Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Insights into the morphometric characteristics of the Himalayan River using remote sensing and GIS techniques: a case study of Saryu basin, Uttarakhand, India

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Applied Geomatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The watershed’s hydrological response behavior can be elucidated by studying its various morphometric parameters with geographic information system (GIS) tools. The Saryu River, one of the major tributaries of the Ganga River system, was analyzed for a detailed study using Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection (ASTER-30 m) data and topographic sheets of Survey of India. In total, 19 watersheds are identified within the basin for calculating the morphometric parameters in the linear, aerial, and relief directions. The total drainage area of the basin is 754.23 km2. Overall, the drainage pattern is dendritic to sub-dendritic and its topography, the underlying geology, and the rainfall all influence it. The study area is designated as a 6th-order basin having 3070 stream numbers with a cumulative length of 2912.44 km. The bifurcation ratio varies from 0.50 to 10, while the drainage density ranges from 0.94 to 1.33 km/km2. The physiography and the lithology of the region profoundly impact its stream order. The shape index, shape factor, and compactness coefficient indicate that the basin has moderate tectonic activity with moderate basin lag times and will take longer for peak flow to occur. In light of the study area’s relief characteristics, it has moderate to steep slopes, consequently experiencing low to moderate soil erosion. The study results can be used to formulate strategies for sustainable basin management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data supporting the findings of this study is available in manuscript in the form of tables.

References

  • Aghayev A (2018) Determining of different inundated land use in Salyan plain during 2010 the Kura river flood through GIS and remote sensing tools. Int J Eng Geosci 3(3):80–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Ågren GI, Andersson FO (2011) Terrestrial ecosystem ecology: principles and applications. Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed SA, Chandrashekarappa KN, Raj SK, Nischitha V, Kavitha G (2010) Evaluation of morphometric parameters derived from ASTER and SRTM DEM—a study on Bandihole sub-watershed basin in Karnataka. J Ind Soc Remote Sens 38(2):227–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ahnert F (1970) Functional relationships between denudation, relief, and uplift in large, mid-latitude drainage basins. Am J Sci 268(3):243–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al Kalbani K, Rahman AA (2021) 3D city model for monitoring flash flood risks in Salalah, Oman. Int J Eng Geosci 7(1):17–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali SA, Khan N (2013) Evaluation of morphometric parameters a remote sensing and GIS-based approach. Open J Mod Hydr 03:20–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altaf F, Meraj G, Romshoo SA (2013) Morphometric analysis to infer hydrological behaviour of Lidder watershed, Western Himalaya, India. Geogr J 2013:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Altın TB, Altın BN (2011) Drainage morphometry and its influence on landforms in volcanic terrain, Central Anatolia, Turkey. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 19:732–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angillieri MYE (2008) Morphometric analysis of Colangüil river basin and flash flood hazard, San Juan. Argent Environ Geol 55(1):107–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Band LE (1986) Topographic partition of watersheds with digital elevation models. Water Resour Res 22(1):15–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhat S, Romshoo S (2009) Digital elevation model-based watershed characteristics of upper watersheds of Jhelum basin. J Appl Hydrol 21(2):23–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas S, Sudhakar S, Desai VR (1999) Prioritisation of subwatersheds based on morphometric analysis of drainage basin: a remote sensing and GIS approach. J Ind Soc Remote Sens 27(3):155–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bull WB and McFadden LD (1977) Tectonic geomorphology North and South of the Garlock Fault, California. Geomorphology in Arid Regions. In: Doehring, D.O., Ed., Proceedings of the Eight Annual Geomorphology Symposium, State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton 115–138

  • Chopra R, Dhiman RD, Sharma PK (2005) Morphometric analysis of sub-watersheds in Gurdaspur district, Punjab using remote sensing and GIS techniques. J Ind Soc Remote Sens 33(4):531–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chorley RJ, Morgan MA (1962) Comparison of morphometric features, Unaka Mountains, Tennessee and North Carolina, and Dartmoor. Engl Geol Soc of Am Bull 73(1):17–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chow VT, Maidment D, Mays LW (1988) Applied hydrology. McGraw, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chorley RJ (1969) The drainage basin as the fundamental geomorphic unit. In Chorley, RJ, editor, Water, earth and man, London: Methuen 77–98

