Skip to main content
Log in

A comparison of criteria for diagnosis of atopic dermatitis in children

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Atopic dermatitis (AD) diagnosis in children gives rise to many problems. Although the Hanifin and Rajka criteria are acknowledged and used universally in diagnosing AD, their evaluation is a major source of difficulty in pediatrician’s daily practice. The simplified criteria, revised by Williams et al, seem to be more useful and represent the most common clinical manifestations of AD. The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy of the two different criteria for diagnosing AD in children.

Methods

This study involved 250 children with AD. All of the patients underwent clinical examinations and the diagnostic procedures according to the criteria of Hanifin and Rajka as well as those of Williams.

Results

According to the Hanifin-Rajka criteria, AD was diagnosed in 173 children, of whom 153 were diagnosed positive by the criteria of Williams. Among the 77 children who were diagnosed without AD according to the Hanifin and Rajka criteria, 4 were detected with AD by the Williams criteria. Four children with scabies and seborrhoeic dermatitis were misdiagnosed as having AD according to the Williams criteria due to the atypical locations of their lesions and the histories of asthma or hay fever and xerosis.

Conclusions

Although the criteria of Hanifin and Rajka are the gold standard for diagnosing AD, the Williams criteria are also very useful in children older than 4 years. The most useful Williams criteria for AD diagnosis in children is pruritus with history of lesions in characteristic locations and history of generally dry skin. The significant increase in the detectability of AD is found by raising the borderline age for the first skin lesion development from 2 to 5 years of age.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Williams H, Flohr C. How epidemiology has challenged 3 prevailing concepts about atopic dermatitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006;118:209–213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bieber T. Atopic dermatitis. N Engl J Med 2008;358:1483–1494.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Rudzki E, Samochocki Z, Rebandel P, Saciuk E, Gałecki W, Raczka A, et al. Frequency and significance of the major and minor features of Hanifin and Rajka among patients with atopic dermatitis. Dermatology 1994;189:41–46.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hanifin JM, Rajka G. Diagnostic features of atopic dermatitis. Acta Dermato-Venereologica 1980;suppl.92:44–47.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Williams HC, Burney PG, Pembroke AC, Hay RJ. The U.K. Working Party’s Diagnostic Criteria for Atopic Dermatitis. III. Independent hospital validation. Br J Dermatol 1994;131:406–416.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. De D, Kanwar AJ, Handa S. Comparative efficacy of Hanifin and Rajka’s criteria and the UK working party’s diagnostic criteria in diagnosis of atopic dermatitis in a hospital setting in North India. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2006;20:853–859.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Böhme M, Svensson A, Kull I, Nordvall SL, Wahlgren CF. Clinical features of atopic dermatitis at two years of age: a prospective, population-based case-control study. Acta Derm Venereol 2001;81:193–197.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wisuthsarewong W, Viravan S. Diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis in Thai children. J Med Assoc Thai 2004;87:1496–1500.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Popescu CM, Popescu R, Williams H, Forsea D. Community validation of the United Kingdom diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis in Romanian schoolchildren. Br J Dermatol 1998;138:436–442.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kang KF, Tian RM. Atopic dermatitis. An evaluation of clinical and laboratory findings. Int J Dermatol 1987;26:27–32.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kanwar AJ, Dhar S, Kaur S. Evaluation of minor clinical features of atopic dermatitis. Pediatr Dermatol 1991;8:114–116.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nagaraja, Kanwar AJ, Dhar S, Singh S. Frequency and significance of minor clinical features in various age-related subgroups of atopic dermatitis in children. Pediatr Dermatol 1996;13:10–13.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Böhme M, Svensson A, Kull I, Wahlgren CF. Hanifin’s and Rajka’s minor criteria for atopic dermatitis: which do 2-yearolds exhibit? J Am Acad Dermatol 2000;43(5 Pt 1):785–792.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lee HJ, Cho SH, Ha SJ, Ahn WK, Park YM, Byun DG, et al. Minor cutaneous features oatopic dermatitis in South Korea. Int J Dermatol 2000;39:337–342.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Eigenmann PA. Clinical features and diagnostic criteria of atopic dermatitis in relation to age. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2001;12:69–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Gu H, Chen XS, Chen K, Yan Y, Jing H, Chen XQ, et al. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis: validity of the criteria of Williams et al. in a hospitalbased setting. Br J Dermatol 2001;145:428–433.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Brenninkmeijer EE, Schram ME, Leeflang MM, Bos JD, Spuls PI. Diagnostic criteria for atopic dermatitis: a systematic review. Br J Dermatol 2008;158:754–765.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jowita Dejewska.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Samochocki, Z., Dejewska, J. A comparison of criteria for diagnosis of atopic dermatitis in children. World J Pediatr 8, 355–358 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-012-0381-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-012-0381-1

Key words

Navigation