Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

GIS-based spatial prediction of poor-drainage areas using frequency ratio: a case study of Tekirdag Province, Turkey

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Applied Geomatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study aims to identify the distribution and the sensibility ratios of the poorly drained areas of Tekirdag Province. GIS-based frequency ratio (FR) was used to detect areas that are likely to limit agricultural production due to poor drainage. Sensitive areas were identified and classified using susceptibility analysis. Spatial features were calculated and mapped using FR by combining the factors that could cause the drainage problem in the study area. The results indicated that the drainage conditions in the majority of the study area fall in well-drained (20.14%) and somewhat excessively drained (18.22%) classes. Furthermore, the study area was found to be 50.99% well suited, 11.66% suited, 13.35% moderately suited, and 24.00% unsuited, respectively, for agricultural production. About one-third of the unsuited area was found to be under agro-production. Furthermore, agriculturally suited areas were located mostly in plateaus and sloping lands. On the other hand, unsuited areas were located in the lowland areas where the groundwater level is high, the slope is low, and alluvial lithology and heavily textured soil features are present, while most of the scrublands, forest lands, and vineyard land use classes are located in well-drained areas in both provincial boundaries and the hotspot areas. On the other hand, agriculture, paddy fields, barren lands, pasture, and settlements are mostly located in poorly drained areas. To minimize the effect of the drainage problems, it is crucial to detect poorly drained areas using susceptibility analysis on agricultural areas. As a result, the spatial distribution of poor drainage areas can be mapped precisely and so contribute to agricultural productivity. Thus, sustainable agricultural policies can be developed by contributing to the agricultural economy and food security.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

On-demand.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  • Ahmad M, Arshad M, Iqbal M, Waqas MM, Awais M (2017) Simulation of groundwater quantity using hydrological model for Mithawan spate irrigated area of Dera Ghazi Khan, Pakistan. Pak J Agric Sci 54:847–853. https://doi.org/10.21162/PAKJAS/17.6093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexandratos N, Bruinsma J (2012) World agriculture towards 2030/2050: the 2012 revision. ESA Working paper No. 12–03. FAO, Rome, Italy.

  • Alturk B, Konukcu F, Albut S (2019) The current structure of land use/land cover and agricultural land in the TR21 Thrace region. In: Konukçu F, Albut S, Altürk B (eds) Effects of climate change and adaptation strategies in the TR21 Thrace region. Tekirdag Namık Kemal University Press, Turkey, pp 61–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Asgari N, Ayoubi S, Demattê JAM, Jafari A, Safanelli JL, Da Silveira AFD (2020) Digital mapping of soil drainage using remote sensing, DEM and soil color in a semiarid region of Central Iran. Geoderma Regional 22.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2020.e00302

  • Bahceci I (2008) Drainage engineering. Harran University Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Agricultural Structures and Irrigation, Şanlıurfa, Turkey

    Google Scholar 

  • Balamurugan G, Seshan K, Bera S (2017) Frequency ratio model for groundwater potential mapping and its sustainable management in cold desert India. Journal of King Saud University – Science 29(3):333–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bos MG (2001) Selecting the drainage method for agricultural land. Irrig Drain Syst 15:269–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouwer H (1999) Developing drainage design criteria. In: Skaggs RW, Van Schilfgaarde J (ed). Agricultural drainage Agron. Monogr. 38. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, WI, pp 67–79. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr17.c5.

  • Bouwer H, Jackson RD (1999) Determining soil properties. In: Skaggs RW, Van Schilfgaarde J (editors). Agricultural drainage Agron. Monogr. 38. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, WI. pp 611–666. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr17.c33.

  • Canik B (2003) Hydrogeology, exploration, operation, chemistry of groundwater. Ertem Press, Ankara, Turkey

    Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho FP (2017) Pesticides, environment, and food safety. Food Energy Security 6:48–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cetin M, Diker K (2003) Assessing drainage problem areas by GIS: a case study in the eastern Mediterranean region of Turkey. Irrig Drain 52:343–353. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Pourghasemi HR, Panahi M, Kornejady A, Wang J, Xie X, Cao S (2017) Spatial prediction of landslide susceptibility using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system combined with frequency ratio, generalized additive model, and support vector machine techniques. Geomorphology 297:69–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.09.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darzi-Naftchali A, Ritzema H (2018) Integrating irrigation and drainage management to sustain agriculture in northern Iran. Sustainability 10(6):1775. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10061775

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darzi-Naftchali A, Karandish F, Asgari A (2017) Diagnosing drainage problems in coastal areas using machine-learning and geostatistical models. Irrig Drain 66:428–438. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demir S, Oğuz İ, Ciba ÖF, Özer E (2017) Estimation of soil loss and runoff under different land use by using WEPP Hillslope model. J Agric Fac Gaziosmanoasa Univ (JAFAG) 34:97–104. https://doi.org/10.13002/jafag4411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dieleman PJ, Trafford B (1976) Drainage testing. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 28. FAO, Rome, Italy.

  • ESR (2018) Environmental status report (ESR) of Tekirdag province. EIA and Environmental Permits Branch Directorate Environmental Management and Environmental Supervision Branch Directorate, Tekirdag, Turkey.

  • ESRI (2020) USA soils drainage class. https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=55d0c2d32c234ce497cd30dc9bc06729. Accessed 26 August 2020.

  • FAO (1980) Drainage design factors. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 38, Rome, Italy.

  • FAO (1996) Guidelines for planning irrigation and drainage investment projects. FAO Investment Centre Technical Paper No. 11, Rome, Italy.

  • FAO (2002) Agricultural drainage water management in arid and semi-arid areas. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 61, Rome, Italy.

  • FAO (2017) The future of food and agriculture, trends and challenges. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy.

  • FAO (2005) Materials for subsurface land drainage systems. FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 60 Rev. 1, Rome, Italy.

  • Fenton TE (2020) Land capability classification. Chapter: 23, Wang, Y. (Ed.). Landscape and Land Capacity (1st ed.). CRC Press., https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429445552-25.

  • Franzmeier DP, Kladivko EJ, Jenkinson BJ (2001) Drainage and wet soil management - wet soils of Indiana. Natural Resources Conservation Service, Rockport, Indiana.

  • FRS (2019) Farmer registration system (FRS) of Tekirdag province. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry Tekirdag Provincial Directorate of Agriculture and Forestry, Tekirdag, Turkey.

  • GDM (2002) Geological maps of Turkey. General Directorate of Mineral Research and Exploration, Ankara, Turkey.

  • GDM (2015) Topographic maps and data of Turkey. General Directorate of Mapping, Ankara, Turkey.

  • GDSHW (1970) Hydrogeology map of Turkey. General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works, Ankara, Turkey.

  • Grose CJ (ed) (1999) Land capability handbook. guidelines for the classification of agricultural land in Tasmania. Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, Tasmania, Australia.

  • Gurovich L, Oyarce P (2015) New approaches to agricultural land drainage: a review. Irrigation and Drainage Systems Engineering 4:135. https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9768.1000135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hanedar A, Çağlar F, Görgün E, Konukcu F, Altürk B, Albut S (2019) Climate assessment in the TR21 Thrace region: current situation and projections. In: Konukçu F, Albut S, Altürk B (eds) Effects of climate change and adaptation strategies in the TR21 Thrace region. Tekirdag Namık Kemal University Press, Turkey, pp 1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilbagı H (2016) Virus diseases that cause yield and quality losses in grains in Turkey. TURKTOB Journal 17:39–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilbagı H (2017) Epidemic of yellow dwarf virus diseases in cereal growing areas and their control. Plant Prot Bull 57(3):317–335. https://doi.org/10.16955/bitkorb.300020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin RW, Whiteley HR (1983) Effects of land drainage on stream flow. Canadian Water Resources Journal 8(2):88–103. https://doi.org/10.4296/cwrj0802088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ismail M, Abdel Ghaffar MK, Azzam MA (2012) GIS application to identify the potential for certain irrigated agriculture uses on some soils in Western Desert Egypt. Egypt J Remote Sens Space Sci 15(1):9–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2012.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Istanbulluoglu A, Konukcu F, Kocaman İ (2006) Development of water resources and agricultural practices under irrigation in Thrace region: analysis of existing data for the solution of problems. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty 3(2):139–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Javaid MS (Ed) (2012) Drainage systems. IntechOpen, United Kingdom.https://doi.org/10.5772/1177

  • Joost S, Kalbermatten M, Bonin A (2008) Spatial analysis method (SAM): a software tool combining molecular and environmental data to identify candidate loci for selection. Mol Ecol Resour 8(5):957–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanber R, Çullu MA, Kendirli B, Antepli S, Yılmaz N (2005) Irrigation, drainage and salinity. In: Agricultural Engineering of Turkey VI. Technical Congress Proceedings; National Library, Ankara, Turkey, pp 213–251.

