Skip to main content

Limestone dimension stone quarry waste properties for concrete in Western Turkey

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to assess the influence of the composition and texture of the limestone on aggregate properties from the five working dimension stone quarries wastes of Karaburun Peninsula in Western Turkey. The limestone samples were tested to determine their petrographic, mineralogic, and chemical characteristics and aggregate properties. Then, the testing concretes were prepared by using these aggregates, and hardened concrete properties were determined. According to the results obtained, limestone was found to be suitable for use as coarse and fine aggregate in normal-strength concrete production. But, the quality of concretes made using the limestone aggregates were found to be dependent on the silica ratio present in them. The threshold value of the silica ratio is determined to be 2 % by weight for the alkali-silica reaction development in concrete made with the Karaburun dimension stone quarries wastes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Akman SM (1984) Beton Agregaları, Beton Semineri. D.S.İ., Ankara

    Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Oraimi SK, Taha R, Hassan HF (2006) The effect of the mineralogy of coarse aggregate on the mechanical properties of high-strength concrete. Constr Build Mater 20(7):499–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Asamoah MA, Afrifa RO (2010) A study of concrete properties using phyllite as coarse aggregates. Constr Build Mater 31:4561–4566

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bell FG (2004) Engineering geology and construction. Spon, London

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brinkmann R, Flogel E, Jacobshagen V, Kenchner H, Rendel B, Trıck P (1972) Triyas, Jura and Underkreide der Halbinson Karaburun (West Anatolia). Geo Paleontol 6:139–150

    Google Scholar 

  6. Carlos A, Masumu I, Hiroaki M, Maki M, Takahisa O (2010) The effects of limestone aggregate on concrete properties. Constr Build Mater 24:2363–2368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dunham RJ (1962) Classification of carbonate rocks according to depositional texture. In: Ham WE (ed) Classification of carbonate rocks, vol 1, American Association Petroleum Geologist., pp 108–121

    Google Scholar 

  8. Erdoğan B (1990) İzmir – Ankara Zonu ile Karaburun Kuşağının Tektonik İlişkisi. MTA Dergisi 110:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  9. Erdogan B, Altıner D, Güngör T, Özer (1990) Karaburun Yarımadası’nın stratigrafisi. MTA Dergisi 111:1–22

    Google Scholar 

  10. Erkan M (2008) Agrega sektörüne genel bir bakış, sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri I. Ulusal Mermer ve Doğal Taşlar Kongresi, pp 248–258

  11. Flügel E (2004) Microfacies of carbonate rocks: analysis, interpretation and application. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Fookes PG (1980) An introduction to the influence of natural aggregates on the performance and durability of concrete. Q J Eng Geol 123:207–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. French WJ (1991) Concrete petrography: a review. Q J Eng Geol 24:17–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. French WJ, Poole AB (1974) Deleterious reactions between dolomites from Bahrain and cement paste. Cem Concr Res 4:925–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gillott JE (1980) Properties of aggregates affecting concrete in North America. Q J Eng Geol 13:289–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gillott JE, Swenson EG (1969) Mechanism of alkali carbonate reaction. Q J Eng Geol 2:7–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Güngör T (1989) Karaburun Yarımadası Balıklıova – Barboros arasındaki bölgenin jeolojisi ve yapısal evrimi. Yüksek lisans tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi, İzmir, Turkiye

  18. Hammersly GP (1989) The use of petrography in the evaluation of aggregates concrete, 23 No:1

  19. Hasdemir S (2004) Metilen mavisi deney sonuçlarının beton basınç dayanımlarına etkisi. Beton 2004 Kongresi, s 615–622, 10–12 Haziran, İstanbul

  20. Hewlett PC (2006) Lea’s chemistry of cement and concrete. Elsevier LTD

  21. Kandall PS, Lynn CY and Parker F (1998) Tests for plastic fines in aggregates related to stripping in asphalt paving mixtures. National Center of Asphalt Technology, Auburn University, Alabama, USA, Report no. 98-3, pp 1–20

  22. Kara G, Tuğrul A, Yılmaz M, Buldum M (2009) Taş Ocaklarındaki Kayaç Değişimlerinin Agrega ve Beton Özelliklerine Etkisi. 5. Ulusal Kırmataş Sempozyumu, İstanbul

    Google Scholar 

  23. Katayama T (2004) How to identify carbonate rock reactions in concrete. Mater Charact 53:85–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lorenzi G, Jensen J, Wigum B (2001) Petrographic atlas of the potentially alkali-reactive rocks in Europe. Version 060701, Partner-project

  25. McNally GH (1998) Soil and rock construction materials. E and FN Spon, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Neville AM (1995) Properties of concrete, 4th edn. Pitman, London

    Google Scholar 

  27. Okay AI, Siyako M (1993) The revised location of the İzmir-Ankara Suture in the region between Balıkesir and İzmir. In: Turgut S, (ed) Tectonics and Hydrocarbon Potential of Anatolia and Surrounding Regions. Ozan Sungurlu Symposium Proceedings, pp 333–55

  28. Okay AI, Tüysüz O (1999) Tethyan Sutures of northern Turkey. In: Durand, Jolivet L, Horvath, F & Seranne M, (eds) Mediterranean Basins: Tertiary Extension within the Alpine Orogen. Geological Society of London, Special Publication 156, pp 475–515

  29. Okay AI, Satır M, Sıyako M, Monıé Metzger R, Akyüz S (1996) Paleo- and Neo-Tethyan events in northwestern Turkey: geologic and geochronologic constrains. In: Yin A, Harrison TM (eds) The tectonic evolution of Asia. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 420–441