  • Clarke JI (1996) Morphometry from maps. Essays in Geomorphol 235–274

  • Costa JE (1987) Hydraulics and basin morphometry of the largest flash floods in the conterminous United States. J Hydrol 93(3–4):313–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dar RA, Chandra R, Romshoo SA (2013) Morphotectonic and lithostratigraphic analysis of intermontane Karewa basin of Kashmir Himalayas. Ind J Mountain Sci 10(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das S, Pardeshi SD (2018) Morphometric analysis of Vaitarna and Ulhas river basins, Maharashtra, India: using geospatial techniques. Appl Water Sci 8(6):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demoulin A (2011) Basin and river profile morphometry: a new index with a high potential for relative dating of tectonic uplift. Geomorphol 126(1–2):97–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenlohr PV, Alves LF, Bernacci LC, Padgurschi MC, Torres RB, Prata EM, dos Santos FAM, Assis MA, Ramos E, Rochelle ALC, Martins FR (2013) Disturbances, elevation, topography and spatial proximity drive vegetation patterns along an altitudinal gradient of a top biodiversity hotspot. Biodivers Conserv 22(12):2767–2783

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El. Hamdouni R, Irigaray C, Fernandez T, Chacón J, Keller E (2007) Assessment of Relative Active Tectonics, Southwest Border of Sierra Nevada (Southern Spain). Geomorphol 96:150–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elewa HH, Ramadan ESM, Nosair AM (2016) Spatial-based hydro-morphometric watershed modeling for the assessment of flooding potentialities. Environ Earth Sci 75(10):927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairfield J, Leymarie P (1991) Drainage networks from grid digital elevation models. Water Resour Res 27(5):709–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faniran A (1968) The index of drainage intensity: a provisional new drainage factor. Aust J Sci 31(9):326–330

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganie PA, Posti R, Kumar P, Singh AK (2016) Morphometric analysis of a Kosi River Basin, Uttarakhand using geographical information system. Int J Multidiscip Curr Res 4:1190–1200

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardiner V (1995) Channel networks: progress in the study of spatial and temporal variations of drainage density. Chang River Channels 65–85

  • Gayen S, Bhunia GS, Shit PK (2013) Morphometric analysis of Kangshabati-Darkeswar Interfluves area in West Bengal, India using ASTER DEM and GIS techniques. J Geol Geosci 2(4):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Giusti EV and Schneider WJ (1965) The distribution of branches in river networks. USGS

  • Gottschalk LC (1964) Reservoir sedimentation in handbook of applied hydrology. McGraw Hill Book Company, New York Section 7–1

  • Gregory KJ, Walling DE (1973) Drainage basin form and process a geomorphological approach. Edward Arnold, London, p 456

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutiérrez‐Jurado HA, Vivoni ER, Cikoski C, Harrison JBJ, Bras RL, Istanbulluoglu E (2013) On the observed ecohydrologic dynamics of a semiarid basin with aspect‐delimited ecosystems. Water Resour Res 49(12):8263–8284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GSI (1981) Geological and mineralogical map of Karnataka & Goa, Geological Survey of India

  • Horton RE (1932) Drainage-basin characteristics. EOS Trans Am Geophys Union 13(1):350–361

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton RE (1945) Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology. Bull Geol Soc Am 56:275–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard AD (1990) Role of hypsometry and planform in basin hydrologic response. Hydrol Process 4(4):373–385

  • Indian Meteorological Department (2021) https://mausam.imd.gov.in. Accessed 20 Nov 2021

  • Jasmin I, Mallikarjuna P (2013) Morphometric analysis of Araniar river basin using remote sensing and geographical information system in the assessment of groundwater potential. Arab J Geosci 6(10):3683–3692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joji VS, Nair ASK, Baiju KV (2013) Drainage basin delineation and quantitative analysis of Panamaram Watershed of Kabani River Basin, Kerala using remote sensing and GIS. J Geol Soc India 82(4):368–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochel RC (1988) Geomorphic impact of large floods: review and new perspectives on magnitude and frequency.  Flood Geomorphol Wiley: New York 1988:169-187