  • Kanber R, Unlu M (2008) Irrigation and drainage problems in Turkey: overview. 5th World Water Forum Regional Preparation Process DSI Domestic Regional Water Meetings Irrigation - Drainage Conference Proceedings (10–11 April 2008). Republic of Turkey Ministry of Environment and Forestry General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works DSI VI. Regional Directorate, Adana, Turkey, pp 1–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaushik S, Dhote PR, Thakur PK, Nikam BR, Aggarwal SP (2019) An integrated approach for identification of waterlogged areas using RS and GIS technique and groundwater modelling. Sustainable Water Resources Management 5:1887–1901. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-019-00342-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kidd DB, Malone BP, McBratney AB, Minasny B, Webb MA (2014) Digital mapping of a soil drainage index for irrigated enterprise suitability in Tasmania. Australia Soil Research 52:107–119. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR13100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konukcu F, Albut S, Altürk B (eds) (2019) Effects of climate change and adaptation strategies in Thrace region. Tekirdag Namık Kemal University, Tekirdag, Turkey

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroes JG, Van Dam JC, Groenendijk P, Hendriks RFA, Jacobs CMJ (2008) SWAP version 3.2. theory description and user manual. Alterra Report 1649, Wageningen, Netherlands.

  • Kulshreshtha SN (ed) (2017) Current perspective on irrigation and drainage. IntechOpen, United Kingdom.https://doi.org/10.5772/63177

  • Lee S, Pradhan B (2007) Landslide hazard mapping at Selangor, Malaysia using frequency ratio and logistic regression models. Landslides 4:33–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10346-006-0047-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubbe E (2008) Agricultural drainage and environment in different farming policies. In Proceedings of 10th International Drainage Workshop of ICID, 6–11 July, Vol. 6, No. 11, Helsinki/Tallinn, Finland/Estonia.

  • Ma L, Hoogenboom G, Ahuja LR, Nielson DC, Ascough JC II (2005) Development and evaluation of the RZWQM-CROPGRO hybrid model for soybean production. Agron J 97(4):1172–1182. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2003.0314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MAFGDM (2015) Meteorological observation records. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry General Directorate of Meteorology, Ankara, Turkey.

  • Malone BP, McBratney AB, Minasny B (2018) Description and spatial inference of soil drainage using matrix soil colours in the Lower Hunter Valley, New South Wales. Australia Peer Journal 6:e4659. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McBratney AB, Mendonca Santos ML, Minasny B (2003) On digital soil mapping. Geoderma 117:3–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7061(03)00223-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarty LB, Hubbard LR, JrV Q (2016) Applied soil physical properties, drainage, and irrigation strategies. Springer International Publishing AG, Cham, Switzerland

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meral R, Temizel KE (2006) Irrigation applications and efficient water use in rice production. KSU Journal of Science and Engineering 9(2):104–109

    Google Scholar 

  • Miháliková M, Dengiz O (2019) Towards more effective irrigation water usage by employing land suitability assessment for various irrigation techniques. Irrig Drain 68(4):617–628. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Molen WH, Martinez Beltran J, Ochs WJ (2007) Guidelines and computer programs for the planning and design of land drainage systems. Irrigation and Drainage Paper 62, Food and Agriculture Organisation, Rome, Italy.

  • Mondal S, Mandal S (2019) Landslide susceptibility mapping of Darjeeling Himalaya, India using index of entropy (IOE) model. Applied Geomatics 11:129–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-018-0248-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore ID, Grayson RB, Landson AR (1991) Digital terrain modeling: a review of hydrological, geomorphological, and biological applications. Hydrol Process 5:3–30. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.3360050103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niang MA, Nolin M, Bernier M, Perron I (2012) Digital mapping of soil drainage classes using multitemporal RADARSAT-1 and ASTER images and soil survey data. Applied and Environmental Soil Science 1-17.https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/430347

  • Oh HJ, Lee S, Hong SM (2017) Landslide susceptibility assessment using frequency ratio technique with iterative random sampling. J Sens 2017:1–21. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/3730913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osman KT (2018) Management of soil problems. Springer International Publishing, Cham, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75527-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozsahin E (2016) Land suitability assessment for rice cultivation using GIS: Hayrabolu Stream Basin (Thrace Peninsula) case. J Agric Sci 22(2):295–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozsahin E (2018) Eroglu I (2018a) Geomorphometric features of Thrace Peninsula. J Geomorphological Res 1:87–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozsahin E, Eroglu I (2018a) Land capability classification of Tekirdag province according to ecological conditions. Kriter publisher, Istanbul, Turkey

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozsahin E, Ozdes M, Eroglu I (2019) Possible effects of climate change on economic sectors in TR21 Thrace region. In: Konukçu F, Albut S, Altürk B (eds) Impacts of climate change and adaptation strategies in TR21 Thrace region. Tekirdag Namık Kemal University Press, Tekirdag, Türkiye, pp 169–177

    Google Scholar 

  • Ozsahin E, Eroglu I (2018b). Environmental degradation analysis using GIS in Tekirdag province, Turkey. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 27 (12B/2018b): 9650–9661.

  • Ozsahin E, Eroglu I (2019). Impact of local soil conditions on earthquake sensitivity in Erzincan City. Artvin Çoruh University Natural Hazards Application and Research Center Journal of Natural Hazards and Environment 5 (1): 41–57. https://doi.org/10.21324/dacd.428012 15(2).

  • Oztekin T, Oztekin S (2007) Effects of bulk density and drainage system on infiltration. ournal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanoasa Universty (JAFAG) 24 (2): 67–75.

  • Ozturk I, Korkut KZ (2017) Drought effect in different level of plant development stage on quality characters in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. Journal of Field Crops Central Research Institute 26(2):170–179. https://doi.org/10.30910/turkjans.471122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozturk I, Avcı R, Tulek A, Kahraman T, Tuna B, Mert Z, Akan K (2016) Investigation of grain yield and agronomic characters of the some barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) genotypes in Trace region. Journal of Field Crops Central Research Institute 25(1):26–34. https://doi.org/10.21566/tbmaed.98917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsinejad M, Akram MA (2018) Fresh look at drainage for agriculture. Irrig Drain 67(2):8–16. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons JE, Skaggs RW, Doty CW (1991) Development and testing of a three-dimensional water management model (WATRCOM): development. Trans ASAE 34(1):120–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirasteh S, Li J (2017) Probabilistic frequency ratio (PFR) model for quality improvement of landslide susceptibility mapping from LIDAR-derived DEMs. Geoenvironmental Disasters 4(19):17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40677-017-0083-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pradeep CM, Balakrishnan P, Satishkumar U, Dandekar AT, Lokesh H, Bellakki MA (2018) Impact assessment of subsurface drainage system in waterlogged saline lands on improvement of soil Parametres and crop yield in UKP Command Area. Karnataka Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 7(1):115–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Saranaathan SE, Mani S, Ramesh V, PrasannaVenkatesh S (2021) Landslide susceptibility zonation mapping using bivariate statistical frequency ratio method and GIS: a case study in part of SH 37 Ghat Road, Nadugani, Panthalur Taluk, The Nilgiris. J Indian Soc Remote Sens 49:275–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-020-01207-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sari H (2014) The effect of some land characteristics on the hydraulic conductivity of soil in the city of Tekirdag. Tekirdag Namık Kemal University, Institute of Natural and Applied Sciences, Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Tekirdag, Turkey.

  • Sari H, Ozsahin E (2016) Spatiotemporal change in the LULC (Landuse/Landcover) characteristics of Tekirdag Province based on the CORINE (Thrace, Turkey). Fresenius Environ Bull 25(11):4694–4707

    Google Scholar 

  • Sari H, Saglam T (2018) The relations of hydraulic conductivity in the samples of disturbed and undisturbed soil taken from the same points. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty 15(03):78–86

    Google Scholar 

  • Shedekar VS, Brown LC (2018) GIS and GPS applications for planning, design and management of drainage systems. In: Delgado JA, Sassenrath, GF, Mueller T (ed). Precision conservation: geospatial techniques for agricultural and natural resources conservation. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr59.c11.

  • Singh A (2017a) Waterlogging and salinity management for sustainable irrigated agriculture. I: Overview, implication and plant response. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering (ASCE) 143 (9): 04017035. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001227.

  • Singh A (2017b) Waterlogging and salinity management for sustainable irrigated agriculture. II: Engineering measures and bio‐drainage. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering 143 (9): 04017036. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IR.1943-4774.0001227.

  • Singh A (2018) Managing the salinization and drainage problems of irrigated areas through remote sensing and GIS techniques. Ecol Ind 89:584–589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.02.041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh A (2020) Salinization and drainage problems of agricultural land. Irrig Drain 69:844–885. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.2477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaggs RW (1978) A water management model for shallow water table soils. Report No. 134. Water Resources Research Institute of the University of North Carolina, N.C. State University, Raleigh, N.C.

  • Skaggs RW, Breve MA, Gilliam JW (1994) Hydrologic and water quality impacts of agricultural drainage. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 24(1):1–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389409388459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaggs RW, Chescheir GM, Phillips BD (2005) Methods to determine lateral effect of a drainage ditch on wetland hydrology. Trans Am Soc Agr Eng 48(2):577–584. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.18332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skaggs RW, Van Schilfgaarde J (ed) (1999) Agricultural drainage. Agronomy Monographs 38. ASA, CSSA, SSSA, Madison, WI. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr38.frontmatter.

  • Smedema LK, Vlotman WF, Rycroft D (2004) Modern land drainage. Planning, design and management of agricultural drainage systems. Taylor, Francis, London.

  • Sørensen R, Zinko U, Seibert J (2006) On the calculation of the topographic wetness index: evaluation of different methods based on field observations. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 10:101–112. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-10-101-2006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stewart GH, Harrison JBJ (1987) Plant communities, landforms, and soils of a geomorphically active drainage basin, Southern Alps, New Zealand. NZ J Bot 25(3):385–399. https://doi.org/10.1080/0028825X.1987.10413356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thapa D, Bhandari B (2019) GIS-based frequency ratio method for identification of potential landslide susceptible area in the Siwalik zone of Chatara-Barahakshetra Section. Nepal Open Journal of Geology 9:873–896. https://doi.org/10.4236/ojg.2019.912096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thapa R, Gupta S, Guin S, Kaur H (2018) Sensitivity analysis and mapping the potential groundwater vulnerability zones in Birbhum district, India: a comparative approach between vulnerability models. Water Science 32(1):44–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsj.2018.02.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari A, Shoab M, Dixit A (2021) GIS-based forest fire susceptibility modeling in Pauri Garhwal, India: a comparative assessment of frequency ratio, analytic hierarchy process and fuzzy modeling techniques. Nat Hazards 105:1189–1230. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-020-04351-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TUIK (2018) Land use and agricultural production statistics of Tekirdag province. Turkish Statistical Institute, Ankara, Turkey.

  • Tyagi AC (2014) Drainage on waterlogged agricultural areas. Irrig Drain 63:558–559. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.1888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valipour M (2014) Drainage, waterlogging, and salinity. Arch Agron Soil Sc 60(12):1625–1640. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2014.905676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waller P, Yitayew M (2016) Irrigation and drainage engineering. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05698-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walls JIII, Rajotte E, Rosa C (2019) The past, present, and future of barley yellow dwarf management. Agriculture 9(23):1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture9010023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Q, Abdelkareem M (2021) Mapping groundwater potential zones using a knowledge-driven approach and GIS analysis. Water 13:579. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13050579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zine El Abidine R, Abdelmansour N (2019) Landslide susceptibility mapping using information value and frequency ratio for the Arzew sector (North-Western of Algeria). Bull Mineral Res Explor 160(160):197–211. https://doi.org/10.19111/bulletinofmre.502343

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: EO, BA, MO; methodology: EO, BA; survey data collection: EO, HS, IE; original draft preparation: EO, BA, MO; review and editing: EO, BA, MO, HS, IE. All authors have read and agreed to submit the manuscript for publication (EO: Emre Ozsahin, BA: Bahadir Alturk, MO: Mehmet Ozdes, HS: Huseyin Sari, IE: Ilker Eroglu).

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emre Ozsahin.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional declarations for articles in life science journals that report the results of studies involving humans and/or animals

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ozsahin, E., Alturk, B., Ozdes, M. et al. GIS-based spatial prediction of poor-drainage areas using frequency ratio: a case study of Tekirdag Province, Turkey. Appl Geomat 14, 369–386 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-022-00439-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-022-00439-x

Keywords

Navigation