Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Model tests of reinforced soil retaining sand walls by shaking table test

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research investigates the seismic response of sand-made wrap-faced retaining walls using a shaking table, focusing on the impact of varying relative densities and frequencies on the dynamic characteristics of the walls. Two types of sand have been used to prepare retaining wall model for shake table testing. They are “Local” sand and “Sylhet” sand. A 2 m × 2 m computer-controlled servo-hydraulic single degree of freedom shaking table facility in geotechnical laboratory of Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology (BUET) has been used to test the model under sinusoidal loading. Here, different kinds of combination of seismic waves of different frequencies are selected to apply on different densities wrap-faced wall model in order to observe their dynamic characteristics. The relative densities of Sylhet sand are chosen 48%, 64%, and 80% for preparing the model wall. On the other hand, 48%, 64%, and 80% are selected for preparing Local sand model. Portable traveling pluviator (PTP) developed by (Hossain and Ansary, Innov Infrastruct Solut 3:53, 2018) has been used here to construct the uniform wrap-faced retaining wall model. Tests are performed under three different surcharge pressures like 0.7 kPa, 1.12 kPa, and 1.72 kPa. Sinusoidal tests are implemented for three base accelerations (0.1 g, 0.15 g, and 0.2 g) and for eight different frequencies (1 Hz, 2 Hz, 3 Hz, 5 Hz, 8 Hz, 10 Hz, 12 Hz, and 15 Hz). In the end, from these test results, it has been observed that acceleration amplification is inversely proportional to relative density. Further, acceleration amplifications are increased with the rise of frequencies. On the other hand, face displacement has been decreased with the increase of the relative density and frequency at same normalized elevation. The test results have been compared with (Krishna and Latha, Geosynth Int 14:355–364, 2007), although they used poorly graded sand and different scaling factor of the retaining wall model. It has been also noticed that the Sylhet sand retaining wall shows more acceleration amplification during sinusoidal loading than the Local sand retaining wall. In this research, the impact of different kinds of relative densities and frequencies on wrap-faced retaining wall model under sinusoidal testing has been observed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Hattamleh O, Muhunthan B (2006) Numerical procedures for deformation calculations in the reinforced soil walls. Geotext Geomembr 24(1):52–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D 4595-86, 1994. Standard test method for tensile properties of geotextiles by the wide-width strip method, designation, ASTM standards, vol 07 01

  • ASTM D4253 (2014) Standard test methods for maximum index density and unit weight of soils using a vibratory table. ASTM Standards, West Conshohocken

  • ASTM. (2006). “Standard test methods for minimum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation of relative density.” ASTM D4254–00, West Conshohocken, PA.

  • Bairrao R and Vaz C (2000). “Shaking table testing of civil engineering structures - the LNEC 3D simulator experience.” Proceedings 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Auckland, New Zealand, Paper 2129, 2000

  • Bairrao R, Duarte RT, Vaz CT and Costa AC Portuguese methodology for the earthquake design of important structures. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Seismology and Earthquake Engineering, vol. 1, pp. 785/794, Tehran, Iran, 1995

  • Baker R, Klein Y (2004) An integrated limiting equilibrium approach for design of reinforced soil retaining structures, part I: formulation. Geotext Geomembr 22(3):119–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bathurst RJ (1998) NCMA segmental retaining wall seismic design procedure supplement to design manual for segmental retaining walls, 2nd edn. National Concrete Masonry Association, Herndon, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bathurst RJ, Hatami K (1998) Seismic response analysis of a geosynthetic reinforced soil retaining wall. Geosynth Int 5(1–2):127–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bathurst RJ, Hatami K, Alfaro MC (2002b) Geosynthetic reinforced soil walls and slopes: seismic aspects. In: Shukla SK (ed) Geosynthetics and Their Applications. Thomas Telford, London, pp 327–392

    Google Scholar 

  • Bathurst RJ, Allen TM, Walters DL (2005) Reinforcement loads in geosynthetic walls and the case for a new working stress design method. Geotext Geomembr 23(4):287–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bathurst RJ, and Alfaro MC (1996). “Review of seismic design, analysis and performance of geosynthetic reinforced walls, slopes and embankments.” In: Proc. Int. Symp. Earth Reinforcement, 12–14 November 1996, Fukuoka, Kyushu, Japan, vol. 2, pp. 887–918.

  • Bathurst RJ, El-Emam M, and Mashhour MM (2002a). Shaking table model study on the dynamic response of reinforced soil walls. Proceedings of the 7th International Geosynthetics Conference, Nice, France, September 2002, Vol. 1, pp. 99–102

  • Benjamim CVS, Bueno BS, Zornberg JG (2007) Field monitoring and evaluation of geotextile-reinforced soil-retaining walls. Geosynth Int 14(2):100–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai Z, Bathurst RJ (1996) Seismic induced permanent displacement of geosynthetic reinforced segmental retaining walls. Can Geotech J 31:937–955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty S, Hore R, Shuvon AM, Mazhar MS, Ansary MA (2021) Dynamic responses of reinforced soil model wall on soft clay foundation. Geotech Geol Eng 39:2883–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty S, Hore R, Shuvon AM, Ansary MA (2022) Effect of surcharge pressure on model geotextile wrapped-face wall under seismic condition. Iran J Sci Technol Trans Civ Eng 46(3):4409–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen TC, Chen RH, Lin SS (2000) A nonlinear homogenized model applicable to reinforced soil analysis. Geotext Geomembr 18(6):349–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen HT, Hung WY, Chang CC, Chen YJ, Lee CJ (2007) Centrifuge modeling test of a geotextile-reinforced wall with a very wet clayey backfill. Geotext Geomembr 25(6):346–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collin JG (2001) Lessons learned from a segmental retaining wall failure. Geotext Geomembr 19(7):445–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dave TN, Dasaka SM (2012) Assessment of portable traveling pluviator to prepare reconstituted sand specimens. Geomech Eng 4(2):79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte RT, Correa MR, Vaz CT and Costa AC (1992). Shaking table testing of structures. Proceedings of the 10th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, pp. 6837/6846, Madrid, Spain

  • Duarte RT, Costa AC and Vaz CT (1994). The new LNEC triaxial earthquake simulator. Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, vol. 4, pp. 2999/3008, Vienna, Austria

  • Duque J, and Bairrao R (2000). “LNEC experiences and strategies in earthquake simulation. Recent developments.” Proceedings 12th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Auckland, New Zealand, Paper 2624, 2000

  • El-Emam MM, Bathurst RJ (2007) Influence of reinforcement parameters on the seismic response of reduced-scale reinforced soil retaining walls. Geotext Geomembr 25(1):33–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emílio FT, Duarte RT, Carvalhal FJ, Costa CO, Vaz CT, and Corrêa MR (1989). The new LNEC shaking table for earthquake resistance testing, Memoire LNEC 757

  • FHWA, 2001. Mechanically stabilized earth walls and reinforced soil slopes: design and construction guidelines. Federal Highway Administration and National Highway Institute, Washington DC. FHWA NHI-00–43

  • Hatami K, Bathurst RJ (2000) Effect of structural design on fundamental frequency of reinforced-soil retaining walls. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 19:137–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hore R, Chakraborty S, Shuvon AM, Ansary MA (2020) Effect of acceleration on wrap faced reinforced soil retaining wall on soft clay by performing shaking table test. Proc Eng Technol Innov 15:24–34. https://doi.org/10.46604/peti.2020.4485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hore R, Chakraborty S, Ansary MA (2021) Seismic response of embankment on soft clay based on shaking table test. Int J Geosynth Ground Eng 7(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-020-00246-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossain MZ, Ansary MA (2018) Development of a portable traveling pluviator device and its performance to prepare uniform sand specimens. Innov Infrastruct Solut 3(1):53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang CC, Wang WC (2005) Seismic displacement charts for the performance-based assessment of reinforced soil walls. Geosynth Int 12(4):176–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang CC, Wu SH (2006) Simplified approach for assessing seismic displacements of soil retaining walls, part I: geosynthetic-reinforced modular block walls. Geosynth Int 13(6):219–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang CC, Wu SH (2007) Simplified approach for assessing seismic displacements of soil retaining walls, part II: geosynthetic-reinforced walls with rigid panel facing. Geosynth Int 14(5):264–276. https://doi.org/10.1680/gein.2007.14.5.264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang CC, Chou LH, Tatsuoka F (2003) Seismic displacements of geosynthetic-reinforced soil modular block walls. Geosynth Int 10(1):2–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Sawada K, Moriguchi S, Yashima A, Zhang F (2006) Numerical assessment of the effect of reinforcement on the performance of reinforced soil dikes. Geotext Geomembr 24(3):169–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iai S (1989) Similitude for shaking table tests on soil-structure-fluid models in 1g gravitational field. Soils Found 29(1):105–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jahanandish M, Keshavarz A (2005) Seismic bearing capacity of foundations on reinforced soil slopes. Geotext Geomembr 23(1):1–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juran I, Christopher B (1989) Laboratory model study on geosynthetic reinforced soil retaining walls. J Geotech Eng 115(7):905–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kazimierowicz-Frankowska K (2005) A case study of a geosynthetic reinforced wall with wrap-around facing. Geotext Geomembr 23(1):107–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koerner RM (1999) Designing with geosynthetics, 4th edn. Prentice Hall, NJ, p 761

