981;49:245–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mendelsohn A, Dreyer B, Tamis-LeMonda C, Ahuja P. Validity of StimQ, a scale for assessing the cognitive home environment. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1999;20:399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Burston A, Puckering C, Kearney E. At HOME in Scotland: validation of the home observation for measurement of the environment inventory. Child Care Health Dev. 2005;31:533–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee WO. The cultural context for Chinese learners: conceptions of learning in the confucian tradition. In: Watkins DA, Biggs JB, editors. The Chinese learner: Cultural, psychological and contextual influences. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre and Australian Council of Educational Research; 1996. p. 63–7.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Totsika V, Sylva K. The home observation for measurement of the environment revisited. Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2004;9:25–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Rao N, Ng SS, Sun J. Early learning experiences of young Chinese learners in Hong Kong: the role of traditional values and changing educational policy. In: King RB, Bernardo ABI, editors. The psychology of asian learners. Dordrecht: Springer; 2016. p. 635–49.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Lau EYH, Li H, Rao N. Exploring parental involvement in early years education in China: development and validation of the Chinese early parental involvement scale (CEPIS). Int J Early Years Educ. 2012;20:405–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Hong Kong Census and Statistics Department. Population and household statistics analysed by district council district. Hong Kong: Census and Statistics Department; 2012.

  15. Ip P, Li SL, Rao N, Ng SS, Lau WW, Chow CB. Validation study of the Chinese early development instrument (CEDI). BMC Pediatr. 2013;13:146.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Wright BD, Masters GN. Rating scale analysis. Chicago: Mesa Press; 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mair P, Hatzinger R. Extended Rasch modeling: the eRm package for the application of IRT models in R. J Stat Softw. 2007;20:1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tesio L. Measurement in clinical vs. biological medicine: the Rasch model as a bridge on a widening gap. J Appl Meas. 2004;5:362–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wright BD, Linacre JM, Gustafson J, Martin-Lof P. Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Meas Trans. 1994;8:370.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mair P, Hatzinger R. CML based estimation of extended Rasch models with the eRm package in R. Psychol Sci. 2007;49:26.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Linacre JM. Unidimensional models in a multidimensional world. Rasch Meas Trans. 2009;23:1209.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Smith EV Jr. Understanding Rasch measurement: detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. J Appl Meas. 2002;3:205–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Smith RM, Miao CY. Assessing unidimensionality for Rasch measurement. In: Wilson M, editor. Objective measurement: theory into practice. Greenwich: Ablex; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Wright BD, Stone MH. Measurement essentials. Wilmington: Wide Range; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen MR. Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electron J Bus Res Methods. 2008;6:53–60.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kwok MK, Schooling CM, Lam TH, Leung GM. Does breastfeeding protect against childhood overweight? Hong Kong’s "Children of 1997" birth cohort. Int J Epidemiol. 2010;39:297–305.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Janus M, Offord DR. Development and psychometric properties of the early development instrument (EDI): a measure of children’s school readiness. Can J Behav Sci. 2007;39:1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences Hillsdale. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Aspland H, Gardner F. Observational measures of parent-child interaction: an introductory review. Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2003;8:136–43.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Lytton H. Observation studies of parent-child interaction: a methodological review. Child Dev. 1971;42:651–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Dodici BJ, Draper DC, Peterson CA. Early parent–child interactions and early literacy development. Top Early Child Spec. 2003;23:124–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Ginsburg KR. The importance of play in promoting healthy child development and maintaining strong parent–child bonds. Pediatrics. 2007;119:182–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mathews A, Bradle B. Mood and the self-reference bias in recall. Behav Res Ther. 1983;21:233–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Brunner E, Juneja M, Marmot M. Dietary assessment in Whitehall II: comparison of 7 days diet diary and food-frequency questionnaire and validity against biomarkers. Br J Nutr. 2001;86:405–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Dodge KA, Pettit GS, Bates JE. Socialization mediators of the relation between socioeconomic status and child conduct problems. Child Dev. 1994;65:649–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Davis-Kean PE. The influence of parent education and family income on child achievement: the indirect role of parental expectations and the home environment. J Fam Psychol. 2005;19:294.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. O’Brien M. Shared caring: bringing fathers into the frame. Manchester: Equal Opportunities Commission; 2005.

  38. Gornick JC, Heron A. The regulation of working time as work-family reconciliation policy: comparing Europe, Japan, and the United States. J Comp Policy Analysis. 2006;8:149–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Booth CL, Clarke-Stewart KA, Vandell DL, McCartney K, Owen MT. Child care usage and mother-infant “quality time”. J Marriage Fam. 2002;64:16–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The study was fully supported by a grant from the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project No. 743413 and 746111). The funding body has no responsibilities in study design, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, the writing of the report, and the decision to submit the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China

    Patrick Ip, Winnie Tso, Frederick Ka Wing Ho, Sophia Ling Li, Wilfred Hing-sang Wong & Chun Bong Chow

  2. Faculty of Education, University of Hong Kong, Room 510, Meng Wah Complex, Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China

    Nirmala Rao

  3. Department of Applied Social Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China

    Ko Ling Chan

  4. Journalism and Media Studies Center, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, People’s Republic of China

    King Wa Fu

  5. KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore, Singapore

    Winnie Goh

Authors
  1. Patrick Ip
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Winnie Tso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Nirmala Rao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Frederick Ka Wing Ho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Ko Ling Chan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. King Wa Fu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Sophia Ling Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Winnie Goh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Wilfred Hing-sang Wong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Chun Bong Chow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Dr. Ip conceptualized and designed the study, interpreted the data, and critically revised the manuscript. Dr. Tso interpreted the data and drafted the manuscript. Prof. Rao contributed to study design, interpreted the data, and critically revised the manuscript. Mr. Ho analyzed the data and drafted the manuscript. Drs. Chan, Fu, Li, and Goh interpreted the data and critically revised the manuscript. Mr. Wong and Dr. Chow assisted study design, interpreted the data, and critically revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final manuscript as submitted.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Patrick Ip.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the ethical committee of the Institutional Review Board of the University of Hong Kong. Informed written consent was obtained from the parents of each participant. Study procedure was carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines.

Conflict of interest

No financial or non-financial benefits have been received or will be received from any party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 597 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ip, P., Tso, W., Rao, N. et al. Rasch validation of the Chinese parent–child interaction scale (CPCIS). World J Pediatr 14, 238–246 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-018-0132-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-018-0132-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation