Skip to main content
Log in

Towards a sustainable capital city: an approach for flood management and artificial recharge in naturally water-scarce regions, Central Region of Saudi Arabia

Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Cite this article

Abstract

Flash floods occur periodically on Riyadh province, Saudi Arabia, due to various factors, including rugged topography and geological structures. Each year, it results tremendous loss of life and property damage across a wide area. The present study aims to identify potential suitable areas for stormwater management in Riyadh province-Saudi Arabia using a GIS-decision support system (DSS), in addition, to determine the runoff coefficient and the runoff depth for different land cover/use classes and different soil type. Moreover, it aims to study the effect of the Riyadh metro project in the generation of flash floods around the proposed metro lines. The results of the spatial distributions of modelled annual runoff depth varied from 9 to 180 mm/year, and annual runoff depth around the proposed metro lines ranged from 70 to 120 mm/year. The major cause of floods in Al-Riyadh province is the occurrence of extremely heavy rainfall over a short period and low water absorptive capacity of soil, leading to an increased overland flow. Therefore, despite the total rainfall amount being relatively small in Riyadh province, Saudi Arabia, the rainfall event can be very intense, hence causing problems of flooding. The high-potential risk of flash floods is within areas around line 1, 2, 4, and 6. The analysis indicates that construction of the Riyadh Metro will lead to an annual increase in the flash flood generation in the urban regions. The DSS was implemented to obtain suitability maps and to evaluate the existing SWH/Groundwater recharge (GWR) structures in the study area. The DSS inputs comprised maps of rainfall surplus, slope, runoff coefficient (RC), land cover/use, and soil type. Based on an analytical hierarchy process analysis taking into account five layers, the spatial extents of SWH suitability areas were identified by multi-criteria evaluation. The spatial distribution of the classes in the suitability map showed that the excellent and good areas are mainly located in the northeastern and northwestern parts of the study area. The southeastern and west southern parts almost have the same categories dominated by moderate and poor and unsuitable areas. On average, 22.17 % (84,356 Km2) and 31.56 % (120,085 Km2) of the study area are classified as excellent and good for SWH, respectively, while 23.98 % (91,243 Km2) and 22.28 % (84,775 Km2) of the area are classified as moderately suitable and poorly suited and unsuitable, respectively. Most of the areas with excellent to good suitability have slopes between 2 and 8 % and are intensively cultivated areas. Rainfall in these areas ranges from 120 to 230 mm. Most of the existing SWH/ GWR structures that are categorized as successful were within the excellent (89.1 % of the structures) areas followed by good suitable (10.9 of the structures). Overall, results indicated that wadi Hanifah and Wadi Nisah have a moderate vulnerability to flooding, with high vulnerability in the northeast part of Al-Riyadh province. The use of a number of SWH sites in the excellent areas is recommended to ensure successful implementation of SWH systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig 3
Fig 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

References

  • Chowdhury A, Jha MK, Chowdary VM, Mal BC (2009) Integrated remote sensing and GIS‐based approach for assessing groundwater potential in West Medinipur district, West Bengal, India. Int J Remote Sens 30(1):231–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durga Rao KHV, Bhaumik MK (2003) Spatial expert support system in selecting suitable sites for water harvesting structures—a case study of Song watershed, Uttaranchal. India Geocarto Intern 18:43–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • El-Awar FA, Makke MK, Zurayk RA, Mohtar RH (2000) A hydro-spatial hierarchical method for siting water harvesting reservoirs in dry. Appl Eng Agric 16(4):395–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evenari ML, Shanan L, Tadmor NH (1971) The Negev: the challenge of a desert [M]. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2003) Land and water digital media series, 26. Training Course on RWH (CDROM) Planning of water harvesting schemes, Unit 22. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. FAO, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • Fewkes A (1999) The use of rainwater for WC flushing: the field-testing of a collection system. Build Environ 34:765–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould J, Nissen-Petersen E (1999) Rainwater catchment systems for domestic supply: design, construction, and implementation. Intermediate Technology Publications, UK

  • Gupta KK, Deelstra J, Sharma KD (1997) Estimation of water harvesting potential for a semiarid area using GIS and remote sensing. IAHS Pub Ser Proc Rep-Intern Assoc Hydrol Sci 242:63

  • Jabr WM, El-Awar FA (2005) GIS & analytic hierarchy process for siting water harvesting reservoirs, Beirut, Lebanon. J Environ Eng 122(6):515–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson RB (2001) Water in changing world. J Ecol Appl 11:1027–1045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen JR (2005) Introductory digital image processing a remote sensing perspective. Pearson Education, Inc., New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahinda JM, Lillie ESB, Taigbenu AE, Taute M, Boroto RJ (2008) Developing suitability maps for rainwater harvesting in South Africa. Phys Chem Earth 33:788–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna H (2003) An overview of rainwater harvesting systems and guidelines in the United States. In Proceedings of the First American Rainwater Harvesting Conference, pp 21–23

  • Ludwig JA, Wilcox BP, Breshears DD, Tongway DJ, Imeson AC (2005) Vegetation patches and runoff-erosion as interacting eco-hydrological processes in semiarid landscapes. Ecology 86:288–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoud SH (2014a) Delineation of potential sites for groundwater recharge using a GIS-based decision support system. Environ Earth Sci 72(9):3429–3442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoud SH (2014b) Investigation of rainfall–runoff modeling for Egypt by using remote sensing and GIS integration. CATENA 120:111–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoud SH, Alazba AA (2014) The potential of in situ rainwater harvesting in arid regions: developing a methodology to identify suitable areas using GIS-based decision support system. Arab J Geosci. doi:10.1007/s12517-014-1535-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoud SH, Alazba AA, Amin MT (2014a) Identification of potential sites for groundwater recharge using a GIS-based decision support system in Jazan region-Saudi Arabia. Water Resour Manag 28(10):3319–2240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoud SH, Mohammad FS, Alazba AA (2014b) Determination of potential runoff coefficient for Al-Baha Region, Saudi Arabia. Arab J Geosci 7(5):2041–2057

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahmoud SH, Mohammad FS, Alazba AA (2015) Delineation of potential sites for rainwater harvesting structures using a geographic information system-based decision support system. Hydrol Res 46(4):591–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malczewski J (2004) GIS-based land-use suitability analysis: a critical overview. Progr Plann 62(1):3–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mbilinyi BP, Tumbo SD, Mahoo H, Mkiramwinyi FO (2007) GIS-based decision support system for identifying potential sites for rainwater harvesting. Phys Chem Earth Parts A/B/C 32(15):1074–1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monteith JL (1965) Evaporation and the environment. In the movement of water in living organisms. Cambridge University Press, Society of Experimental Biology, Swansea, pp 205–234

  • Pacey A, Cullis A (1986) Rainwater harvesting: the collection of rainfall and run-off in rural areas. Intermediate Technology Publications, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Penman HL (1948) Natural evaporation from open water, bare soil and grass. Proc R Soc Lond A Math Phys Sci 193(1032):120–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penman HL (1953) The physical bases of irrigation control. Rept. 13th Intern. Hort Congr 2:913–924

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramakrishnan D, Bandyopadhyay A, Kusuma KN (2008) SCS-CN and GIS based approach for identifying potential water harvesting sites in the Kali Watershed, Mahi River Basin. India J Earth Syst Sci 118:355–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reiz C, Maulder P, Begemann L (1988) Water harvesting for plant production. World Bank Technical Paper 91, Washington, DC

  • Russell GD, Hawkins CP, O’Neill MP (1997) The role of GIS in selecting sites for riparian restoration based on hydrology and land use. Restor Ecol 5(4S):56–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1977) A scaling method for priorities in hierarchical structures. J Mathema Psychol 15:57–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1990) How to make a decision: the analytic hierarchy process. Euro J Operat Res 48:9–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1994) Fundamentals of decision making and priority theory with the AHP. RWS Publications, Pittsburgh

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (2008) Decision making with analytic hierarchy process. Int J Serv Sci 1(1):16

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma KD (1986) Runoff behaviour of water harvesting microcatchments. Agric Water Manag 11(2):137–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirdaş S, Şen Z (2007) Determination of flash floods in western Arabian Peninsula. J Hydrol Eng 12(6):676–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Store R, Kangas J (2001) Integrating spatial multi-criteria evaluation and expert knowledge for GIS-based habitat suitability modelling. Landscape Urban Plann 55(2):79–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Triantaphyllou E, Mann SH (1995) Using the analytic hierarchy process for decision making in engineering applications: some challenges. Int J Indust Eng Appl Pract 2(1):35–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiner J (2003) Incorporating rainwater harvesting in the suburban landscape. Proc. of 11th International Conference on Rainwater Catchment Systems, Texcoco, Mexico

  • Yu M, Gao Q, Epstein HE, Zhang X (2008) An eco-hydrological analysis for optimal use of redistributed water among vegetation patches. Ecol Appl 18:1679–1688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zaunderer J, Hutchinson CF (1988) A review of water harvesting techniques of the Arid Southwestern US and North Mexico, Working paper for the World Bank’s Sub-Sahara Water Harvesting Study

Download references

Acknowledgments

This project was financially supported by King Saud University, Deanship of Scientific Research, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences Research Centre.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shereif H. Mahmoud.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mahmoud, S.H., Alazba, A.A. Towards a sustainable capital city: an approach for flood management and artificial recharge in naturally water-scarce regions, Central Region of Saudi Arabia. Arab J Geosci 9, 92 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-2021-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-2021-2

Keywords

Navigation