Abstract
In agricultural production, the critical basis and prerequisite are the environmental climate resources related to agriculture. Agricultural environmental-climate resources are also important factors to solve the problems of environment, resources, disasters, and population. However, due to the extensive distribution of environmental climate resources in the whole earth biosphere and the disorder in time and space allocation, it is almost impossible to obtain the relevant information about the changing trend of a particular area or a specific period the traditional monitoring technology. It is impossible to predict and timely monitor the environmental climate resources effectively. At present, spatial information technology is used to obtain the relevant information of the environmental climate change trend in a particular area and to monitor the environmental climate resources effectively and analyze and forecast the changing trend. With the help of relatively new technology, combined with the main characteristics of clothing design, this paper explores the relevant history of fashion design, its explicit form, and corresponding connotation, carries out in-depth and scientific research and discussion, and provides a new way for innovation of modern clothing by deconstructing the image characteristics of clothing. Also, this paper studies agricultural climate change and the distribution range of climatic factors related to agricultural production. The spatial surface characteristics of the agricultural climate elements are preliminarily obtained by remote sensing technology. The parameters reflecting the agricultural climate change and distribution are conveniently used—the trend and characteristics of agricultural climate change in recent years. The distribution in different regions and the main features of agricultural climate factors were obtained, which laid a good foundation for exploring agricultural regionalization and regional land resources development and production potential.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Change history
24 November 2021
This article has been retracted. Please see the Retraction Notice for more detail: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-09044-5
28 September 2021
An Editorial Expression of Concern to this paper has been published: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-08472-7
References
Aichouri I, Hani A, Bougherira N, Djabri L, Chaffai H, Lallahem S (2015) River flow model using artificial neural networks. Energy Procedia 74:1007–1014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2015.07.832
Behzad M, Asghari K, Eazi M, Palhang M (2009) Generalization performance of support vector machines and neural networks in runoff modelling. Expert Syst Appl 36:7624–7629. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2008.09.053
Broomhead D, Lowe D (1988) Multivariable functional interpolation and adaptive networks. Complex Syst 2:321–355
Chang TK, Talei A, Quek C, Pauwels VRN (2018) Rainfall-runoff modelling using a self-reliant fuzzy inference network with a flexible structure. J Hydrol 564:1179–1193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.07.074
Chanu SN, Kumar P (2016) Application of multilayer perceptron based artificial neural network for modelling rainfall-runoff in a Himalayan. 8th Int Conf Recent Innov Sci Eng Manag New Delhi, India, 21st Oct 2016 15 pp
Chau KW (2007) A split-step particle swarm optimization algorithm in river stage forecasting. J Hydrol 346:131–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2007.09.004
Danandeh Mehr A, Kahya E, Şahin A, Nazemosadat MJ (2015) Successive-station monthly streamflow prediction using different artificial neural network algorithms. Int J Environ Sci Technol 12:2191–2200. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-014-0613-0
de Vos NJ, Rientjes THM (2005) Constraints of artificial neural networks for rainfall-runoff modelling: trade-offs in hydrological state representation and model evaluation. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 2:365–415. https://doi.org/10.5194/hessd-2-365-2005
Devia GK, Ganasri BP, Dwarakish GS (2015) A review on hydrological models. Aquat Procedia 4:1001–1007. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aqpro.2015.02.126
Firat M, Gungor M (2008) Hydrological time-series modelling using an adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system. Hydrol Process 22:2122–2132
Ghorbani MA, Zadeh HA, Isazadeh M, Terzi O (2016) A comparative study of artificial neural network (MLP, RBF) and support vector machine models for river flow prediction. Environ Earth Sci 75:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-015-5096-x
Govindaraju R, Rao R (2000) Artificial neural networks in hydrology. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Netherlands, pp 203–211. https://www.springer.com/cn/book/9780792362265
He J, Valeo C, Chu A, Neumann NF (2011) Stormwater quantity and quality response to climate change using artificial neural networks. Hydrol Process 25:1298–1312. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7904
Jain A, Sudheer KP, Srinivasulu S (2004) Identification of physical processes inherent in artificial neural network rainfall runoff models. Hydrol Process 18:571–581. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5502
Kamat R, Kumar A (2007) Urban multiple disaster scenario for Hoshangabad City of, vol 2, pp 60–72
Lin JY, Cheng CT, Chau KW (2006) Using support vector machines for long-term discharge prediction. Hydrol Sci J 51:599–612. https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.51.4.599
Mulvany TJ (1850) On the use of self-registering rain and flood gauges. In: Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers. 4(2):1–8. Dublin, Ireland
Mutlu E, Chaubey I, Hexmoor H, Bajwa SG (2008) Comparison of artificial neural network models for hydrologic predictions at multiple gauging stations in an agricultural watershed. Hydrol Process 22:5097–5106
Nourani V (2017) An Emotional ANN (EANN) approach to modeling rainfall-runoff process. J Hydrol 544:267–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.11.033
Nourani V, Kisi Ö, Komasi M (2011) Two hybrid artificial intelligence approaches for modeling rainfall-runoff process. J Hydrol 402:41–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.03.002
Qiu WZ, Zhao ZS, Du Y, Hu MX, Xu ZK (2017) Antimicrobial membrane surfaces via efficient polyethyleneimine immobilization and cationization. Appl Surf Sci 426:972–979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.217
Rezaeianzadeh M, Tabari H, Arabi Yazdi A, Isik S, Kalin L (2014) Flood flow forecasting using ANN, ANFIS and regression models. Neural Comput & Applic 25:25–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-013-1443-6
Riad S, Mania J, Bouchaou L, Najjar Y (2004) Predicting catchment flow in a semi-arid region via an artificial neural network technique. Hydrol Process 18:2387–2393. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1469
Selvaraj RS (2011) Prediction of monthly rainfall in Chennai using back propagation neural network model. Int J Eng Sci Technol 3:211–213
Sharma RK, Goswami SB, Tiwari S, Kar SC (2015) Evaluation of daily rainfall-runoff simulations in Narmada river basin. Int J Earth Sci Eng 8:1123–1132
Solomatine DP, Dulal KN (2003) Model trees as an alternative to neural networks in rainfall-runoff modelling. Hydrol Sci J 48:399–411. https://doi.org/10.1623/hysj.48.3.399.45291
Stangierski J, Weiss D, Kaczmarek A (2019) Multiple regression models and artificial neural network (ANN) as prediction tools of changes in overall quality during the storage of spreadable processed Gouda cheese. Eur Food Res Technol 245:2539–2547. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00217-019-03369-y
Sudheer K (2000) Modeling hydrological processes using neural computing technique. Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, pp 17–23. http://eprint.iitd.ac.in/bitstream/handle/2074/6057/TH-2783.pdf;sequence=1
Sumi SM, Zaman MF, Hirose H (2012) A rainfall forecasting method using machine learning models and its application to the Fukuoka city case. Int J Appl Math Comput Sci 22:841–854. https://doi.org/10.2478/v10006-012-0062-1
Tayyab M, Zhou J, Dong X, Ahmad I, Sun N (2019) Rainfall-runoff modeling at Jinsha River basin by integrated neural network with discrete wavelet transform. Meteorog Atmos Phys 131:115–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00703-017-0546-5
Tealab A, Hefny H, Badr A (2017) Forecasting of nonlinear time series using ANN. Futur Comput Informatics J 2:39–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcij.2017.05.001
Tiwar H, Rai S (2015) Review of Information and soft computing techniques (ISCT) approaches in Water Resources Projects, vol 2015, pp 89–94 Delhi, India
Uysal G, Şorman AA, Şensoy A (2016) Streamflow forecasting using different neural network models with satellite data for a snow dominated region in Turkey. Procedia Eng 154:1185–1192. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.07.526
Wang WC, Chau KW, Cheng CT, Qiu L (2009) A comparison of performance of several artificial intelligence methods for forecasting monthly discharge time series. J Hydrol 374:294–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.06.019
Wu CL, Chau KW (2011) Rainfall-runoff modeling using artificial neural network coupled with singular spectrum analysis. J Hydrol 399:394–409. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2011.01.017
Young CC, Liu WC, Wu MC (2017) A physically based and machine learning hybrid approach for accurate rainfall-runoff modeling during extreme typhoon events. Appl Soft Comput J 53:205–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2016.12.052
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he/she has no competing interest.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Ahmed Farouk
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Big Data and Intelligent Computing Techniques in Geosciences
This article has been retracted. Please see the retraction notice for more detail: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-09044-5
About this article
Cite this article
Tang, J. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Agricultural climate change based on remote sensing images and fashion design innovation. Arab J Geosci 14, 927 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-07169-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-021-07169-1