Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

GIS-based evaluation of the speed limit increase on urban arterial traffic safety in Ankara

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Setting safe speed limit is very critical and complex phenomenon, which has to be decided based on the road hierarchy that categorizes roads according to their functions and capacities, and poses certain restrictions in the design process. However, this is challenging in urban regions of developing countries, where rapid city growth forces high-speed intercity roads to serve as urban arterials, along which traditional 50 km/h limit is not practically possible. To lower the speed variation (and provide mobility), speed limit increase is allowed as high as 82 km/h as in the case of urban arterials in Turkey. To understand the real impact of such controversial countermeasures, which is the main scope of this study, spatiotemporal distribution of accident hotspots along urban arterials are analyzed in GIS using nearest neighbor hierarchical (NNH) clustering; changes between 3 years before and after periods are evaluated using as hit rate (HR), predictive accuracy index (PAI), and recapture rate index (RRI) indices. For a case study of 7 urban arterials in Ankara, NNH analysis (with nmin = 5 and dmax = 250 m) resulted in 94 clusters in the before period, while there were 101 clusters in the after period; and decreased PAI values in the after case showed more accidents in the clusters, demonstrated no real improvement by speed limit increase. Application of safe system approach in the critical hotspots also showed that speed limit increase on the study corridors in Ankara was against the safe limits suggested by UNECE based on possibility of certain accident types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AASHTO (2011) A policy on geometric design of highways and streets. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed I, Puan OC, Ismail CR (2013) A comparative review of road safety audit guidelines of selected countries. J Teknologi 65(3):67–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson T (2006) Comparison of spatial methods for measuring road accident ‘hotspot’: a case study of London. J Maps 3(1):55–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bíl M, Andrášik R, Janoška Z (2013) Identification of hazardous road locations of traffic accidents by means of kernel density estimation and cluster significance evaluation. Accid Anal Prev 55:265–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chainey S, Tompson L, Uhlig S (2008) The utility of hotspot mapping for predicting spatial patterns of crime. Sec J 21:4–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colak HE, Memisoglu T, Erbas YS, Bediroglu S (2018) Hotspot analysis based on network spatial weights to determine spatial statistics of traffic accidents in Rize, Turkey. Arab J Geosci 11(7):151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erdogan S, Yilmaz I, Baybura T, Gullu M (2008) Geographical information systems aided traffic accident analysis system case study: city of Afyonkarahisar. Accid Anal Prev 40:174–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forbes GJ, Gardner T, McGee H, Srinivasan R (2012) Methods and practices for setting speed limits: an informational report FHWA-SA-12-004

  • GDH (General Directorate of Highways (2014) Karayollarında hız. http://www.kgm.gov.tr/sitecollectiondocuments/kgmdocuments/yayinlar/yayinpdf/karayollarindahiz.pdf Accessed 18 January 2017

  • Gundogdu IB (2010) Applying linear analysis methods to GIS-supported procedures for preventing traffic accidents: Case study of Konya. Saf Sci 48:763–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harirforoush H, Bellalite L (2016) A new integrated GIS-based analysis to detect hotspots: a case study of the city of Sherbrooke. Accid Anal Prev. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.015

  • Harrell K (2014) The Predictive Accuracy of Hotspot Mapping of Robbery over Time and Space. Doctoral dissertation, University of Salford, Manchester

  • Hart TC, Zandbergen PA (2012) Effects of data quality on predictive hotspot mapping. National Justice Research Service, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashimoto S, Yoshiki S, Saeki R, Mimura Y, Ando R, Nanba S (2016) Development and application of traffic accident density estimation models using kernel density estimation. J Traffic Transp Eng 3(3):262–270

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaygisiz O, Duzgun S, Yildiz A (2015) Senbil M (2015) Spatio-temporal accident analysis for accident prevention in relation to behavioral factors in driving: The case of South Anatolian Motorway. Transp Res Part F: Traffic Psychol and Behav 33:128–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keskin F, Yenilmez F, Colak M, Yavuzer I, Düzgün HS (2011) Analysis of traffic incidents in METU campus. Proc Soc Behav Sci 19:61–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krammes RA, Fitzpatrick K, Blaschke JD, Fambro DB (1996) Speed: understanding design, operating, and posted speed Rept No. 1465-1

  • Kundakci E (2014) Identification of urban traffic accident hot spots and their characteristics by using GIS. Master thesis, Middle East Technical University, Ankara, Turkey

  • Kundakci E, Tuydes-Yaman H (2014) Understanding the distribution of traffic accident hotspots in urban regions. Proceedings of 93rd Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting, Washington No 14-3811

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine N (2008) The “hottest” part of a hotspot: comments on the utility of hotspots mapping for predicting spatial patterns of crime. Sec J 21:295–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine N (2013) Hot spot analysis of zones. CrimeStat: Spatial Statistics Program for the Analysis of Crime Incident Locations, Version 4:242960–242995

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine N (2014) CrimeStat IV: Part I: Program Overview. Ned Levine & Associates, Houston, TX, and the National Institute of Justice, Washington DC

  • Levine N, Kim KE, Nitz LH (1995a) Spatial analysis of Honolulu motor vehicle crashes: I. Spatial Patterns. Accid Anal Prev 27(5):663–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine N, Kim KE, Nitz LH (1995b) Spatial analysis of Honolulu motor vehicle crashes: II. Zonal Generators. Accid Anal Prev 27(5):675–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molla MM, Stone ML, Lee ES (2014) Geostatistical approach to detect traffic accident hotspots and clusters in North Dakota. UGPTI Department Publication 276, North Dakota State University, Fargo

  • Moreira I, Gonçalves A, Shrusbsall S (2012) Planning on safer urban mobility through spatial analysis: application to Vila Real, Portugal. AESOP 26th Annual Congress, METU, Ankara

  • OECD (2006) European Conference of Ministers of Transport, & OECD/ECMT Transport Research Centre: Speed management. OECD Publishing, Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development

  • Prasannakumar V, Vijith H, Charutha R, Geetha N (2011) Spatio-temporal clustering of road accidents: GIS based analysis and assessment. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 21:317–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shoukrallah R (2008) Road safety in five leading countries. J Australasian Coll Road Safe 19(1):9–12

  • Thakali L, Kwon TJ, Fu L (2015) Identification of crash hotspots using kernel density estimation and Kriging methods: a comparison. J Mod Transp 23(2):93–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TurkStat (2019) Turkish Statistical Institute, Ankara, Turkey. http://www.tuik.gov.tr Accessed 18 July 2019

  • Ulak MB, Ozguven EE, Spainhour L, Vanli OA (2017) Spatial investigation of aging-involved crashes: a GIS-based case study in Northwest Florida. J Transp Geogr 58:71–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNECE (2010) Consolidated resolution on road traffic. ECE/TRANS/211, Geneva, pp 1– 134. United Nations Economic Commission for Europe

  • UNRSC (2011) United Nations Road Safety Collaboration, Global Plan for the Decade of Action for Road Safety 2011-2020. World Health Organization, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • WHO (2009) Global status report on road safety for action. World Health Organization Department of Violence & Injury Prevention & disability (VIP) 20 avenue Appia Geneva 27 Switzerland. World Health Organization

  • WHO (2015) Global status report on road safety 2015. World Health Organization

Download references

Acknowledgment

This study has been performed as a requirement of the Highway Traffic Safety Council Subcommittee established in 136th meeting.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, Başkent University, 06790, Ankara, Turkey

    Funda Ture Kibar

  2. Department of Civil Engineering, Transportation Research Center, Middle East Technical University, 06800, Ankara, Turkey

    Hediye Tuydes-Yaman

Authors
  1. Funda Ture Kibar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hediye Tuydes-Yaman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Funda Ture Kibar.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Biswajeet Pradhan

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ture Kibar, F., Tuydes-Yaman, H. GIS-based evaluation of the speed limit increase on urban arterial traffic safety in Ankara. Arab J Geosci 13, 476 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05486-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-020-05486-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation