Skip to main content
Log in

Psychomotor development of children born after preimplantation genetic diagnosis and parental stress evaluation

  • Original Article
  • Published:
World Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The increasing number of children conceived following preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) necessitates the evaluation of their motor and cognitive development. The primary study objective was to evaluate the physical, developmental, and neurological outcome of children born after PGD in Greece. In addition, the secondary study objective was to compare the stress levels regarding parental roles between parents of PGD children and those of naturally conceived children.

Methods

A cross-sectional study design was applied. The study population consisted of 31 children (aged 2 months to 7.5 years) born after PGD analysis and their parents. The developmental evaluation of children included a detailed physical evaluation and cognitive assessment with the Bayley Scales of Infant Development. The parent stress index was applied to evaluate comparative parental stress levels between those parents of PGD children and those of naturally conceived healthy children.

Results

High rates of caesarean deliveries, increased incidence of prematurity, multiples and low-birth weight were observed among the 31 PGD children. Overall, 24 of the 31 PGD children had cognitive skills within normal range [general developmental quotient (GDQ): 86–115], while 6 children had lower levels of cognitive skills (GDQ<85). With regard to parental stress, PGD parents reported lower levels of parenting stress as compared to parents of naturally conceived children (P<0.01).

Conclusions

The enhanced frequency of poor cognitive and motor skills as well as low parental stress necessitates early detection and intervention for developmental delays among PGD children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Handyside AH, Kontogianni EH, Hardy K, Winston RM. Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification. Nature 1990;344:768–770.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kanavakis E, Traeger-Synodinos J. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis in clinical practice. J Med Genet 2002;39:6–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kuliev A, Verlinsky Y. Place of preimplantation diagnosis in genetic practice. Am J Med Genet A 2005;134A:105–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Sermon K, Van Steirteghem A, Liebaers I. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Lancet 2004;363:1633–1641.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kokkali G, Vrettou C, Traeger-Synodinos J, Jones GM, Cram DS, Stavrou D, et al. Birth of a healthy infant following trophectoderm biopsy from blastocysts for PGD of betathalassaemia major. Hum Reprod 2005;20:1855–1859.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Harper JC, Boelaert K, Geraedts J, Harton G, Kearns WG, Moutou C, et al. ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection V: cycles from January to December 2002 with pregnancy followup to October 2003. Hum Reprod 2006;21:3–21.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sermon K, Moutou C, Harper J, Geraedts J, Scriven P, Wilton L, et al. ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection IV: May–December 2001. Hum Reprod 2005;20:19–34.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sermon KD, Michiels A, Harton G, Moutou C, Repping S, Scriven PN, et al. ESHRE PGD Consortium data collection VI: cycles from January to December 2003 with pregnancy followup to October 2004. Hum Reprod 2007;22:323–336.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Nekkebroeck J, Bonduelle M, Desmyttere S, Van den Broeck W, Ponjaert-Kristoffersen I. Mental and psychomotor development of 2-year-old children born after preimplantation genetic diagnosis/screening. Hum Reprod 2008;23:1560–1566.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Strom CM, Levin R, Strom S, Masciangelo C, Kuliev A, Verlinsky Y. Neonatal outcome of preimplantation genetic diagnosis by polar body removal: the first 109 infants. Pediatrics 2000;106:650–653.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Bonduelle M, Ponjaert I, Steirteghem AV, Derde MP, Devroey P, Liebaers I. Developmental outcome at 2 years of age for children born after ICSI compared with children born after IVF. Hum Reprod 2003;18:342–350.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ponjaert-Kristoffersen I, Bonduelle M, Barnes J, Nekkebroeck J, Loft A, Wennerholm UB, et al. International collaborative study of intracytoplasmic sperm injection-conceived, in vitro fertilization-conceived, and naturally conceived 5-year-old child outcomes: cognitive and motor assessments. Pediatrics 2005;115:e283–e289.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Nekkebroeck J, Bonduelle M, Desmyttere S, Van den Broeck W, Ponjaert-Kristoffersen I. Socio-emotional and language development of 2-year-old children born after PGD/PGS, and parental well-being. Hum Reprod 2008;23:1849–1857.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Liebaers I, Desmyttere S, Verpoest W, De Rycke M, Staessen C, Sermon K, et al. Report on a consecutive series of 581 children born after blastomere biopsy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Hum Reprod 2010;25:275–282.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Desmyttere S, De Schepper J, Nekkebroeck J, De Vos A, De Rycke M, Staessen C, et al. Two-year auxological and medical outcome of singletons born after embryo biopsy applied in preimplantation genetic diagnosis or preimplantation genetic screening. Hum Reprod 2009;24:470–476.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Desmyttere S, Bonduelle M, Nekkebroeck J, Roelants M, Liebaers I, De Schepper J. Growth and health outcome of 102 2-year-old children conceived after preimplantation genetic diagnosis or screening. Early Hum Dev 2009;85:755–759.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Banerjee I, Shevlin M, Taranissi M, Thornhill A, Abdalla H, Ozturk O, et al. Health of children conceived after preimplantation genetic diagnosis: a preliminary outcome study. Reprod Biomed Online 2008;16:376–381.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Bonduelle M, Wennerholm UB, Loft A, Tarlatzis BC, Peters C, Henriet S, et al. A multi-centre cohort study of the physical health of 5-year-old children conceived after intracytoplasmic sperm injection, in vitro fertilization and natural conception. Hum Reprod 2005;20:413–419.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Cox GF, Bürger J, Lip V, Mau UA, Sperling K, Wu BL, et al. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection may increase the risk of imprinting defects. Am J Hum Genet 2002;71:162–164.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A. A review of ten years experience of ICSI. Hum Reprod Update 2004;10:19–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Halliday J, Oke K, Breheny S, Algar E, J Amor D. Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome and IVF: a case-control study. Am J Hum Genet 2004;75:526–528.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Squires J, Kaplan P. Developmental outcomes of children born after assisted reproductive technologies. Infants Young Child 2007;20:2–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ponjaert-Kristoffersen I, Tjus T, Nekkebroeck J, Squires J, Verté D, Heimann M, et al. Psychological follow-up study of 5-year-old ICSI children. Hum Reprod 2004;19:2791–2797.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Golombok S, Cook R, Bish A, Murray C. Families created by the new reproductive technologies: quality of parenting and social and emotional development of the children. Child Dev 1995;66:285–298.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. McMahon CA, Gibson F, Leslie G, Cohen J, Tennant C. Parents of 5-year-old in vitro fertilization children: psychological adjustment, parenting stress, and the influence of subsequent in vitro fertilization treatment. J Fam Psychol 2003;17:361–369.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bayley N. Bayley Scales of Infant Development Manual. San Antonio: Psychological Corporation, Harbour & Brace Corporation, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Griffiths R. A comprehensive system of measurement for the first eight years of life. In: The abilities of young children, child development. Oxford: The Test Agency, 1984:101–172.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Paraskevopoulos I, Kalatzi-Azizi A, Giannitsas N. Athina Test for the diagnosis of learning difficulties. Athens: Ellinika Grammata, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Abidin R. Parenting Stress Index Test manual. Charlottesville: Paediatric Psychology Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, Bower C, Webb S. The risk of major birth defects after intracytoplasmic sperm injection and in vitro fertilization. N Engl J Med 2002;346:725–730.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ludwig M, Diedrich K. Follow-up of children born after assisted reproductive technologies. Reprod Biomed Online 2002;5:317–322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Mayor S. Babies born after preimplantation genetic diagnosis need follow-up. BMJ 2006;332:254.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Pinborg A, Loft A, Rasmussen S, Schmidt L, Langhoff-Roos J, Greisen G, et al. Neonatal outcome in a Danish national cohort of 3438 IVF/ICSI and 10,362 non-IVF/ICSI twins born between 1995 and 2000. Hum Reprod 2004;19:435–441.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Schieve LA, Meikle SF, Ferre C, Peterson HB, Jeng G, Wilcox LS. Low and very low birth weight in infants conceived with use of assisted reproductive technology. N Engl J Med 2002;346:731–737.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lambert RD. Safety issues in assisted reproductive technology: aetiology of health problems in singleton ART babies. Hum Reprod 2003;18:1987–1991.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Soini S, Ibarreta D, Anastasiadou V, Aymé S, Braga S, Cornel M, et al. The interface between assisted reproductive technologies and genetics: technical, social, ethical and legal issues. Eur J Hum Genet 2006;14:588–645.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Sermon KD. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Verh K Acad Geneeskd Belg 2006;68:5–32.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Van Steirteghem A, Bonduelle M, Devroey P, Liebaers I. Follow-up of children born after ICSI. Hum Reprod Update 2002;8:111–116.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Thornhill AR, deDie-Smulders CE, Geraedts JP, Harper JC, Harton GL, Lavery SA, et al. ESHRE PGD Consortium ‘Best practice guidelines for clinical preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)’. Hum Reprod 2005;20:35–48.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. ESHRE PGD Consortium Steering Committee. ESHRE Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis Consortium: data collection III (May 2001). Hum Reprod 2002;17:233–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hampton T. Panel reviews health effects data for assisted reproductive technologies. JAMA 2004;292:2961–2962.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Jackson RA, Gibson KA, Wu YW, Croughan MS. Perinatal outcomes in singletons following in vitro fertilization: a metaanalysis. Obstet Gynecol 2004;103:551–563.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. National Center for Health Statistics, 2001. www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr51/nvsr5102 (accessed July 18, 2003).

  44. Bonduelle M, Liebaers I, Deketelaere V, Derde MP, Camus M, Devroey P, et al. Neonatal data on a cohort of 2889 infants born after ICSI (1991–1999) and of 2995 infants born after IVF (1983–1999). Hum Reprod 2002;17:671–694.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Papaligoura Z, Panopoulou-Maratou O, Solman M, Arvaniti K, Sarafidou J. Cognitive development of 12 month old Greek infants conceived after ICSI and the effects of the method on their parents. Hum Reprod 2004;19:1488–1493.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Allen KD, Maguire KD, Williams GE, Sanger WG. The effects of infertility on parent—child relationships and adjustment. Child Health Care 1996;25:93–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Golombok S, Brewaeys A, Cook R, Giavazzi MT, Guerra D, Mantovani A, et al. The European study of assisted reproduction families: family functioning and child development. Hum Reprod 1996;11:2324–2331.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Thornhill AR, deDie-Smulders CE, Geraedts JP, Harper JC, Harton GL, Lavery SA, et al. ESHRE PGD Consortium ‘Best practice guidelines for clinical preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)’. Hum Reprod 2005;20:35–48.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Loretta Thomaidis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Thomaidis, L., Kitsiou-Tzeli, S., Critselis, E. et al. Psychomotor development of children born after preimplantation genetic diagnosis and parental stress evaluation. World J Pediatr 8, 309–316 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-012-0374-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12519-012-0374-0

Key words

Navigation