Abstract
Energy demand for alternative resources increases day by day. The solar energy is one of the most preferred sustainable energy sources. Building a solar energy facility encounters the problem of alteration solar radiation. Literature shows that defining solar radiation can be done by regional models. Therefore, estimation of solar radiation potential for specified region which is Turkey should be done partially. Hence, the south and north region of Turkey is evaluated by means of solar radiation models on the horizontal surface for the clean air conditions. The examination is done under three stations of each region. As selected models represent monthly average of daily global solar radiation for specific stations, the responses of each model differ due to not only region but also each station of Turkey. In order to define the accuracy and performance of the models, t statistical examination is done for each station. The results meet the expectations by representing different models are suitable for particular regions. On the other hand, the solar radiation models on the horizontal surface for the clean air conditions are proposed to the literature for stations of north and south region of Turkey.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- H 0 :
-
Clear sky radiation with extraterrestrial radiation.
- Δ:
-
Declination angle
- Ø:
-
Latitude
- w s :
-
Hour angle
- w s :
-
Hour angle
- S 0 :
-
The monthly average daily hours of bright sunshine
- H :
-
(Terrestrial) Global solar radiation on the horizontal surface
- S :
-
Monthly average day length
References
Ahmad MJ, Tiwari GN (2010) Solar radiation models review. Int J Energy Environ 1-3:513–532 ISSN: 20762909
Aksoy B (1997) Estimated monthly average global radiation for Turkey and its comparison with observations. Renew Energy 10-4:625–633
Bakirci K (2007) Yatay Yuzeye Gelen Global Gunes Isiniminin Tahmini. sı Bilimi ve Tekniği Dergisi 27:7–11 ISSN: 1300-3615
Bakirci K (2009) Correlations for estimation of daily global solar radiation with hours of bright sunshine in Turkey. Energy 34:485–501. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2009.02.005
Besharat F, Dehghan AA, Faghih AR (2013) Empirical models for estimating global solar radiation a review and case study. Renew Sust Energ Rev 21:798–821 ISSN: 13640321
Cetin M, Adiguzel F, Kaya O, Sahap A (2018) Mapping of bioclimatic comfort for potential planning using GIS in Aydin. Environ Dev Sustain 20:361–375. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-016-9885-5
Er Z (2015a) A study of importance of solar calculations for two colored rainbow system in Istanbul. Acta Phys Pol A 128(2B):B477–B478
Er Z (2015b) Utilization of the collector rainbow system in Istanbul. Acta Phys Pol A 128(2B):B300–B302
Er Z, Turna IB (2016) Future expectation of the PVs role in compensating energy demand. Acta Phys Pol A. https://doi.org/10.12693/APhysPolA.129.865
Er Z, Rouabah Z, Kizilkan G, Orken AT (2018) Standards and testing experiments for a photovoltaic module. European Journal of Science and Technology Special Issue. pp 12–15. SSN:2148–2683
Ertekin C, Yaldiz O (2000) Comparison of some existing models for estimating global solar radiation for Antalya-Turkey. Energy Convers Manag 41:311–330
Gueymard CA (2004) The sun’s total and spectral irradiance for solar energy applications and solar radiation models. Sol Energy 76(4):423–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2003.08.039
Menges HO, Ertekin C, Sonmete MH (2006) Evaluation of global solar radiation models for Konya, Turkey. Energy Convers Manag 47(18–19):3149–3173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2006.02.015
Page J (2017) Chapter II-1-A–The role of solar-radiation climatology in the design of photovoltaic systems. McEvoy’s Handbook of Photovoltaics (Third Edition), Fundamentals and Applications. pp 601–670. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809921-6.00016-1
Ruiz-Ariasa JA, Quesada-Ruiz S, Fernández EF, Gueymard AC (2015) Optimal combination of gridded and ground-observed solar radiation data for regional solar resource assessment. Sol Energy 112:411–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.12.011
Suehrcke H, Bowden RS, Hollands KGT (2013) Relationship between sunshine duration and solar radiation. Sol Energy 92:160–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2013.02.026
Tarhan S, Sari A (2005) Model selection for global and diffuse radiation over the central Black Sea (CBS) region of Turkey. Energy Convers Manag 46:605–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2004.04.004
TEIAS (2015) TurkiyeElektrikEnerjisiIstatistikleri
Tiris M, Tiris C (1997) Analysis of solar radiation data for Gebze, Turkey. Energy Convers Manag 38-2:179–186
Togrul IT, Togrul H, Evin D (2000) Estimation of monthly global solar radiation from sunshine duration measurement in Elazig. Renew Energy 19:587–595
Turna IB (2015) New model and comparative study of correlation factors with monthly average of daily global solar radiation. Istanbul Technical University
Ulgen K, Hepbasli A (2002) Comparison of solar radiation correlations for Izmir, Turkey. Int J Energy Res 26:413–430. https://doi.org/10.1002/er.794
Wilda M, Folinia D, Henschela F, Fischer N, Müller B (2015) Projections of long-term changes in solar radiation based on CMIP5 climate models and their influence on energy yields of photovoltaic systems. Sol Energy 116:12–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2015.03.039
Yao W, Li Z, Wang Y, Jiang F, Hu L (2014) Evaluation of global solar radiation models for shanghai China. Energy Convers Manag 84:597–612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.04.017
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Geo-Resources-Earth-Environmental Sciences
PACS
– (at least 2) Related PAC no can be found at http://ufn.ru/en/pacs/all/ or http://www.aip.org/publishing/pacs/pacs-2010-regular-edition
Electronic supplementary material
ESM 1
(DOCX 15 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Er, Z., Turna, I.B. Solar radiation evaluation by t statistical analysis method for south and north region of Turkey. Arab J Geosci 11, 249 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3603-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-018-3603-6