    Google Scholar 

  • Koga Y, Ito Y, Washida S and Shimazu T (1988). “Seismic resistance of reinforced embankment by model shaking table tests.” Proceedings of the International Geotechnical Symposium on Theory and Practice of Earth Reinforcement, Fukuoka, Japan, pp. 413–418

  • Kokusho T (1980) Cyclic triaxial test of dynamic soil properties for wide strain range. Soils Found 20:45–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koseki J, Munaf Y, Tatsuoka F, Tateyama M, Kojima K, Sato T (1998) Shaking and tilt table tests of geosynthetic-reinforced soil and conventional-type retaining walls. Geosynth Int 5(1–2):73–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer SL, Paulsen SB (2004) Seismic performance evaluation of reinforced slopes. Geosynth Int 11(6):429–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna AM, Latha GM (2007) Seismic response of wrap-faced reinforced soil retaining wall models using shaking table tests. Geosynth Int 14(6):355–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latha GM, Krishna AM (2006) Shaking table studies on reinforced soil retaining walls. Indian Geotech J 36(4):321–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Latha GM, Krishna AM (2008) Seismic response of reinforced soil retaining wall models: influence of backfill relative density. Geotext Geomembr 26(4):335–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee KZZ, Wu JTH (2004) A synthesis of case histories on GRS bridge-supporting structures with flexible facing. Geotext Geomembr 22(4):181–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling HI, Mohri Y, Leshchinsky D, Christopher B, Matsushima K, Liu H (2005) Large-scale shaking table tests on modular-block reinforced soil retaining walls. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 131(4):465–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsuo O, Tsutsumi T, Yokoyama K, Saito Y (1998) Shaking table tests and analyses of geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls. Geosynth Int 5(1–2):97–126

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Murata O, Tateyama M, Tatsuoka F (1994) Shaking table tests on a large geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining wall model. In: Tatsuoka F, Leshchinsky D (eds) Recent Case Histories of Permanent Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Walls. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 287–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakanishi, A., and Sakaguchi, M. (1990). “Seismic behavior of reinforced embankments by geotextiles.” Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Geotextiles, Geomembranes and Related Products, The Hague, Netherlands, May, Balkema, Vol. 1, pp. 121

  • Newmark NM (1965) Effects of earthquakes on dams and embankments. Geotechnique 15(2):139–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nimbalkar SS, Choudhury D, Mandal JN (2006) Seismic stability of reinforced-soil wall by pseudo-dynamic method. Geosynth Int 13(3):111–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nouri HR, Fakher A, Jones CJFP (2006) Development of horizontal slices method in stability analysis of reinforced slopes. Geotext Geomembr 24(3):175–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nouri H, Fakher A, Jones CJFP (2008) Evaluating the effects of the magnitude and amplification of pseudo-static acceleration on reinforced soil slopes and walls using the limit equilibrium horizontal slices method. Geotext Geomembr 26(3):263–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nova-Roessig L, and Sitar N, (1999). “Centrifuge model studies of the seismic response of reinforced soil slopes.” In: Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Earthquake Geotechnical Eng., pp. 679–684

  • Palmeira EM, Gomes RC (1996) Comparisons of predicted and observed failure mechanisms in model reinforced soil walls. Geosynth Int 3(3):329–347

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perez A and Holtz RD (2004) Seismic response of reinforced steep soil slopes: results of a shaking table study. GeoTrans 2004, Proceedings of Geotechnical Engineering for Transportation Projects, 27–31 July, Los Angeles, CA, Yegian, M. K. and Kavazanjian, E., Editors, ASCE Geotechnical Special Publication No. 126, pp. 1664–1672

