Existing infrastructure cost effective informative modelling with multisource sensed data: TLS, MMS and photogrammetry

Abstract

Current practice in large infrastructure management requires new procedures for cost-effective maintenance and safe operation. In this sense, the availability of new surveying, inspection and monitoring procedures as well as new instruments can play a significant role in securing a fundamental asset with an affordable cost. Indeed, inspection and monitoring with automated or semi-automated instruments can guarantee a significant reduction of time in operations that are currently manual, risky and time-consuming. The availability of new sensing platforms and instruments like lightweight mobile mapping systems and drones is fundamental for rethinking current survey and inspection practice. However, their performance, in terms of metric accuracy and reliability, in real applications is still limited. On the other hand, the acquisition of primary data is only the first step of the maintenance workflow. Indeed, even if the adoption of informative content models for structural health monitoring (SHM) for large infrastructures clearly presents important advantages compared with standard management; the adoption of proper tolls for such complex infrastructures poses some issues that need to be solved to develop smooth management and maintenance workflows. This paper presents a methodology for the generation of a detailed informative model starting from multi-sources data: terrestrial laser scanning (TLS), Mobile Mapping Systems (MMS) and photogrammetry. The integration of those different techniques is discussed and a comparative analysis is carried out. The enrichment of the informative model with further data coming from load testing and inspection is presented to create a unique informative platform suitable for different end-users involved in maintenance operations.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Notes

  1. 1.

    Source: “Investment in infrastructure in the EU”, European Parliament, 2018

  2. 2.

    TEN-T Connecting Europe Facility (CEF) https://ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/infrastructure/ten-t_en, June 2019

References

  1. Acampa, G., Bona, N., Grasso, M., & Ticali, D. (2018). BIM: building information modeling for infrastructures. In AIP conference proceedings (Vol. 2040, no. 1, p. 140008). AIP publishing LLC

  2. Ahmad Z, Thaheem MJ, Maqsoom A (2018) Building information modeling as a risk transformer: an evolutionary insight into the project uncertainty. Autom Constr 92:103–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Banfi, F. (2017). BIM orientation: grades of generation and information for different type of analysis and management process. International archives of the photogrammetry, Remote Sensing & Spatial Information Sciences, 42

  4. Banfi, F., Barazzetti, L., Previtali, M., & Roncoroni, F. (2017). Historic BIM: A new repository for structural health monitoring. In geomatics & restoration–Conservation of Cultural Heritage in the Digital Era (Vol. 42, No. 5W1, pp. 269–274)

  5. Barazzetti L, Banfi F, Brumana R, Previtali M (2015) Creation of parametric BIM objects from point clouds using NURBS. Photogramm Rec 30(152):339–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barazzetti, L., Banfi, F., Brumana, R., Roncoroni, F., & Previtali, M. (2016). BIM from laser scans… not just for buildings: NURBS-based parametric modeling of a medieval bridge. In XXIII ISPRS congress, commission V (pp. 51-56)

  7. Bauwens S, Bartholomeus H, Calders K, Lejeune P (2016) Forest inventory with terrestrial LiDAR: a comparison of static and hand-held mobile laser scanning. Forests 7(6):127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bensalah, M., Elouadi, A., & Mharzi, H. (2019). Overview: the opportunity of BIM in railway. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment

  9. Besl, P. J., & McKay, N. D. (1992). Method for registration of 3-D shapes. In sensor fusion IV: control paradigms and data structures (Vol. 1611, pp. 586-606). International Society for Optics and Photonics

  10. Bosse M, Zlot R, Flick P (2012) Zebedee: design of a spring-mounted 3-d range sensor with application to mobile mapping. IEEE Trans Robot 28(5):1104–1119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bradley A, Li H, Lark R, Dunn S (2016) BIM for infrastructure: an overall review and constructor perspective. Autom Constr 71:139–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Brumana R, Della Torre S, Previtali M, Barazzetti L, Cantini L, Oreni D, Banfi F (2018) Generative HBIM modelling to embody complexity (LOD, LOG, LOA, LOI): surveying, preservation, site intervention—the basilica di Collemaggio (L’Aquila). Appl Geomatics 10(4):545–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Cabo C, Del Pozo S, Rodríguez-Gonzálvez P, Ordóñez C, Gonzalez-Aguilera D (2018) Comparing terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) and wearable laser scanning (WLS) for individual tree modeling at plot level. Remote Sens 10(4):540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chatterjee A, Matsuno F (2007) A neuro-fuzzy assisted extended Kalman filter-based approach for simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM) problems. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 15(5):984–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Chen Y, Tang J, Jiang C, Zhu L, Lehtomäki M, Kaartinen H et al (2018) The accuracy comparison of three simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM)-based indoor mapping technologies. Sensors 18(10):3228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cheng JC, Lu Q, Deng Y (2016) Analytical review and evaluation of civil information modelling. Autom Constr 67:31–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chiabrando, F., Coletta, C. D., Sammartano, G., Spanò, A., & Spreafico, A. (2018). “Torino 1911” project: a contribution of a slam-based survey to extensive 3d heritage modeling. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing & Spatial Information Sciences, 42(2)

