Advertisement

The impact of relative and absolute GNSS positioning strategies on estimated coordinates and ZWD in the framework of meteorological applications

  • Alessandro Fermi
  • Eugenio Realini
  • Giovanna VenutiEmail author
Original Paper
  • 61 Downloads

Abstract

Since many years, the GNSS has been regarded by the meteorological community as one of the systems for atmospheric water vapour remote sensing. Time series of wet delays, estimated as by-products of accurate positioning, have been assimilated into numerical weather prediction models. However, a dedicated use the system for water vapour monitoring is still under investigation. Ad hoc dense networks have been designed and implemented to collect data at a high spatial resolution, baseline lengths lower than 10 km, with the aim of describing the high spatial and temporal variability of tropospheric water vapour. Within this framework, the paper reports a study on how the positioning strategy affects the estimated coordinates and tropospheric parameters. The study was conducted on the data collected by an experimental network of geodetic receivers, used as single or dual frequency ones. More specifically, investigations were made on the use of L1-only or iono-free combinations in differential positioning of receivers 100 to 10 km apart, finding that L1-only data provide more accurate results. Therefore, comparisons between local coordinates and ZWD obtained from relative and absolute positioning were performed to provide the statistics of the differences; the agreement between the results for short baselines is always better than 1 cm standard deviation. In order to assess the differences in the results that can be obtained from the two strategies when applied to the same observation set, a further comparison was carried out in terms of baseline components and ZWD increments. It results that, even for dense networks, the differential approach produces accurate results without losing information compared to the absolute one.

Keywords

GNSS meteorology Tropospheric delays Hyper-dense GNSS network Relative positioning Absolute positioning 

Abbreviations

APS

atmospheric phase screen

CODE

Center for Orbit Determination in Europe

DD

double difference

GIM

global ionosphere maps

GNSS

Global Navigation Satellite Systems

InSAR

Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar

IWV

integrated water vapour

NWP

numerical weather prediction models

PCV

phase center variation

PN

permanent network

PPP

precise point positioning

PWV

precipitable water vapour

WVR

water vapour radiometer

ZTD

zenith total delay

ZWD

zenith wet delay

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge Dr. Grazia Visconti and Prof. Ludovico Biagi who collected and firstly analysed the data and Leica Geosystem Italy for providing the GNSS stations for the MisT experiment. We thank Dr. Daniele Sampietro for his suggestions in the results analysis and the anonymous referees for their important comments on the manuscript that allowed us to improve it significantly.

Author contributions

AF, ER and GV designed the study, developed the methodology, collected the data, performed the analysis, and wrote the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

