Skip to main content
Log in

Physical characterization to estimate the hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer case study: wadi Izerzi (Tamanrasset-Algeria)

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The groundwater exploitation requires the evaluation of groundwater potentiality of the aquifer, particularly from the various studies such as the study of its physical characteristics. A complete hydrodynamic study requires knowledge of the properties of the aquifer system: its characterizing configuration and structure, functions of the reservoir, and its behavior. The aquifer is a complex interaction of two main functions: the storativity function and the conductivity function. This research is an integral part of a long-term research development and of a short-term operation, typically for medium- and long-term exploration of groundwater resources. In order to achieve this target, a substantial number of well-developed methods of evaluating the hydric potential and statistic calculations are currently being established. It is generally accepted that the method of estimating hydraulic parameters such as hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer is a very effective way, in case it is correlated to the results of the physical properties characterizing this aquifer.

The laboratory study has been realized on an adequate sample of the soil from the aquifer by using appropriate techniques, to define its properties such as particle size, porosity, and measurements. For this case study, the physical properties of the aquifer materials are based on analysis of the test results obtained from 18 samples of the soil aquifer material, weighing from 2500 to 3000 g each, with the total mass of about 50 kg.

Resulting values of the hydraulic conductivity are quite similar; all of them meet the range of the hydraulic conductivity from medium to coarse sand (8.8 E-05 to 3.27 E-03 m/s), an average value of (1.5 E-3 m/s). Nevertheless, it is possible to show the linear relationship between hydraulic conductivity and other physical properties such as void ratio (e) and the effective diameter (d10) of the aquifer material which its mean values are respectively 52% and 0.52 mm. The hydraulic conductivity of soil depends on a variety of physical factors, including porosity, particle size and distribution, shape of particles, and arrangement of particles. Thus, it is complicated to identify a method to estimate values of hydraulic conductivity yielding a priori reliable ranges of results, when they are compared with results obtained by other methods of in situ measurement and laboratory. However, this method of empirical expression based on the particle size we have used provides satisfactory results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

References

  • Aubertin M, Bussiere B, Aachib M, Chapuis RP, Crespo JR (1996) Une modélisation numérique des écoulements non saturés dans des couvertures multicouches en sols. Hydrogéologie 1:3–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Aubertin M, Ricard JF, Chapuis RP (1998) A predictive model for the water retention curve: application to tailing from hard rock mines. Can Geotech J 35:55–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aubertin M, Mbonimpa M, Bussiere B, Chapuis RP (2003a) A model to predict the water retention curve from basic geotechnical properties. Can Geotech J 40:1104–1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aubertin M, Mbonimpa M, Bussiere B, Chapuis R. P (2003b) Development of a model to predict the water retention curve using geotechnical properties. Montreal: Editions de l’Ecole polytechnique. 51 pp. EPM-RT-2003-01

  • Barbour S. L, Hendry M. J, Smith J. L, Beckie R. D, Wilson G. W (2001) A research partnership program in the mining industry for waste rock hydrology. Workshop notes (unpublished). University of Saskatchewan, Canada

  • Castany G (1982) Principes et méthodes de l’hydrogéologie, Ed. Dunod Paris, 235 p

  • Chapuis RP (2004) Predicting the saturated hydraulic conductivity of sand and gravel using effective diameter and void ratio. Can Geotech J 41(5):787–795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapuis RP (2008) Predicting the saturated hydraulic conductivity of natural soils. Geotech News 26:47–50

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapuis RP, Baas K, Davenne L (1989) Laboratory permeability tests on sand. Influence of the compaction method on anisotropy. Can Geotech J 26(4):614–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gamache-Rochette A (2004) Une étude de caractérisation en laboratoire et sur le terrain des écoulements de l’eau dans les roches stériles, Mémoire de maîtrise, Génie Minéral, École Polytechnique de Montréal, 280 p

  • Hazen A (1911) Discussion of “dams on sand formation”. Trans Am Soc Civil Engineers 73:199–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Herasymuik G M (1996) “Hydrogeology of a sulfide waste rock dump”, Masters’ Thesis in Civil Engineering, University of Saskatchewan, 184 p

  • Hernandez M A (2005) Étude des fonctions hydriques des matériaux grossiers. Mémoire M.Sc.A. , Génie Minéral, École Polytechnique de Montréal

  • Hwang SI, Hong SP (2006) Estimating relative hydraulic conductivity from log-normally distributed particle-size data. Geoderma 133:421–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kézdi Á (1976) Soil mechanics, (in Hungarian), Tankönyvkiadó, Budapest

  • Kovács GY (1972) Seepage hydraulics, (in Hungarian), Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest

  • Li M (2000) Unsaturated flow and transport observations in large waste rock columns, Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Acid Rock Drainage, Denver, Soc. Mining, Metallurgy & Exploration, Inc (SME), pp. 247 256

  • Mbonimpa M, Aubertin M, Chapuis RP, Bussière B (2002) Practical pedotransfer functions for estimating the saturated hydraulic conductivity. Geotech Geol Eng 20(3):235–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mlynarek Z (2010) Quality of in situ and laboratory tests contribution to risk management

  • Navfac DM7 (1974) Design Manual-Soil Mechanics, Foundations, and Earth Structures U.S.Government Printing Office, Wahingthon, D.C.

  • Nimmo J (2004) Porosity and pore size distribution. Encycl Soils Environ 3:295–303 http://wwwrcamnl.wr.usgs.gov/uzf/abs_pubs/papers/nimmo.04.encyc.por.ese.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Rózsa L (1977) Foundation engineering handbook (in Hungarian), Műszaki kiadó

  • UZIELLI M (2008) Statistical analysis of geotechnical data. Proceedings of Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization Conference, Balkema, Taiwan, Taylor, Frances 2008

  • Vereecken H, Weynants M, Javaux M, Pachepsky M, Schaap MG, van Cenuchten MTH (2010) Using pedotransfer functions to estimate the van Genuchten-Mualem soil hydraulic properties: a review. Vadose Zone J 9(4):795–820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vipulanandan C, Ozgurel HG (2009) Simplified relationships for particle-size distribution and permeation groutability limits for soils. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 135:1190–1197

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mouloud Nefis.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nefis, M., Afrouag, S., Ben Abdelkrim, R. et al. Physical characterization to estimate the hydraulic conductivity of the aquifer case study: wadi Izerzi (Tamanrasset-Algeria). Arab J Geosci 11, 480 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3848-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3848-0

Keywords

Navigation