Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

An orientation survey for methodizing classification accuracy of Cu mineralization by hybrid methods of fractal, neural networks, and support vector machine in Haftcheshmeh, NW Iran

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main objective of this study is to compare and find an optimal method (structured or unstructured) for determining lithogeochemical and alteration classes of Haftcheshmeh Cu-porphyry deposit located in NW of Iran. Initially, fractal model of concentration-area (C-A) was applied to Cu data followed by principal component analysis in which PC2 pertinent to Cu mineralization, utilized in C-A model. Both methods had weak results probably due to insufficient elimination of syngenetic effect by this method. To overcome these drawbacks, other supplementary models were implemented commencing with fuzzy C means clustering (FCMC), then PCA was applied to the residuals of FCMC. On the other hand, Neural Network (NN) classifier was added to optimize classification. A total of three integration methods, PCANN, FCMCNN, and FCMCPCANN, were executed for geochemical and alteration classifications. Among them, FCMCNN had the least mean squared error (MSE) and compatible results with the reality of the area. Furthermore, the integrated models of Support Vector Machine (SVM) such as PCASVM, FCMCSVM, and FCMCPCASVM were attempted and compared with the results of NN integrations. The SVM results were unsatisfactory due to low classification accuracy, whereas the NNs methods had privileges for classification. Overall, comparative stepwise approach indicates FCMCNN as tangible optimized technique in eliminating the syngenetic effects causing considerable uncertainty reduction for classifying different geochemical classes enabling the proposed method more reliable for detailed exploration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbaszadeh M, Hezarkhani A, Soltani-Mohammadi S (2015) Classification of alteration zones based on whole-rock geochemical data using support vector machine. J Geol Soc India 85:500–508

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afzal P, Heidari SM, Ghaderi M, Yasrebi AB (2017) Determination of mineralization stages using correlation between geochemical fractal modeling and geological data in Arabshah sedimentary rock-hosted epithermal gold deposit, NW Iran. Ore Geol Rev 91:278–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alpaydin E (2014) Introduction to machine learning 3rd edition. Adaptive computation and machine learning. The MIT Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezdek JC (1981) Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms. Plenum Press, Newyork

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boser BE, Guyon I, Vapnik V (1992) A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers. In: Proceedings of the fifth annual workshop on computational learning theory. ACM Press, pp 144–152

  • Calagary AA (2003) Stable isotope (S, O, H and C) studies of the phyllic and potassic –phyllic alteration zones of the porphyry copper deposit at Sungun, East Azarbaijan, Iran. J Asian Earth Sci 21:767–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carranza EJM (2009) Geochemical anomaly and mineral prospectivity mapping in GIS. Handbook of exploration and environmental geochemistry, vol 11. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang C, Lin C (2001) Training ϑ-support vector classifiers: theory and algorithms. Neural Comput 13(9):2119–2147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang C, Lin C (2002) Training ϑ- support vector regression: theory and algorithms. Neural Comput 14(8):1959–1977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang CC, Lin CJ (2011) LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol 2:1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Q, Agterberg FP, Ballantyne SB (1994) The separation of geochemical anomalies from background by fractal methods. J Geochem Explor 51:109–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Q, Xu Y, Grunsky E (1999) Integrated spatial and spectral analysis for geochemical anomaly separation. In: Lippard SJ, Naess A, Sinding-Larsen R (eds) Proceedings of the fifth annual conference of the international association for mathematical geology, Trondheim, Norway, pp 87–92

  • Cheng Q, Xu Y, Grunsky E (2000) Integrated spatial and spectrum method for geochemical anomaly separation. Nat Resour Res 9:43–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Q, Bonham-Carter G, Wang W, Zhang S, Li W, Xia Q (2011) A spatially weighted principal component analysis for multi-element geochemical data for mapping locations of felsic intrusions in the Gejiu mineral district of Yunnan, China. Comput Geosci 37(5):662–669 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2010.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cloutier V, Lefebvre R, Therrien RM, Savard MM (2008) Multivariate statistical analysis of geochemical data as indicative of the hydrogeochemical evolution of groundwater in a sedimentary rock aquifer system. J Hydrol 353:294–313 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.02.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support- vector network. Mach Learn 20(3):273–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisp DJ, Burges CJC (2000) A geometric interpretation of ϑ-SVM classifiers. In: Solla S, Leen T, Muller KR (eds) Advances in neural information processing systems, vol 12. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 244–250

    Google Scholar 

  • Cristianini N, Scholkopf B (2002) Support vector machines and kernel methods- the new generation of learning machines. AI Mag 23:31–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Cristianini N, Shawe-Taylor J (2000) An introduction to support vector machines and other kernel- based learning methods. Cambridge university Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Davis L (ed) (1991) Handbook of genetic algorithms. Van Nostrand Reinhold, Newyork

    Google Scholar 

  • Feder J (1988) Fractals. Plenum Press, Newyork 283pp

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Guo QH, Kelly M, Graham CH (2005) Support vector machines for prediction distribution of sudden oak death in California. Ecol Model 182:75–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G, Pfahringer B, Reutemann P, Witten IH (2009) The WEKA data mining software: an update; SIGKDD explorations. 11(1)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris JR, Wilkinson L, Grunsky EC (2000) Effective use and interpretation of lithogeochemical data in regional mineral exploration programs: application of geographic information systems GIS technology. Ore Geol Rev 16:107–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • He H, Jin J, Xiong Y, Chen B, Sun W, Zhao L (2008) Language feature mining for music emotion classification via supervised learning from lyrics. Adv Comput intell 5370:426–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Hezarkhani A (2006) Petrology of intrusive rocks within the Sungun porphyry copper deposit, Azarbaijan, Iran. J Asian Earth Sci 73:326–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howarth RJ, Earle SAM (1979) Application of a generalized power transformation to geochemical data. Math Geol 11:45–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu CW, Chang CC, Lin CJ (2010) A practical guide to support vector classification, technical report.: department of computer science and information engineering. University of National Taiwan, Taipei, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang C, Davis LS, Townshend JRG (2002) An assessment of support vector machines for land cover classification. Int J Remote Sens 23:725–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayalakshmi T, Santhakumaran A (2011) Statistical normalization and Back propagation for classification. Int J Comput Theory Eng 3:1793–8201

    Google Scholar 

  • Joachims T (1998) Text categorization with support vector machines: learning with many relevant features. In: Proceedings of European conference on machine learning. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 137–142

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kavzoglu T, Colkesen I (2009) A kernel functions analysis for support vector machines for land cover classification. Int J Appl Earth Obs Geoinf 11:352–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kishida A, Kerrich R (1987) Hydrothermal alteration zoning and gold concentration at the Kerr-Addisin Archean lode gold deposit, / Kirkland Lake, / Ontarion. Econ Geol 82:649–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu G, Xu H, Zhou D, Mei C (2008) On-line estimation of biomass concentration based on ANN and fuzzy c means clustering. Adv Comput Intell 5370:306–314

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot BB (1983) The fractal geometry of nature (updated and augmented edition). Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohammadzadeh M, Naseri A (2018) Geochemical modeling of orogenic gold deposit using PCANN hybrid method in the Alut, Kurdistan province, Iran. J Afr Earth Sci 139:173–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muller J, Kylander M, Martinez-Cortizas A, Wuest RAJ, Weiss D, Blake K, Coles B, Garcia-Sanchez R (2008) The use of principle component analyses in characterizing trace and major elemental distribution in a 55 kyr peat deposit in tropical Australia: implications to paleoclimate. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 72(2):449–463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gca.2007.09.028

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan J, Zhuang Y, Fong S (2016) The impact of data normalization on stock market prediction: using SVM and Technical Indicators. International Conference on Soft Computing in Data Science, pp 72–88

  • Pendharkar PC (2009) Genetic algorithm based neural network approaches for predicting churn in cellular wireless network services. J Expert Syst Appl 36:6714–6720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadeghi B, Madani N, Carranza EJM (2015) Combination of geostatistical simulation and fractal modeling for mineral resource classification. J Geochem Explor 149:59–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scholkopf B, Smola AJ, Williamson RC, Bartlett PL (2000) New support vector algorithms. Neural Comput 12(5):1207–1245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi G (2014) Data mining and knowledge discovery for geosciences. Elsevier

  • Sohrabi G, Hossenzadeh MR, Calagari AA, Hajalilou B (2015) Study of Mo mineralization in Gharadagh (Ordobad)-Shivardagh strip with emphasis on alteration, petrology and geochemistry of host intrusive bodies (NW Iran). Q Geosci Geol Surv Iran 24:243–258

    Google Scholar 

  • Vapnik V (1992) Principles of risk minimization for learning theory. In: Lippman DS, Moody JE, Touretzky DS (eds) Advances in neural information processing systems. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco, pp 831–838

    Google Scholar 

  • Vapnik V (1995) The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vapnik V (1998) Statistical learning theory. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Zhao J, Cheng Q (2011) Analysis and integration of geo-information to identify granitic intrusions as exploration targets in southeastern Yunnan District, China. Comput Geosci 37:1946–1957 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2011.06.023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Zhao J, Cheng Q, Liu J (2012) Tectonic–geochemical exploration modeling for characterizing geo-anomalies in southeastern Yunnan district, China. J Geochem Explor 122:71–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang W, Zhao J, Cheng Q, Carranza EJM (2015) GIS-based mineral potential modeling by advanced spatial analytical methods in the southeastern Yunnan mineral district, China. Ore Geol Rev 735–748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oregeorev.2014.09.032.71

  • Yousefi M (2017) Analysis of zoning pattern of geochemical indicators for targeting of porphyry-cu mineralization: a pixel-based mapping approach. J Nat Resour Res 26:429–441. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-017-9334-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yousefi M, Carranza EJM (2015) Fuzzification of continuous-value spatial evidence for mineral prospectivity mapping. Comput Geosci 74:97–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yousefi M, Carranza EJM, Kamkar-Rouhani A (2013) Weighted drainage catchment basin mapping of stream sediment geochemical anomalies for mineral potential mapping. J Geochem Explor 128:88–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yousefi M, Kamkar-Rouhani A, Carranza EJM (2014) Application of staged factor analysis and logistic function to create stream a fuzzy sediment geochemical evidence layer for mineral prospectivity mapping. Geochemistry: exploration, environment. Analysis 14:45–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu X, Liu S, Ren J, Zhang T, Yu X, Liu S, Ren J, Zhang T (2007) Robust fast independent component analysis applied to mineral resources prediction. Proceedings of the IAMG 07, Beijing, China, pp 94–97

  • Yu X, Liu L, Hu D, Wang Z (2012) Robust Ordinal Independent Component Analysis (ROICA) applied to mineral resources prediction. J Jilin Univ (Earth Sci Ed) 42(3):872–880. https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-5888.2012.03.035

  • Zhang T, Yu X, Liu L, Yu X, Leng H (2007) Constrained fast independent component analysis applied tomineral resources prediction. Proceedings of the IAMG 07, Beijing,China, pp 535–540

  • Zhao J, Wang W, Dong L, Yang W, Cheng Q (2012) Application of geochemical anomaly identification methods in mapping of intermediate and felsic igneous rocks in eastern Tianshan, China. J Geochem Explor 122:81–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J, Wang W, Cheng Q (2013) Investigation of spatially non-stationary influences of tectono-magmatism on Fe mineralization in eastern Tianshan, China with geographically weighted regression. J Geochem Explor 134:38–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J, Wang W, Cheng Q (2014) Application of geographically weighted regression to identify spatially non-stationary relationships between Femineralization and its controlling factors in eastern Tianshan, China. Ore Geol Rev 57:628–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ziaii M, Doulati-Ardejani F, Ziaei M, Soleymani AA (2012) Neuro-fuzzy modeling based genetic algorithms for identification of geochemical anomalies in mining geochemistry. Appl Geochem 27:663–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuo R (2011) Identifying geochemical anomalies associated with cu and Pb-Zn skarn mineralization using principal component analysis and spectrum-area fractal modeling in the Gangdese belt, Tibet (China). J Geochem Explor 111:13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuo R (2017) Machine learning of mineralization-related geochemical anomalies: a review of potential methods. Nat Resour Res J 26:457–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuo R, Carranza EJM (2011) Support vector machine: a tool for mapping mineral prospectivity. Comput Geosci 37:1967–1975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuo R, Wang J (2016) Fractal/multifractal modeling of geochemical data: a review. J Geochem Explor 164:33–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuo R, Carranza EJM, Cheng Q (2012) Fractal/multifractal modeling of geochemical exploration data. J Geochem Explor 122:1–3

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohammadjafar Mohammadzadeh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mohammadzadeh, M., Mohebbi, P. An orientation survey for methodizing classification accuracy of Cu mineralization by hybrid methods of fractal, neural networks, and support vector machine in Haftcheshmeh, NW Iran. Arab J Geosci 11, 618 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3963-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3963-y

Keywords

Navigation