Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Segmentation of multi-coal seam pore structure in single well profile and its sedimentary control: a case study of Well Y1 in Panguan syncline, western Guizhou, China

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The pore structure of coal reservoirs is crucial for the occurrence and production of coalbed methane (CBM). Taking as an example the upper Permian coal-bearing strata profile of Well Y1 in Panguan syncline of western Guizhou, mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) and low-temperature N2 adsorption/desorption (LT-N2GA) experiments were carried out on samples from six main coal seams. Hysteresis coefficients of MIP and LT-N2GA were proposed. Fractal dimension of pore structure of each coal seam was calculated. The segmentation of pore structure of multi-coal seams was found. We found the total pore volume (TPV) and specific surface area (SSA) of coal were increased and then decreased as the increase of coal seam buried depth, which is characterized by two-segment distribution. The upper segment included the 7#, 10#, and 12# coal seams, whereas the lower segment contained the 18#, 19#, and 24# coal seams. The TPV, SSA, and MIP hysteresis coefficients and fractal dimension of seepage pore of the upper segment coal seams are larger than those of lower segment coal seams on the whole, while the LT-N2GA hysteresis coefficient, fractal dimension of adsorption pore, and fractal dimension of high-pressure stage of the upper segment are smaller than those of the lower segment. The coal seams in upper segment have more open pores, while the coal seams in the lower segment have more fine neck bottle pores or ink bottle pores. Taken together, these data demonstrated that the coal seams in the upper segment have higher adsorption and seepage capacity, and are more favorable for CBM development. The fundamental reason for the two-segment variation of TPV and SSA of six main coal seams is the symmetry of sedimentary facies in coal-bearing strata; moreover, the ash yield controls the TPV and SSA of coal seams, and the ratio of vitrinite to inertinite (V/I) controls the development of pores.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrett EP, Joyner LG, Halenda PP (1951) The determination of pore volume and area distribution in porous substances: computations from nitrogen isotherms. J Am Chem Soc 73:373–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunauer SB, Emmett PH, Teller E (1938) Adsorption of gases in multi-molecular layers. J Am Chem Soc 60:309–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai YD, Liu DM, Yao YB, Li JQ, Liu JL (2011) Fractal characteristics of coal pores based on classic geometry and thermodynamics models. Acta Geologica Sinica - English Ed 85:1150–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SD, Tang DZ, Tao S, Xu H, Zhao JL, Fu HJ, Ren PF (2018a) In-situ stress, stress-dependent permeability, pore pressure and gas-bearing system in multiple coal seams in the Panguan area, western Guizhou, China. J Nat Gas Sci Eng 49:110–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SD, Tao S, Tang DZ, Xu H, Li S, Zhao JL, Jiang Q, Yang HX (2017) Pore structure characterization of different rank coals using N2 and CO2 adsorption and its effect on CH4 adsorption capacity: a case in Panguan syncline, western Guizhou, China. Energy Fuel 31:6034–6044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen YL, Qin Y, Wei CT, Huang LL, Shi QM, Wu CF, Zhang XY (2018b) Porosity changes in progressively pulverized anthracite subsamples: implications for the study of closed pore distribution in coals. Fuel 225:612–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson CR, Bustin RM (1996) Variation in micropore capacity and size distribution with composition in bituminous coal of the Western Canadian Sedimentary Basin: implications for coalbed methane potential. Fuel 75:1483–1498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson CR, Bustin RM (1999) The effect of pore structure and gas pressure upon the transport properties of coal: a laboratory and modeling study. 1. Isotherms and pore volume distributions. Fuel 78:1333–1344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diessel CFK (1982) An appraisal of coal facies based on macerals characteristics. Aust Coal Geol 4:474–483

    Google Scholar 

  • Duan XQ, Qu JW, Wang ZN (2009) Pore structure of macerals from a low rank bituminous. J China Univ Min Technol 38:224–228 (In Chinese with an English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Friesen WI, Mikula RJ (1987) Fractal dimensions of coal particles. J Colloid Interface Sci 120:263–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fu HJ, Tang DZ, Xu T, Xu H, Tao S, Li S, Yin ZY, Chen BL, Zhang C, Wang LL (2017) Characteristics of pore structure and fractal dimension of low-rank coal: a case study of Lower Jurassic Xishanyao coal in the southern Junggar Basin, NW China. Fuel 193:2542–2564

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gan H, Nandi SP, Walker PL (1972) Nature of porosity in American coals. Fuel 51:272–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao D, Qin Y, Yi TS (2009) CBM geology and exploring-developing stratagem in Guizhou Province, China. Procedia Earth and Planet Sci 1:882–887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gmur D, Kwiecińska BK (2002) Facies analysis of coal seams from the Cracow Sandstone Series of the Upper Silesia Coal Basin, Poland. Int J Coal Geol 52:29–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodot BB (1966) Outburst of coal and coalbed gas. China Industry Press, Beijing (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaroniec M, Kruk M, Olivier J (1997) Fractal analysis of composite adsorption isotherms obtained by using density functional theory data for argon in slitlike pores. Langmuir 13:3719–3722

    Google Scholar 

  • Ju W, Yang ZB, Qin Y, Yi TS, Zhang ZG (2018) Characteristics of in-situ stress state and prediction of the permeability in the Upper Permian coalbed methane reservoir, western Guizhou region, SW China. J Pet Sci Eng 165:199–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Jiang B, Lin S, Lin SF, Wang JL, Ji MJ, Qu ZH (2011) Tectonically deformed coal types and pore structures in Puhe and Shanchahe coal mines in western Guizhou. Min Sci Technol 21:353–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Tang DZ, Xu H, Yang Z (2012) The pore-fracture system properties of coalbed methane reservoirs in the Panguan syncline, Guizhou, China. Geosci Front 3:853–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lu J, Shao LY, Wang ZG, Li YH, Wang S (2014) Organic carbon isotope composition and paleoclimatic evolution of Jurassic coal seam in the northern Qaidam basin. J China Univ Min Technol 43:612–618 (In Chinese with an English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lv ZF, Zhang XM, Zhong LW, Zhang SA, Zhu ZY, Li J (1991) The pore features of lump coal and its influence factors. J China Univ Min Technol 20:48–57 (In Chinese with an English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahnke M, Mögel HJ (2003) Fractal analysis of physical adsorption on material surfaces. Colloids Surf A Physicochem Eng Asp 216:215–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot BB (1975) Les objets fractals: forme, hazard et dimension. Flammarion, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Mastalerz M, Drobniak A, Rupp J (2008) Meso- and micropore characteristics of coal lithotypes: implications for CO2 adsorption. Energy Fuel 22:4049–4061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neimark AV (1990) Determination of surface fractal dimension from the results of an adsorption experiment. J Chem Phys 64:1398–1403

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie BS, Liu XF, Yang LL, Meng JQ, Li XC (2015) Pore structure characterization of different rank coals using gas adsorption and scanning electron microscopy. Fuel 158:908–917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishioka M (1992) The associated molecular nature of bituminous coal. Fuel 71:941–948

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okolo G, Everson R, Neomagus H, Roberts M, Sakurovs R (2015) Comparing the porosity and surface areas of coal as measured by gas adsorption, mercury intrusion and SAXS techniques. Fuel 141:293–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeifer P, Colem W (1990) Fractals in surface science: scattering and thermodynamics of adsorbed films. New J Chem 14:221–232

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt M, Fernandes CP, Neto DC, Wolf FG, Santos VS (2013) Characterization of pore systems in seal rocks using nitrogen gas adsorption combined with mercury injection capillary pressure techniques. Mar Pet Geol 39:138–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi JQ, Durucan S (2005) Gas storage and flow in coalbed reservoirs: implementation of a bidisperse pore model for gas diffusion in coal matrix. SPE Reserv Eval Eng 8:3823–3832

    Google Scholar 

  • Sing KSW (1985) Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems-with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity. Pure Appl Chem 57:603–619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Song Y, Jiang B, Li FL, Liu JG (2017) Structure and fractal characteristic of micro- and meso-pores in low, middle-rank tectonic deformed coals by CO2 and N2 adsorption. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 253:191–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swanson SM, Mastalerz MD, Engle MA, Valentine BJ, Warwick PD, Hackley PC, Belkin HE (2015) Pore characteristics of Wilcox Group Coal, U.S. Gulf Coast Region: implications for the occurrence of coalbed gas. Int J Coal Geol 139:80–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SY/T 5346-2005, 2005, Chinese oil and gas industry standard. Rock capillary pressure measurement (In Chinese).

  • SY/T 6154-1995, 1995, Chinese oil and gas industry standard. Determination of specific surface and pore size distribution of rock by static nitrogen adsorption capacity method (In Chinese).

  • Tao S, Chen SD, Tang DZ, Zhao X, Xu H, Li S (2018a) Material composition, pore structure and adsorption capacity of low-rank coals around the first coalification jump: a case of eastern Junggar Basin, China. Fuel 211:804–815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao S, Pan ZJ, Tang SL, Chen SD (2019) Current status and geological conditions for the applicability of CBM drilling technologies in China: a review. Int J Coal Geol 202:95–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tao S, Zhao X, Tang DZ, Deng CM, Meng Q, Cui Y (2018b) A model for characterizing the continuous distribution of gas storing space in low-rank coals. Fuel 283:552–557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teichmüller M (1989) The genesis of coal from the viewpoint of coal petrology. Int J Coal Geol 12:1–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teng J, Mastalerz M, Hampton LB (2017) Maceral controls on porosity characteristics of lithotypes of Pennsylvanian high volatile bituminous coal: example from the Illinois Basin. Int J Coal Geol 172:80–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang BY, Qin Y, Shen J, Zhang QS, Wang G (2018) Pore structure characteristics of low- and medium-rank coals and their differential adsorption and desorption effects. J Pet Sci Eng 165:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardlaw NC, Mckellar M (1981) Mercury porosimetry and the interpretation of pore geometry in sedimentary rocks and artificial models. Powder Technol 29:127–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu BB, He MD (2003) Guizhou coalfield geology. China University of Mining and Technology press, Xuzhou (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yan JP, He X, Geng B, Hu QH, Feng CZ, Kou XP, Li XW, State K (2017) Nuclear magnetic resonance T2 spectrum: multifractal characteristics and pore structure evaluation. Appl Geophys 14:205–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang JY (2008) The 6# coal of Heidaigou from Junger Coalfield in inner Mongolia: the action of trace elements separation in the coal facies. J Fuel Chem Technol 36:646–652 (In Chinese with an English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang ZB, Zhang ZG, Qin Y, Wu CC, Yi TS, Li YY, Tang J, Chen J (2018) Optimization methods of production layer combination for coalbed methane development in multi-coal seams. Pet Explor Dev 45:312–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao YB, Liu DM, Che Y, Tang DZ, Tang SH, Huang WH (2010) Petrophysical characterization of coals by low-field nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Fuel 89:1371–1380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang BQ, Li SF (1995) Determination of the surface fractal dimension for porous media by mercury porosimetry. Ind Eng Chem Res 34:1383–1386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang SH, Tang SH, Tang DZ, Pan ZJ, Yang F (2010) The characteristics of coal reservoir pores and coal facies in Liulin district, Hedong coal field of China. Int J Coal Geol 81:117–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang SH, Tang SH, Tang DZ, Yan ZF, Zhang B, Zhang JZ (2009) Fractal characteristics of coal reservoir seepage pore, east margin of Ordos basin. J China Univ Min Technol 38:713–718 (In Chinese with an English abstract)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao JL, Xu H, Tang DZ, Mathews JP, Li S, Tao S (2016a) A comparative evaluation of coal specific surface area by CO2, and N2, adsorption and its influence on CH4, adsorption capacity at different pore sizes. Fuel 183:420–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao JL, Xu H, Tang DZ, Mathews JP, Li S, Tao S (2016b) Coal seam porosity and fracture heterogeneity of macrolithotypes in the Hancheng Block, eastern margin, Ordos Basin, China. Int J Coal Geol 159:18–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41772155,41802181), the key project of the National Science and Technology (2016ZX05044-002), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China (No. 2015XKZD07).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Key Laboratory of Coalbed Methane Resources and Reservoir Formation Process, Ministry of Education, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221008, China

    Zhengguang Zhang, Yong Qin, Zhaobiao Yang & Junlong Zhao

  2. School of Resources and Geosciences, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, 221116, China

    Zhengguang Zhang, Yong Qin, Zhaobiao Yang & Junlong Zhao

  3. Guizhou Research Center of Shale Gas and Coalbed Methane Engineering Technology, Guiyang, 550009, China

    Tongsheng Yi

Authors
  1. Zhengguang Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yong Qin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhaobiao Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Junlong Zhao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tongsheng Yi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhaobiao Yang.

Additional information

Editorial handling: Santanu Banerjee

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, Z., Qin, Y., Yang, Z. et al. Segmentation of multi-coal seam pore structure in single well profile and its sedimentary control: a case study of Well Y1 in Panguan syncline, western Guizhou, China. Arab J Geosci 12, 469 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4629-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-019-4629-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation