Arabian Journal of Geosciences

, Volume 5, Issue 6, pp 1435–1448 | Cite as

Validation of RMR-based support design using roof bolts by numerical modeling for underground coal mine of Monnet Ispat, Raigarh, India—a case study

  • Avinash Paul
  • A. P. Singh
  • John Loui P
  • Ajoy K. Singh
  • Manoj Khandelwal
Original Paper


In underground coal mines, a lot of major fatalities have occurred due to roof fall in the newly developed faces or galleries of coal mines during the development or production of coal. There are around 500 underground coalmines in India, and continuous production or development or exploitation of coal depends upon the stability of the gateways developed in the form of galleries, which are supported in such a manner so that they can last up to that period, unless it has been finally extracted out with an operation called depillaring. A system of support design with roof bolting, resin bolting, and cable bolting for the aforesaid galleries is presently being decided on the basis of rock mass rating (RMR). The same support design has been attempted with the use of 3D numerical modeling technique—a tool nowadays very extensively used in geotechnical engineering to predict the stability of structures to be built or for the structures which are built against nature, i.e., underground mines. In this study, the support design system on the basis of RMR has also been validated with a numerical modeling technique for three locations of Monnet Ispat underground coalmine. After the study, it has been found that the numerical modeling technique can give better design of support system in underground coal mines in comparison with RMR-based support design system, and it will also play a major role in reducing the total cost incurred in coal exploitation from the underground coal mines.


Rock mass rating Roof bolt FLAC Underground coal mine Support design Factor of safety 


  1. Bieniawski ZT (1974) Geomechanics classification of rock masses and its application in tunneling. Proceedings of the 3rd International Congress on Rock MechanicsGoogle Scholar
  2. Bieniawski ZT (1976) Rock mass classification in rock engineering. In: Bieniawski ZT (ed) Exploration for rock engineering, 1st edn. Balkemma, Rotterdam, pp 97–106Google Scholar
  3. Bieniawski ZT (1979) The geomechanics classification in rock engineering applications. Proceedings of the 4th International Congress on Rock MechanicsGoogle Scholar
  4. Bieniawski ZT (1984) Rock mechanics design in mining and tunneling. A.A Balkema, RotterdamGoogle Scholar
  5. BIS (1981) Bureau of Indian Standard, 10050 for SDIGoogle Scholar
  6. CMRI (1987) Geomechanical classification of coal measure roof rocks vis-à-vis roof support. S & T ReportGoogle Scholar
  7. CMRI (2002) In situ stress measurement in underground coal mines and its application to stability analysis. S & T ReportGoogle Scholar
  8. FLAC3D (2005) ITASCA consulting group INC, USA, Version 3Google Scholar
  9. Ghosh CN, Ghose AK (1992) Estimation of critical convergence and rock load in coal mine roadways—an approach based on rock mass rating. Geotech Geol Eng 10:185–202CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hoek E, Brown ET (1980) Underground excavation in rock. Institution of Mining and Metallurgy, LondonGoogle Scholar
  11. ISRM (1979) Suggested method for determining the uniaxial compressive strength and deformability of rock materials. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abst 16(5):135–140Google Scholar
  12. Loui PJ, Jhawar JC (2007) Assessment of roadway support adequacy in some Indian manganese mines using theoretical in situ stress estimates. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 44:148–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Paul A, Singh AK, Rao DG, Babu SH, Sinha A (2004) Resin bolting as a system of support in underground coal mines. Mining Eng J 6(4):14–22Google Scholar
  14. Paul A, Babu SH, Singh AK, Sinha A (2005) Evolvement of roof bolting as a system of support design using rock mass classification for Indian coal mines. Indian Mineral Congress, Dhanbad, 28 Feb–1st March 2005, pp 343–356Google Scholar
  15. Sheorey PR (1997a) Empirical rock failure criteria. Balkemma, Rotterdam, p 176Google Scholar
  16. Sheorey PR (1997b) Empirical rock failure criteria. A.A Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 54–55Google Scholar
  17. Singh AK, Sinha A, Paul A, Saikia K (2005a) Geotechnical investigation for support design in depillaring panels in Indian coal mines. J Sci Ind Res 64:358–363Google Scholar
  18. Singh TN, Khandelwal M, Verma AK (2005b) A study of the strength and deformational characteristics of jointed rockmass. IACMAG-2005, Italy, pp 191–198Google Scholar
  19. Venkateshwarlu V, Ghose AK, Raju NM (1989) Rock mass classification for design of roof supports—a statistical evolution of parameters. Min Sci Technol 8:97–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Saudi Society for Geosciences 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Avinash Paul
    • 1
  • A. P. Singh
    • 1
  • John Loui P
    • 1
  • Ajoy K. Singh
    • 1
  • Manoj Khandelwal
    • 2
  1. 1.Central Institute of Mining & Fuel ResearchDhanbadIndia
  2. 2.Department of Mining Engineering, College of Technology & EngineeringMaharana Pratap University of Agriculture and TechnologyUdaipurIndia

Personalised recommendations