References

  1. Baby BH, Golé P, Lavergnat J (1988) A model for the tropospheric excess path length of radio waves from surface meteorological measurements. Radio Sci 23(6):1023–1038CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bennitt GV, Jupp A (2012) Operational assimilation of GPS zenith total delay observations into the Met office numerical weather prediction models. Mon Wea Rev 140(8):2706–2719CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bevis M, Businger S, Herring TA, Rocken C, Anthes RA, Ware RH (1992) GPS Meteorology: remote sensing of atmospheric water vapor using the Global Positioning System. J Geophys Res: Atmos 97(D14):15787–15801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. BRIGAID - H2020 project - Precipitable Water Vapour Monitoring (2016) http://brigaid.eu/meet-our-innovations-precipitable-water-vapour-monitoring. Accessed 16 May 2017
  5. Dach R, Lutz S, Walser P, Fridez P (2015) BERNESE GNSS Software version 5.2. University of Bern, Bern Open PublishingGoogle Scholar
  6. EDWIGE - Eurostars-2 project (2016) https://www.eurostars-eureka.eu/project/id/10235. Accessed 16 May 2017
  7. Elliott WP, Gaffen DJ (1991) On the utility of radiosonde humidity archives for climate studies. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 72:1507–1520CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gelb A (1974) Applied optimal estimation. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  9. Herring TA, Davis JL, Shapiro II (1990) Geodesy by radio interferometry: the application of Kalman filtering to the analysis of very long baseline interferometry data. J Geophys Res 95(B8):12561–12581CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Herring TA (1992) Modeling atmospheric delays in the analysis of space geodetic data. J Geophys Res 74:4487–4499Google Scholar
  11. Hofmann-Wellenhof B, Lichtenegger H, Collins J (2001) Global positioning system theory and practice. Springer-Verlag, WienCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ishikawa Y (2010) The Use of Ground Based GPS Data for Meso-scale Analysis. Suuchi Yohouka Houkoku Bessatsu (Additional Vol Report Numer Prediction Div) 56:54–60. (In Japanese)Google Scholar
  13. Kleijer F (2004) Troposphere modeling and filtering for precise GPS leveling. Dissertation, TU DelftGoogle Scholar
  14. Kouba J, Héroux P (2001) Precise Point Positioning using IGS orbit and clock products. GPS Solutions 5(2):2–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. MacMillan DS (1995) Atmospheric gradients from very long base interferometry observations. Geophys Res Lett 22:1041–1044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. METAWAVE - ESA Contract No. ESTEC-21207/07/NL/HE (2007) “Metawave - Mitigation of Electromagnetic Transmission errors induced by Atmospheric Water Vapour Effects” 2007–2009Google Scholar
  17. MORFEO - Contratto ASI prot. n. 6003 del 31/07/2006 (2007) “MOnitoraggio Rischio da Frane con dati EO”, http://www.morfeoproject.it http://www.morfeoproject.it
  18. Niell AE, Coster AJ, Solheim FS, Mendes VB, Toor PC, Langley RB, Upham CA (2001) Comparison of measurements of atmospheric wet delay by radiosonde, water vapor radiometer, GPS, and VLBI. J Atmos Ocean Tech 18(6):830–850CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Notarpietro R, Cucca M, Gabella M, Venuti G, Perona G (2011) Tomographic reconstruction of wet and total refractivity fields from GNSS receiver networks. Adv Space Res 47:898–912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Onn F (2006) Modeling water vapor using GPS with application to mitigating inSAR atmospheric distorsions. Dissertation, Stanford UniversityGoogle Scholar
  21. Pierdicca N, Rocca F, Rommen B, Basili P, Bonafoni S, Cimini D, Ciotti P, Consalvi F, Ferretti R, Foster W, Marzano FS, Mattioli V, Mazzoni A, Montopoli M, Notarpietro R, Padmanabhan S, Perissin D, Pichelli E, Reising S, Sahoo S, Venuti G (2009) Atmospheric water vapour effects on spaceborne interferometric SAR imaging: comparison with ground based measurements and meteorological model simulations at different scales. In: 2009 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium, IGARSS 2009. IEEE, pp V-320-V-323Google Scholar
  22. Pierdicca N, Rocca F, Basili P, Bonafoni S, Carlesimo G, Cimini D, Ciotti P, Ferretti R, Marzano FS, Mattioli V, Montopoli M, Notarpietro R, Perissin D, Pichelli E, Rommen B, Venuti G (2011) Synergic use of EO, NWP and ground based measurements for the mitigation of vapour artefacts in SAR interferometry. In: 2011 IEEE International Geoscience and remote sensing symposium (IGARSS). IEEE, pp 2566–2569Google Scholar
  23. Perissin D, Rocca F, Pierdicca N, Cimini D, Pichelli E, Venuti G, Rommen B (2011) Mitigation of atmospheric delay in inSAR: The ESA Metawave project. In: 2011 IEEE international Geoscience and remote sensing symposium (IGARSS). IEEE, pp 2558–2561Google Scholar
  24. Princea SD, Goetza SJ, Dubayaha RO, Czajkowskia KP, Thawleya M (1998) Inference of surface and air temperature, atmospheric precipitable water and vapour pressure deficit using advanced very high-resolution radiometer satellite observations: comparison with field observations. J Hydrol 212-213:230–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Resch GM (1984) Water vapor radiometry in geodetic applications. In: Brunner FK (ed) Geodetic refraction. Springer, Berlin-HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  26. Sato K, Realini E, Tsuda T, Oigawa M, Iwaki Y, Shoji Y, Seko H (2013) A high-resolution, precipitable water vapor monitoring system using a dense network of GNSS receivers. J Disaster Res 8(1):37–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Seeber G (2003) Satellite geodesy. Walter de Gruyter, BerlinCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Shoji Y, Nakamura H, Iwabuchi T, Aonashi K, Seko H, Mishima K, Ohtani R (2004a) Tsukuba GPS dense net campaign observation: improvement in GPS analysis of slant path delay by stacking one-way postfit phase residuals. J Meteor Soc Japan 82(1B):301–314Google Scholar
  29. Shoji Y, Yamauchi H, Mashiko W, Sato E (2014b) Estimation of Local-scale Precipitable Water Vapor Distribution Around Each GNSS Station using Slant Path Delay. SOLA 10:29–33Google Scholar
  30. Saito K, Shoji Y, Origuchi S, Duc L (2017) GPS PWV Assimilation with the JMA Nonhydrostatic 4DVAR and Cloud Resolving Ensemble Forecast for the 2008 August Tokyo Metropolitan Area Local Heavy Rainfalls. Data Assimilation for Atmospheric, Oceanic and Hydrologic Applications (Vol III), pp 383–404Google Scholar
  31. Teunissen P J G, Kleusberg A (eds) (1998) GPS For geodesy. Springer, Berlin-HeidelbergGoogle Scholar
  32. Tikhonov AN (1966) Regularization of incorrectly posed problems. Sov Math Dokl 1963 4:1624–1627Google Scholar
  33. Tregoning P, Boers R, O’Brien D, Hendy M (1998) Accuracy of absolute precipitable water vapor estimates from GPS observations. J Geophys Res: Atmos 103(D22):28701–28710CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Visconti MG (2009) L’esperimento MisT: stima dei ritardi troposferici da una rete GNSS locale. PhD dissertation, Politecnico di MilanoGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Società Italiana di Fotogrammetria e Topografia (SIFET) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.IEIIT-CNRGenovaItaly
  2. 2.Geomatics Research and Development (GReD) srlLomazzoItaly
  3. 3.Politecnico di Milano (DICA/GEOlab)MilanItaly

Personalised recommendations