Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Geodiversity evaluation and geoconservation using grid analysis: case study, north of Ilam Province

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Applied Geomatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The north of Ilam Province in Iran has a great variety of geodiversity features, and the presence of geodiversity resources, along with other geological and geomorphological values, has enriched the area. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the geodiversity in the north of Ilam Province. The main indices for assessing geodiversity in the present study include geology, geomorphology, geomorphosites, paleontology, pedology, hydrology, mineral resources, and fossil species. In addition to assessing geodiversity, the hazard maps of the area were also prepared and overlapped with the geodiversity attraction maps, to identify areas with high geodiversity attraction as well as areas with high vulnerability. The results showed that 71% of the region had moderate and high attraction in terms of geodiversity indices. The most attractive areas are located in the north, center, and southeast of the region, which include the entire protected area of Manesht, Bankul, and Ghalarang; the Gachan and Arghavan area; and to the south the Sivan Arch and the Kabir Kuh area. The hazard map analysis also showed that the areas with the highest score in terms of geodiversity indices had many hazards indicating high sensitivity, unsustainable exploitation, and a growing trend of their destruction. All areas with high geodiversity attraction are exposed to severe human hazards. Most of these hazards are concentrated in the center and southeast of the region, which corresponds to areas with high geodiversity attraction. Due to their specific sensitivities, these areas can maintain their existence if they are exploited in a sustainable manner; otherwise, we will see these resources degraded and destroyed in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmadi  M (2020)  Assessment of geomorphologic processes in the formation of geomorphosites in Northern Ilam Province to planning sustainable tourism development. Dissertation, University of Tabriz

  • Ahmadi M, Asgari S, Ghanavati E (2015) Land capability evaluation for ecotourism development in Ilam Province, a GIS approach. Boletim De Ciências Geodésicas 21:107–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmadi M, Khodadadi M, Shahabi H (2018) Planning for ecotourism in the protected area of Manesht and Ghelarang, Ilam Province. Iran Jof Qual Assur Hosp Tour 19(2):243–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Alahuhta J, Hulkko TA, Tukiainen H, Purola L, Hjort J (2018) The role of geodiversity in providing ecosystem services at broad scales. Ecol Ind 91:47–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Araujo AM, Pereira DI (2018) A new methodological contribution for the geodiversity assessment: applicability to Ceará State (Brazil). Geoheritage 10(4):591–605

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey J, Boyd DS, Lavers CP, Field R (2017) Modelling native and alien vascular plant species richness: at which scales is geodiversity most relevant? Glob Ecol Biogeogr 26(7):763–776

    Google Scholar 

  • Bétard F, Peulvast JP (2019) Geodiversity hotspots: concept, method and cartographic application for geoconservation purposes at a regional scale. Environ Manage 63:822–834

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandolini P, Faccini F, Piccazzo M (2006) Geomorphological hazard and tourist vulnerability along Portofino Park trails (Italy). Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 6:563–571

    Google Scholar 

  • Brilha J, Gray M, Pereira DI, Pereira P (2018) Geodiversity: an integrative review as a contribution to the sustainable management of the whole of nature. Environ Sci Pol 86:19–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown EJ, Evans DH, Larwood JG, Prosser CD, Townley HC (2018) Geoconservation and geoscience in England: a mutually beneficial relationship. Proc Geol Assoc 129(3):492–504

    Google Scholar 

  • Coratza P, Vandelli V, Fiorentini L, Paliaga G, Faccini F (2019) Bridging terrestrial and marine geoheritage: assessing geosites in Portofino Natural Park (Italy). Water 11:2112

    Google Scholar 

  • Crofts R (2019) Linking geoconservation with biodiversity conservation in protected areas. Int J Geoheritage Parks 7:211–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Dollma M (2019) Geotourism potential of Thethi National Park (Albania). Int J Geoheritage Parks 7:85–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong HM, Song YG, Chen T, Zhao JB, Yu LP (2014) Geoconservation and geotourism in Luochuan Loess National Geopark, China. Quatern Int 334–335:40–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahimi O, Ahmadi M, Shahabi S, Asgari S (2017) Evaluation of karst features using principal component analysis (PCA): a case from Zarneh and Kergan. Carbonates Evaporites, Western Iran. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13146-017-0373-2

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Erikstad L (2013) Geoheritage and geodiversity management—the questions for tomorrow. Proc Geol’ Assoc 124:713–719

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghanavati E (2014) Flood risk zonation for Karaj City using Fuzzy Logic. Geogr Environ Hazards 8:23–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon JE (2012) Rediscovering a sense of wonder: geoheritage, geotourism and cultural landscape experiences. Geoheritage 4:65–77

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon JE (2020) Geoconservation principles and protected area management. Int J Geoheritage Parks 7(4):199–210

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon JE, Barron HF, Hansom JD, Thomas MF (2012) Engaging with geodiversity—why it matters. Proc Geol’ Assoc 123:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray M (2004) Geodiversity: Valuing and Conserving Abiotic Nature. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray M (2019) Geodiversity, geoheritage and geoconservation for society. Int J Geoheritage Parks 7(4):226–236

    Google Scholar 

  • Hejazi S, Ahmadi M, Shahabi H (2019) Estimation of soil erosion and sediment production in Kanger Basin by EPM model. J Nat Environ Hazards 6(2):1–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjort J, Luoto M (2010) Geodiversity of high latitude landscapes in northern Finland. Geomorphology 115:109–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Hjort J, Heikkinen K, Luoto M (2012) Inclusion of explicit measures of geodiversity improve biodiversity models in a boreal landscape. Biodivers Conserv 21:3487–3506

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibáñez J, Brevik EC, Cerdà A (2019) Geodiversity and geoheritage: detecting scientific and geographic biases and gaps through a bibliometric study. Sci Total Environ 659(1):1032–1044

    Google Scholar 

  • Ilić MM, Stojković S, Rundić L, Ćalić J, Sandić D (2016) Application of the geodiversity index for the assessment of geodiversity in urban areas: an example of the Belgrade city area. Serbia Geologia Croatica 69:3

    Google Scholar 

  • Jafarzadeh A, Mahdavi H (2017) Evaluation of forest fire risk using the Apriori algorithm and fuzzy c-means clustering. J For Sci 63(8):370–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamorska Z, Sobiech M, Karasiewicz T, Tylmann K (2020) Geoheritage of Postglacial Areas in Northern Poland—Prospects for Geotourism. Geoheritage 12(1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Karimi H, Naderi F, Morshedi A, Nikseresht M (2011) Landslide hazard zonation in Chardwell Ilam watershed using Geographic Information System (GIS). Geotech Geol Q 7(4):319

    Google Scholar 

  • Karimi P, Naderi T, Naseri B, Salajega AS (2014) Comparison of models for landslide hazard zonation in Zangwan Ilam watershed. J Rangel Watershed Manag 3:459–474

    Google Scholar 

  • Karna OM, Heino J, Gronroos M, Hjort J (2018) The added value of geodiversity indices in explaining variation of stream macroinvertebrate diversity. Ecol Indic 94:420–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Karna OM, Heino H, Laamanen T, Jyrka J, Mikkola N, Pajunen V, Soininen J, Tolonen KT, Tukiainen H, Hjort J (2019) Does catchment geodiversity foster stream biodiversity? Landscape Ecol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-019-00901-z(0123456789(),-volV)(0123456789().,-volV)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaskela M, Rousi H, Ronkainen M, Zhamoida V (2017) Linkages between benthic assemblages and physical environmental factors: the role of geodiversity in Eastern Gulf of Finland ecosystems. Cont Shelf Res 142:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight J (2011) Evaluating geological heritage: correspondence on Ruban, “Quantification of geodiversity and its loss.” Proc Geol Assoc 122(3):508–510

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuleta M (2019) Geodiversity Research Methods in Geotourism. Geosciences 8(6):197

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawler JJ, Ackerly DD, Albano CM, Anderson MG, Dobrowski SZ, Gill JL, Heller NE, Pressey RL, Sanderson EW, Weiss SB (2015) The theory behind, and the challenges of, conserving nature’s stage in a time of rapid change. Conserv Biol 29(3):618–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.12505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold A (1949) A Sand County Almanac. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukic T, Vidic N, Jovic G, Janiccevic S, Samardzija D (2009) The use of web-based dynamic maps in the promotion of the Titel Loess Plateau (Vojvodina, Serbia), a potential geotourism destination. Geographica Pannonica 12(3):78–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Majnunian H (2001) Environmental capability assessment of Londavil Wildlife Refuge. J Environ Stud 27:23–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansouri R, Ghanavati E, Servati MR (2014) The assessment of geomorphological landscapes and geotourism potential role of the Ilam province with respect to sustainable development. J Geogr Data 4:5–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokhtari D, Roostaei S, Khodadadi M, Ahmadi M, Ebrahimi O, Shahabi H (2019) Evaluation of the role of environmental education in Manesht and Ghelarang geotourism destination Iran. J Qual Assur Hosp Tour. https://doi.org/10.1080/1528008X.2019.1616039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nieto LM (2001) Geodiversidad: propuesta de una definition integradora. Boletin Geolögico y Minero 112(2):3–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Nobre da Silva ML, Leite do Nascimento MA, Leite Mansur K (2019) Quantitative assessments of geodiversity in the area of the Seridó Geopark Project, Northeast Brazil: grid and centroid analysis. Geoheritage 11(1):1177–1186

  • Pellitero R, González-Amuchastegui MJ, Ruiz-Flaño P, Serrano E (2010) Geodiversity and geomorphosite assessment applied to a natural protected area: the Ebro and Rudron Gorges Natural Park (Spain). Geoheritage 3(3):163–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira LS, da Silva Farias T (2020) Assessing the cultural values of the geodiversity in a Brazilian city: the historical center of João Pessoa (Paraíba, NE Brazil), Mata da Aldeia chart. International Journal of Geoheritage and Parks. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgeop.2020.03.002

  • Pereira P, Pereira D, Caetano Alves MI (2007) Geomorphosite assessment in Montesinho Natural Park (Portugal). Geographica helvetica 62(3):159–168

    Google Scholar 

  • Pereira DI, Pereira P, Brilha J, Santos L (2013) Geodiversity assessment of Paranástate (Brazil): an innovative approach. Environ Manag 52:541–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Perotti L, Carraro G, Giardino M, De Luca DA, Lasagna M (2019) Geodiversity evaluation and water resources in the Sesia Val Grande UNESCO Geopark (Italy). Water 11:2102. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11102102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope GA, Meierding TC, Paradise TR (2002) Geomorphology’s role in the study of weathering of cultural stone. Geomorphology 47:211–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Rostami N, Kazemi U (2019) Flood hazard zoning in the Ilam city using AHP and GIS. J Spat Anal Environ Hazards 6(1):179–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruban DA (2010) Quantification of geodiversity and its loss. Proc Geol Assoc 121(3):326–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruban DA (2015) Geotourism—a geographical review of the literature. Tour Manag Perspect 15:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos DS, Mansur KL, Gonçalves JB, Arruda ERJ, Manosso FC (2017) Quantitative assessment of geodiversity and urban growth impacts in Armação dos Búzios, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Appl Geogr 85:184–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Scarsi M, Crispini L, Malatesta C, Spagnolo C, Capponi C (2019) Geological map of a treasure chest of geodiversity: the Lavagnina Lakes Area (Alessandria, Italy). Geosciences 9(5):229

  • Serrano E, Ruiz-Flaño P (2007) Geodiversity: concept, assessment and territorial application. The case of Tiermes-Caracena (Soria). Boletín de la Asociación de Geógrafos Españoles 45(45):389–393

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrano E, Ruiz-Flaño P (2009) Geomorphosites and geodiversity. In: Reynard E, Coratza P, RegoliniBissig G (eds) Geomorphosites. Pfeil, München, pp 49–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Silva MLN (2018) Serviços Ecossistêmicos e Índices de Geodiversidade como Suporte da Geoconservação no Geoparque Seridó. Dissertation, National Museum, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro

  • Silva JP, Rodrigues C, Pereira DI (2015) Mapping and analysis of geodiversity indices in the Xingu River basin, Amazonia. Brazil Geoheritage 7(4):337–350

    Google Scholar 

  • Solarska A, Jary Z (2010) Geoheritage and geotourism potential of the Strzelin Hills (Sudetic Foreland, SW Poland). Geographica Pannonica 14(4):118–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavi I, Rachmilevitch S, Hjazin A, Yizhaq H (2018) Geodiversity decreases shrub mortality and increases ecosystem tolerance to droughts and climate change. Earth Surf Process Landf 43:2808–2817

    Google Scholar 

  • Stavia I, Rachmilevitchb S, Yizhaqc H (2019) Geodiversity effects on soil quality and geo-ecosystem functioning in drylands. CATENA 176:372–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein A, Gerstner K and Kreft H (2014) Environmental heterogeneity as a universal driver of species richness across taxa, biomes and spatial scales. Ecol Lett 17: 866–880. https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12277

  • Telbisz T, Gruber P, Mari L, Kőszegi M, Bottlik Z, Standovár T (2020) Geological heritage, geotourism and local development in Aggtelek National Park (NE Hungary). Geoheritage 12(1):1–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasiljevic DA, Markovic SB, Hose TA, Smalley I, Basarin B, Lazic L, Jovic G (2011) The introduction to geoconservation of loess-palaeosol sequences in the Vojvodina region: significant geoheritage of Serbia. Quatern Int 240:108–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Vujicic MD, Vasiljevic DA, Markovic SB, Hose TA, Lukic T, Hadzic O, Janicevic S (2011) Preliminary geosite assessment model (GAM) and its application on Fruska Gora Mountain, potential geotourism destination of Serbia. Acta Geogr Slov 51–3:361–376. https://doi.org/10.3986/AGS51303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang LL, Tian MZ, Wen XF, Zhao LL, Song JL, Sun M, Wang H, Lan YH, Sun M (2014) Geoconservation and geotourism in Arxan-Chaihe Volcano Area, Inner Mongolia, China. Quatern Int 349:384–391

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Tian M, Wng L (2015) Geodiversity, geoconservation and geotourism in Hong Kong Global Geopark of China. Proc Geol Assoc 126(3):426–437

  • Wang Y, Wu F, Li X, Chen L (2019) Geotourism, geoconservation, and geodiversity along the belt and road: a case study of Dunhuang UNESCO Global Geopark in China. Proc Geol Assoc 130(2):232–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Zwoliński Z (2004) Geodiversity. Encyclopedia of Geomorphology, vol 1. Routledge, New York, pp 417–418

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehdi Ahmadi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahmadi, M., Mokhtari, D., Khodadadi, M. et al. Geodiversity evaluation and geoconservation using grid analysis: case study, north of Ilam Province. Appl Geomat 13, 537–553 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-021-00377-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-021-00377-0

Keywords

Navigation