Skip to main content

Effect of a motorcycle helmet on the airborne dust concentration near a rider’s nose and mouth: wind tunnel study and field test

Abstract

Wind tunnel experiments were performed to investigate how the presence of a driver wearing a motorcycle helmet affects the airborne dust concentration near the driver’s nose and mouth relative to the ambient dust concentration. Data were collected for different grain size fractions of dust ranging from less than 20 μm to approximately 100 μm. The wind tunnel data were also applied to a field experiment with motorcycles and quads. Results show that the presence of a driver wearing a helmet significantly affects dust concentration. For the helmet tested, the concentration at the mouth position was about 50 % lower than the ambient concentration. At the nose position, the concentration depended on the particle size considered. For fine particles (smaller than approximately 30 μm), the dust concentrations at the nose position were lower than the ambient concentrations, similar to the situation near the mouth. For particles larger than 30 μm, which represent most dust released during typical off-road driving on natural surfaces, the dust concentration at the nose position was higher than the ambient concentration. The reason is most probably the chin guard of the helmet, which disturbs the trajectory of the dust particles and brings many particles to a higher elevation as they flow over the chin guard. Most helmets currently on the market have a chin guard and will behave similarly to the one tested in this study. Applying the wind tunnel results to the field experiment showed that the dust concentrations near the nose of the driver were more than 10 % higher than the ambient concentration, but only for particles coarser than 30 μm. For finer particles, they were lower, up to 70 % lower for particles smaller than 20 μm. On the other hand, the dust concentration near the mouth was significantly lower than the ambient concentration, less than half for all particle size classes investigated. This study shows that the effect of wearing a helmet should be taken into consideration when calculating human exposures to airborne dust.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

References

  • Alam F, Subic S, Akbarzadeh A (2008) Aerodynamics of bicycle helmets. In: Estivalet M, Brisson P (eds) The engineering of sport 7, vol 1. Springer, Paris, pp 337–344

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chabroux V, Barelle C, Favier d (2008) Aerodynamics of time trial bicycle helmets. In: Estivalet M, Brisson P (eds) The engineering of sport 7, vol 2. Springer, Paris, pp 401–410

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chabroux V, Mba MN, Sainton P, Favier D (2010) Wake characteristics of time trial helmets using PIV-3C technique. Proc. 15th Int. Symp. on Applications of Laser Techniques to Fluid Mechanics, 5-8 July 2010. Center for Innovation, Technology and Policy Research, IN+, Lisbon, p 12

  • Cordell HK (2004) Outdoor recreation for 21st Century America. Venture Publishing Inc., State College, PA

    Google Scholar 

  • Cordell HK, Betz CJ, Green GT, Stephens B (2008) Off-highway vehicle recreation in the United States and its regions and states: a national report from the National Survey on Recreation and the Environment (NSRE). USDA Forest Service’s Southern Research Station, Internet Research Report Series. http://www.fs.fed.us/recreation/programs/ohv/IrisRec1rpt.pdf. Accessed 29 May 2015

  • Defraeye T, Blocken B, Koninck E, Hespel P, Carmeliet J (2010) Aerodynamic study of different cyclist positions: CFD analysis and full-scale wind-tunnel tests. Exp Fluids 36:204–213

    Google Scholar 

  • DSR (2009) Swan-collie off-road vehicle regional land use planning study. Western Australia Department of Sport and Recreation. http://tbma.com.au/orvlp. Accessed 29 May 2015

  • Fryrear DW (1986) A field dust sampler. J Soil Water Conserv 41:117–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillies JA, Etyemezian V, Kuhns H, Nikolic D, Gillette DA (2005) Effect of vehicle characteristics on unpaved road dust emissions. Atmos Environ 39:2341–2347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillies JA, Watson JG, Rogers CF, DuBois DW, Chow JC, Langston R, Sweet J (1999) Long term efficiencies of dust suppressants to reduce PM10 emissions from unpaved roads. J Air Waste Manag Ass 49:3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goossens D (1989) Height distortion and the sedimentation of dust on topographic scale models: considerations and simulations. Earth Surf Proc Land 14:655–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goossens D, Buck B (2009a) Dust dynamics in off-road vehicle trails: measurements on 16 arid soil types, Nevada, USA. J Environ Manage 90:3458–3469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goossens D, Buck B (2009b) Dust emission by off-road driving: experiments on 17 arid soil types, Nevada, USA. Geomorphology 107:118–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goossens D, Buck B (2014) Dynamics of dust clouds produced by off-road vehicle driving. J Earth Sci Geotech Eng 4(2):1–21