  • Porbaha A, Zhao A, Kobayashi M, Kishida T (2000) Upper bound estimate of scaled reinforced soil retaining walls. Geotext Geomembr 18(6):403–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramakrishnan K, Budhu M, Britto A (1998) Laboratory seismic tests on geotextile wrap-faced and geotextile-reinforced segmental retaining walls. Geosynth Int 5(1–2):55–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy GVN, Madhav MR, Reddy ES (2008) Pseudo-static seismic analysis of reinforced soil wall – effect of oblique displacement. Geotext Geomembr 26(5):393–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitherman R (2012) Earthquakes and engineers: an international history. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, pp 126–127

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson GN, Lee KL (1975) Seismic design of reinforced earth walls. J Geotech Eng Div 101(2):167–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson GN, Feger D, Fong A, Lee KL (1977) Seismic testing of reinforced earth walls. J Geotech Eng Div 103(1):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe RK, Skinner GD (2001) Numerical analysis of geosynthetic reinforced retaining wall constructed on a layered soil foundation. Geotext Geomembr 19(7):387–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabermahani M, Ghalandarzadeh A, Fakher A (2009) Experimental study on seismic deformation modes of reinforced-soil walls. Geotext Geomembr 27(2):121–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakaguchi M (1996) A study of the seismic behavior of geosynthetic reinforced walls in Japan. Geosynth Int 3(1):13–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sakaguchi, M., Muramatsu, M. and Nagura, K. (1992). A discussion on reinforced embankment structures having high earthquake resistance. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Earth Reinforcement Practice, IS-Kyushu ’92, Fukuoka, Japan, Vol. 1, pp. 287–292

  • Sakaguchi M, Yamada K and Tanaka M (1994). “Prediction of deformation of geotextile reinforced walls subjected to earthquakes.” Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Geotextiles, Geomembranes and Related Products, Singapore, September, Vol. 1, pp. 521–524

  • Shekarian S, Ghanbari A, Farhadi A (2008) New seismic parameters in the analysis of retaining walls with reinforced backfill. Technical Note Geotext Geomembr 26(4):350–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siddharthan RV, Ganeshwara V, Kutter BL, El-Desouky M, Whitman RV (2004) Seismic deformation of bar mat mechanically stabilized earth walls, II: a multi block model. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 130(1):26–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner GD, Rowe RK (2005) Design and behavior of a geosynthetic reinforced retaining wall and bridge abutment on a yielding foundation. Geotext Geomembr 23(3):234–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Srinivasan V, Srivastava S, Ghosh P (2016) Optimization and parametrical investigation to assess the reconstitution of different types of Indian sand using portable travelling pluviator. Geotech Geol Eng 34(1):59–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tatsuoka F, Tateyama M, Uchimura T, Koseki J (1997) Geosynthetic-reinforced soil retaining walls as important permanent structures. Geosynth Int 4(2):81–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Talukder A R, Hore S and Hore R (2023) A Review of Soil Chemical Properties for Bangladesh Perspective. West. Eur J Mod Exp Sci Methods 1(1):52–65

  • Viswanadham BVS, Mahajan RR (2007) Centrifuge model tests on geotextile reinforced slopes. Geosynth Int 14(6):365–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Won MS, Kim YS (2007) Internal deformation behavior of geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls. Geotext Geomembr 25(1):10–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wood J, Elms DG (1990) Seismic design of bridge abutments and retaining walls. Road and Research Unit Bulletin 84. Transit New Zealand, Wellington

  • Wood, D.M., (2004). Geotechnical modeling, version 2.2, 247 pp. (electronic copy)

  • Yoo C (2004) Performance of a 6-year-old geosynthetic-reinforced segmental retaining wall. Geotext Geomembr 22(5):377–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo C, Jung HS (2004) Measured behavior of a geosynthetic-reinforced segmental retaining wall in a tiered configuration. Geotext Geomembr 22(5):359–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu P, Richart FE (1984) Stress ratio effects on shear modulus of dry sands. J Geotech Eng 110(GT3):331–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh

    Md. Zakir Hossain

  2. APS Engineering and Testing, LA, United States

    Ripon Hore

  3. Department of Civil Engineering, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, Dhaka, Bangladesh

    Mehedi A. Ansary

Authors
  1. Md. Zakir Hossain
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ripon Hore
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mehedi A. Ansary
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ripon Hore.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Murat Karakus

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hossain, M.Z., Hore, R. & Ansary, M.A. Model tests of reinforced soil retaining sand walls by shaking table test. Arab J Geosci 17, 166 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-024-11965-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-024-11965-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation