Skip to main content
Log in

Ultra-resolution unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and digital surface model (DSM) data-based automatic extraction of urban features using object-based image analysis approach in Gurugram, Haryana

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Applied Geomatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAV) have emerged as flexible, swift, and economical imaging systems that have proven their feasibility in urban infrastructure mapping. However, data derived from such systems are not utilized thoroughly. In this study, an object-oriented, multiresolution segmentation-based workflow is explored to automatically extract the urban features such as buildings and roads that can revolutionize the pace of existing mapping methods. This paper contemplates the automatic object-oriented-based feature extraction process on 5-cm true color ortho-rectified images and digital surface model (DSM). The data was generated using the JOUAV/CW-10 model and a Sony Camera with a 40-megapixel resolution. The segmentation procedure was implemented, defining various parameters such as scale, shape, and compactness. Here, the optimum scale, shape, and compactness parameters chosen for buildings and road segmentation are 100, 0.6, and 0.8, and 50, 0.5, and 0.9, respectively. The object-based image analysis (OBIA) results were compared to manually digitized features to assess the accuracy of the automated process. The fractal border error accuracy is calculated for urban features such as roads and buildings. The OBIA results indicated that completeness, correctness, and quality of building features were 98.2%, 97.6%, and 95.9%, respectively. Similarly, the road features’ average completeness, correctness, and quality were 85.8%, 73.8%, and 68.2%, respectively, which is on the lower side due to obscuring of roads by the avenue trees. The methodology yielded promising results for urban feature extraction with substantial accuracy and can be implemented in other areas with little fine-tuning of feature extraction parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Beger R, Gedrange C, Hecht R, Neubert M (2011) Data fusion of extremely high resolution aerial imagery and LiDAR data for automated railroad centre line reconstruction. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 66(6):S40–S51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2011.09.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benz UC, Hofmann P, Willhauck G, Lingenfelder I, Heynen M (2004) Multi-resolution, object-oriented fuzzy analysis of remote sensing data for GIS-ready information. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 58(3–4):239–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2003.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaschke T (2010) Object based image analysis for remote sensing. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 65(1):2–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2009.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvajal F, Agüera F, Pérez M (2011) Surveying a landslide in a road embankment using unmanned aerial vehicle photogrammetry. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci XXXVIII-1/C22:201–206. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXVIII-1-C22-201-2011

  • Chen Y, Zhang W, Zhou G, Yan G (2013) A novel building boundary reconstruction method based on lidar data and images. International Symposium on Photoelectronic Detection and Imaging 2013: Laser Sensing and Imaging and Applications. 8905. Beijing, China: SPIE. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2034748

  • Chiabrando F, Nex F, Piatti D, Rinaudo F (2011) UAV and RPV systems for photogrammetric surveys in archaelogical areas: two tests in the Piedmont region (Italy). J Archaeol Sci 38(3):697–710. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2010.10.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chou TY, Yeh ML, Chen Y, Chen YH (2010) Disaster monitoring and management by the unmanned aerial vehicle technology. In: Wagner W, Székely B (eds) ISPRS TC VII symposium – 100 years ISPRS. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, Vienna, pp 137–142

  • Crommelinck S, Bennett R, Gerke M, Nex F, Yang M Y, Vosselman G (2016) Review of automatic feature extraction from high-resolution optical sensor data for UAV-based cadastral mapping. Remote Sensing, 8(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8080689

  • Dey V (2013) Image segmentation techniques for Urban land cover segmentation of VHR imagery: recent developments and future prospects. International Journal of Geoinformatics 9(4):15–35

  • Eisenbeiss H, Zhang L (2006) Comparison of DSMs generated from mini UAV imagery and terrestrial laser scanner in a cultural heritage application. Int Arch Photogramm, Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci 36(5):90–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Gavankar NL, Ghosh SK (2019) Object based building footprint detection from high resolution multispectral satellite image using K-means clustering algorithm and shape parameters. Geocarto Int 34(6):626–643. https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2018.1425736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grenzdörffer GJ, Engel A, Teichert B (2008) The photogrammetric potential of low-cost UAVs in forestry and agriculture. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 31(B3):1207–1214

