Skip to main content
Log in

Numerical analysis of bearing capacity of circular footing reinforced with geogrid layers

  • Technical Note
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In today’s constructions, soil weakness in shear and tension is important. Geogrid is a common solution for improving bearing capacity for soil reinforcement with geotechnical problems. In this paper, a numerical study, using the finite element method, the circular footing resting on soil reinforced with geogrid sheets is modeled, and the effect of geogrid layers on soil bearing capacity is investigated. This study tries to find optimal values of geometric parameters, including geogrid length, the number of geogrid layers, the geogrids layer spacing, the distance of geogrid reinforcements from the footing, and buried depth of the footing on the bearing capacity improvement of the reinforced soil with geogrid. Likewise, the optimum values for geometric parameters of geogrid layers have been achieved in terms of bearing capacity and ease of execution. The simulation results reveal that the optimum value for geometric parameters of geogrid can improve the bearing capacity ratio (BCR) up to 50%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

References

  • Abdolhosseinzadeh A, Akhlaghi T, Katebi H (2020) Effect of a row of soldier piles on the settlement of adjacent buildings due to tunnelling: numerical study. Int J Geotech Eng 1-16.https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2020.1808286

  • Abu-Farsakh M, Chen Q, Sharma R (2013) An experimental evaluation of the behavior of footings on geosynthetic-reinforced sand. Soils Found 53(2):335–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akhlaghi T, Abdolhosseinzadeh A, Katebi H (2017) Numerical analysis of soldier piles construction to reduce surface settlement due to tunneling. Paper presented at the The International Conference on Recent Progresses in Civil Engineering

  • Al-Tirkity JK, Al-Taay AH (2012) Bearing capacity of eccentrically loaded strip footing on geogrid reinforced sand. Tikrit J Eng Sci 19(1):14–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Armaghani DJ, Faizi K, Hajihassani M, Mohamad ET, Nazir R (2015) Effects of soil reinforcement on uplift resistance of buried pipeline. Measurement 64:57–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D (2003) 1194–94: Standard test method for bearing capacity of soil for static load and spread footings. ASTM International, West Conshohocken

  • Badakhshan E, Noorzad A (2015) Load eccentricity effects on behavior of circular footings reinforced with geogrid sheets. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 7(6):691–699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badakhshan E, Noorzad A (2017) A simplified method for prediction of ultimate bearing capacity of eccentrically loaded foundation on geogrid reinforced sand bed. Int J Geosyn Ground Eng 3(2):14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basudhar P, Saha S, Deb K (2007) Circular footings resting on geotextile-reinforced sand bed. Geotext Geomembr 25(6):377–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binquet J, Lee KL (1975) Bearing capacity tests on reinforced earth slabs. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 101(ASCE# 11792 Proceeding)

  • Boushehrian JH, Hataf N (2003) Experimental and numerical investigation of the bearing capacity of model circular and ring footings on reinforced sand. Geotext Geomembr 21(4):241–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty M, Kumar J (2014) Bearing capacity of circular foundations reinforced with geogrid sheets. Soils Found 54(4):820–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chowdhury S, Patra NR (2021) Settlement behavior of circular footing on geocell-and geogrid-reinforced pond ash bed under combine static and cyclic loading. Arab J Geosci 14(11):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das PP, Khatri VN, Kumar J (2022) Bearing capacity of strip and circular footing on layered sand with geogrid at the interface. Arabian J Geosci 15(361). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-09614-1

