Skip to main content
Log in

High-resolution electrical resistivity imaging of buried grave in Nif (Olympos) Mountain/Izmir

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nif Mountain is located approximately at the borders of Kemalpaşa, Torbalı, and Buca districts in the east of Izmir which is located in the west of Turkey. Nif Mountain has three investigated sectors, namely as Dağkızılca, Karamatepe, and Başpınar. Surface investigations were started in 2004. The areas include the surrounding area of the monastery complex in Dağkızılca that belongs to the classic Hellenistic period. Since official excavations can only be carried out in the summer period, some illegal excavations were also encountered in the study area, and it was seen that these illegal excavations destroyed historical remains. Despite the illegal excavations, it is estimated that some ancient ruins and burial areas (Tumulus, chamber tombs, cist graves, terracotta sarcophagus, etc.) expected to be in the Dağkızılca area are still buried. For this purpose, archeo-geophysical research was carried out in the Dağkızılca area using the electric tomography method. We aimed to determine the location and depth of the buried structures and graves, as the geo-electric survey was carried out via Wenner-Alfa array along 8 profiles 1 m apart in two areas. One of them was on top of the illegally excavated grave to test the results of the electrical method. It was observed in the resistivity images that our results were successful in getting an idea of the electrical resistivity anomaly on the grave. To detect a similar anomaly in other untouched parts of the study area, measurements were taken in 7 profiles. An anomaly, similar to obtained from our test profile, was observed in one profile. To test the accuracy of this anomaly, a new measurement was taken by shifting the beginning of the measurement point on the profile. Thus, the findings were tested once again. The exact location of the buried tomb was eventually found. Consequently, this study reveals possible buried remains that cannot be observed from the surface. It was made to quickly display the location, shape, depth, etc. features. Thus, it has been shown that the ruins can be reached more quickly and at a lower cost without deterioration by guiding the archeological studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ateş A, Büyüksaraç A (2008) Nif (Olympos) Dağı Kazısı, Türk Eskiçağ Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Haberler, 27, 21–23. (in Turkish)

  • Balkaya Ç, Kalyoncuoğlu ÜY, Özhanlı M, Merter G, Çakmak O, Güven İT (2018) Ground-penetrating radar and electrical resistivity tomography studies in the Biblical Pisidian Antioch city. SW Anatolia Archaeol Prospect 25:285–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Büyüksaraç A, Bektaş Ö, Tulunay E, Ateş A (2013) Identification of buried archaeological substances using derivatives of magnetic anomalies in Nif (Olympos) Mountain. West Anatolia Mediterranean Archaeology and Archaeometry 13(1):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Büyüksaraç A, Yalçıner CÇ, Ekinci YL, Demirci A, Yücel MA (2014) Geophysical investigations at Agadere cemetery, Gallipoli Peninsular. NW Turkey Aust J Forensic Sci 46:111–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlin T, Zhou B (2004) A numerical comparison of 2D resistivity imaging with 10 electrode arrays. Geophys Prospect 52:379–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derin B (2014) Nif (Olympos) Dağı Geometrik Ve Arkaik Dönem Keramik Buluntuları. Pamukkale University, Turkey, Unpublished master's thesis. (in Turkish)

  • Drahor MG, Berge MA, Kurtulmuş Ö (2004) Nif (Olympos) Dağı Araştırma Projesi: Yüzey Araştırması, Türk Eskiçağ Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Haberler 20:33–35. (in Turkish)

  • Drahor MG, Berge MA, Kurtulmuş Ö, Hartmann M, Speidel MA (2008) Magnetic and electrical resistivity tomography investigations in a Roman legionary camp site (Legio IV Scythica) in Zeugma, Southeastern Anatolia, Turkey. Archaeol Prospect 15(3):159–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekinci YL, Balkaya Ç, Şeren A, Kaya MA, Lightfoot C (2014) Geomagnetic and geoelectrical prospection for buried archaeological remains on the upper city of Amorium, a Byzantine city in Midwestern Anatolia Turkey. J Geophys Eng 11(1):015012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ercan A, Büyüksaraç A (2008) Nif (Olympos) Dağı Kazısı, Türk Eskiçağ Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Haberler 27:22–23. (in Turkish)

  • Gaffney CF, Gater JA, Linford P, Gaffney VL, White R (2000) Large-scale systematic fluxgate gradiometry at the Roman City of Wroxeter. ArchaeologicalProspection 7:81–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaffney V, Patterson H, Piro S, Goodman D, Nishimura Y (2004) Multimethodological approach to study and characterize Forum Novum (Vescovio, Central Italy). Archaeol Prospect 11:201–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geotomo Software (2006) RES2DINV – Manual. Retrieved from http://www.geotomosoft.com/.  Accessed 12 Feb 2019

  • Griffiths DH, Barker RD (1994) Electrical imaging in archaeology. J Archaeol Sci 21:153–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henning T, Weller A, Canh T (2005) The effect of dike geometry on different resistivity configurations. Appl Geophys 57:78–292

    Google Scholar 

  • Koçman A (1989) Uygulamalı Fiziki Coğrafya Çalışmaları ve İzmir-Bozdağlar Yöresi Üzerine Araştırmalar, İzmir (In Turkish)

  • Malfitana D, Leucci G, Mazzaglia A, Cacciaguerra G, De Giorgi L, Barone S, Fragalà G, Pavone PD, Russo S (2018) Archaeo-geophysics surveys in Pompeii. Surv Geophys 39:1219–1238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nuzzo L, Leucci G, Negri S (2009) GPR, ERT and magnetic investigations inside the Martyrium of St Philip, Hierapolis. Turkey Archaeol Prospect 16:177–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos NG, Tsourlos P, Tsokas GN, Sarris A (2007) Efficient ERT measuring and inversion strategies for 3D imaging of buried antiquities. Near Surface Geophysics 6:349–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peker M (2015) “İzmir İli Nif Dağı Kazısı Buluntusu Altın Diademler”, Akdeniz İnsani Bilimler Dergisi - Mediterranean. Journal of Humanities 2:307–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Peker M (2017) “İzmir İli Nif Dağı Kazısı – 2017”, İstanbul Üniversitesi Edebiyat Fakültesi Arkeolojik Kazı ve Araştırmalar Toplantısı – 17, Prof. Dr. Belkıs Dinçol Onuruna , İSTANBUL, TÜRKIYE, 16–18 Mayıs 2018, ss.26–26

  • Scudero S, Martorana R, Capizzi P, Pisciotta A, D’Alessandro A, Bottari C, Di Stefano G (2018) Integrated geophysical investigations at the Greek Kamarina site (Southern Sicily, Italy). Surv Geophys 39:1181–1200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsokas GN, Giannopoulos A, Tsourlos P et al (1994) A large scale geophysical survey in the archaeological site of Europos (N. Greece). J Appl Geophys 32:85–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsokas GN, Tsourlos PI, Vargemezis G, Novack M (2008) nondestructive electrical resistivity tomography for indoor investigation: the case of Kapnikarea Church in Athens. Archaeol Prospect 15:47–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulunay ET (2002) “Nif (Olympos) Dağı Araştırma Projesi Ön İnceleme Gezileri 1999–2001”, Haberler, 14, s. 18 - 19. (In Turkish)

  • Tulunay ET (2011) “Nif (Olympos) Dağı Kazı ve Araştırma Projesi: 2009 Yılı Kazısı”, KST, 32–3, s. 405–423. (In Turkish)

  • Tulunay ET (2012) “Smyrna (İzmir) Yakınlarında Birçok Kültürü Barındıran Dağ: Nif (Olympos), CollAn, XI, s. 81–99. (In Turkish)

  • Verdier J (1963) “Kemalpaşa Dağı Etüdü”, Maden Tetkik ve Arama Dergisi, 61, Ankara, s. 37–39

  • Yılmaz S, Oksum E, Cakmak O, Dogan O, Tekelioğlu E (2018) Preliminary results of an integrated archaeo-geophysical survey on the basis of ancient finds unearthed by an illegal excavation at Kılıç Ören site (Isparta, Turkey). Archaeol Prospect 25:197–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz S, Balkaya Ç, Çakmak O, Oksum E (2019) GPR and ERT explorations at the archaeological site of Kılıç village (Isparta, SW Turkey). J Appl Geophys. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2019.103859

  • Yılmaz S, Öksüm E, Çakmak O (2019b) Isparta Kılıç Ören Mevkiinde Bir Kaçak Kazı Alanında Elektrik Özdirenç Tomografi Araştırması. Mühendislik Bilimleri Ve Tasarım Dergisi 7(1):46–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yüksel FA (2007) Nif (Olympos) Dağı Kazı ve Araştırma Projesi. Türk Eskiçağ Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Haberler 23:32–34. (in Turkish)

  • Yüksel FA (2008) Nif (Olympos) Dağı Kazı Çalışmaları. Türk Eskiçağ Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Haberler 25:30–32. (in Turkish)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Prof. Dr. Elif Tül Tulunay and Associate Prof. Dr. Müjde Perker who are the director of Nif archeological excavations and field surveys. We also thank their excavation team. We are also grateful to our students Ekrem Mehmet Zeren, Ezgi Başak Filoğlu, Yaren Gürdamar, and Yiğit Kaan Alpaslan for helping during the geo-electrical field surveys. Lastly, we thank Prof. Ethem Görgün for helping with manuscript correction and the English language. The manuscript benefitted from constructive comments by one anonymous referee as well as the journal editors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Okan Tezel.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Narasimman Sundararajan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tezel, O., Alp, H. High-resolution electrical resistivity imaging of buried grave in Nif (Olympos) Mountain/Izmir. Arab J Geosci 14, 2357 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-08741-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-08741-5

Keywords

Navigation