Abstract
The adaptive Gaussian mixture model is a probability model that can be used to represent the probability distribution of K in the overall distribution. The mixed model represents the probability distribution of the overall observed data. This is a mixed distribution composed of K sub-distributions. In the mixed model, in order to calculate the probability of the observation data in the overall distribution, the observation data is not required to provide information about the sub-distribution. The EM algorithm is used to estimate the parameters of a probability model with hidden variables. Large-scale analysis of remote sensing images of various temporal, climate, and terrain types of mountain environmental characteristics is one of the most important issues at present. In this experiment, 6 Landsat TM remote sensing images with different longitudes and latitudes, different land use patterns, different realities, different ranges, different terrains, and different climates were selected as the research objects. Through their comprehensive comparison, the general ones were selected. The supervised classification method (most likelihood method, BP neural network and support vector machine method) classifies Landsat TM remote sensing images. In order to improve the accuracy of remote sensing image classification and the accuracy of land use information extraction, data such as normalized vegetation index and texture features are used to classify the experimental samples. Cluster statistics and filter analysis are used to classify the results. Finally, a confusion matrix is used to evaluate the accuracy of the classification results.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
06 December 2021
This article has been retracted. Please see the Retraction Notice for more detail: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-09208-3
28 September 2021
An Editorial Expression of Concern to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-08471-8
References
Adam E, Mutanga O, Odindi J, Abdel-Rahman EM (2014) Land-use/cover classification in a heterogeneous coastal landscape using RapidEye imagery: evaluating the performance of random forest and support vector machines classifiers. Int J Remote Sens 35:3440–3458
Al-Mustansiriya J, SA MZ, Qazi W, Aslam N (2018) A comparative study of ALOS-2 PALSAR and Landsat-8 imagery for land cover classification using maximum likelihood classifier. Egypt J Remote Sens Space Sci 21:S29–S35
Amarsaikhan D, Saandar M, Ganzorig M, Blotevogel HH, Egshiglen E, Gantuyal R, Nergui B, Enkhjargal D (2012) Comparison of multisource image fusion methods and land cover classification. Int J Remote Sens 33:2532–2550
Ashkan MRH, Najmeh CS (2012) Speckle reduction approach for SAR image in satellite communication. Int J Mach Learn Comput 2:62–70
Badreldin N, Goossens R (2014) Monitoring land use/land cover change using multi-temporal Landsat satellite images in an arid environment: a case study of El-Arish, Egypt. Arab J Geosci 7:1671–1681
Ban Y, Webber L, Gamba P, Paganini M (2017) EO4Urban: Sentinel-1A SAR and Sentinel-2A MSI data for global urban services. In: 2017 Joint Urban Remote Sensing Event (JURSE), IEEE, pp 1-4
Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Mach Learn 45:5–32
Chatziantoniou A, Psomiadis E, Petropoulos G (2017) Co-orbital Sentinel 1 and 2 for LULC mapping with emphasis on wetlands in a Mediterranean setting based on machine learning. Remote Sens 9:1259
Cho MA, Debba P, Mutanga O, Dudeni-Tlhone N, Magadla T, Khuluse SA (2012) Potential utility of the spectral red-edge region of SumbandilaSat imagery for assessing indigenous forest structure and health. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 16:85–93
Markus Robertus de Leeuw LMTdC (2009) Performance evaluation of several adaptive speckle filters for SAR imaging Anais XIV Simpósio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto, Natal, Brasil, 25-30 abril. INPE, p:7299–7305
Erinjery JJ, Singh M, Kent R (2018) Mapping and assessment of vegetation types in the tropical rainforests of the Western Ghats using multispectral Sentinel-2 and SAR Sentinel-1 satellite imagery. Remote. Sens Environ 216:345–354
Foody GM (2002) Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment. Remote Sens Environ 80:185–201
Goodman NR (1963) Statistical analysis based on a certain multivariate complex Gaussian distribution (an introduction). Ann Math Stat 34:152–177
Hansen MC, Loveland TR (2012) A review of large area monitoring of land cover change using Landsat data. Remote Sens Environ 122:66–74
Jos’e A. Apolin’ario Jr SLN (2009) QRD-RLS adaptive filtering. Springer Science+Business Media
Joshi N, Baumann M, Ehammer A, Fensholt R, Grogan K, Hostert P, Jepsen M, Kuemmerle T, Meyfroidt P, Mitchard E, Reiche J, Ryan C, Waske B (2016) A review of the application of optical and radar remote sensing data fusion to land use mapping and monitoring. Remote Sens 8:70
Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174
Leinenkugel P, Wolters ML, Kuenzer C, Oppelt N, Dech S (2014) Sensitivity analysis for predicting continuous fields of tree-cover and fractional land-cover distributions in cloud-prone areas. Int J Remote Sens 35:2799–2821
Lin X, Sun L, Li Y, Guo Z, Li Y, Zhong K, Wang Q, Lu X, Yang Y, Xu G (2010) A random forest of combined features in the classification of cut tobacco based on gas chromatography fingerprinting. Talanta 82:1571–1575
Mahboob Iqbal JC, Yang W, Wang P, Sun B (2013) Sar image despeckling by selective 3D filtering of multiple compressive reconstructed images. Electromagn Waves (Camb) 134:209–226
Mohammed Noori A, Hasan SF, Ajaj QM, Ridha Mezaal M, Shafri H ZM, Shareef MA (2018) Fusion of airborne hyperspectral and WorldView2 multispectral images for detailed urban land cover classification a case study of Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Int J Eng Tech 7:5
Van JL yH (1996) Evaluation of several speckle filters techniques for ERS1 and 2 imagry Int Arch Photogramm. Remote Sens Spat Inf Sci XXXI:164–169
Zhou HKZM (2008) An impulsive noise color image filter using learning based color morphological operations. Digit Signal Process 18:406–421
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Liaoning Province under Grant 2019-ZD-0665, 2019-ZD-0259.
Open access
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution, and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third-party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Sheldon Williamson
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Environment and Low Carbon Transportation
This article has been retracted. Please see the retraction notice for more detail: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-09209-2
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, N. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Application of remote sensing image classification based on adaptive Gaussian mixture model in analysis of mountain environment features. Arab J Geosci 14, 1486 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-07899-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-07899-2