Skip to main content
Log in

Road pavement rut detection using mobile and static terrestrial laser scanning

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Applied Geomatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research work was anticipated to quantify pavement rut depths for one of the main roads in Jordan. New techniques using mobile and terrestrial laser scanning systems were used in order to detect, assess, and evaluate the surface measured rutting values. A study area located to the south of Amman, the capital city of Jordan, was used for data collection purpose. Accuracy assessment was carried out with reference to ground measurements using differential global position system (GPS). GPS static measurements were used to have accurate and precise rutting locations and depths. Captured images were rectified, enhanced, and processed using threshold values and noise removal filters. Pavement rut depths were measured for different severity levels for the three mentioned different methods using digital surface models (DSM) extracted from the mobile and terrestrial laser scanning systems point clouds. Statistical analysis of the extracted surfaces showed that the mean difference of measured rut depths between mobile laser scanning and GPS was 24 mm, while it was 45 mm for the terrestrial laser scanning system. Results showed consistent accuracy and preference for terrestrial laser scanner measurements associated with least commission errors; however, mobile laser scanning system had lowest omission errors, whereas the potential accuracy measured in terms of root mean square error (RMSE) was 74 mm for the mobile laser scanning system and 93 mm of the static terrestrial laser scanner system, respectively. On the other hand, the consistency of accuracy of measurements was slightly better for the static terrestrial laser system with a mean average error (MAE) of 66 mm, while it was 97 mm for the mobile system. High correlation does exist between mobile laser scanner and GPS measurements with R2 of 0.92, while it was 0.89 between static terrestrial laser system and GPS systems. These results and potential accuracies of rut depth measurements of the new used techniques would open the door to adapt them in different micro and macro measurements in numerous transportation engineering applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Some or all data, models, or code that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  • Al-Durgham K, Lichti DD, Kwak E, Dixon R (2021) Automated accuracy assessment of a mobile mapping system with lightweight laser scanning and MEMS sensors. Applied Sciences. 11(1007). https://doi.org/10.3390/app11031007

  • Al-Suleiman T, Obaidat MT, Abdul-Jabbar Ghassan, Khedaywi T (2000) Field inspection and laboratory testing of highway pavement rutting. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 27(1):1109–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barber D, Mills J, Smith-Voysey S (2008) Geometric validation of a ground-based mobile laser scanning system. ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 63(1):128–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beraldin J-A, Blais F, Lohr U (2010) Laser scanning technology. Chapter 1 of Airborne and Terrestrial Laser Scanning (Vosselman and Maas, eds.), Whittles Publishing, UK.

  • Campbell DMH, White B, Arp PA (2013) Modeling and mapping soil resistance to penetration and rutting using LiDAR-derived digital elevation data. J Soil Water Conserv 68(6):460–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng H, Miyojim M (1998) Automatic pavement distress detection system. Inf Sci 108(4):219–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darmawati AT (2008) Utilization of multiple echo information for classification of airborne laser scanning data. Master’s Thesis, International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation (ITC), Enschede, the Netherlands

  • Dickmanns E, Mysliwetz B (1992) Recursive 3D road and relative ego-state recognition. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 14(2):199–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fröhlich C, Mettenleiter M (2004) Terrestrial laser scanning – new perspectives in 3D surveying. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. 36, part 8/W2, Freiburg, Germany, pp. 7–13

  • Fuentes R, Pauly L, Hogg D (2017) Deeper Networks for Pavement Crack Detection. 34th International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction (ISARC 2017)

  • Haala N, Peter M, Cefalu A, Kremer J (2008) Mobile LiDAR mapping for urban data capture, In: Loannides, M., Addison, A., Georgopoulos, A., and Kalisperis, L. (eds.), 14th International Conference on Virtual Systems and Multimedia, 95- 100.

  • Hoffmeister D (2020) Geological records of tsunamis and other extreme waves. Chapter 9 - Mapping of subaerial coarse clasts. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/C2017-0-03458-4

  • Liu Z, Wang J, Liu D (2013) A new curb detection method for unmanned ground vehicles using 2D sequential laser data. Sensors 13(1):1102–1120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGhee KH (2004) Automated pavement distress collection techniques. Transportation Research. Board, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meignen D, Bernadet M, Briand H (1997) One application of neural networks for detection of defects using video data bases: identification of road distresses', IEEE 8th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications - DEXA, 1–2 September, Toulose, France, 459–464

  • Oliveira H (2013) Crack detection and characterization in flexible road pavements using digital image processing. Thesis in electrical and computer engineering, Universidade Técnica De Lisboa, Instituto Superior Técnico

  • Obaidat MT, Al-Suleiman TI, Abdul-Jabbar GT (1997) Quantification of pavement rut depth using stereo vision technology. Journal of Surveying Engineering, American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE) Geomatics Division 123(2):55–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Obaidat MT, Shatnawi N, Al Sharideah A (2020) Geomatics techniques for evaluation of road pavement rutting. Applied geomatics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-020-00337-0 )

  • Pierce KB Jr (2015) Accuracy optimization for high resolution object-based change detection: an example mapping regional urbanization with 1-m aerial imagery. Remote Sens 7:12654–12679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakitina E, Rakitin I, Staleva V, Arnaoutoglou F, Koutsoudis A, Pavlidis G (2008) An overview of 3D laser scanning technology. In Proc. of the International Scientific Conference,(Varna, Bulgaria)

  • Rasband WS, Image J. U. S. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA, https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/, 1997–2018.

  • Shahin MY (2005) Pavement for airports, roads, and parking lots. Springer, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Shan J, Toth CK (2018) Topographic laser ranging and scanning, Principles and Processing, Second Edition. CRC Press

  • Shatnawi N (2018) Automatic pavement cracks detection using image processing techniques and neural network. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications(IJACSA), 9(9), 399- 402

  • Subirats P, Fabre O, Dumoulin J, Legeay V, Barda D (2004) A combined wavelet-based image processing method for emergent crack detection on pavement surface images. 12th European Signal Processing Conference - EUSIPCO, 6–10 September, Vienna, Austria, 257–260

  • Tao V, Li J (2007) Advances in mobile mapping technology. Taylor & Francis Group, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Telling J, Lyda A, Hartzell P, Glennie C (2017) Review of earth science research using terrestrial laser scanning. Earth Sci Rev 169(1):35–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai Y, Ai C, Wang Z, Pitts E (2014) Mobile cross-slope measurement method using Lidar technology. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2367(1):0361–1981

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsogas M, Floudas N, Lytrivis P, Amditis A, Polychronopoulos A (2011) Combined lane and road attributes extraction by fusing data from digital map, laser scanner and camera. Information Fusion 12(1):28–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vacca G, Deidda M, Dessi A, Marras M (2012) Laser scanner survey to cultural heritage conservation and restoration. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences. XXXIX-B5: 589—594. DOI ,10.5194/isprsarchives-XXXIX-B5-589-2012

  • Vallet B, Mallet C (2016) Urban mapping with the mobile mapping technology. Land Surface Remote Sensing in Urban and Coastal Areas , Chapter: 2 , Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-1-78548-160-4.50002-9

  • Vosselman G, Gorte BGH, Sithole G, Rabbani T (2004) Recognising structure in laser scanner point clouds. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences, vol. 46, part 8/W2, Freiburg, Germany, 4–6 October, pp. 33–38

  • Young-Chan S, Cgo NHC, Mun S (2011). Development of mechanistic–empirical design method for an asphalt pavement rutting model using APT. Construction and Building Materials, 25(4), 1685–1690. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.10.014

  • Wang K (2000) Design and implementation of automated system for pavement surface distress survey. Journal of Infrastructure System 6(1):24–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang A, Shaoxing B, Chen A, Liu B, Yang F, Liu J (2008) The international archives of the photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences. Vol. XXXVII. Part B1. Beijing

  • Zhang L, Yang F, Zhang YD, Zhu YJ (2016) Road crack detection using deep convolutional neural network. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), Phoenix, AZ, USA, 25–28 September 2016, 3708–3712

  • Zhang W, Zhang Z, Qi D, Liu Y (2014) Automatic crack detection and classification method for subway tunnel safety monitoring. Sensors 14(10):19307–19328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, Huang P, Chiang F (2005) Wavelet-based pavement distress classification’. Journal of the Transportation Research Board 1940(1):89–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammed Taleb Obaidat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shatnawi, N., Obaidat, M.T. & Al-Mistarehi, B. Road pavement rut detection using mobile and static terrestrial laser scanning. Appl Geomat 13, 901–911 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-021-00400-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-021-00400-4

Keywords

Navigation