Abstract
To promote hydraulic refracturing, plugging hydraulic fractures through forming artificial barriers with temporary plugging agent (TP) as an effective method has been widely used. Innumerable researches have been carried out on the process, mechanism, and influence factors of hydraulic fractures plugging. Despite great achievements, the fluid infiltration velocity, as an essential parameter in the transient solution of plugging process, still needs to be obtained by experiments in view of the variation of fluid infiltration, which is unfavorable to efficiency and economy. To solve this problem, in this work, the plugging process of hydraulic fractures of tight sandstone reservoirs was comprehensively analyzed and divided into two parts: fluid infiltration and TP accretion. Specifically, for the fluid infiltration part, the variation of fluid pressure with porosity was realized by modified Richards equation; for the TP accretion part, the governing equation was derived based on convection–diffusion equation. These two parts were coupled by fluid infiltration velocity and artificial barrier porosity, and a new model for plugging hydraulic fractures of tight sandstone reservoirs was proposed. To verify the accuracy of the model, we poured artificial analogue rock samples (AARS) with hydraulic fractures according to physical and mechanical parameters of 1832.5-m-deep tight sandstone reservoir in Shengli Oilfield, China, and carried out plugging experiments. In particular, the new model that is based on numerical calculations provides a more efficient and cost-effective way of obtaining fluid infiltration velocity in comparison with the traditional plugging experiments. After validation, we investigated the effect of TP concentration, injection pressure, and fluid viscosity commonly used in oilfield plugging operation on the plugging effect including plugging efficiency and pressure bearing capacity for hydraulic fractures in the oilfield scale. The results show that TP accretion in hydraulic fractures determines the plugging effect which is closely related to fluid infiltration when TP density is close to the fluid density. Fluid viscosity influences both plugging efficiency and pressure bearing capacity, and they are affected by TP concentration and injection pressure, respectively. The findings contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of the plugging mechanism of hydraulic fractures of tight sandstone reservoirs and the optimization of plugging operation parameters in the oilfield.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- (a,b,c):
-
Mesh number
- BTS:
-
Brazilian tensile strength (MPa)
- C :
-
Fluid capacity (Pa−1)
- d, d 0, d M :
-
Propagation distance of injection pressure in AARS along the Fl and that at plugging beginning/M point (m)
- D, D ii, D ij :
-
Hydrodynamic dispersion tensor and its diagonal entries/cross-terms (m2/s)
- D m :
-
Diffusion coefficient (m2/s)
- d r, d rI, d r II :
-
Average variation rate of d and that of part I/part II (m/s)
- E :
-
Young’s modulus (GPa)
- F l, F w, F h :
-
Length/width/height of hydraulic fracture (m)
- g :
-
Acceleration of gravity (m/s2)
- G´x ( a , b , c ), G´y ( a , b , c ), G´z ( a , b , c ) :
-
Distance gradient variation
- Gx ( a , b , c ), Gy ( a , b , c ), Gz ( a , b , c ) :
-
Distance gradient between fine mesh and hydraulic fracture along x, y, z
- h :
-
Pressure head (m)
- k, k ar :
-
Permeability of reservoir/AARS and that of artificial barrier at plugging completion (m2)
- K :
-
Relative hydraulic conductivity
- L d :
-
Distance between the fine mesh and hydraulic fracture
- L e :
-
Edge length of AARS (m)
- n, n r, n ar :
-
Porosity of artificial barrier and that of reservoir/AARS (initial value) and that of artificial barrier at plugging completion (final value)
- n :
-
Unit normal vector
- p, p 1, p 2, p 3, p a, p p, p r :
-
Fluid pressure, starting pressure, pseudo-starting pressure, critical pressure, injection pressure, pore pressure, residual fluid pressure (Pa)
- PS:
-
Porosity size (μm)
- R L :
-
Diffusion of TP with size smaller than reservoir pores with fluid in reservoir pores per unit time (s−1)
- R P :
-
TP accretion on reservoir particles per unit time (s−1)
- S :
-
Fluid storage coefficient (Pa−1)
- S C :
-
TP embedded in reservoir matrix per unit time (s−1)
- S e :
-
Coefficient of pore variation
- t, t n, t M :
-
Plugging time, completion time, and M point time (s)
- UCS:
-
Uniaxial compressive strength (MPa)
- v, v ar, v r, v 0, v M :
-
Fluid infiltration velocity that in artificial barrier/reservoir and that at plugging beginning/M point (m/s)
- v r, v rI, v r II :
-
Average variation rate of v and that of part I/part II (m/s2)
- β, β 1, β 2 :
-
Dispersivity and longitudinal/transverse dispersivities (m)
- δ, ε, ζ :
-
Constants that specify the type of medium
- Δx, Δy, Δz :
-
Size of fine mesh
- Δx 0, Δy 0, Δz 0 :
-
Size of coarse mesh
- η :
-
Poisson’s ratio
- λ, λ TP, λ TP M, λ TP n :
-
TP concentration and TP concentration of artificial barrier and that at M point/plugging completion
- λ p :
-
Mass of accreted TP per unit weight of reservoir (mg/kg)
- λ TPr, λ TP rI, λ TP r II :
-
Average variation rate of λTP and that of part I/part II (s−1)
- μ :
-
Fluid viscosity (Pa·s)
- ρ, ρ TP, ρ b :
-
Density of fluid and TP, bulk density of reservoir/AARS (kg/m3)
- τ :
-
Tortuosity coefficient
- ψ :
-
Fluid content
- ω, ω max :
-
Division level of mesh size and its maximum
References
Al-Otoom A (2005) Prediction of the collection efficiency, the porosity, and the pressure drop across filter cakes in particulate air filtration. Atmos Environ 39(1):51–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2004.09.057
Andersen NPR, Christensen ML, Keiding K (2004) New approach to determining consolidation coefficients using cake-filtration experiments. Powder Technol 142:98–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2004.03.015
Biao FJ, Liu H, Zhang ZC, Zhang J, Wang XX (2011) A numerical study of parameter influences on horizontal hydraulic fracture. Eng Mech 28(10):228–235
Cao Y, Ye YT, Liang LL, Zhao HL, Jiang YZ, Wang H (2019) High efficient and accurate simulation of pollutant transport in torrential flow based on adaptive grid method. J Hydraul Eng 50(3):388–398
Cheng WM, Liu Z, Yang H, Wang WY (2018) Non-linear seepage characteristics and influential factors of water injection in gassy seams. Exp Thermal Fluid Sci 91:41–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2017.10.002
Chung ET, Kalachikova U, Vasilyeva M, Alekseev V (2022) Generalized multiscale discontinuous Galerkin method for convection–diffusion equation in perforated media. Math Comput Simul 193:666–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matcom.2021.11.001
Cipolla CL, Warpinski NR, Mayerhofer MJ, Lolon EP, Vincent MC (2010) The relationship between fracture complexity, reservoir properties, and fracture treatment design. SPE Prod Oper 25(4):438–452. https://doi.org/10.2118/115769-MS
Dejam M, Hassanzadeh H, Chen ZX (2018) Semi-analytical solution for pressure transient analysis of a hydraulically fractured vertical well in a bounded dual-porosity reservoir. J Hydrol 565:289–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.08.020
Feng ZY, Fan YP, Dong XS, Ma XM, Chen RX (2021) Permeability estimation in filter cake based on X-ray microtomography and Lattice Boltzmann method. Sep Purif Technol 275:119114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2021.119114
Gong YW, Mehana M, El-Monier I, Viswanathan H (2020) Proppant placement in complex fracture geometries: a computational fluid dynamics study. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 79:103295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103295
Gu WB, Pei YB, Zhao AJ, Wang T, Cai J, Wu KK (2017) Application of artificial barrier technology to fracture height control in fracturing wells. Oil Drilling and Production Technology 39(5):646–651
Guo TK, Tang SJ, Liu S, Liu XQ, Xu JC, Qi N, Rui ZH (2021) Physical simulation of hydraulic fracturing of large-sized tight sandstone outcrops. SPE J 26(01):372–393. https://doi.org/10.2118/204210-pa
He L, Mei HY, Hu XR, Dejam M, Kou ZH, Zhang ML (2019) Advanced flowing material balance to determine original gas-in-place of shale gas considering adsorption hysteresis. SPE Reservoir Eval Eng 22(4):1282–1291. https://doi.org/10.2118/195581-PA
Hou JM, Wang JH, Tong Y, Zhang ZA, Guo MP, Su F, Gao XJ (2021) High-efficient and high-precision flood process simulation based on the non-uniform grid. Adv Eng Sci 53(4):53–62
Hou JM, Wang R, Liang QH, Li ZB, Huang MS, Hinkelmann R (2018) Efficient surface water flow simulation on static Cartesian grid with local refinement according to key topographic features. Comput Fluids 176:117–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compfluid.2018.03.024
Hu XD, Wu K, Song XZ, Yu W, Tang JZ, Li GS, Shen ZH (2018) A new model for simulating particle transport in a low-viscosity fluid for fluid-driven fracturing. AIChE J 64(9):3542–3552. https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.16183
Hu YQ, Zhao JZ, Lin T (2012) Hydraulic fracture height growth containment by artificial barrier: experimental studies. Advanced Materials Research 396–398:2420–2423. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/amr.396-398.2420
Jiang WD, Liu H, Yan J, Liang C, He AL, Zhang HW, Zhu DW (2015) A novel fiber temporary plugging and diverting acid fracturing technology: an experimental study and field practices. Nat Gas Ind 35(11):54–59
Kong FQ, Liu FP, Zhang Y, Yang CC (2003) Adaptive nonuniform grid Dagan’s upscaling method of fluid equation in porous media. Chinese J Appl Mech 20(3):15–20
Li CM, Hu YQ (2013) Simulation of hydraulical fracture height by creating artificial barrier. Adv Mater Res 734–737:1262–1267. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.734-737.1262
Li W, Zhao H, Pu H, Zhang YG, Wang L, Zhang LG, Sun XF (2019) Study on the mechanisms of refracturing technology featuring temporary plug for fracturing fluid diversion in tight sandstone reservoirs. Energy Sci Eng 7(1):88–97. https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.259
Liu K, Zhao Y, Jia LY, Hao RL, Fu D (2019) A novel CFD-based method for predicting pressure drop and dust cake distribution of ceramic filter during filtration process at macro-scale. Power Technology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.05.014
Mualem Y (1976) A new model for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated porous media. Water Resour Res 12(3):513–522. https://doi.org/10.1029/wr012i003p00513
Raimbay A, Babadagli T, Kuru E, Develi K (2016) Quantitative and visual analysis of proppant transport in rough fractures. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 33:1291–1307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.06.040
Richards LA (1931) Capillary conduction of liquids through porous mediums. J Appl Phys 1(5):318–333. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1745010
Ross PJ (1990) Efficient numerical methods for infiltration using Richards’ equation. Water Resour Res 26(2):279–290. https://doi.org/10.1029/wr026i002p00279
Sayevand K, Machado JT, Masti I (2022) Analysis of dual Bernstein operators in the solution of the fractional convection–diffusion equation arising in underground water pollution. J Comput Appl Math 399:113729. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2021.113729
Shi X, Zhang WD, Xu HX, Xiao CY, Jiang, S (2020) Experimental study of hydraulic fracture initiation and propagation in unconsolidated sand with the injection of temporary plugging agent. J Pet Sci Eng 106813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106813
Shimizu H, Murata S, Ishida T (2011) The distinct element analysis for hydraulic fracturing in hard rock considering fluid viscosity and particle size distribution. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 48:712–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.04.013
Suri Y, Islam SZ, Hossain M (2019) A new CFD approach for proppant transport in unconventional hydraulic fractures. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 70:102951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2019.102951
Tan P, Jin Y, Han K, Hou B, Chen M, Guo XF, Gao J (2017) Analysis of hydraulic fracture initiation and vertical propagation behavior in laminated shale formation. Fuel 206:482–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2017.05.033
Tien C, Ramarao BV (2013) Can filter cake porosity be estimated based on the Kozeny-Carman equation? Powder Technol 237:233–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2012.09.031
Tosun Ì, Willis M (1987) The effect of filter cake geometry on average porosity. Chem Eng J 35(1):65–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/0300-9467(87)80042-4
van Genuchten MT (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci Soc Am J 44(5):892–898
Wang B, Zhou FJ, Wang DB, Liang TB, Yuan LS, Hu J (2018) Numerical simulation on near-wellbore temporary plugging and diverting during refracturing using XFEM-Based CZM. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 55:368–381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2018.05.009
Wang HK, Qian H, Gao YY (2020) Non-Darcian flow in loess at low hydraulic gradient. Eng Geol 267:105483
Wang ZZ, Wang RH, Bu YH, Shan X (2012) A new method of preparing artificial cores with certain cracks for experiment study of elastic wave propagation. Adv Mater Research 356–360:2954–2957. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.356-360.2954
Wang ZZ, Wang RH, Qiu H, Li TY, Shan X (2015) A new method for artificial core preparation with multiple pore structure sand its application. Geophys Prospect Pet 54(2):150–156. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-1441.2015.02.005
Wei MQ, Duan YG, Dong MZ, Fang QT, Dejam M (2019) Transient production decline behavior analysis for a multi-fractured horizontal well with discrete fracture networks in shale gas reservoirs. J Porous Med 22(3):343–361. https://doi.org/10.1615/JPorMedia.2019028982
Wrobel M, Mishuris G, Papanastasiou P (2021) On the influence of fluid rheology on hydraulic fracture. Int J Eng Sci 158:103426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijengsci.2020.103426
Xiao BQ, Wang W, Zhang X, Long GB, Fan JT, Chen HX, Deng L (2019) A novel fractal solution for permeability and Kozeny-Carman constant of fibrous porous media made up of solid particles and porous fibers. Powder Technol 349:92–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.powtec.2019.03.028
Xiong CM, Shi Y, Zhou FJ, Liu XF, Yang XY, Yang XT (2018) High efficiency reservoir stimulation based on temporary plugging and diverting for deep reservoirs. Pet Explor Dev 45(5):948–954. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1876-3804(18)30098-3
Xu CY, Kang YL, Chen F, You ZJ (2016) Fracture plugging optimization for drill-in fluid loss control and formation damage prevention in fractured tight reservoir. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 35:1216–1227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.09.059
Xu JX, Ding YH, Yang LF, Liu Z, Gao R, Wang Z, Mo SY (2020) Numerical analysis of proppants transport in tortuous fractures of shale gas reservoirs after shear deformation. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 78:103285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103285
Yu RG, Ren WM, Zhang A (2008) Numerical calculation model of pressure drop of barrier created by diverting agent and its engineering application. Acta Petrolei Sinica 29(6):942–945
Yu RG, Zhang Y, Li JF, Tian Y (2019) Experiment on influence of diverting agents to rock fracture pressure and crack extension. J China Univ Pet 43(3):138–144
Zeng JS, Li H, Zhang DX (2016) Numerical simulation of proppant transport in hydraulic fracture with the upscaling CFD-DEM method. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 33:264–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2016.05.030
Zeng YJ, Zhou J, Wang HT, Zuo L, Jiang TX, Zhong GY, Guo YT, Chang X, Wang L, Yang CH (2019) Research on true triaxial hydraulic fracturing in deep shale with varying pumping rates. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 38(9):1758–1766
Zhang LH, Kou ZH, Wang HT, Zhao YL, Dejam M, Guo JJ, Du J (2018) Performance analysis for a model of a multi-wing hydraulically fractured vertical well in a coalbed methane gas reservoir. J Petrol Sci Eng 166:104–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2018.03.038
Zhang Y, Yu RG, Yang WD, Tian Y, Sheng CX, Shi ZC, Zhang KQ (2021) Plugging mechanism of upper and lower tip of hydraulic fracture in tight sandstone reservoir. Arabian J Sci Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-021-06047-y
Zhang Y, Yu RG, Yang WD, Tian Y, Shi ZC, Sheng CX, Song YS, Du HZ (2022) Effect of temporary plugging agent concentration and fracturing fluid infiltration on initiation and propagation of hydraulic fractures in analogue tight sandstones. J Petrol Sci Eng 210:110060. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petrol.2021.110060
Zhang Y, Zhang DL, Fang Q, Xiong LJ, Yu L, Zhou MZ (2020) Analytical solutions of non-Darcy seepage of grouted subsea tunnels. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 96:103182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2019.103182
Zhao HF, Chen M, Jin Y (2009) Extending behavior of hydraulic fracture on formation interface. Acta Petrolei Sinica 30(3):450–454
Zhao YY, Huang M, Ouyang XP, Luo J, Shen YQ, Bao F (2022) A half boundary method for two dimensional unsteady convection–diffusion equations. Eng Anal Boundary Elem 135:322–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enganabound.2021.11.024
Zimmermann G, Moeck I, Bloecher G (2010) Cyclic waterfrac stimulation to develop an enhanced geothermal system (EGS)-conceptual design and experimental results. Geothermics 39:59–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2009.10.003
Funding
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52034010, 51979281) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (18CX02079A).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Murat Karakus
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Y., Yu, R., Yang, W. et al. A new model for plugging hydraulic fractures of tight sandstone reservoirs. Arab J Geosci 15, 1347 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10646-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10646-w