  • Das B, Omar M (1994) The effects of foundation width on model tests for the bearing capacity of sand with geogrid reinforcement. Geotech Geol Eng 12(2):133–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demir A, Yildiz A, Laman M, Ornek M (2014) Experimental and numerical analyses of circular footing on geogrid-reinforced granular fill underlain by soft clay. Acta Geotech 9(4):711–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faizi K, Armaghani DJ, Momeni E, Nazir R, Mohamad ET (2014) Uplift resistance of buried pipelines enhanced by geogrid. Soil Mech Found Eng 51(4):188–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fragaszy RJ, Lawton E (1984) Bearing capacity of reinforced sand subgrades. J Geotech Eng 110(10):1500–1507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guido VA, Chang DK, Sweeney MA (1986) Comparison of geogrid and geotextile reinforced earth slabs. Can Geotech J 23(4):435–440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hataf N, Sayadi M (2018) Experimental and numerical study on the bearing capacity of soils reinforced using geobags. J Build Eng 15:290–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosamo H, Sliteen I, Ding S (2021) Numerical analysis of bearing capacity of a ring footing on geogrid reinforced sand. Buildings 11(2):68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang C-C, Tatsuoka F (1990) Bearing capacity of reinforced horizontal sandy ground. Geotext Geomembr 9(1):51–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolay P, Kumar S, Tiwari D (2013) Improvement of bearing capacity of shallow foundation on geogrid reinforced silty clay and sand. J Construct Eng 2013:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurian NP, Beena K, Kumar RK (1997) Settlement of reinforced sand in foundations. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 123(9):818–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovisa J, Shukla SK, Sivakugan N (2010) Behaviour of prestressed geotextile-reinforced sand bed supporting a loaded circular footing. Geotext Geomembr 28(1):23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Momeni E, Yarivand A, Dowlatshahi MB, Armaghani DJ (2021) An efficient optimal neural network based on gravitational search algorithm in predicting the deformation of geogrid-reinforced soil structures. Transport Geotech 26:100446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naghadehi MZ, Samaei M, Ranjbarnia M, Nourani V (2018) State-of-the-art predictive modeling of TBM performance in changing geological conditions through gene expression programming. Measurement 126:46–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.05.049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliaei M, Kouzegaran S (2017) Efficiency of cellular geosynthetics for foundation reinforcement. Geotext Geomembr 45(2):11–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Omar M, Das B, Puri V, Yen S (1993) Ultimate bearing capacity of shallow foundations on sand with geogrid reinforcement. Can Geotech J 30(3):545–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raja MNA, Shukla SK (2020) An extreme learning machine model for geosynthetic-reinforced sandy soil foundations. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering 1-21.https://doi.org/10.1680/jgeen.19.00297

  • Ray R, Kumar D, Samui P, Roy LB, Goh ATC, Zhang W (2021) Application of soft computing techniques for shallow foundation reliability in geotechnical engineering. Geosci Front 12(1):375–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsf.2020.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sahu R, Patra C, Sivakugan N, Das B (2017) Use of ANN and neuro fuzzy model to predict bearing capacity factor of strip footing resting on reinforced sand and subjected to inclined loading. Int J Geosyn Ground Eng 3(3):1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-017-0102-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samaei M, Ranjbarnia M, Nourani V, Naghadehi MZ (2020) Performance prediction of tunnel boring machine through developing high accuracy equations: a case study in adverse geological condition. Measurement 152:107244. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.107244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samui P (2012) Application of statistical learning algorithms to ultimate bearing capacity of shallow foundation on cohesionless soil. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 36(1):100–110. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh H (1988) Bearing capacity of reinforced soil beds. Ph. D. thesis, Indian Institute of Science

  • Soleimanbeigi A, Hataf N (2005) Predicting ultimate bearing capacity of shallow foundations on reinforced cohesionless soils using artificial neural networks. Geosynth Int 12(6):321–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Useche-Infante D, Aiassa Martinez G, Arrúa P, Eberhardt M (2019) Experimental study of behaviour of circular footing on geogrid-reinforced sand. Geomech Geoeng 1–19

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pijush Samui.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor:  Broder J. Merkel.

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdolhosseinzadeh, A., Samui, P., Samaei, M. et al. Numerical analysis of bearing capacity of circular footing reinforced with geogrid layers. Arab J Geosci 15, 750 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10030-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-022-10030-8

Keywords

Navigation