Skip to main content
Log in

Modeling and simulation of runoff from an irrigation tank watershed to evaluate the utilizable water

  • S. I. – CEC Framework
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The present study consists of hydrological modeling of a tank watershed along with simulation modeling. Two important parameters, such as rainfall and runoff events, were identified for hydrological modeling to assess the validity of the Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) model. The runoff from the watershed was calculated using historical daily rainfall data for 14 years. The tank simulation was performed over a 14-year period using the data obtained from the following: (i) the actual flow realized in the tank, (ii) USDA-NRCS model output, (iii) the estimated irrigation needs, (iv) the estimated net losses, and (v) the elevation–water spread area–storage capacity relationship. For 2008–2009, 50% dependable year with 1239 mm of rainfall, the inflow to the tank was 1.567 MCM, or 37.47% of the rainfall. About 1173 MCM of tank storage was released to meet the irrigation needs of the ayacut. The net loss from the tank storage corresponds to 0.394 MCM, and there was no spillage during the year. With a release quantity of 1173 MCM, only about 50% of the irrigation needs were met. The net loss of 0.394 MCM is approximately 30% of the total tank capacity. The simulation model provides the variation of the storage in the tank, the extent of the satisfied demand, the extent of the spillage, and the net loss. Hydrological modeling and simulation can be used to determine the amount of usable water in the watershed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Asadi K, Abbas AA, Hamdan AN (2020) Optimization of the hydrological tank model by downhill simplex method. Int J Civil Eng 18:1433–1450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awadallah AG, Saad H, Elmoustafa A, Hassan A (2016) Reliability assessment of water structures subject to data scarcity using the SCS-CN model. Hydrol Sci J 61(4):696–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brouwer C, Heibloem M (1986) Irrigation water needs-irrigation water management, training manual no.3. Food and Agriculture Organisation, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • CGWB (2000) Water balance studies in upper Yamuna basin–terminal report-project findings and recommendations. Central Ground Water Board, Chandigarh

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow VT, Maidment DR, Mays LW (1988) Applied hydrology. McGraw-Hill

  • Cole SJ, Moore RJ (2008) Hydrological modelling using raingage and radar-based estimators of areal rainfall. J Hydrol 358:159–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove W, Rijsberman F (2000) World water vision: making water everybody’s business. Earthscan Publications, World Water Council

    Google Scholar 

  • Dadhwal VK (1999) Remote sensing and GIS for agricultural crop acreage and yield estimation. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing XXXII 7-W9:58–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Doorenbos J, Pruitt WO (1977) Guidelines for predicting crop water requirements, irrigation and drainage paper no.24. Food and Agriculture Organisation, Rome, Italy

    Google Scholar 

  • Formetta G, Prosdocimi I, Stewart E, Bell V (2017) Estimating the index flood with continuous hydrological models: an application in Great Britain. Hydrol Res 49(1):123–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García A, Sainz A, Revilla JA, Álvarez C, Juanes JA, Puente A (2008) Surface water resources assessment in scarcely gauged basins in the north of Spain. J Hydrol 356(3–4):312–326

  • Gabellani S, Boni G, Ferraris L, Hardenberg JV, Provenzale A (2007) Propagation of uncertainty from rainfall to runoff: a case study with a stochastic rainfall generator. Adv Water Resour 30:2061–2071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geetha K, Mishra SK, Eldho TI, Rastogi AK, Pandey RP (2007) Modifications to SCS-CN method for long-term hydrologic simulation. J Irrig Drain Eng 133:475–486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaiswal RK, Ali S, Bharti B (2020) Comparative evaluation of conceptual and physical rainfall–runoff models. Appl Water Sci 10(48):1–10

  • Jothiprakash V, Mohan S, Elango K (2002) Artificial recharge through percolation ponds. In: International conference on Sustainable Development and Management of Groundwater Resources in semi arid regions with special reference to Hard Rock. Oxford& IBH Publishing Co. Pvt. Ltd., New Delhi, pp 194–197

    Google Scholar 

  • Kabiri R, Chan A, Ramani B (2013) Comparison of SCS and Green-Ampt methods in surface runoff-flooding simulation for Klang Watershed in Malaysia. Open Journal of Modern Hydrology (OJMH) 3:102–114

  • Kobold M, Suselj K (2005) Precipitation forecasts and their uncertainty as input into hydrological models. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 9:322–332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meher J, Jha R (2011) Time series analysis of rainfall data over Mahanadi River basin. Emerg Sci 3(6):22–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishra SK, Singh VP (1999) Another look at the SCS-CN method. J Hydrol Eng ASCE 4(3):257–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra SK, Singh VP (2004) Validity and extension of the SCS-CN method for computing infiltration and rainfall-excess rates. J Hydrol Process 18(17):3323–3345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohan S, Abraham M (2010) Derivations of simple site-specific recharge-precipitation relationships: a case study from the Cuddalore Basin, India. Environ Geosci 17(1):37–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moulin L, Gaume E, Obled C (2009) Uncertainties on mean areal precipitation: assessment and impact on stream flow simulations. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 13:99–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panahi A (2013) Evaluating SCS-CN method in estimating the amount of runoff in SoofiChay basin using GIS. Life Sci J 10(5):271–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponce VM, Hawkins RH (1996) Runoff curve number: has it reached maturity? J Hydrol Eng 1(1):11–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poonia V, Tiwari HL (2020) Rainfall-runoff modeling for the Hoshangabad Basin of Narmada River using artificial neural network. Arab J Geosci 13(18):1–10

  • Pradhan R, Mohan PP, Ghose MK, Vivek SA, Agarwa S (2010) Estimation of rainfall runoff using remote sensing and GIS in and around Singtam, East Sikkim. Int J Geomatics Geosci 1:466

    Google Scholar 

  • Putty M, Hareesha KT (2001) A watershed model using curve number expression for piped catchments. Interline Publishing, International Conference on Civil Engineering. Bangalore, pp 632–640

    Google Scholar 

  • Razmkhah H, AkhoundAli AM, Radmanesh F et al (2016) Evaluation of rainfall spatial correlation effect on rainfall-runoff modelling uncertainty, considering 2-copula. Arab J Geosci Vol 9:323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruelland D, Ardoin-Bardin S, Billen G, Servat E (2008) Sensitivity of a lumped and semi-distributed hydrological model to several methods of rainfall interpolation on a large basin in West Africa. J Hydrol 361:96–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santhanam K, Abraham M (2018) Assessment of surface water potential and groundwater recharge in ungauged watersheds-a case study in Tamil Nadu, India. Environ Earth Sci 77:788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sastry G, Reddy YVR, Prakash O, Singh HP (2002) Impact of watershed development programme on biophysical and economic factors in India. J Soil Water Conserv India 1(4):296–303

    Google Scholar 

  • Satheeshkumar S, Venkateswaran S, Kannan R (2017) Rainfall–runoff estimation using SCS–CN and GIS approach in the Pappiredipatti watershed of the Vaniyar sub basin, South India model. Earth Syst Environ 3:24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz GA (1996) Remote sensing applications to hydrology: runoff. Hydrol Sci J 41(4):453–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shiklomanov IA (2000) Appraisal and assessment of world water resources. Water Int. Vol 25:11–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Song JH, Her Y, Park J, Lee KD, Kang MS (2017) Simulink implementation of a hydrologic model: a tank model case study. Water 9(9):639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song JH, Her Y, Suh K, Kang MS, Kim H (2019) Regionalization of a rainfall-runoff model: limitations and potentials. Water, Vol.11, No. 11, 2257 Soulis KX, Valiantzas JD (2012) SCS-CN parameter determination using rainfall-runoff data in heterogeneous watersheds: the two-CN system approach. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 16:1001–1015

    Google Scholar 

  • Soulis KX, Valiantzas JD (2012) SCS-CN parameter determination using rainfall-runoff data in heterogeneous watersheds: the two-CN system approach. Hydrol Earth Syst. Sci 16:1001–1015

  • Soulis KX, Valiantzas JD, Dercas N, Londra PA (2009) Analysis of the runoff generation mechanism for the investigation of the SCS-CN method applicability to a partial area experimental watershed. Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sc. Vol. 13:605–615

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone DB, Moomaw CL, Davis A (2001) Estimating recharge by incorporating runoff from mountainous areas in an alluvial basin in the Great Basin regions of the South Eastern United States. Ground Water 39(6):807–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Syed KH, Goodrich DC, Myers DE, Sorooshian S (2003) Spatial characteristics of thunderstorm rainfall fields and their relation to runoff. J Hydrol 271:1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tedela NH, McCutcheon SC, Campbell JL, Swank WT, Adams MB, Rasmussen TC (2012) Curve numbers for nine mountainous Eastern United State watersheds: seasonal variation and forest cutting. J Hydrol Eng 17(11):1199–1203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thakuriah G, Saikia R (2014) Estimation of surface runoff using NRCS curve number procedure in Buriganga Watershed, Assam, India-a geospatial approach. Int Res J Earth Sci 2(5):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service (1986) Urban hydrology for small watersheds. Technical Release 55:156

  • Viji R, Prasanna PR, Ilangovan R (2015) GIS based SCS-CN method for estimating runoff in Kundahpalam Watershed, Nilgries District, Tamilnadu. Earth Sci Res J 19(1):59–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Virginia DEQ (2011) Infiltration practices. Virginia Department of Environmental Quality - Stormwater Design Specification No. 8, Version1.9, USA

  • Yasmeen Z, Zaidi A, Afzaal M (2017) Rainfall runoff modelling using geo-spatial techniques in Tarbela sub-catchment. Pakistan J Meteorol 12(24):1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhan X, Huang ML (2004) ArcCN-Runoff: an ArcGIS tool for generating curve number and runoff maps. Environ Model Softw 19(10):875–879

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The work was carried out with the financial support received from the Natural Recourses Data Management System (NRDMS), Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India. The financial support for the work is greatly acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marykutty Abraham.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Recent advanced techniques in water resources management

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kanagaraj, R.P., Abraham, M., Perumal, M. et al. Modeling and simulation of runoff from an irrigation tank watershed to evaluate the utilizable water. Arab J Geosci 14, 16 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-06267-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-06267-w

Keywords

Navigation