Mineralogical, geochemical, and gemological characteristics of silicic gemstone in Aydıncık (Yozgat-Turkey)
- 136 Downloads
There are chalcedony and amethyst formations in two fields in Aydıncık-Yozgat (West of Aydıncık District, Keşlik area and Southwestern of Hacıilyas). The gemstones in this region have been formed within the gaps and cracks of the brecciated rocks of the fault zone in altered andesites. Chalcedony and amethyst are either present in the form of crack fillings from a few millimeters to 10 cm in width, or in the form of generally oval pore fillings reaching a few centimeters to 40 cm in diameter. The chalcedony is composed of 0.1-mm–centimeter-thick bands parallel to each other in varying tones ranging from light blue/white to dark blue to reddish brown, and in some points in the central part of this banded structure are large crystalline quartz and amethysts. Chalcedony occurs as kidney—banded and geodesic forms as cryptocrystalline and macrocrystalline. The altered volcanic rock with brecciated texture, which hosts chalcedony and amethyst occurrences in both regions, is the altered andesite. Petrographic examinations carried out from chalcedony and amethysts indicated that gemstones composed of fine-coarse grained quartz have microcrystalline texture in the rim zones and have macrocrystalline texture toward the core. XRD analysis of chalcedony and amethyst with different colors and crystal grain sizes revealed that gemstones in the region were composed of large and microcrystalline quartz. When amethyst, blue chalcedony, and reddish brown chalcedony were compared to white transparent quartz, there was a significant increase in the amounts of Fe2O3 and Al2O3, and metal elements (Mo, Cu, Pb, Zn, Ni, Co, Mn, Cr) in the case of amethyst and reddish brown chalcedony. The visible reserves of chalcedony and amethysts in the region, their dimensions and varying color range, and large-grained texture and physical properties show that the chalcedonies and amethyst formations can be used as gemstones. Use of these formations as gemstones also makes a significant contribution to the regional economy.
KeywordsGemology Geochemistry Chalcedony Amethyst Gemstone
Some part of this study was carried out within the scope of the project of PYO-MÜH.4001.15.002 (Akbudak et al., 2016) supported by Ahi Evran University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit. We would like to extent our thanks to the project researchers and Ahi Evran University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit, which provided financial support to carry out this work.
Some part of this study was carried out within the scope of the project of PYO-MÜH.4001.15.002 supported by the Ahi Evran University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit. We would like to extend our thanks to the project researchers and Ahi Evran University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit, which provided financial support to carry out this work.
- Akbudak İK, Gürbüz M, Ulus Ü, Başıbüyük Z (2016) Aydıncık (Yozgat) Kalsedonların Mineralojik, Jeokimyasal ve Gemolojik İncelemesi. Ahi Evran Üniversitesi Bilimsel Araştırma Projesi, No: PYO-MÜH.4001.15.002, 55 sGoogle Scholar
- Akbudak KI, Basıbüyük Z, Gürbüz M (2018) Yozgat “Aydıncık” kalsedon-ametist oluşumlarının mineralojisi-petrografisi ve ekonomikliliğinin incelenmesi. Dicle Üniversitesi Mühendislik Fakültesi Mühendislik Dergisi 9(1):313–324Google Scholar
- Çevik N (2009) Yozgat-Yerköy-Belkavak Köyü Civarı Kalsedon ve Ametist Oluşumlarının İncelenmesi, Ankara Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Jeoloji Mühendisliği Anabilim Dalı, 110s., AnkaraGoogle Scholar
- Çevik N, Sayılı İS (2010) Yozgat-Yerköy-Belkavak Kalsedon– Kuvars ve Ametist Oluşumlarının Jeolojik, Mineralojik ve Jeokimyasal Özellikleri, 2. Uluslararası Katılımlı Mücevher – Takı Tasarımı ve Eğitimi Sempozyumu, 575Google Scholar
- Flörke OW, Graetsch H, Mıehe G (1983) Crystalstructure and microstructure of Chalcedony. Fortschr Mineral 61(1):62–63Google Scholar
- Flörke OW, Graetsch H, Röller K, Martin B, Wirth R (1991) Nomenclature of micro-and non-crystalline silica minerals. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie, Abhandlungen 163:19–42Google Scholar
- Frondel C (1978) Characters of quartz fibers. Am Mineral 63:17–27Google Scholar
- Frondel C (1982) Structural hydroxyl in chalcedony (type B quartz). Am Mineral 67:1248–1257Google Scholar
- Graetsch H (1994) Structural characteristics of opaline and microcrystalline silica minerals. Rev Mineral Geochem 29(1):209–232Google Scholar
- Hatipoğlu M, Dora OÖ (2000) Ankara Agatının mineralojisi ve bantlı yapının kökeni. Yerbilimleri Dergisi 22:1–12Google Scholar
- Hatipoğlu M, Kibar R, Çetin A, Can N, Helvacı C, Derin H (2011) Spectral, electron microscopic and chemical investigations of gamma-induced purple color zonings in amethyst crystals from the Dursunbey-Balıkesir region of Turkey. Radiation Effects & Defects in Solids 166(7):537–548CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kretz R (1983) Symbols for rock-forming minerals. Am Mineral 68:277–279Google Scholar
- Kumbasar I, Aykol A (1993) Mineraloji, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi Kütüphanesi, Sayı: 1519, İstanbulGoogle Scholar
- MTA (2002) 1/500.000 Türkiye Jeoloji Haritası, Maden Tetkik ve Arama Genel Müdürlüğü, AnkaraGoogle Scholar
- Özsert E (2009) Aydıncık (Yozgat) Yöresinin Tersiyer (Lütesiyen) İstifinin Bentik Foraminiferleri. Çukurova Üniversitesi, Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Yüksek Lisans Tezi Jeoloji Mühendisliği Anabilim Dalı, AdanaGoogle Scholar
- Selim H (2014) Türkiye’nin Değerli Ve Yarı Değerli Mücevher Taşları, İstanbul, 102sGoogle Scholar
- Üstündağ A, İnceöz M (1999) Zile (Tokat) batısında Uzunköy çevresinin stratigrafisi, 42/1, 69–83Google Scholar