Skip to main content
Log in

Description of the area distribution of landmasses by Korcak exponent—the importance of the Arabic and Indian subcontinents in proper classification

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Landmasses can be classified as “islands” or “continents” mainly by geological, rather than geographical, criteria but the classification is still a bit arbitrary. We are presenting a statistical method (a modified Korcak analysis) where the area distribution reveals an intrinsic classification of landmasses. Based on this analysis, one can separate island, subcontinents and continents using only a spatial or geographical criterion, the area. Although not completely, this classification gives more or less the same groups like the ones based on geological criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The special Czech diacritical mark “č” in “Korčák” is usually omitted in English literature; therefore in this paper we are using “Korcak” for the method, exponent and dimension, but keeping the original way (Korčák) for the person.

  2. Just for the sake of curiosity, these sizes are much bigger than the hypothetical island of the Greek mythology (Atlantis) fitting into the Aegean sea; the area of the biggest Aegean island, Crete is slightly above 8,000 km2.

References

  • Gaina C, Müller RD, Brown B, Ishihara T (2002) Microcontinent formation around Australia. Geol Soc Aust Spec Publ 22:399–410

    Google Scholar 

  • GID (2010) Global island database. http://gid.unep-wcmc.org/

  • Hashemi M, Afzal P (2013) Identification of geochemical anomalies by using of number–size (N–S) fractal model in Bardaskan area, NE Iran. Arab J Geosci 6:4785–4794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huynh HN, Chew LY (2011) Arc-fractal and the dynamic of coastal morphology. Fractals 19:141–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imre AR (2006) Artificial fractal dimension obtained by using perimeter–area relationship on digitalized images. Appl Math Comput 173:443–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imre AR, Bogaert J (2006) The Minkowski-Bouligand dimension and the interior-to-edge ratio of habitats. Fractals 14:49–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imre AR (2007) Systematic error in the determination of perimeter and area of off-lattice digitalized images. Int J Remote Sens 28:5071–5077

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imre AR, Cseh D, Neteler M, Rocchini D (2012a) Korcak dimension as a novel indicator of landscape fragmentation and re-forestation. Ecol Indic 11:1134–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imre AR, Novotný J, Rocchini D (2012b) The Korcak-exponent: a non-fractal descriptor for landscape patchiness. Ecol Complex 12:70–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jang J, Jang YH (2012) Spatial distributions of islands in fractal surfaces and natural surfaces. Chaos, Solitons Fractals 45:1453–1459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korčak J (1938) Deux types of fondamentaux de distribution statistique. Bull Inst Int Stat III:295–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot BB (1967) How long is the coast of Britain? Statistical self-similarity and fractional dimension. Science 156:636–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot BB (1975) Earth’s relief, shape and fractal dimension of coastlines, and number-area rule for islands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 72:3825–3838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbrot BB (1982) The fractal geometry of nature. Freeman, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller RD, Gaina C, Roest WR, Hansen DL (2010) A recipe for microcontinent formation. Geology 29:203–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Novotný J, Nosek V (2009) Nomothetic geography revisited: statistical distributions, their underlying principles, and inequality measures. Geografie 114:282–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Richardson LF (1961) The problem of contiguity: an appendix to Statistic of Deadly Quarrels in General systems: Yearbook of the Society for the Advancement of General Systems Theory. Soc Gen Syst Res Ann Arbor Mich 6:139–187

    Google Scholar 

  • Sasaki Y, Kobayashi N, Ouchi N, Matsushita M (2006) Fractal structure and statistics of computer-simulated and real landforms. J Phys Soc Jpn 75:074804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlüter T (2006) Geological atlas of Africa: With notes on stratigraphy, tectonics, economic geology. Geohazards and Geosites of Each Country. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Ch. 4, pp 198–200

  • Scrutton RA (1976) Microcontinents and their significance. In: Drake CL (ed) Geodynamics: progress and prospects. American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C., pp 177–189

    Google Scholar 

  • Seuront L (2011) Fractals and multifractals in ecology and aquatic science. CRC Press, Boka Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Su F, Gao Y, Zhou C, Yang X, Fei X (2011) Scale effects of the continental coastline of China. J Geogr Sci 21:1101–1111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugihara G, May RM (1990) Applications of fractals in ecology. Trends Ecol Evol 5:79–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thielen DR, San José JJ, Montes RA, Lairet R (2010) Assessment of land use changes on woody cover and landscape fragmentation in the Orinoco savannas using fractal distributions. Ecol Indic 8:224–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2010) United Nations environment programme. http://islands.unep.ch/isldir.htm

  • Wessel P, Smith WHF (1996) A global self-consistent, hierarchical, high-resolution shoreline database. J Geophys Res 101:8741–8743

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author wishes to express his thanks to J. Novotný (Prague) and D. Rocchini (Trento) for the valuable discussions about Korcak analysis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Attila R. Imre.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Imre, A.R. Description of the area distribution of landmasses by Korcak exponent—the importance of the Arabic and Indian subcontinents in proper classification. Arab J Geosci 8, 3615–3619 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1481-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-014-1481-0

Keywords

Navigation