  • Kumar L, Joshi G, Agarwal KK (2020) Morphometry and Morphostructural Studies of the Parts of Gola River and Kalsa River Basins, Chanphi-Okhalkanda Region, Kumaun Lesser Himalaya. Ind Geotectonics 54(3):410–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lama S, Maiti R (2019) Morphometric analysis of Chel River Basin, West Bengal, India, using Geographic Information System. Earth Science India 12(1):1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Maidment DR and Morehouse S (2002) Arc Hydro: GIS for water resources. ESRI, Inc.

  • Magesh NS, Chandrasekar N, Soundranayagam JP (2011) Morphometric evaluation of Papanasam and Manimuthar watersheds, parts of Western Ghats, Tirunelveli district, Tamil Nadu, India: a GIS approach. Environ Earth Sci 64(2):373–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahadevaswamy G, Nagaraju D, Siddalingamurthy S, Nagesh PC, Rao K (2011) Morphometric analysis of Nanjangud taluk, Mysore District, Karnataka, India, using GIS. Techniques. Int J Geomatics Geosci 1(4):721–734

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangan P, Haq MA, Baral P (2019) Morphometric analysis of watershed using remote sensing and GIS—a case study of Nanganji River Basin in Tamil Nadu. Ind Arab J Geosci 12(6):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton MA (1957) An analysis of the relations among elements of climate, surface properties, and geomorphology. Columbia Univ New York

  • Mekel JFM (1970) The use of aerial photographs in geological mapping. Int Ins Aerial Surv Earth Sci

  • Mesa LM (2006) Morphometric analysis of a subtropical Andean basin (Tucuman, Argentina). Environ Geol 50:1235–1242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller VC (1953) Quantitative geomorphic study of drainage basin characteristics in the Clinch Mountain area, Virginia and Tennessee. Technical report (Columbia University. Department of Geology) 3

  • Montgomery DR, Dietrich WE (1989) Source areas, drainage density, and channel initiation. Water Resour Res 25(8):1907–1918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery DR, Dietrich WE (1992) Channel initiation and the problem of landscape scale. Sci 255(5046):826–830

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morisawa ME (1962) Quantitative geomorphology of some watersheds in the Appalachian Plateau. Geol Soc Am Bull 73(9):1025–1046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris DG, Heerdegen RG (1988) Automatically derived catchment boundaries and channel networks and their hydrological applications. Geomorphol 1(2):131–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muralikrishnan S, Pillai A, Narender B, Reddy S, Venkataraman VR, Dadhwal VK (2013) Validaion of Indian national D.E.M. from Cartosat-1 data. J Ind Soc Remote Sens 41(1):1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mustak SK, Baghmar NK, Ratre CR (2012) Measurement of dissection index of Pairi River basin using remote sensing and GIS. Nat Geogr J Ind 58(2):97–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Nag SK, Chakraborty S (2003) Influence of rock types and structures in the development of drainage network in hard rock area. J Ind Soc Remote Sens 31(1):25–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ODAV (2011) Morphology and hydrological aspects of Black River basin, division of state of Rio de Janeiro and Minas Gerais. Revista Árvore 35(3):485–492

    Google Scholar 

  • Pankaj A, Kumar P (2009) GIS-based morphometric analysis of five major sub-watersheds of Song River, Dehradun District, Uttarakhand with special reference to landslide incidences. J Ind Soc Remote Sens 37(1):157–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pareta K, Pareta U (2011) Quantitative morphometric analysis of a watershed of Yamuna basin, India using ASTER (DEM) data and GIS. Int J Geomatics Geosc 2(1):248–269

    Google Scholar 

  • Patton PC (1988) Drainage basin morphometry and floods. Flood Geomorphol Wiley: New York 1988:51–64

