Skip to main content
Log in

A probabilistic model to improve reconciliation of estimated and actual grade in open-pit mining

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arabian Journal of Geosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Many of the open-pit mines suffer from the lack of reconciliation between estimated and actual grades. In a mining operation, grade reconciliation is the comparison between the values of the estimated grade calculated in exploration stage and the actual grade obtained from more reliable data such as blast holes’ samples. Many different factors affect the degree of reconciliation in a mining operation. In this paper, the factors related to estimated grade which affect the reconciliation process in the exploration stage of the orebody are investigated. These factors constitute the sources of uncertainty for the upcoming phases of the mining life. Among these parameters, the inherent variability, statistical uncertainty, and systematic uncertainty are the most important factors. In this work, these parameters are studied in further detail, and, accordingly, for each of these uncertainties, a correction factor is determined in the proposed model. The model was applied to the study of real data taken from an iron open-pit mine in Iran. The results of the case study indicated that the systematic uncertainty, inherent variability, and statistical uncertainty are, in order, the main sources of uncertainty on grade reconciliation process. Applying the correction factors to estimated grade values has increased the amount of grade reconciliation from 10%, at original condition, to 50%, at new condition, in the case study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ang AH-S, Tang WH (1984) Probability concepts in engineering planning and design, vol 2. Wiley, New York, pp 333–400

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker CT, Giacomo SM (1998) Resource and Reserve: their uses and abuses by the equity markets. Ore reserve and Finance: A Joint Seminar between Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and ASX, Sydney

  • Burmeister B (1988) From resource to reality: a critical review of the achievements of new Australian gold mining projects during the period January 1983 to September 1987, Macquarie University

  • Carrasco P, Carrasco P, Jara E (2004) The economic impact of correct sampling and analysis practices in the copper mining industry. Chemometrics Intelligent Lab Syst J 74:209–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clow G (1991) Why gold mines fail. North Min Mag 2(4):31–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Crawford D (2003) Reconciliation of reserves. (Part 1), Pincock Perspectives, Colorado, ISSUE No. 49–December 2003

  • Dimitrakopoulos R, Martinez L, Ramazan S (2007) A maximum upside/minimum downside approach to the traditional optimization of open pit mine design. J Mining Sci 43(1):73–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duzgun HSB, Yucemen MS, Kapruz C (2002) A probabilistic model for the assessment of uncertainties in the shear strength of rock discontinuities. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 39:743–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot MS, Snowden V, Bywater A et al (2001) Reconciliation of the McKinnons gold deposit, Cobar, New South Wales. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Haren E, Williams P (2000) Mine geology practices at the Sunrise open pit. 4th International Mining Geology Conference, Coolum, Queensland, 14–17 May 2000

  • Knoll K (1989) And now the bad news. North Min Mag 4(6):48–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Magri E, Ortiz J (2000) Estimation of economic losses due to poor blast hole sampling in open pits. WJ Kleingeld and Krige (eds), Geostats 2000, Cape Town, Document transformation technologies, Printed in South Africa

  • Morley C (2003) Beyond reconciliation–a proactive approach to using mining data. Fifth Large Open Pit Mining Conference, Kalgoorlie, WA, 3–5 November

  • Noppe M (2004) Reconciliation: importance of good sampling and data QA-QC. Mining and Resource Geology Symposium, XYZ, EGRU Contribution No.62

  • Rossi M, Parker HM (1993) Estimating recoverable reserves–is it hopeless? Geostatistics for the next century, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, June 3–5

  • Schofield NA (2001) The myth of mine reconciliation. In: Mineral resource and ore reserve estimation—the AusIMM Guide to Good Practice (Ed A C Edwards), pp. 601–610, The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy: Melbourne

  • Snowden V (2000) Grade control and reconciliation. Snowden Associates Pty Ltd, West Perth

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas M, Snowden V (1990) Improving reconciliation and grade control by statistical and geostatistical analysis. Strateg grade control. AIG Bull 10:49–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallee M (2000) Mineral resource+engineering, economic and legal feasibility = ore reserve. CIM Bull 93(1039):53–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Warren M (1991) Pre-feasibility and feasibility studies: a case for improvements. In Minopt 91. The Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy, Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Parhizkar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parhizkar, A., Ataei, M., Moarefvand, P. et al. A probabilistic model to improve reconciliation of estimated and actual grade in open-pit mining. Arab J Geosci 5, 1279–1288 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-010-0275-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12517-010-0275-2

Keywords

Navigation