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruen A, Nevatia R (1998) Automatic building extraction from aerial images. Comput vis Image Underst 72(2):99–100. https://doi.org/10.1006/cviu.1998.0731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Happ PN, Ferreira RS, Bentes C, Costa GAOP, Feitosa RQ (2010) Multiresolution segmentation: a parallel approach for high resolution image segmentation in multicore architectures. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 38(4):C7

  • Hossain MD, Chen D (2019) Segmentation for Object-Based Image Analysis (OBIA): a review of algorithms and challenges from remote sensing perspective. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 115-134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.02.009

  • Jazayeri I, Rajabifard A, Kalantari M (2014) A geometric and semantic evaluation of 3D data sourcing methods for land and property information. Land Use Policy 36:219–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson B, Xie Z (2013) Classifying a high resolution image of an urban area using super-object information. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 83:40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2013.05.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanjani HK, Motiani AT, Prakash I, Mehmood K (2016) Selection of inter-linking canal alignment from Kadana Dam to Watrak Dam, Gujarat, using remote sensing and GIS. Int J Sci Technol Eng 2(11):373–379

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuldeep, Garg PK (2014) Texture based information extraction from high resolution images using object based classification approach. 3rd International Workshop on Earth Observation and Remote Sensing Applications, EORSA 2014 (pp. 299–303). Changsha, China: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/EORSA.2014.6927899

  • Lambers K, Eisenbeiss H, Sauerbier M, Kupferschmidt D, Gaisecker T, Sotoodeh S, Hanusch T (2007) Combining photogrammetry and laser scanning for the recording and modelling of the Late Intermediate Period site of Pinchango Alto, Palpa. Peru J Archaeol Sci 34(10):1702–1712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang J, Shen S, Gong J, Liu J, Zhang J (2017) Embedding user-generated content into oblique airborne photogrammetry-based 3D city model. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 13(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2016.1180389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y, Wu H, Li Y, Ye L, Cheng Z, Xu C, Zhao X (2013) A comparision of high resolution satellite imagery classification between object-oriented and pixel-based method. IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering and Service Sciences, ICSESS (pp. 1002–1005). Beijing, China: IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSESS.2013.6615475

  • Manyoky M, Theiler P, Steudler D, Eisenbeiss H (2011) Unmanned aerial vehicle in cadastral applications. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci XXXVIII-1/C22:57–62. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXVIII-1-C22-57-2011

  • Martínez-De Dios JR, Merino L, Caballero F, Ollero A, Viegas DX (2006) Experimental results of automatic fire detection and monitoring with UAVs. Forest Ecol Manage 234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.08.259

  • Mayunga S, Zhang Y, Coleman D (2005) Semi-automatic building extraction utilizing Quickbird imagery. In: Stilla U, Rottensteiner F, Hinz S (eds) International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. 36, pp 131–136

  • Mei AX, Peng WL, Qin QM, Liu HP (2001) Introduction to remote sensing. Higher Education Press, Beijing, China

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammed F, Idries A, Mohamed N, Al-Jaroodi J, Jawhar I (2014) UAVs for smart cities: opportunities and challenges. International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS) (pp. 267–273). Orlando, FL, USA : IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICUAS.2014.6842265

  • Mohd Noor N, Abdullah A, Hashim M (2018) Remote sensing UAV/drones and its applications for urban areas: a review. IOP Conference Ser: Earth Environ Sci 169(1):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Molina P, Colomina I, Vitoria T, Silva PF, Skaloud J, Kornus W, Prades R, Aguilera C (2012) Searching lost people with Uavs: the system and results of the close-search project. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci XXXIX-B1:441–446. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXIX-B1-441-2012