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter KW, Faulkner EB (1987) catchment response time as a predictor of flood quantiles 1. Jawra J Am Water Resour Ass 23(5):857–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prabhakar A, Singh KK, Lohani AK, Chandniha SK (2019) Study of Champua watershed for management of resources by using morphometric analysis and satellite imagery. Appl Water Sci 9:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman SA, Islam MM, Salman MA, Rafiq MR (2022) Evaluating bank erosion and identifying possible anthropogenic causative factors of Kirtankhola River in Barishal, Bangladesh: an integrated GIS and Remote Sensing approaches. Int J Eng Geosc 7(2):179–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Rai PK, Mohan K, Mishra S, Ahmad A, Mishra VN (2017) A GIS-based approach in drainage morphometric analysis of Kanhar River Basin. Ind App Water Sci 7(1):217–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramshoo SA, Bhat SA, Rashid I (2012) Geoinformatics for assessing the morphometric control on hydrological response at watershed scale in the upper Indus Basin. University of Kashmir, Hazratbal, Srinagar Kashmir, India. J Earth Syst Sci 121(3):659–686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawat KS, Mishra AK (2016) Evaluation of relief aspects morphometric parameters derived from different sources of DEMs and its effects over time of concentration of runoff (TC). Earth Sci Inf 9(4):409–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy GPO, Maji AK, Gajbhiye KS (2004) Drainage morphometry and its influence on landform characteristics in a basaltic terrain, Central India–a remote sensing and GIS approach. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 6(1):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Sameena M, Krishnamurthy J, Jayaraman V, Ranganna G (2009) Evaluation of drainage networks developed in hard rock terrain. Geocarto Int 24(5):397–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sangireddy H, Carothers RA, Stark CP, Passalacqua P (2016) Controls of climate, topography, vegetation, and lithology on drainage density extracted from high resolution topography data. J Hydrol 537:271–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schumm SA (1956) Evolution of drainage systems and slopes in badlands at Perth Amboy, New Jersey. Geol Soc Am Bull 67(5):597–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searcy KB, Wilson BF, Fownes JH (2003) Influence of bedrock and aspect on soils and plant distribution in the Holyoke Range, Massachusetts. J Torrey Bot Soc 130:158–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selvan MT, Ahmad SARFARAZ, Rashid SM (2011) Analysis of the geomorphometric parameters in high altitude glacierised terrain using SRTM DEM data in Central Himalaya, India. Arpn J Sci Technol 1(1):22–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Shukla DP, Dubey CS, Ningreichon AS, Singh RP, Mishra BK, Singh SK (2014) GIS-based morpho-tectonic studies of Alaknanda river basin: a precursor for hazard zonation. Nat Hazards 71(3):1433–1452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh S (1998) Geomorphology. Prayag Pustak Bhawan, Allahabad, p 613

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Singh MC (1997) Morphometric analysis of Kanhar river basin. Nat Geogr J Ind 43(1):31–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh PK, Singh UC (2009) Water resource evaluation and management for Morar River basin, Gwalior District, Madhya Pradesh using GIS. E-Journal Earth Sci India 2:174–186

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh P, Thakur JK, Singh UC (2013) Morphometric analysis of Morar River Basin, Madhya Pradesh, India, using remote sensing and GIS techniques. Environ Earth Sci 68(7):1967–1977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith KG (1950) Standards for grading texture of erosional topography. Am J Sci 248(9):655–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sreedevi PD (2005) Groundwater quality of Pageru river basin, Cuddapah district, Andhra Pradesh. J Geol Soc Ind 64(5):619–636

    Google Scholar 

  • Sreedevi PD, Owais SHHK, Khan HH, Ahmed S (2009) Morphometric analysis of a watershed of South India using SRTM data and GIS. J Geol Soc India 73(4):543–552

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sreedevi PD, Sreekanth PD, Khan HH, Ahmed S (2013) Drainage Morphometry and Its Influence on Hydrology in a Semi-Arid Region: Using SRTM Data and GIS. Environ Earth Sci 70(2):839–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahler AN (1957) Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Eos Trans Am Geophys Union 38:913–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahler AN (1964) Part II. Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basins and channel networks. McGraw-Hill, New York, Handbook of Applied Hydrology, pp 4–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahler AN (1968) Quantitative geomorphology. Encycl Geomorphol 898–912