    Google Scholar 

  30. Petkovsek A, Macek M, Pavsic P (2010) Fines characterization through the methylene blue and sand equivalent test: comparison with other experimental techniques and application of criteria to the aggregate quality assessment. Bull Eng Geol Environ 69:561–574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Poitevin P (1999) Limestone aggregate concrete, usefulness and durability. Cem Concr Compos 21:89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Qian G, Deng M, Thang M (2001a) Expansion of siliceous and dolomitic aggregates in lithium hydroxide solution. Cem Concr Res 32:763–768

    Google Scholar 

  33. Qian G, Deng M, Lan X, Xu Z, Tang M (2001b) Alkali carbonate reaction expansion of dolomitic limestone aggregates with porphyrotopic texture. Eng Geol 63:17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ramsay DM, Dhir RK, Spence IM (1974) The role of rock and clast fabric in the physical performance of crushed-rock aggregate. Eng Geol 8:267–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. RİLEM TC 106–2 AAR (2000) Alkali aggregate reaction—the ultra accelerated mortar–bar test. mater struct 33:283–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. RILEM TC 191-ARP (2005) ‘Alkali-reactivity and prevention—assessment, specification and diagnosis of alkali-reactivity’ AAR-5: rapid preliminary screening test for carbonate aggregates. Mater Struct 38:787–792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Rollings MP, Rollings RS (1995) Geotechnical materials in construction. McGraw-Hill, London pp 523

  38. Sims I and Sotiropoulos P (1983) Standard alkali-reactivity testing of carbonate rocks from the Middle East and North Africa. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference, Alkalis in Concrete, Research and Practice. Copenhagen, June 1983

  39. Smith MR and Collis L (2001) Aggregates: sand, gravel and crushed rock aggregates for construction purposes. Geological Society, London, UK, Engineering Geology Special Publication 17

  40. TSE (Türk Standartları Enstitüsü) (1996) TS 10088 EN 932-3. Tests for general properties of aggregates-Part 3: Procedure and terminology for simplified petrographic description., Ankara

  41. Stapel EE, Verhoef PNW (1989) The use of the methylene blue adsorption test in assessing the quality of basaltic tuff rock aggregate. Eng Geol 26:233–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. TS EN 1097-1 (2011). Tests for mechanical and physical properties of aggregates—part 1: determination of the resistance to wear (Micro-Deval). Ankara, Turkey

  43. TS EN 1097-6 (2013) Tests for mechanical and physical properties of aggregates—part 6: determination of particle density and water absorption. Ankara, Turkey

  44. TS EN 1367-1 (2009) Tests for thermal and weathering properties of aggregates—part 1: determination of resistance to freezing and thawing. Ankara, Turkey

  45. TS EN 1367-2 (2011) Tests for thermal and weathering properties of aggregates—part 2: magnesium sulfate test. Ankara, Turkey

  46. TS EN 1744-5 (2008) Tests for chemical properties of aggregates—part 5: determination of acid soluble chloride salts. Ankara, Turkey

  47. TS EN 1744-1 (2013) Tests for chemical properties of aggregates—part 1: chemical analysis. Ankara, Turkey

  48. TS EN 933-3 (2012) Tests for geometrical properties of aggregates—part 3: determination of particle shape—flakiness index. Ankara, Turkey

  49. TS EN 933-4 (2009) Tests for geometrical properties of aggregates—part 4: determination of particle shape—shape index. Ankara, Turkey

  50. TS EN 933-9 (2010) Tests for geometrical properties of aggregates—part 9: assessment of fines—methylene blue test. Ankara, Turkey

  51. TSE (2000) TS EN 197-1: Compositions and conformity criteria for common cements. Ankara, Turkey

  52. TSE (2009) TS 706 EN 12620 + A1 Aggregates for concrete

  53. TSE (2010a) TS EN 1097-2 Tests for mechanical and physical properties of aggregates—part 2: methods for the determination of resistance to fragmentation. Ankara, Turkey

  54. TSE (2010b) TS EN 12350-2 Testing fresh concrete—part 2: slump test. Ankara, Turkey

  55. TSE (2010c) TS EN 12350-6 Testing fresh concrete—Part 6: density. Ankara, Turkey

  56. TSE (2010d) TS EN 12390-3 Testing hardened concrete—part 3: compressive strength of test specimens. Ankara, Turkey

  57. TS EN 933-8 (2012) Tests for geometrical properties of aggregates—part 8: ASSESSMENT of fines—sand equivalent test. Ankara, Turkey

  58. Tuğrul A, Yılmaz M (2012) Assesing the quality of sandstone for use as aggregates in concrete. Mag Concr Res 64(12):1067–1078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. West G (1996) Alkali–aggregate reaction in concrete roads and bridges. Thomas Telford, London

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was financially supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK) project number 107Y052. We are grateful to TUBITAK for their financial support. The authors would like to express their sincere gratitude to the two anonymous reviewers for their constructive and considerate comments.

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hakan Elçi.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(RAR 102470 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elçi, H., Türk, N. & İşintek, İ. Limestone dimension stone quarry waste properties for concrete in Western Turkey. Arab J Geosci 8, 8951–8961 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-015-1838-z

Download citation

Keywords

  • Alkali-silica reaction
  • Concrete aggregate
  • Dimension stone waste
  • Karaburun Peninsula
  • Mesozoic limestone
  • Western Turkey