Abstract
In the present study, simulation of groundwater resources of the Zanjan Plain aquifer located in the western part of Iran was done using the GMS 7.1 software to evaluate groundwater table changes and the concentration of physicochemical parameters. A new comprehension about groundwater quality changes was considered by evaluating the effects of size and sediment granulation as a hydrogeological factor on groundwater resources. Therefore, over a period of 3 years, between 2009 and 2012, a MODFLOW model was calibrated and hydrodynamic parameters were extracted that indicated higher hydraulic conductivity values in foothill areas due to coarse-grained alluvial materials as well as the effect of runoff within the Zanjan city on greater amount of recharge rate. The calculated flow budget also showed that from 2009 to 2012, on average, approximately 210 MCM of water resources decreased in the Zanjan aquifer every year. The results of the sensitivity analysis indicated that the changes in the recharge rate affected the model mostly. From 2012 to 2018, the process of validation was done and revealed that in the southeastern part of the aquifer the groundwater table diminished significantly due to the higher density of irrigated agricultural lands. The results of the MT3DMS model showed that although the amount of electrical conductivity (EC) and total hardness (TH) decreased during the period, the groundwater quality in the central and northwestern areas of the plain was still unsuitable. Additionally, the assessment of the changes in the amount of the mentioned parameters in comparison to the changes in groundwater level and the annual rainfall showed that because of coarse-grained alluvial sediments, groundwater quality was at the highest level in the foothill regions and deteriorated in the terrace areas of the aquifer due to greater dissolution of the fine-grained sediments, and in that the thalweg area of the plain, the groundwater quality increased because of the fine-grained sediments scour due to the Zanjanrood river.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
Notes
\(ME=\frac{1}{n}\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}\left({GWL}_{\mathrm{sim}}-{GWL}_{\mathrm{obs}}\right)\)
\(MAE=\frac{1}{n}\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}\left|{GWL}_{\mathrm{sim}}-{GWL}_{\mathrm{obs}}\right|\)
\(RMSE=\sqrt{\sum\limits_{i=1}^{n}\frac{{\left({GWL}_{\mathrm{obs}}-{GWL}_{\mathrm{sim}}\right)}^{2}}{n}}\)
References
Alattar MH, Troy TJ, Russo TA, Boyce SE (2020) Modeling the surface water and groundwater budgets of the US using MODFLOW-OWHM. Adv Water Resour 143:103682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2020.103682
Aryafar A, Khosravi V, Karami S (2020) Groundwater quality assessment of Birjand plain aquifer using kriging estimation and sequential Gaussian simulation methods. Environ Earth Sci 79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-08905-8
Bhakar P, Singh AP (2019) Groundwater quality assessment in a hyper-arid region of Rajasthan, India. Nat Resour Res 28:505–522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-018-9405-4
Chakraborty S, Maity PK, Das S (2020) Investigation, simulation, identification and prediction of groundwater levels in coastal areas of Purba Midnapur, India, using MODFLOW. Environ Dev Sustain 22:3805–3837. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-019-00344-1
De Graaf IEM, Van Beek LPH, Wada Y, Bierkens MFP (2014) Dynamic attribution of global water demand to surface water and groundwater resources: effects of abstractions and return flows on river discharges. Adv Water Resour 64:21–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2013.12.002
Deng C, Bailey R (2019) A modeling approach for assessing groundwater resources of a large coral island under future climate and population conditions: Gan Island. Maldives Water 11:1963. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11101963
Ebrahimi M, Kazemi H, Ehtashemi M, Rockaway TD (2016) Assessment of groundwater quantity and quality and saltwater intrusion in the Damghan basin Iran. Geochemistry 76:227–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemer.2016.04.003
Ehtiat M, Mousavi SJ, Srinivasan R (2018) Groundwater modeling under variable operating conditions using SWAT, MODFLOW and MT3DMS: a catchment scale approach to water resources management. Water Resour Manag 32:1631–1649. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-017-1895-z
El Baba M, Kayastha P, Huysmans M, De Smedt F (2020) Evaluation of the groundwater quality using the water quality index and geostatistical analysis in the Dier al-Balah Governorate, Gaza Strip. Palestine Water 12:262. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12010262
Gosses M, Nowak W, Wöhling T (2018) Explicit treatment for Dirichlet, Neumann and Cauchy boundary conditions in POD-based reduction of groundwater models. Adv Water Resour 115:160–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2018.03.011
ISIRI (2009) Drinking water - physical and chemical specification 1053 5th.Revision
Jabbari E, Fathi M, Moradi M (2020) Modeling groundwater quality and quantity to manage water resources in the Arak aquifer Iran. Arab J Geosci 13:1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05681-4
Jafari H, Raeisi E, Zare M, Haghighi AAK (2012) Time series analysis of irrigation return flow in a semi-arid agricultural region Iran. Arch Agron Soil Sci 58:673–689. https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2010.535204
Karimi L, Motagh M, Entezam I (2019) Modeling groundwater level fluctuations in Tehran aquifer: results from a 3D unconfined aquifer model. Groundw Sustain Dev 8:439–449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2019.01.003
Kheirandish M, Rahimi H, Kamaliardakani M, Salim R (2020) Obtaining the effect of sewage network on groundwater quality using MT3DMS code: case study on Bojnourd plain. Groundw Sustain Dev 11:100439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2020.100439
Lautz LK, Siegel DI (2006) Modeling surface and ground water mixing in the hyporheic zone using MODFLOW and MT3D. Adv Water Resour 29:1618–1633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.12.003
Malekzadeh M, Kardar S, Shabanlou S (2019) Simulation of groundwater level using MODFLOW, extreme learning machine and wavelet-extreme learning machine models. Groundw Sustain Dev 9:100279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2019.100279
Mohammadi Arasteh S, Shoaei SM (2020) An assessment of the effects of excessive groundwater abstraction on the quality of groundwater resources of the Zanjan Plain, Iran. Environ Earth Sci 79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-020-09268-w
Nabatian G, Ghaderi M, Corfu F et al (2014) Geology, alteration, age, and origin of iron oxide–apatite deposits in upper Eocene quartz monzonite, Zanjan district, NW Iran. Miner Depos 49:217–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00126-013-0484-1
Najafi Saleh H, Valipoor S, Zarei A et al (2020) Assessment of groundwater quality around municipal solid waste landfill by using water quality index for groundwater resources and multivariate statistical technique: a case study of the landfill site, Qaem Shahr City Iran. Environ Geochem Health 42:1305–1319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-019-00417-0
Obeidavi S, Gandomkar M, Akbarizadeh G, Delfan H (2021) Evaluation of groundwater potential using Dempster-Shafer model and sensitivity analysis of effective factors: a case study of north Khuzestan province. Remote Sens Appl Soc Environ 22:100475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2021.100475
Panahi M, Misagi F, Asgari P (2018) Simulation and estimate groundwater level fluctuations using GMS (Zanjan plain). Environ Sci 16:1–14
Pétré M-A, Rivera A, Lefebvre R (2019) Numerical modeling of a regional groundwater flow system to assess groundwater storage loss, capture and sustainable exploitation of the transboundary Milk River Aquifer (Canada–USA). J Hydrol 575:656–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.05.057
Phi TH, Strokova LA (2015) Prediction maps of land subsidence caused by groundwater exploitation in Hanoi Vietnam. Resour Technol 1:80–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reffit.2015.09.001
Qiu S, Liang X, Xiao C et al (2015) Numerical simulation of groundwater flow in a river valley basin in Jilin urban area, China. Water 7:5768–5787. https://doi.org/10.3390/w7105768
Rao NS (2020) Spatial distribution of quality of groundwater and probabilistic non-carcinogenic risk from a rural dry climatic region of South India. Environ Geochem Health 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-020-00621-3
Rezaei A, Hassani H, Tziritis E, et al (2020) Hydrochemical characterization and evaluation of groundwater quality in Dalgan basin, SE Iran. Groundw Sustain Dev 100353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2020.100353
Saha P, Paul B (2019) Groundwater quality assessment in an industrial hotspot through interdisciplinary techniques. Environ Monit Assess 191:326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-019-7418-z
Sahoo S, Jha MK (2017) Numerical groundwater-flow modeling to evaluate potential effects of pumping and recharge: implications for sustainable groundwater management in the Mahanadi delta region, India. Hydrogeol J 25:2489–2511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-017-1610-4
Sathe SS, Mahanta C (2019) Groundwater flow and arsenic contamination transport modeling for a multi aquifer terrain: assessment and mitigation strategies. J Environ Manage 231:166–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.057
Shakerkhatibi M, Mosaferi M, Pourakbar M et al (2019) Comprehensive investigation of groundwater quality in the north-west of Iran: physicochemical and heavy metal analysis. Groundw Sustain Dev 8:156–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2018.10.006
Shi F, Zhao C, Zhao X et al (2021) Spatial variability of the groundwater exploitation potential in an arid alluvial-diluvial plain using GIS-based Dempster-Shafer theory. Quat Int 571:127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2020.10.055
Singh AP, Bhakar P (2021) Development of groundwater sustainability index: a case study of western arid region of Rajasthan, India. Environ Dev Sustain 23:1844–1868. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00654-9
Taherian P, Ansari H, Davari K et al (2021) Modeling the groundwater quality (salinity) variations in Neyshabour plain using MODFLOW and MT3DMS. Iran J Irrig Drain 15:27–37
Udeshani WAC, Dissanayake H, Gunatilake SK, Chandrajith R (2020) Assessment of groundwater quality using water quality index (WQI): a case study of a hard rock terrain in Sri Lanka. Groundw Sustain Dev 100421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2020.100421
Valivand F, Katibeh H (2020) Prediction of nitrate distribution process in the groundwater via 3D modeling. Environ Model Assess 25:187–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-019-09671-z
WHO (2022) Guidelines for drinking-water quality, fourth , ed. Geneva, Switzerland
Yidana SM, Chegbeleh LP (2013) The hydraulic conductivity field and groundwater flow in the unconfined aquifer system of the Keta Strip, Ghana. J African Earth Sci 86:45–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jafrearsci.2013.06.009
Acknowledgements
The authors would like to appreciate the experts of the Zanjan Regional Water Company for providing the data required for this project.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Saeed Mohammadi Arasteh: methodology, data curation, software, writing (original draft), investigation, and analysis. Seyyed Mohammad Shoaei: methodology, conceptualization, material preparation, reviewing and editing, supervision, and validation.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Broder J. Merkel
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Mohammadi Arasteh, S., Shoaei, S.M. Simulation of groundwater resource quantity and quality and assessment of the effects of alluvial material dissolution on the changes of qualitative parameters of the Zanjan Plain, Iran. Arab J Geosci 16, 60 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-11129-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-11129-8