  • Tarboton DG, Baker ME (2008) Towards an algebra for terrain-based flow analysis. Represent Model Visual Nat Environ: Innov GIS 13:167–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarboton DG, Bras RL, Rodriguez-Iturbe I (1991) On the extraction of channel networks from digital elevation data. Hydrol Process 5(1):81–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Umrikar BN (2017) Morphometric analysis of Andhale watershed, Taluka Mulshi, District Pune. Ind App Water Sci 7(5):2231–2243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vijith H, Satheesh R (2006) GIS based morphometric analysis of two major upland sub-watersheds of Meenachil river in Kerala. J Ind Soc Remote Sens 34(2):181–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vinutha DN, Janardhana MR (2014) Morphometry of The Payaswini Watershed, Coorg District, Karnataka, India, Using Remote Sensing and GIS. Techniques. Int J Innov Res Sci Eng Technol 3(5):516–524

    Google Scholar 

  • Vittala SS, Govindaiah S, Gowda HH (2004) Morphometric analysis of sub-watersheds in the Pavagada area of Tumkur district, South India using remote sensing and GIS techniques. J Ind Soc Remote Sens 32(4):351–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wentworth CK (1930) A simplified method of determining the average slope of land surfaces. Am J Sci 5(117):184–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson JP and Gallant J (2000) Terrain analysis: principles and applications

  • Wilson JJ and Ch N (2012) Morphometric analysis of major sub-watersheds in Aiyar & Karai Pottanar Basin, Central Tamil Nadu, India using remote sensing & GIS techniques. Bonfring Int J Ind Eng Manag Sci 8–15

  • Yangchan J, Jain AK, Tiwari AK, Sood A (2015) Morphometric analysis of drainage basin through GIS: a case study of Sukhna Lake Watershed in Lower Shiwalik. India Int J Sci Eng Res 6(2):1015–1023

    Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz OS, Gülgen F, Ateş AM (2023) Determination of the appropriate zone on dam surface for floating photovoltaic system installation using RS and GISc technologies. Int J Eng Geosc 8(1):63–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Zavoianu I (2011) Morphometry of drainage basins. Elsevier

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaz SN, Romshoo SA (2012) Assessing the geoindicators of land degradation in the Kashmir Himalayan region. Ind Nat Haz 64(2):1219–1245

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to express their gratitude to the Director of the ICAR-Directorate of Coldwater Fisheries Research for providing the study with the required resources. The Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR), Ministry of Agriculture and Farmer’s Welfare, New Delhi, India, gave financial support to this work through an institutional project (CF-6, sub-project 6) that is greatly appreciated. We are grateful to the Survey of India (SOI), Dehradun, Uttarakhand, for contributing toposheet data for the research region. The authors are also grateful for the USGS's ASTER data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. ICAR-Directorate of Coldwater Fisheries Research, Bhimtal, Nainital, 263136, Uttarakhand, India

    Parvaiz Ahmad Ganie, Ravindra Posti, Kishor Kunal, Garima Kunal, Debajit Sarma & Pramod Kumar Pandey

Authors
  1. Parvaiz Ahmad Ganie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ravindra Posti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kishor Kunal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Garima Kunal
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Debajit Sarma
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Pramod Kumar Pandey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Parvaiz Ahmad Ganie: project administration, conceptualization, resources, methodology, data curation, software, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing. Ravindra Posti: methodology, software, formal analysis, data curation, validation, visualization. Kishor Kunal: visualization, resources, data curation, formal analysis. Garima: resources, data curation, formal analysis. Debajit Sarma: investigation, supervision, data curation, resources. Pramod Kumar Pandey: investigation, supervision, visualization, resources, review and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Parvaiz Ahmad Ganie.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

This article is not based on a study involving humans or animals.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ganie, P.A., Posti, R., Kunal, K. et al. Insights into the morphometric characteristics of the Himalayan River using remote sensing and GIS techniques: a case study of Saryu basin, Uttarakhand, India. Appl Geomat 14, 707–730 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-022-00461-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-022-00461-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation