Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Evaluation of the suitability of sites for outdoor recreation using a multi-criteria assessment model

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The determination of the suitability of a site for recreation is a complex process that requires the integration of several criteria. The main aim of the current study carried out in the Eğirdir district of southern Turkey was to determine the most suitable zones for outdoor recreation by applying new methodological approach. Large volumes of spatial data and multiple criteria were assessed simultaneously by utilising the linear combination technique and a hierarchical analysis in association with GIS to rank the suitability of a mosaic of contiguous, semi-natural sites for outdoor recreation. According to obtained results, 33.1% was deemed very suitable or suitable for outdoor recreational activities, whereas 25.8% was determined as less suitable and 41.1% not suitable for outdoor recreation place in the study area. In addition, in order to investigate temporal changes in human activities, land use and land cover detection analysis was performed for the period 1988 to 2016 inclusive. The number of potential recreational sites increased over time, based on the increased amount of forested and grassed areas. On the other hand, increasing artificial area and decreasing shrub lands caused reduction of the potential recreational sites during the 28-year period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aklıbaşında M, Yahya Bulut Y (2013) Analysis of terrains suitable for tourism and recreation by using geographic information system (GIS). International Caucasian Forestry Symposium 961–969

  • Alvarez-Guerra M, Viguri JR, Voulvoulis N (2009) A multicriteria-based methodology for site prioritisation in sediment management. Environ Int 35(6):920–930 ISSN: 0160-4120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bobade ST, Bhashkar BP, Gaikwad MS, Raja P, Gaikwad SS, Anatwar SG, Patil SV, Singh SR, Maji AK (2010) A GIS-based land use suitability assessment in Seoni district, Madhya, Pradesh, India. Trop Ecol 51(1):41–54 0266–4674 (Print) 1469–7831 (Online)

    Google Scholar 

  • Borzoei N, Maleknia R, Zeinivand H (2014) Ecological capability evaluation of taf traditional-property for ıntensive recreation based on MCDM. Agri Sci Develop 3(2):175–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd SW, Butler RW (1996) Seeing the forest through the trees: using GIS to identify potential ecotourism sites in northern Ontario. In: Harrison LC, Husbands W (eds) Practicing responsible tourism: international case studies in tourism planning, policy and development. Wiley, New York, pp 380–403

    Google Scholar 

  • Broadhurst R (2001) Managing environments for leisure and recreation. Taylor and Francis Group, Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhushan N, Rai K (2004) Strategic decision making: applying the analytic hierarchy process. New York

  • Chen Y, Hipel KW, Kilgour DM, Zhu Y (2009) A strategic classification support system for brownfield redevelopment. Environ Model Softw 24:647–654 ISSN: 1364-8152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colson V, Garcia S, Rondeux J, Lejeune P (2010) Map and determinants of woodlands visiting in Wallonia. Urban For Urban Green 9(2):83–91 ISSN: 1618-8667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Congalton RG (1996) Accuracy assessment: a critical component of land cover mapping. In: Scott JM, Tear TH, Davis F (eds) A land scape approach to biodiversity planning. American Society of Photogrammetric and Remote Sensing, Charlotte, pp 119–131

    Google Scholar 

  • De Clercq EM, De Wulf R, Van Herzele A (2007) Relating spatial pattern of forest cover to accessibility. Landsc Urban Plan 80:14–22 ISSN: 0169-2046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeVries S, Goossen M (2002) Modelling recreational visits to forests and nature areas. Urban For Urban Gree 1:5–14 ISSN: 1618-8667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeVries S, Lankhorst JR, Buis AE (2007) Mapping the attractiveness of the Dutch countryside: AGIS-based landscape appreciation model. Forest Snow and Landscape Research 81:43–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Duygu Cay R (2015) Environment and ecology at the beginning of 21st century. Recreation and urban park management. St. Kliment Ohridski University Press, Sofia, Chapter 21, 302–312

  • Fan F, Weng Q, Wang Y (2007) Land use land cover change in Guangzhou, China, from 1998 to 2003, based on Landsat TM/ETM+ imagery. Sensors 7:1323–1342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forkuo EK, Frimpong A (2012) Analysis of forest cover change detection. Int J Remote Sens App 2(4):82–92 ISSN Online: 2226–4353 ISSN Print: 2226–4361

    Google Scholar 

  • Fry GLA, Tveit MS, Ode A, Velarde MD (2009) The ecology of visual landscapes: exploring the conceptual common ground of visual and ecological landscape indicators. Ecol Indic 9: 933–947. ISSN: 1470-160X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobster PH (1995) Perception and use of a metropolitan greenway system for recreation. Landsc Urban Plan 33(3):401–413 ISSN: 0169-2046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guisse AW, Gimblett HR (1997) Assessing and mapping conflicting recreation values in state park settings using neural networks. AI Appl 11:78–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Gundersen VS, Frivold LH (2008) Public preferences for forest structures: a review of quantitative surveys from Finland, Norway and Sweden. Urban For Urban Green 7(4):241–258 ISSN: 1618-8667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karaman ME (2010) The tectonic evolution of Lake Eğirdir, West Turkey. Geologos 16(4):223–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kliskey AD (2000) Recreation terrain suitability mapping: a spatially explicit methodology for determining recreation potential for resource use assessment. Landsc Urban Plan 52:33–43 ISSN: 0169-2046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koppen Gro G, Sang AO, Tveit MS (2014) Managing the potential for outdoor recreation: adequate mapping and measuring of accessibility to urban recreational landscapes. Urban For Urban Green 13:71–83 ISSN: 1618-8667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraus R (1966) Recreation today: program planning and leadership. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, p 7

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurdoğlu O (2002) Investigation Kaçkar Mountain and National park and its near district in terms of Natural Source Management. PhD Thesis, Black Sea Technical University Graduated Schools of Natural and Applied Sciences (in Turkish)

  • Küçük F, Sari HM, Demir O, Gülle İ (2007) Variation process of fish fauna in Lake Eğridir. 1915–2007 Göller Yöresi, İç Anadolu Gölleri ve Sorunları: Göller Kongresi. 09–10 Haziran 2007, Isparta. (in Turkish)

  • Levinsohn A, Langford G, Rayner M, Rintoul J, Eccles R (1987) A micro-computer based GIS for assessing recreation suitability. In: Proceedings of GIS 87, American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Falls Church, VA, 739–747

  • Mahmoodi BN, Sharifi R, Maleknia R, Ahmadeian R, Zohreh K (2012) Ecological based planning of forest outdoor recreation case study: traditional span of Manj in Lordegan forest-Iran. RJECS 4(7):680–687 ISSN: 1618-8667

    Google Scholar 

  • Maleknia R, Mirarab J, Moghadam NM, Shahvalı A (2013) An ecological capability evaluation model for recreation, conservation and protection functions of Iran’s Zagros. Int J Agric Res Rev 3(2):458–466 ISSN-2360-7971

    Google Scholar 

  • Mc Harg IL (1992) Processes as values. In: Desing with nature, Published for the American Museum of Natural History, New York, p 279

  • Miller W, Collins MG, Steiner FR, Cook E (1998) An approach for greenway suitability analysis. Landsc Urban Plan 42:91–105 ISSN: 0169-2046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moller-Jensen L (1997) Classification of urban land cover based on expert systems, object models and texture. Comput Environ Urban Syst 21:291–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Najafi far A (2012) The role of land use planning in optimal management of Zagros forests. Case study: Sarb Darrehshahr catchment, Ilam province. Iran J Forests and Poplar Res 19:510–522 ISSN: 1735–0889

    Google Scholar 

  • Ode A, Miller D (2011) Analyzing the relationship between indicators of landscape complexity and preference. Environ Plann B Plann Des 38:24–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly M, Brink R (2006) Initial risk based screening of potential brown field development sites. Soil Sediment Contam 93:463–470. https://doi.org/10.1080/15320383.2017.1255875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piran H (2013) Site selection for local forest park using analytic hierarchy process and geographic information system, case study: Badreh Country M. Sc. Studies Department of Forestry, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resource, Lorestan University

  • Rezaei-Moghaddam K, Karami E (2008) A multiple criteria evaluation of sustainable agricultural development models using AHP. Environ Dev Sustain 10:407–426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty T (1993) The analytic hierarchy process: a 1993 overview. Cent Eur J Oper Res and Econ 2:119–137. SSN: 1435-246X (print version) ISSN: 1613–9178 (electronic version)

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty T, Vargas L (2001) Methods, concepts and applications of the analytic hierarchy process. Boston

  • Skov-Petersen H, Goossen M (2009) Assessing and planning the supply of opportunities for forest recreation. In: Bell S, Simpson M, Tyrvainen L, Sievanen T, Probstl U (eds) European forest recreation and tourism. Taylor Francis, pp 134–148

  • Stebbins RA (2005) Choice and experiential definitions of leisure. Leis Sci 27(4):349–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarhan Z (1998) Eğirdir Göl. 2. Isparta’nın Dünü-Bugünü ve Yarını Sempozyumu, Cilt 1, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Yayını, Isparta (in Turkish)

  • Tozar T (2006) Ecological planning methods developed for sustainability of natural sources. Post-graduate Thesis, Yıldız Teknik University, Science Institute

  • TSMS (2016) Turkish State Meteorological Service. Long term meteorological data between 1975 and 2016 year

  • Van Herzele A, Wiedemann T (2003) A monitoring tool for the provision of accessible and attractive urban green spaces. Landsc Urban Plan 63(2):109–126 ISSN: 0169-2046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wedding GC, Crawford-Brown D (2007) Measuring site-level success in brownfield redevelopments: a focus on sustainability and green building. J Environ Manag 85:483–495 ISSN: 0301-4797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickware GM, Howarth PJ (1981) Change detection in the Peace-Athabasca delta using digital Landsat data. Remote Sens Environ 1:9–25 ISSN: 0034-4257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams K, Dair C (2007) A framework for assessing the sustainability of brown field developments. J Environ Plan Manag 50:23–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2017.1290589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woo DM, Do VD (2015) Post-classification change detection of high resolution satellite images using Ada Boost Classifier. Adv Sci Technol Lett 117:34–38. ISSN: 1936–6612 (Print): EISSN: 1936–7317 (Online)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Chen B, Sun Z, Bao Z (2013) Landscape perception and recreation needs in urban green space in Fuyang, Hangzhou, China. Urban For Urban Green 12:44–52. ISSN: 1618-8667

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Gregory T. Sullivan of the University of Queensland in Brisbane, Australia, for proofreading and comments on an earlier version of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Orhan Dengiz.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dağıstanlı, C., Turan, İ.D. & Dengiz, O. Evaluation of the suitability of sites for outdoor recreation using a multi-criteria assessment model. Arab J Geosci 11, 492 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3856-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3856-0

Keywords

Navigation