  • Myint SW, Gober P, Brazel A, Grossman-Clarke S, Weng Q (2011) Per-pixel vs. object-based classification of urban land cover extraction using high spatial resolution imagery. Remote Sens Environ 115(5):1145–1161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.12.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nex F, Remondino F (2014) UAV for 3D mapping applications: a review. Appl Geomatics 6(1):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-013-0120-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikolakopoulos KG, Soura K, Koukouvelas IK, Argyropoulos NG (2017) UAV vs classical aerial photogrammetry for archaeological studies. J Archaeol Sci Rep 14:758–773. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jasrep.2016.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norasma CY, Abu Sari MY, Fadzilah MA, Ismail M R, Omar MH, Zulkarami B, . . . Tarmidi Z (2018) Rice crop monitoring using multirotor UAV and RGB digital camera at early stage of growth. IOP Conference Ser: Earth Environ Sci, 169. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/169/1/012095

  • Pandey H, Tiwari PS, Chauhan N, Karyakarte Y (2011) Synergistic fusion of hyperspectral and high resolution image for improving performance and reliability of automatically extracted urban features. J Remote Sens GIS 1:68–78. https://doi.org/10.37591/.v1i1-2-3.723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Radoglou-Grammatikis P, Sarigiannidis P, Lagkas T, Moscholios I (2020) A compilation of UAV applications for precision agriculture. Comput Networks 172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2020.107148

  • Restás A (2006) The regulation unmanned aerial vehicle of the Szendro Fire Department supporting fighting against forest fires. For Ecol Manag 234:S233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2006.08.260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinaudo F, Chiabrando F, Lingua A, Spanò A (2012) Archaeological site monitoring: UAV photogrammetry can be an answer. ISPRS - Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci. XXXIX-B5;583-588. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXIX-B5-583-2012

  • Salvoa G, Carusoa L, Scordoa A (2014) Urban traffic analysis through an UAV. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 111:1083–1091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla A, Jain K (2020) Automatic extraction of urban land information from unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) data. Earth Sci Inf 13(4):1225–1236. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-020-00498-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tahar K, Ahmad A (2013) An evaluation on fixed wing and multi-rotor UAV images using photogrammetric image processing. Int J Comput Electrical Automation Control Inf Eng 7(1):48–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Toth C, Jóźków G (2016) Remote sensing platforms and sensors: a survey. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 115:22–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2015.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven GJ (2009) Providing an archaeological bird’s-eye view; an overall picture of ground-based means to execute low-altitude aerial photography (LAAP) in Archaeology. Archaeol Prospect 16(4):233–249. https://doi.org/10.1002/arp.354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Wang M, Wang S, Wu Y (2015) Extraction of vegetation information from visible unmanned aerial vehicle images. Nongye Gongcheng Xuebao/trans Chinese Soc Agri Eng 31(5):152–159. https://doi.org/10.3969/J.ISSN.1002-6819.2015.05.022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weidner U, Förstner W (1995) Towards automatic building extraction from high-resolution digital elevation models. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 50(4):38–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-2716(95)98236-S

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weih RC, Riggan ND (2010) Object-based classification vs. Pixel-based classification: comparative importance of multi-resolution imagery. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci 38:31–36

  • Wiedemann C, Heipke C, Mayer H, Jamet O (1998) Empirical evaluation of automatically extracted road axes. Empirical Evaluation Methods in Computer Vision. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, CA, pp 172–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y (2006) An overview of image and video segmentation in the last 40 years. In: Zhang Y (ed) Advances in image and video segmentation. IGI Global, pp 1–16. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-59140-753-9.ch001

  • Zhang S, Yang K, Li M, Ma Y, Sun M (2018) Combinational biophysical composition index (CBCI) for effective mapping biophysical composition in urban areas. IEEE Access 6:41224–41237. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2857405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu H, Cai L, Liu H, Huang W (2016) Information extraction of high resolution remote sensing images based on the calculation of optimal segmentation parameters. PLOS ONE, 11(6). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0158585

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nitin Chauhan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chauhan, N., Kumar, R., Mukherjee, S. et al. Ultra-resolution unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and digital surface model (DSM) data-based automatic extraction of urban features using object-based image analysis approach in Gurugram, Haryana. Appl Geomat 14, 751–764 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-022-00466-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-022-00466-8

Keywords

Navigation