  • Goossens D, Buck B, McLaurin B (2012) Contributions to total dust production of natural and anthropogenic emissions in a recreational area designated for off-road vehicular activity (Nellis Dunes, Nevada, USA). J Arid Env 78:80–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goossens D, Buck B, Teng Y, McLaurin BT (2015) Surface and airborne arsenic concentrations in a recreational site near Las Vegas, Nevada, USA. PLoS ONE 10(4):e0124271

  • Goossens D, Offer ZI (1988) Loess erosion and loess deposition in the Negev Desert: theoretical modelling and wind tunnel simulations. The Jacob Blaustein Institute for Desert Research, Sede Boqer, Desert Meteorology Papers, Ser. A, No. 13.

  • Goossens D, Offer ZY (2000) Wind tunnel and field calibration of six aeolian dust samplers. Atmos Environ 34:1043–1057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhns H, Etyemezian V, Green M, Hendrickson K, McGown M, Barton K, Pitchford M (2003) Vehicle-based road dust emission measurement: II—effect of precipitation, wintertime road sanding, and street sweepers on inferred PM10 emission potentials from paved and unpaved roads. Atmos Environ 37:4573–4582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moosmüller H, Gillies JA, Rogers CF, DuBois DW, Chow JC, Watson JG, Langston R (1998) Particulate emission rates for unpaved shoulders along a paved road. J Air Waste Manag Ass 48:398–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Outdoor World Directory (2010) Off Road Resource websites. http://www.agsites.net/links/offroadresource.html. Accessed 9 June 2015.

  • Plumlee GS, Morman SA, Ziegler TL (2006) The toxicological geochemistry of earth materials: an overview of processes and the interdisciplinary methods used to understand them. Rev in Mineralogy & Geochem 64:5–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rollé H (2006) Stofemissie ten gevolge van winderosie en landbouwactiviteiten op een zandleembodem in de Vlaamse Ardennen. M.Sc. Thesis, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium

  • Spivey S (2008) Off-road fans, critics face off. Las Vegas Review-Journal, Monday, March 17: 10B

  • Sylvester JT (2009) Montana off-highway vehicles 2008. Bureau of Business and Economic Research, University of Montana-Missoula, Missoula, MT, USA

  • USEPA (2008) Clear creek management area asbestos exposure and human health risk assessment. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 9, San Francisco, CA. http://www.epa.gov/Region9/toxic/noa/clearcreek/. Accessed 9 June 2015.

  • USEPA (2009) Metabolically derived human ventilation rates: a revised approach based upon oxygen consumption rates. National Center for Environmental Assessment, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks and appreciation to the research team that helped with the field experiments: Deborah Keil, Yuanxin Teng, Jamie DeWitt, Jim Pollard, Winnie David, Rebecca Chow, Sharon Young, and Curtis Coulter. Thanks also to Paul Solomon for his advice on the project. This project was funded by a grant awarded to BB from the Bureau of Land Management (URL: http://www.blm.gov/nv/st/en/fo/lvfo.html), grant number: L11AC20058. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as representing the opinions or policies of the US government. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute their endorsement by the US government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dirk Goossens.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on DUST

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goossens, D., Buck, B. Effect of a motorcycle helmet on the airborne dust concentration near a rider’s nose and mouth: wind tunnel study and field test. Arab J Geosci 9, 184 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-2181-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-2181-0

Keywords

  • Dust
  • Helmet
  • Motorcycle
  • Quad
  • Wind tunnel