Statistical correlation between contents of several components and natural radioactivity levels in sand samples from Antalya, Turkey

  • Canel Eke
  • Christian Segebade
Part of the following topical collections:
  1. Geo-Resources-Earth-Environmental Sciences


Natural radioactivity levels of 238U, 232Th, and 40K were determined using gamma-ray spectrometry. Contents of several components were obtained by photoactivation analysis. Sand samples were irradiated with 18 MeV bremsstrahlung photons from a clinical electron linear accelerator (cLINAC). After irradiation, the gamma-ray spectra of the samples were obtained using a high-purity germanium (HPGe) detector. Spectra were analyzed by computer software. Correlation between the natural radioactivity levels and contents of several components were determined by appropriate statistical calculations.


Statistical correlation Photoactivation analysis (PAA) Natural radioactivity Gamma-ray spectrometry 



The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit of Akdeniz University.


  1. Carreras H, Wannaz E, Pign M (2009) Assessment of human health risk related to metals by the use of biomonitors in the province of Cordoba, Argentina. Environ Pollut 157:117–122. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cetin B (2016) Determination of natural radioactivity concentrations in surface soils in the Yeşilırmak River in Amasya, Turkey. Acta Phys Pol A 130:320–321. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Coskun A, Cetin B (2016) Determination of the natural radioactivity level of Amasya Şeyhcui Region. Acta Phys Pol A 130:309–310. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Eke C (2015) Elemental analysis of sand samples by photoactivation and detection of photofission products (Unpublished doctoral thesis), Antalya, Turkey: Akdeniz University, 2015Google Scholar
  5. Eke C, Boztosun I (2015) Determination of activity concentration of natural and artificial radionuclides in sand samples from mediterranean coast of Antalya in Turkey. Kerntechnik 80:280–290. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Faisal B, Majumder R, Uddin M, Deeba F, Paul D, Haydar M, Ali M (2015) Assessment of heavy metals pollution and natural radioactivity in topsoil of Savar industrial area, Bangladesh. Int J Environ Sci 5(5):964–979. Google Scholar
  7. Gamma W (2017) Available: [Accessed 26 04 2017]
  8. Gulan L, Milenkovic B, Stajic J, Vu B, Krstic D, Zeremskic T, Nin J (2013) Correlation between radioactivity levels and heavy metal content in the soils of the North Kosovska Mitrovica environment. Environ Sci Processes & Impacts 15:1735–1742. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency), Guidelines for radioelement mapping using gamma ray spectrometry data-IAEA-TECDOC-1363, IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 2003Google Scholar
  10. Khan H, Ismail M, Khan K, Akhter P (2011) Radioactivity levels and gamma-ray dose rate in soil samples from Kohistan (Pakistan) using gamma-ray spectrometry. Chin Phys Lett 28(1):019301. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Koray A, Akkaya G, Kahraman A, Kaynak G, Baldık R (2017) The investigation of radionuclide concentrations in soil and lifetime cancer risk due to gamma radioactivity in Zonguldak, Turkey. Acta Phys Pol A 132:1122–1125. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Maestro-32 (2008) Multichannel analyser software, Ortec, Available: [Accessed 16 03 2017]
  13. Nyarko B, Dampare S, Serfor-Armah Y, Osae S, Adotey D, Adomako D (2008) Biomonitoring in the forest zone of Ghana: the primary results obtained using neutron activation analysis and lichens. Int J Environ Pollut 32:467–476. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) (2015) IBM Corporation, IBM SPSS Stattistics for Windows, Version 23.0, Armonk, NY: IBM Corporation, Released 2015Google Scholar
  15. UNSCEAR (2000) Sources effects and ionizing radiation, UNSCEAR 2000 report to the general assembly with scientific annexes. United Nations, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Uyanık NA, Uyanık O, Akkurt İ (2013) Micro-zoning of the natural radioactivity levels and seismic velocities of potential residental areas in volcanic fields: the case of Isparta (Turkey). J Appl Geophys 98:191–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Uyanik NA, Oncu Z, Uyanik O, Akkurt I (2015a) Determination of natural radioactivity from 232Th with gamma-ray spectrometer in Dereköy-Yazır (Southwestern Anatolia). Acta Phys Pol A 128:B-441–B-442. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Uyanik NA, Oncu Z, Uyanik O, Bozcu M, Akkurt I, Gunoglu K, Yagmurlu F (2015b) Distribution of natural radioactivity from 40K radioelement in volcanics of Sandıklı-Şuhut (Afyon) area. Acta Phys Pol A 128:B-438–B-440. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Wang C, Li W, Guo M, Ji J (2017) Ecological risk asessment on heavy metals in soils: Use of soil diffuse reflactance mid-infrared Fourier-transform spectroscopy. Sci. Rep 7:40709. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Zaim N, Tugrul AB, Atlas H, Buyuk B, Demir E, Baydogan N, Altinsoy N (2016) Investigation of natural radioactivity of surface soil samples in the vicinity of Edirne-Turkey. Acta Phys Pol A 130:64–67. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematics and Science Education, Division of Physics Education, Faculty of EducationAkdeniz UniversityAntalyaTurkey
  2. 2.BerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations