Skip to main content
Log in

Performance evaluation of gravel impact compaction piers (GICPs) in liquefiable soils

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A series of field tests were carried out to investigate the performance of gravel impact compaction piers (GICPs) system–supported multilayer coastal soil under liquefiable condition. The influence of the standard penetration test, relative density, and safety factor on the deformation behavior of GICPs were also assessed. Implementation of gravel impact compaction piers is a new generation of aggregate piers. GICPs are used as semi-deep foundations using two processes of substitution and displacement to improve the liquefiable soil layers and to increase the bearing capacity and hardness modulus and reduce subgrade settlement to withstand surface infrastructures. By implementing GICPs, through creating repeated radial compaction for the matrix soil in the process of hammering and feeding the gravel, the first time shuttle, hammering and feeding the gravel, and the second time, hammering and feeding the gravel repeatedly by the long tamper, and hammering and feeding of gravel are frequently done by a flat tamper device, with increasing pore-water pressure; the desired area is artificially liquefiable and highly unstable, and becomes stable and resistant within 8–14 days. In this research, the soil improved rapidly after 8–12 days. The results of the standard penetration test (SPT) in the matrix soil around the piers showed that the amount of (N1)60 in compacted soils was in the range of 24–32 and on average 3.10 times the amount of initial soil (7–16). Also, the relative density of the initial soil increased from 15–35% to about 71% after soil improvement. Accordingly, by relying merely on the compaction properties of the piers and without relying on other primary soil remediation factors, such as piers drainage and soil texture change, the safety factor of the improved soil is 2.2–2.85 times the minimum required according to two risk levels in the design.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barksdale RD, Bachus RC (1983) Design and construction of stone columns Volume II, Appendixes. National Technical Information Service

  • Dar LA, Shah MY (2021) Deep-seated slope stability analysis and development of simplistic FOS evaluation models for stone column-supported embankments. Transp Infrastruct Geotechnol 8(2):203–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doan S, Fatahi B (2021) Green’s function analytical solution for free strain consolidation of soft soil improved by stone columns subjected to time-dependent loading. Comput Geotech 136:103941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farias MM, Nakai T, Shahin HM, Pedroso DM, Passos PGO., Hinokio M (2005) Ground densification due to sand compaction piles. In Soils and Foundations. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.45.2_167

  • Harada K, Ohbayashi J (2017) Development and improvement effectiveness of sand compaction pile method as a countermeasure against liquefaction. Soils Found. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2017.08.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hatanaka M, Feng L, Matsumura N, Yasu H (2008) A study on the engineering properties of sand improved by the sand compaction pile method. Soils Found. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.48.73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitazume M (2005) The sand compaction pile method. The Sand Compaction Pile Method. https://doi.org/10.1201/9781439824696

  • Niroumand B (2017) 9840835. United States of America. doi:E02D 3/10 (20060101); E03F 1/00 (20060101); E02D 1/00 (20060101)

  • Niroumand B (2018) 9915051. United States of America. doi:E02D 3/08 (20060101); E02D 5/62 (20060101); E02D 27/14 (20060101); E02D 27/18 (20060101); E02D 27/26 (20060101); E02D 5/60 (20060101)

  • Niroumand B (2019) 20180230665. United States of America. doi:E02D 3/10 (20060101); E02D 29/02 (20060101); E21B 43/12 (20060101); E21B 43/04 (20060101); E02D 19/10 (20060101); E21B 7/20 (20060101)

  • Okamura M, Ishihara M, Oshita T (2003) Liquefaction resistance of sand deposit improved with sand compaction piles. Soils Found. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.43.5_175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okamura M, Ishihara M, Tamura K (2006) Degree of saturation and liquefaction resistances of sand improved with sand compaction pile. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2006)132:2(258)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priebe HJ (1995) The design of vibro replacement. Ground Eng. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-9062(96)80092-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priebe HJ (1998) Vibro replacement to prevent earthquake induced liquefaction. Ground Engineering

  • Recommendations for the design, calculation, construction and quality control of stone columns under buildings and sensitive structures (2013) Revue Française de Géotechnique. https://doi.org/10.1051/geotech/2013144051

  • Salahi A, Niroumand H, Kassim KA (2015) Evaluation of stone columns versus liquefaction phenomenon. Scientific World Journal 20:739–759

  • Sharma JK, Gupta P (2021) End-bearing granular pile-effect of non-linearity of soil and granular pile. Geotech Eng 51(4):108–121

    Google Scholar 

  • Shields CS, FitzPatrick BT, Wissmann KJ (2004) Modulus load test results for rammed aggregate piersTM in granular soils. In Geotechnical Special Publication. https://doi.org/10.1061/40713(2004)54

  • Yoshimi Y, Tanaka K, Tokimatsu K (1989) Liquefaction resistance of a partially saturated sand. Soils Found. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.29.3_157

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We sincerely thank the board of directors and the specialized team of Asian Soil Improvement (ASI) Company in carrying out complementary geotechnical controls and addressing technical challenges created during the various stages of technical equipment construction.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hamed Niroumand.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Zeynal Abiddin Erguler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Niroumand, B., Niroumand, H. Performance evaluation of gravel impact compaction piers (GICPs) in liquefiable soils. Arab J Geosci 14, 2480 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-08840-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-08840-3

Keywords

Navigation