Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A geology and geomorphology–based decision matrix methodology for route determination of new roads

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Selection of the most appropriate route for new roads is of great importance not only from road planning or construction cost points of view, but also from the aspect of geology and geomorphology. In the present study, a novel geology and geomorphology–based decision method for route selection is introduced as an alternative to the classical approach that considers only the minimum cost. In this context, five different routes are determined and evaluated, which connected the new Istanbul Airport to Fatih Sultan Mehmet Bridge, the second intercontinental bridge of crossing the Bosphorus. For the final decision of the best route, the classical solution that considered only the minimum construction cost for infrastructure is compared with that obtained via the newly introduced Geological and Geomorphological Conformity Matrix (GeoGCoM). With this new approach, the potential cases that can be encountered throughout the design lifetime of the route are considered, and as such, the optimum route that would provide the most economical solution in the long term can be determined. Results verified that the one of the best two alternatives found from the GeoGCoM (with weighing factors of 0.8439 and 0.8437) is also the alternative with the least construction cost, which costs 7% less compared to the nearest option. Although GeoGCoM is not meant to replace the cost comparison of alternatives, it is shown to be an effective novel method to satisfactorily account for the geological/geomorphological aspects of different route alternatives, which may not be revealed by cost estimations. Therefore, GeoGCoM assessment is suggested as a complementary analysis to classical cost estimation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data can be provided by the authors upon request.

References

  • AASHTO (2001) A policy on geometric design of highways and streets, American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington

  • AECOM (2013) Environmental and Social Impact Assessment Report for the North Marmara Highway, Final Report AECOM-TR-R599–01–00 (in Turkish), Istanbul

  • Arabameri A, Rezaei K, Cerdà A, Conoscenti C, Kalantari Z (2019) A comparison of statistical methods and multi-criteria decision making to map flood hazard susceptibility in Northern Iran. Sci Total Environ 660:443–458

  • Azarafza M, Ghazifard A, Akgün H, Asghari-Kaljahi E (2018) Landslide susceptibility assessment of South Pars Special Zone, southwest Iran. Environ Earth Sci 77(24):1–29

  • Bababeik M, Monajjem MS (2012) Optimizing longitudinal alignment in railway with regard to construction and operating costs. J Transpor Eng 138(11):1388–1395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brauers WKM, Zavadskas EK, Peldschus F, Turskis Z (2008) Multi-objective decision-making for road design. Transport 23(3):183–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çalışkan U (2007) Drainage systems of highways and hydraulic design principles (in Turkish). MSc Dissertation, Istanbul Technical University

  • De Smith MJ (2006) Determination of gradient and curvature constrained optimal paths. Comput-Aided Civ Inf 21(1):24–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easa SM (1988) Selection of roadway grades that minimize earthwork cost using linear programming. Transp Res Part A General 22(2):121–136

  • Erguvanlı K (2016) Engineering geology, (in Turkish), TMMOB Publications, Ankara, p 589

  • Eyüboğlu R (1997) Investigation of hillslope stability between Harşit Valley Doğankent and Yurtköyü (in Turkish). PhD Dissertation, Istanbul Technical University

  • Fwa T, Chan W, Sim Y (2002) Optimal vertical alignment analysis for highway design. J Transport Eng 128(5):395–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goh CJ, Chew EP, Fwa TF (1988) Discrete and continuous models for computation of optimal vertical highway alignment.Transp Res Part B Methodol 22(6):399–409

  • Hearn GJ (2019) Geomorphology in engineering geological mapping and modelling. B En Geol Environ 78(2):723–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Highways England (2015a) Kent corridor to M25 Route Strategy (Vision Document). London, UK

  • Highways England (2015b) Route strategies: Our high-level approach to informing future investment on roads (Vision Document). London, UK

  • Hong H, Shahabi H, Shirzadi A, Chen W, Chapi K, Ahmad BB, Tien Bui D (2019) Landslide susceptibility assessment at the Wuning area, China: a comparison between multi-criteria decision making, bivariate statistical and machine learning methods. Natural Hazards 96(1):173–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang RQ, Li YR, Qu K, Wang K (2013) Engineering geological assessment for route selection of railway line in geologically active area: a case study in China. J Mountain Sci 10(4):495–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IBB (2007) Environmental plan report of Istanbul in 1/100.000 scale, Part III. Report published by Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality (in Turkish). Istanbul, Turkey

  • Jansen JD, Nanson GC (2010) Functional relationships between vegetation, channel morphology, and flow efficiency in an alluvial (anabranching) river. J Geophys Res 115:F4

  • Jha MK, Schonfeld P (2004) A highway alignment optimization model using geographic information systems. Transport Res A-Pol 38(6):455–481

    Google Scholar 

  • Jong JC, Schonfeld P (2003) An evolutionary model for simultaneously optimizing three-dimensional highway alignments. Transport Res B-Meth 37(2):107–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jong JC, Jha MK, Schonfeld P (2000) Preliminary highway design with genetic algorithms and geographic information systems. Comput-Aided Civ Inf 15(4):261–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • KGM (2013) Technical specifications for roads. Published by Turkish General Directorate of Highways (KGM), Ankara

  • KGM (2014) Road design handbook. Published by Turkish General Directorate of Highways (KGM), Ankara

  • Li W, Pu H, Schonfeld P, Song Z, Zhang H, Wang L, Peng X, Peng L (2019) A method for automatically recreating the horizontal alignment geometry of existing railways. Comput-Aided Civ Inf 34:71–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mallick J, Singh RK, AlAwadh MA, Islam S, Khan RA, Qureshi MN (2018) GIS-based landslide susceptibility evaluation using fuzzy-AHP multi-criteria decision-making techniques in the Abha Watershed. Saudi Arabia Environ Earth Sci 77(7):1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Marković L, Cvetković M, Marković LM (2013) Multi-Criteria decision-making when choosing variant solution of highway route at the level of preliminary design. Facta Univ Arch Civil Eng Series 11:174–176

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy D (2006) Essentials of soil mechanics and foundations: basic geotechnics. Pretince Hall, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirdda HA, Bera S, Siddiqui MA, Singh B (2020) Analysis of bi-variate statistical and multi-criteria decision-making models in landslide susceptibility mapping in lower Mandakini Valley, India. GeoJ 85(3):681–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moharrami M, Naboureh A, Gudiyangada Nachappa T, Ghorbanzadeh O, Guan X, Blaschke T (2020) National-scale landslide susceptibility mapping in Austria using fuzzy best-worst multi-criteria decision-making. ISPRS Int J Geoinform 9(6):393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery D (1994) Road surface drainage, channel initiation, and slope instability. Water Resour Res 30(6):25–32

  • Nanehkaran YA, Mao Y, Azarafza M, Kockar MK, Zhu HH (2021) Fuzzy-based multiple decision method for landslide susceptibility and hazard assessment: a case study of Tabriz. Iran Geomech Eng 24(5):407–418

    Google Scholar 

  • NPRA (2005) Impact assessment of road transport projects. Summary booklet of “Handbook 140- Impact Assessment” published by Norwegian Public Roads Administration (NPRA). Oslo, Norway

  • Okalp K, Akgün H (2016) National level landslide susceptibility assessment of Turkey utilizing public domain dataset. Environment and Earth Science 75(9):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okalp K, Akgün H (2022) Landslide susceptibility assessment in medium-scale: case studies from the major drainage basins of Turkey. Environment and Earth Science 81(8):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Özaydın K, Yıldırım M (2000) Soil conditions and geotechnical problems of Istanbul (in Turkish). Proc. 2nd Symposium on Istanbul and Earthquake, Istanbul, pp 25–52

  • Özgül N (2011) Geology of Istanbul province (in Turkish), Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality Publications, Istanbul

  • Özgül N (2012) Stratigraphy and some structural features of the Istanbul Paleozoic. Turkish J Earth Sci 21:817–866

    Google Scholar 

  • Özgül N, Üner K, Bilgin İ, Korkmaz R, Özcan İ, Akmeşe İ, Yıldız Z, Yıldırım Ü, Akdağ Ö, Tekin M (2005) General geological characteristics of Istanbul province (in Turkish), Report published by Istanbul Metropolitan Municipality, Earthquake and Soil Investigation Directorate, Istanbul

  • Öztürk O, Bozkurtoğlu E (2018) Influence of geomorphology on infrastructure cost of roads (in Turkish). El Cezeri Sci Eng 5(2):298–309

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahimi S, Hafezalkotob A, Monavari SM, Hafezalkotob A, Rahimi R (2020) Sustainable landfill site selection for municipal solid waste based on a hybrid decision-making approach: fuzzy group BWM-MULTIMOORA-GIS. J Clean Prod 248:119186

  • Rahman SA, Dowell P, Sallman D, Dzakwasi E (2012) Norwegian road network strategic assessment: re-examining the estimation of costs and benefits of investments in road transport in Norway, Final Report. Prepared by Cambridge Systematics for Norwegian Road Federation. Oslo, Norway

  • Road Bureau Japan (2014) White paper on traffic safety in Japan 2014. Chp.1 Land Transport. Osaka, Japan. https://www8.cao.go.jp/koutu/taisaku/h26kou_haku/english/pdf/1_t1.pdf

  • Ruiz A, Guevara J (2020) Sustainable decision-making in road development: Analysis of road preservation policies. Sustainability-Basel 12(3):872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song Y, Thatcher D, Li Q, McHugh T, Wu P (2021) Developing sustainable road infrastructure performance indicators using a model-driven fuzzy spatial multi-criteria decision-making method.  Renew Sustain Energy Rev 138:110538

  • Tunalıoğlu N, Soycan M (2012) An alternative approach based on angle and distance in horizontal route design. Sigma J Eng Natural Sci 30:193–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Tunç A (2002) Geotechnics in road engineering and applications (in Turkish). Atlas Publications, Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulusay R (2010) Applied geotechnical sciences (in Turkish), 5th edn. Turkish Chamber of Geological Engineers, Publication No:38, Ankara

  • Yal GP, Akgün H (2013) Landfill site selection and landfill liner design for Ankara, Turkey. Environment and Earth Science 70(6):2729–2752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yal GP, Akgün H (2014) Landfill site selection utilizing TOPSIS methodology and clay liner geotechnical characterization: a case study for Ankara, Turkey. B Eng Geol Environ 73(2):369–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yıldırım M, Kutay Ö, Erguvanlı A (1992) Geological structure and geotechnical characteristics of south of Bosphorus and Haliç (in Turkish). TMMOB Publications, Istanbul, pp 5–14

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This article is prepared from the findings of the PhD study of the first author.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veysel Sadan Ozgur Kirca.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Zeynal Abiddin Erguler

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Öztürk, O., Bozkurtoğlu, E. & Kirca, V.S.O. A geology and geomorphology–based decision matrix methodology for route determination of new roads. Arab J Geosci 16, 434 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-023-11542-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-023-11542-7

Keywords

Navigation