Skip to main content
Log in

Simulation study on the influence of the number of bridge piers on the flow regime of the lower Yellow River

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The construction of wading piers can modify the water flow characteristics of the river, and the quantity of piers is one of the significant influencing factors. Development of numerical simulation study of various numbers of piers on river flow patterns has significant and profound relevance to river flooding and river stability. A GIS-based Mike21 hydrodynamic model of the lower Yellow River is constructed and applied to the two-dimensional hydrodynamic numerical simulation of the lower Yellow River cross-river bridge section. The effect of the number of bridge piers on the flow regime at different flows is studied, and the mechanisms of changes in flow field, congestion height, and velocity are analyzed. The results suggested that with the growth of the number of piers, the congestion height in front of the bridge increased, but the increase gradually decreased, dropping by 2.22% overall. The average flow rate in front of the bridge has declined, with a gradual reduction of 2.01%. The range of flow field changes gradually expanded; however, the speed of increase in the influence range reduced by 11.85%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Data cannot be made publicly available; readers should contact the corresponding author for details.

References

  • Ahn J, Na Y, Park SW (2019) Development of two-dimensional inundation modelling process using MIKE21 model. KSCE J Civ Eng 23(9):3968–3977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates PD, Horritt MS, Hervouet JM (2015) Investigating two-dimensional, finite element predictions of floodplain inundation using fractal generated topography. Hydrol Process 12(8):1257–1277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang D, Chen X (2017) Comparative analysis of calculation results of river backwater under different pier generalization methods based on MIKE21 two-dimensional numerical simulation. Water Conservancy Sci Technol Econ 23(02):29–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Feng P (2021) Risk assessment of urban floods based on a SWMM-MIKE21-coupled model using GF-2 data. Remote Sens 13, https://doi.org/10.3390/rs13214381

  • Guan M, Li Q, Zhu J et al (2019) A method of establishing an instantaneous water level model for tide correction. Ocean Eng 171:324–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan O, Morgan K, Probert EJ (2015) Unstructured tetrahedral mesh generation for three-dimensional viscous flows. Int J Numer Meth Eng 39(4):549–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt J, Brunner GW, Larock BE (1997) Flow transitions in bridge backwater analysis. J Hydraul Eng 125(9):981–983

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ji Z, Zhang F, Sun Y (2013) Numerical simulation of two-dimensional water flow at the bridge crossing in the plain river network area. Eng J Heilongjiang Univ 4(01):17–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu X, Geng P, Cao L, Sun X (2020) Mike21 simulates the influence of cross-river bridges on river regimes. People’s Yellow River 42(S1):24–25+29

    Google Scholar 

  • Luigia B, Martha KW (2013) Uncertainty in the estimation of backwater effects at bridge crossings. Hydrol Process 27(9):1292–1300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pappenberger F, Matgen P, Beven KJ (2006) Influence of uncertain boundary conditions and model structure on flood inundation predictions. Adv Water Resour 29(10):1430–1449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ren M, Xu Z, Su G (2017) Calculation and comparative analysis of bridge backwater based on two-dimensional hydrodynamic model and empirical formula. J Hydroelectr Eng 36(05):78–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Selahattin K (2014) Prediction of backwater profiles due to bridges in a compound channel using CFD. Adv Mech Eng 6:905217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun D, Jin G, Li X, Chen J (2009) Study on the application of MIKE21 in flood routing of the lower Yellow River. People’s Yellow River 31(11):27–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Ti Z, Zhang M, Li Y et al (2019) Numerical study on the stochastic response of a long-span sea-crossing bridge subjected to extreme nonlinear wave loads. Eng Struct 196(OCT.1):109287.1-1092871.3

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang L (2007) One-dimensional and two-dimensional numerical simulation of rivers with MIKE. Dalian University of Technology

  • Wang G (2016) Research on the application of two-dimensional hydrodynamic model in the flood control impact assessment of Laohahe railway bridge. Jilin University 2016(9):96

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Q, Peng W, Dong F, Liu X, Ou N (2020) Simulating flow of an urban river course with complex cross sections based on the MIKE21 FM model. Water 12(3):761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu T (2010) Summary and application examples of Denmark MIKE21 model. Water Conservancy Sci Technol Econ 16(08):867–869

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong H, Chen L, Sun Z (2021) The impacts of piers on oil spill transport in a typical reach of the Middle Yangtze River. Water Sci Technol Water Supply. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2021.080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang L, Li J, Kang A et al (2020) The effect of nonstationarity in rainfall on urban flooding based on coupling SWMM and MIKE21. Water Resour Manag 34:1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan X, Xu D (2006) Study on the application of Denmark’s MIKE21 model in the calculation of bridge crossing backwater. People’s Yangtze River 04:31–32+52

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X, Wang T, Lu X (2021) Influence of bridge piers shapes on the flow of the lower Yellow River. Water Pract Technol 16(2):661–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuo J, Zhang HX, Deng S et al (2020) Analysis of influence of mesh partition on Mike21 calculation in flood impact assessment. IOP Conf Ser: Earth Environ Sci 612(1):012060 (7pp)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the Key Scientific Research Project of Colleges and Universities in Henan Province (CN) [grant numbers 17A570004] for the collection, analysis and interpretation of data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yaohui Lu or Xilong Wu.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Broder J. Merkel

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, X., Lu, Y., Wu, X. et al. Simulation study on the influence of the number of bridge piers on the flow regime of the lower Yellow River. Arab J Geosci 16, 115 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-023-11197-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-023-11197-4

Keywords

Navigation