Abstract
In this paper, we have developed a least-squares minimization method to estimate the depth of a buried conducting sphere using electromagnetic induction (EMI) data. This approach is basically based on the solving a set of algebraic linear equations to estimate the depth of sphere embedded in an insulating media. In electromagnetic induction method, the transmitter coil produces the incident magnetic and electric fields that obey the Maxwell’s equations. In the receiver coil, the received response is created in two modes—eddy-current mode (V ec) derived from the perfectly conductor placed in the shallow depth and another mode called current-channeling response (V cc) which depends on the conductivity of the medium. As expected, these responses differ depending on the direction of the incident field related to the receiver coil’s axis. In our case, the transmitter coil’s axis is parallel to the ground surface, and only the eddy-current response is measured in the receiver coil. The validity of this new method is demonstrated through studying and analyzing synthetic EMI anomalies, using simulated data generated from a known model with different random error components and a known statistical distribution.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Babaei M, Meshinch-Asl M, Zomorrodian H (2011) Computing eddy-current response and current-channeling response of the spheroidal conductor for the separated receiver and transmitter systems. Arab J Geosci. doi:10.1007/s12517-011-0456-7
Das Y, Mcfee JE, Chesney RH (1985) Determination of depth of shallowly buried objects by electromagnetic induction. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 23:60–66
Fernandez J P, K Sun, B Barrowes, K O’Neill, Shamatava I, F Shubitidze, K Pauksen (2007) Inferring the location of buried UXO using a support vector machine Proc. SPIE. p 6553
Mahmoodi M, Tan SY (2009) Depth detection of conducting of marine mines via eddy-current and current-channeling response. Prog ElectromagnRes 90:287–307
Nabighian MN (1970) Quasistatic transient response of a conducting sphere in a dipolar field. Geophysics 35(2):303–309
Nabighian M N, Macnae J C (1991) Time Domain Electromagnetic Prospecting Methods, in bNabighian, M N, Ed., Electromagnetic Methods In Applied Geophysics: Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Volume 2, Application, Part A, pp 427–520
Norton SJ, SanFilipo WA, Won IJ (2005) Eddy- current and current-channeling response to spheroidal anomalies. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 43:2200–2209
Ozdemir, Mustafa, Miller, Eric L, Norton, Stephen J (1999) “Localization and Characterization of Buried Objects from Multi-Frequency, Array Inductive Data,” Proceedings SPIE AeroSense Symposium, Detection Technologies for Mines and Minelike Targets IV, Abinash C. Dubey, James F. Harvey, J. Thomas Broach, and Regina E. Dugan (eds) Vol 3710, Orlando Fl., pp. 26–36
Singh SK (1973) Electromagnetic transient response of a conductive sphere embedded in a conductive medium. Geophysics 38:864–893
Wait JR, Spies KP (1969) Quasi-static transient response of a conducting permeable sphere. Geophysics 34:789–792
Weaver JT (1994) Mathematical Methods for Geo-electromagnetic Induction: John Wiley and Sons, Inc
Yogadhish D, John EM, Robert HC (1984) Time domain response of a sphere in the field of a coil. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 22:360–367
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Babaei, M., Meshinchi-Asl, M. & Zomorrodian, H. Estimation of depth of buried conductive sphere from electromagnetic induction anomaly data using linearization process. Arab J Geosci 7, 2363–2366 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-013-0882-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-013-0882-9