  18. Chong HY, Lopez R, Wang J, Wang X, Zhao Z (2016) Comparative analysis on the adoption and use of BIM in road infrastructure projects. J Manag Eng 32(6):05016021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Construction, McGraw Hill. “The business value of BIM for infrastructure: Addressing America's infrastructure challenges with collaboration and technology.” Smart Market Report (2012): 1

  20. Costin A, Adibfar A, Hu H, Chen SS (2018) Building information modeling (BIM) for transportation infrastructure–literature review, applications, challenges, and recommendations. Autom Constr 94:257–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Dewez TJ, Yart S, Thuon Y, Pannet P, Plat E (2017) Towards cavity-collapse hazard maps with Zeb-Revo handheld laser scanner point clouds. Photogramm Rec 32(160):354–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Eastman CM, Jeong YS, Sacks R, Kaner I (2010) Exchange model and exchange object concepts for implementation of national BIM standards. J Comput Civ Eng 24(1):25–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Fanning B, Clevenger CM, Ozbek ME, Mahmoud H (2015) Implementing BIM on infrastructure: comparison of to bridge construction projects. Pract Period Struct Des Constr 20(4):04014044

  24. Farrar CR, Worden K (2007) An introduction to structural health monitoring. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 365(1851):303–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Floros, G. S., Boyes, G., Owens, D., & Ellul, C. (2019). Developing IFC for infrastructure: a case study of three highway entities. ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing & Spatial Information Sciences, 4

  26. García-Sánchez, D., Aurtenetxe, J., Zalbide, M., Socorro, R., Pérez-Hernando, A., & Inaudi, D. (2018). Technical management risks for transport infrastructures along whole life cycle: identification and intervention. Proceedings of the 6th international symposium on life-cycle civil engineering, IALCCE 2018 pp. 1435–1442

  27. Gashongore, P. D., Kawasue, K., Yoshida, K., & Aoki, R. (2017). Indoor space 3D visual reconstruction using mobile cart with laser scanner and cameras. In eighth international conference on graphic and image processing (ICGIP 2016) (Vol. 10225, p. 102251E). International Society for Optics and Photonics

  28. Gross, H., & Thoennessen, U. (2006). Extraction of lines from laser point clouds. In symposium of ISPRS commission III: photogrammetric computer vision PCV06. International archives of photogrammetry, remote sensing and spatial information sciences (Vol. 36, no. part 3, pp. 86-91)

  29. Howard R, Björk BC (2008) Building information modelling–experts’ views on standardisation and industry deployment. Adv Eng Inform 22(2):271–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. ISO, I. (2013). 16739: 2013 Industry Foundation classes (IFC) for data sharing in the construction and facility management industries. International Organization for Standardization

  31. Jeong S, Hou R, Lynch JP, Sohn H, Law KH (2017) An information modelling framework for bridge monitoring. Adv Eng Softw 114:11–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Julier SJ, Uhlmann JK (2007) Using covariance intersection for SLAM. Robot Auton Syst 55(1):3–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Karam S, Vosselman G, Peter M, Hosseinyalamdary S, Lehtola V (2019) Design, calibration, and evaluation of a backpack indoor Mobile mapping system. Remote Sens 11(8):905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Lague D, Brodu N, Leroux J (2013) Accurate 3D comparison of complex topography with terrestrial laser scanner: application to the Rangitikei canyon (NZ). ISPRS J Photogramm Remote Sens 82:10–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Limongelli, M. P., Previtali, M., Cantini, L., Carosio, S., Matos, J. C., Isoird, J. M., Wenzel, H., Pellegrino, C. (2019). Lifecycle management, monitoring and assessment for safe large-scale infrastructures: challenges and needs. In 2nd International Conference of Geomatics and Restoration, GeoRes 2019, Vol. 42, No. 2, pp. 727–734. Copernicus GmbH

  36. Marzouk, M., & Abdel Aty, A. (2012). Maintaining subway infrastructure using BIM. In construction research congress 2012: construction challenges in a flat world (pp. 2320–2328)

  37. McGuire B, Atadero R, Clevenger C, Ozbek M (2016) Bridge information modeling for inspection and evaluation. J Bridg Eng 21(4):04015076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Moon H, Dawood N, Kang L (2014) Development of workspace conflict visualization system using 4D object of work schedule. Adv Eng Inform 28(1):50–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Neves J, Sampaio Z, Vilela M (2019) A case study of BIM implementation in rail track rehabilitation. Infrastructures 4(1):8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Nocerino, E., Menna, F., Remondino, F., Toschi, I., & Rodríguez-Gonzálvez, P. (2017, June). Investigation of indoor and outdoor performance of two portable mobile mapping systems. In videometrics, range imaging, and applications XIV (Vol. 10332, p. 103320I). International Society for Optics and Photonics

  41. Nuttens, T., De Breuck, V., & Cattoor, R. (2018). Using BIM models for the design of large rail infrastructure projects: key factors for a successful implementation. Building Information Systems in the Construction Industry, 77

  42. Omoregie, A., & Turnbull, D. E. (2016). Highway infrastructure and building information modelling in UK. In proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Municipal Engineer (Vol. 169, no. 4, pp. 220–232). Thomas Telford Ltd.

  43. Previtali, M., Barazzetti, L., Banfi, F., & Roncoroni, F. (2019). Informative content models for infrastructure load testing management: the Azzone Visconti bridge in Lecco. In 2nd International Conference of Geomatics and Restoration, GeoRes 2019 (Vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 995-1001). Copernicus GmbH

  44. Puente I, González-Jorge H, Martínez-Sánchez J, Arias P (2013) Review of mobile mapping and surveying technologies. Measurement 46(7):2127–2145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Rodríguez-Gonzálvez P, Garcia-Gago J, Gomez-Lahoz J, González-Aguilera D (2014) Confronting passive and active sensors with non-gaussian statistics. Sensors 14(8):13759–13777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Sammartano G, Spanò A (2018) Point clouds by SLAM-based mobile mapping systems: accuracy and geometric content validation in multisensor survey and stand-alone acquisition. Appl Geomatics 10(4):317–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Shim CS, Kim SW, Song HH, Yun NR (2011) Development of BIM for a maintenance system of subway infrastructures. J KIBIM 1(1):6–12

    Google Scholar 

  48. Sinyagov S, Kupriyanovsky V, Kurenkov P, Namiot D, Stepanenko A, Bubnov P et al (2017) Building and engineering based on BIM standards as the basis for transforming infrastructures in the digital economy. Int J Open Inform Technol 5(5):46–79

    Google Scholar 

  49. Sohn H, Farrar CR, Hemez FM, Shunk DD, Stinemates DW, Nadler BR, Czarnecki JJ (2003) A review of structural health monitoring literature: 1996–2001. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Santa Fe, pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  50. Thrun S, Montemerlo M (2006) The graph SLAM algorithm with applications to large-scale mapping of urban structures. Int J Robot Res 25(5–6):403–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Tucci G, Visintini D, Bonora V, Parisi EI (2018) Examination of indoor mobile mapping systems in a diversified internal/external test field. Appl Sci 8(3):401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Tucci G, Conti A, Fiorini L, Corongiu M, Valdambrini N, Matta C (2019) M-BIM: a new tool for the galleria dell’Accademia di Firenze. Virtual Archaeol Rev 10(21):40–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Turco, M. L., & Santagati, C. (2016). From SfM to semantic-aware BIM objects of architectural elements. In Euro-Mediterranean conference (pp. 600–612). Springer, Cham

  54. Vassena G, Clerici A (2018) Open pit mine 3D mapping by tls and digital photogrammetry: 3D model update thanks to a slam based approach. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing & Spatial Information Sciences 42(2):1145–1148

  55. Wu, D., Meng, Y., Zhan, K., & Ma, F. (2018). A LIDAR SLAM based on point-line features for underground mining vehicle. In 2018 Chinese Automation Congress (CAC) (pp. 2879-2883). IEEE

  56. Yuen, D. C., & MacDonald, B. A. (2003, September). An evaluation of the sequential Monte Carlo technique for simultaneous localisation and map-building. In 2003 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No. 03CH37422) (Vol. 2, pp. 1564-1569). IEEE

  57. Zou, Y., Kiviniemi, A., & Jones, S. W. (2016). Developing a tailored RBS linking to BIM for risk management of bridge projects. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management,

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mattia Previtali.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Previtali, M., Brumana, R. & Banfi, F. Existing infrastructure cost effective informative modelling with multisource sensed data: TLS, MMS and photogrammetry. Appl Geomat (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12518-020-00326-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Infrastructure
  • Bridges
  • Point cloud
  • TLS
  • MMS
  • BIM