Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Geospatial analysis of desertification vulnerability using Mediterranean desertification and land use (MEDALUS) model in Kebbi State, Nigeria

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Applied Geomatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Desertification has been a global concern long ago. However, it has never been as severe as it is in the present day. According to the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification (UNCCD), almost one-third of the world’s agricultural land is facing one form of degradation or another. Assessment of desertification using GIS nowadays presents an efficient means for identifying desertification vulnerable areas. Henceforth, this study aimed to assess desertification vulnerability in Kebbi State, Nigeria, by using Mediterranean desertification and land use-environmental sensitivity area index (MEDALUS-ESAI) approach. The approach is based on biophysical and human indicators. The characteristics and intensity of these indicators contribute to the evolution of different levels of desertification. For the desertification sensitivity index (DSI), quality indexes, and the corresponding individual indicators, a weighted sensitivity score was assigned from 1 to 2. The resultant index layers were merged for generating the DSI theme. The distribution of the DSI indicated that 36% of the area is not affected, and 17% and 30% fall into low and moderately sensitive classes, while 15% and 1% of the area are classified as sensitive and highly sensitive respectively. The result, therefore, indicated that the area is moderately sensitive to desertification. DSI is essentially useful for determining desertification severity. The theme will contribute significantly to the decision-making process most importantly in the selection of priority zones in combating the desertification phenomenon in the area. This study delineates the potential desertification vulnerable areas that need urgent action; the model is thus recommendable for its flexibility and accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adeel Z, Safriel U, Niemeijer D & White R (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: desertification synthesis. (Sarukhán J & Whyte A Eds.). Washington DC: World Resources Institute

  • Alim M, & Mumuli SO (2010) Practical guide for land degradation monitoring. FAO-SWALIM. Project Report No. L-20. Nairobi

  • Allen RG, Pereira LS, Raes D, & Smith M (1998) Crop evapotranspiration - guidelines for computing crop water requirements - FAO Irrigation and drainage paper 56. Rome

  • Avdan U, & Jovanovska G (2016) Algorithm for automated mapping of land surface temperature using LANDSAT 8 Satellite Data. J Sens

  • Ayuba NMGHK (2016) On major environmental problems of desertification in northern Nigeria with sustainable effort to managing it. World J Sci Technol Sustain Dev 13(1)

  • Basso F, Bove E, Dumontet S, Ferrara A, Pisante M, Quaranta G, Taberner M (2000) Evaluating environmental sensitivity at the basin scale through the use of geographic information systems and remotely sensed data: an example covering the Agri basin (Southern Italy)1. CATENA 40(1):19–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contador LJF, Schnabel S, Gutiérrez GA, Fernández MP (2009) Mapping sensitivity to land degradation in extremadura. SN Spain Land Degrad Dev 20:129–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FGN (2015) Federal Government of Nigeria: National Human Development Report: Human Security and Human Development in Nigeria. Abuja

  • Idris Medugu N, Rafee Majid M, Johar F (2011) Drought and desertification management in arid and semi-arid zones of Northern Nigeria. Manag Environ Qual Int J 22(5):595–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapalanga TS (2008) A review of land degradation assessment methods. Land Restoration Training Programme. Agricultural University of Iceland

  • Kosmas C, Kirkby M, & Geeson N (1999) MEDALUS Project: Mediterranean desertification and land use. Manual on key indicators of desertification and mapping environmentally sensitive areas. Luxembourg. Retrieved from http://www.medalus.demon.co.uk/. Accessed 16 June 2016

  • Li J, Heap AD (2011) A review of comparative studies of spatial interpolation methods in environmental sciences: performance and impact factors. Eco Inform 6(3–4):228–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NBS (2012) Federal Republic of Nigeria: Annual Abstract of Statistics, Annual Abstract of Statistics. Abuja. Retrieved from www.nigerianstat.gov.ng. Accessed 18 March 2016

  • Ogungbenro SB, Morakinyo TE (2014) Rainfall distribution and change detection across climatic zones in Nigeria. Weather Clim Extremes 5(1):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Olagunju TE (2015) Drought, desertification and the Nigerian environment: a review. J Ecol Nat Environ 7(10):256–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raul P-H, & Koohafkan P (2004) Methodological framework for land degradation assessment in drylands. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Land and Water Development Division. Rome

  • Safriel U (2009) Deserts and desertification: challenges but also opportunities. Land Degrad Dev 20:587–588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sameen MI, Ahmed M, Kubaisy A (2014) Automatic surface temperature mapping in ArcGIS using Landsat-8 TIRS and ENVI Tools case study : Al Habbaniyah Lake. J Environ Earth Sci 4(12):12–18

    Google Scholar 

  • Symeonakis E, Karathanasis N, Koukoulas S, Panagopoulos G (2016) Monitoring sensitivity to land degradation and desertification with the environmentally sensitive area index: the case of Lesvos Island. Land Degrad Dev 27(6):1562–1573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNCCD (2007) Climate change and desertifcation: thematic fact sheet series. Bone, Germany

  • UNCCD (2008) Climate change in the African dry lands: options and opportunities for adaptation and mitigation. Nairobi, Kenya

  • Usman S, Sani Noma S, Kudiri AM (2016) Dynamic surface soil components of land and vegetation types in Kebbi State Nigeria. Eur J Soil Sci 5(2):113–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Yao X, Fu B, Lu Y, Sun F, Wang S et al (2013) Comparison of four spatial interpolation methods for estimating soil moisture in a complex terrain catchment. PLoS ONE 8(1):e54660

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the anonymous referees for their valuable comments. The authors also wish to acknowledge the USGS, NPC, and CGIAR-CSIGeoPortal for making data freely available not only for this project but other of its kind.

Funding

This research was funded by the Tertiary Education Trust Funds (TETFund) of Nigeria through Kebbi State University of Science and Technology, Aliero.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Mansur Aliero.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aliero, M.M., Ismail, M.H., Alias, M.A. et al. Geospatial analysis of desertification vulnerability using Mediterranean desertification and land use (MEDALUS) model in Kebbi State, Nigeria. Appl Geomat 13, 527–536 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-021-00372-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-021-00372-5

Keywords

Navigation