Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Geotechnical properties of Precambrian carbonate, Saudi Arabia

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The effect of post depositional processes (e.g., diagenesis) on geotechnical properties of the studied Fatima carbonates has been evaluated on 32 oriented samples of Precambrian carbonate of Fatima Group, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia where Fatima carbonate considered as the oldest sedimentary rock unit. Fatima carbonate sequence represents the middle part of Fatima Group and attains 90–130 m thick. Fatima carbonate composes mainly of alternating cycles of highly deformed, folded, and faulted stromatolitic carbonates. Algal laminates with scattered dolomite pseudomorphs are recorded within these carbonates and are shown clearly in cut-slabs. The laminae are millimetric in thickness. The Fatima carbonate has a relative abundance of nearly uniform-sized dolomite crystals. Dolomite crystal are represented by small-sized rhombs of euhedral, subhedral, and non-rhombic. The larger euhedral rhomb-shaped dolomite crystals are occurred as cavity filling dolomite. The silicification features are recognized as patches of cryptocrystalline quartz replacing laminated carbonates. It is believed that this type of silicification represents late diagenetic stage and not influenced by the depositional environment or by physicochemical conditions of water. XRD charts indicate that the Fatima carbonate is consisted mainly of dolomite, quartz, and minor constitutes of gypsum. These carbonates are mostly barren in marine fossils and it is clear that these carbonates were deposited within restricted (lagoonal) marine environment. The rock unit weight values of the studied Fatima carbonate range from 29.429 to 25.993 kN/m3. The total porosity varies from 9.147 to 6.112%. The uniaxial compressive strength (UCS, measured by Schmidt Hammer) values of Fatima carbonate range from 22.6 to 110 MPa for the horizontal direction and from 19.7 to 71.8 MPa for the vertical direction). The abovementioned results implicate that the studied Fatima carbonate rock samples are classified as medium to strong rocks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abd-Allah AMA, Ahmed AH, El-Fakharani A, El-Sawy EK, Ali KA (2014) Fatima suture: a new amalgamation zone in the western Arabian Shield, Saudi Arabia. Precambrian Res 249:57–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adel-Aal MH, Abd-Allah AMA, Khafagy AAB (2004) Compressive strength of carbonate rocks; problems and measurements. J Appl Geophys 3(2):27–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Harthi AA, Al-Amri RM, Shehata WM (1999) The porosity and engineering properties of vesicular basalt in Saudi Arabia. Eng Geol 54:313–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM (1984) Standard test method for unconfined compressive strength of intact rock core specimens. Soil and rock, building stones: annual book of ASTM standards 4.08. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania

  • ASTM D5030–04 (2012) Standard test method for density of soil and rock in place by the water replacement method in a test pit. Soil Rock I:D420–D5876

    Google Scholar 

  • Aufmuth RE (1973) A systematic determination of engineering criteria for rocks. Bull Assoc Eng Geol 11:235–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton N, Choubey V (1977) The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice. Rock Mech 10:1–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basahel AN, Bahafzalah A, Omara S, Jux U (1984) Early Cambrian carbonate platform of the Arabian Shield. Neues Jb Geol Paläontol Monat 2:113–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Boggs S Jr (2009) Petrology of sedimentary rocks, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press 600p

  • Brown GF, Hedge C, Marvin R (1978) Geochronologic data for the Arabian shield, section 2, tabulation of Rb-Sr and K-Ar ages, given by rocks of the Arabian shield: U.S. Geological Survey Saudi Arabian Mission Project Report 240: 10–20

  • Cargill JS, Shakoor A (1990) Evaluation of empirical methods for measuring the uniaxial compressive strength. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 27:495–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter PG, Sneddon M (1977) Comparison of the Schmidt hammer, point load and unconfined compression test in carboniferous strata. In: Attewell PB, editor. Proceedings of the Conference on Rock Engineering. University of New Castle upon Tyne, 197–210

  • Darbyshire DPF, Jackson NJ, Ramsay CR, Roobol MJ (1983) Rb-Sr isotope study of latest Proterozoic volcano-sedimentary belts in the Central Arabian shield: journal of the geological society, London 140:203–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deere DU, Miller RP (1966) Engineering classification and index properties for intact rocks. Technical Report, Rep No AFNL-TR; US Air Force Weapons Lab, New Mexico 65–116

  • Duyverman HJ, Harris NBW, Hawkesworth CJ (1982) Crustal accretion in the Pan African: Nd and Sr isotope evidence from the Arabian shield. Earth Planet Sci Lett 59:315–326

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fairbridge RW (1957) The dolomite question. In: R. J. Le Blanc and J. G. Breeding (Eds.), Regional aspects of carbonate deposition. SEPM Spec. Pub. No. 5: 124–178

  • Friedman GM, Amial AJ, Braun M, Miller DS (1973) Generation of carbonate particles and laminites in algal mats-example from sea marginal hypersaline pool, Gulf of Agaba, Red Sea. AAPG Bull 57(3):541–557

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner LW, Gregory AR (1974) Formation velocity and density: the diagnostic basis for stratigraphic. Geophysics 39:770–780

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaviglio P (1989) Longitudinal waves propagation in a limestone: the relationship between velocity and density. Rock Mech Rock Eng 22:399–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haney MG, Shakoor A (1994) The relationship between tensile and comprehensive strengths for selected sandstones as influenced by index properties and petrographic characteristic. Proc. 7th IAEG Cong. Lisbon, Portugal, II: 493–500

  • Haramy KY, DeMarco MJ (1985) Use the Schmidt hammer for rock and coal testing. In: Aswath JB, Eileen W. editors. 26th US Symposium on Rock Mechanics, Rapid City, 549-555

  • Hoffman P (1976) Stromatolite morphogensis in Shark Bay. Western Australia. In: Walter MR (ed) Stromatolites. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 261–277

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Inoue M, Omi M (1970) Study on the strength of rock by the Schmidt hammer test. In: Rock Mechanics in Japan 1:177–179

  • ISRM (1981) ISRM suggested methods. In: Brown ET (ed) Rock characterization testing and monitoring. Pergamon p, New York, p 211

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson PR (2006) Explanatory notes to the map of Proterozoic geology of Western Saudi Arabia, Technical Report, Saudi Geological Survey (SGS-TR-2006-4) 62p

  • Johnson PR, Andresen A, Collinsc AS, Fowler AR, Fritz H, Ghebreab W, Kusky T, Stern RJ (2011) Late Cryogenian–Ediacaran history of the Arabian–Nubian Shield: a review of depositional, plutonic, structural, and tectonic events in the closing stages of the northern East African Orogen. J Afr Earth Sci 61:167–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahraman S (2001) Evaluation of simple methods for assessing the uniaxial compressive strength of rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 38:981–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz O, Reches Z, Rogeiers JC (2000) Evaluation of mechanical rock properties using a Schmidt hammer. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 37:723–728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kydibinski A (1980) Bursting liability indices of coal. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 17:167–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lama RD, Vutukuri VS (1981) Handbook on mechanical properties of rocks. Trans Tech. Publications. 2nd edition

  • Land LS (1973) Contemporaneous dolomitization of Middle Pleistocene reefs by meteoric water, North Jamaica. Bull Mar Sci 23:64–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Lassnig K, Entacher M, Biermeier F, Galler R, Ebner F (2012) Decrease of Schmidt hammer hardness controlled by schistosity orientation of metamorphic rocks after loading with TBM cutters. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 56:27–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Logan BW, Hoffman P, Gebelein CF (1974) Algal mats, cryptoalgal fabrics and structures. Hamelin Pool, Western Australia. Mem Am Assoc Petrol Geologists 22:140–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller RP (1965) Engineering classification and index properties for intact rock. PhD thesis, University of Illinois

  • Moore TA, Al-Reaili MH (1989) Geologic map of the Makkah quadrangle, sheet 21D, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Ministry of Petroleum and Mineral Resources. Deputy Ministry for Mineral Resources Publication, Jeddah

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray RC (1960) Origin of porosity in carbonate rocks. J Sediment Petrol 30:59–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickel M (1982) Experimental dissolution of light and heavy minerals in comparison with weathering and interstratal solution in contribution to sedimentology. Schweizerbart. Schverlag. Stutgart 1;1–68

  • Pierson BJ (1982) Cyclic sedimentation, limestone diagenesis and dolomitization in Upper Cenozoic carbonates of the Southeastern Bahamas, Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. Miami, Florida

  • Purser BH, Aissaoui DM (1985) Reef diagenesis: dolomitization and dedolomitization at Mururoa Atoll, French Polynesia. Proc 5th Int Coral Reef Congr, Tahiti 3:263–269

  • Purser BH, Loreau P (1973) Aragonitic, supratidal encrustations on the Trucial Coast, Persian Gulf. In: Purser BH (ed) The Persian Gulf. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Purser BH, Orszag-Sperber F, Plaziat J-C, Rioual M (1993) Pliocene-Qauternary tectonics and sedimentation in the SW Gulf of Suez and N. Red Sea. Geoscientific Research in Northeast Africa, Eds. Thorweihe and Schandelmeier, Balkema, Rotterdam 250–262

  • Rao MVMS, Sarma LP, Prasanna Lakshmi KJ (2002) Ultrasonic pulse broadening and attenuation in volcanic rock-a case study. Ind J Pure Appl Phys 40:396–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Ronov AB, Khain EE, Balukhovsky AN, Seslavinsky KB (1980) Quantitative analysis of Phaneorzoic sedimentation. Sediment Geol 25:311–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sabatakakis N, Koukis G, Tsiambaos G, Papanakli S (2008) Index properties and strength variations controlled by microstructure for sedimentary rocks. Eng Geol 97:80–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachpazis CI (1990) Correlating Schmidt hardness with compressive strength and Young’s modulus of carbonate rocks. Bull Int Assoc Eng Geol 42:75–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt E (1951) A non-destructive concrete tester. Concrete 59(8):34–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Shalabi F, Cording EJ, Al-Hattamleh OH (2007) Estimation of rock engineering properties using hardness tests. Eng Geol 90:138–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shorey PR, Barat D, Das MN, Mukhherjee KP, Singh B (1984) Schmidt hammer rebound data estimation of large scale in situ coal strength. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 21:39–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skiba WJ, Tayeb J, Al-Khatieb SO, Khallaf HM (1977) Geology of the Jiddah-Makkah area (21°/39°), Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (compiled by W.J. Skiba): Saudi Arabian Directorate General of Mineral Resources unpublished bulletin, 561p

  • Tucker ME (1981) Sedimentary petrolology: an introduction. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford 252p

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward WC, Halley RB (1985) Dolomitization in a mixing zone of near-seawater composition, Late Pleistocene, Northeastern Yucatan Peninsula. J Sediment Petrol 55:407–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasar E, Erdogan Y (2004) Estimation of rock physiomechanical properties using hardness methods. Eng Geol 71:281–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz I (2009) A new testing method for indirect determination of the unconfined compressive strength of rocks. Int J Rock Mech Mining Sci 46:1349–1357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yilmaz I, Sendir H (2002) Correlation of Schmidt hardness with unconfined compressive strength and elasticity modulus in gypsum from Sivas (Turkey). Eng Geol 66:211–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Youash Y (1970) Dynamic physical properties of rocks: part 2, experimental results. In: Proceedings of the Sec. Congress of the International Society of Rock Mechanics, Beograd, 1:185-195

  • Zhao J, Broms B (1993) Mechanical and physical properties of the weathered Bukit Timah granite of Singapore. Proceeding of the ISRM Symposium. Geotechnical Engineering of Hard Soils-Soft Rocks 883–890

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are deeply grateful to Prof. Dr. A.M. Al-Amri (Editor-in-Chief) and the anonymous reviewers for insightful comments and criticism that improved the original manuscript.

Funding

This project was funded by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, under grant no. 64-145-1437. The authors, therefore, acknowledge and thank the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR) for the technical and financial support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to El-Sayed Sedek Abu Seif.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seif, ES.S.A., Bahabri, A.A. & El-Hamed, A.EH.ES.A. Geotechnical properties of Precambrian carbonate, Saudi Arabia. Arab J Geosci 11, 500 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3821-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3821-y

Keywords

Navigation