Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

‘Diseasemanagement’ of ‘welzijnsmanagement’ als oplossing voor onze problemen?

  • Forum
  • Published:
Tijdschrift voor gezondheidswetenschappen Aims and scope

Samenvatting

Initiatieven op het gebied van diseasemanagement, populatiegezondheidsmanagement en innovaties in de eerstelijnszorg zijn nog vooral gericht op klinische en functionele uitkomsten van patiënten en minder op hun algehele kwaliteit van leven en welzijn. In plaats van alleen te kijken naar iemands lichamelijk functioneren, beperkingen door de ziekte en levensstijl is ook aandacht nodig voor de verbetering van zelfmanagementvaardigheden die zorgen voor het algehele welzijn. De zorg moet ondersteunend zijn voor alle problemen die chronisch zieke patiënten ondervinden, die bijvoorbeeld door pijn en vermoeidheid niet in staat zijn een baan uit te oefenen en een volwaardig sociaal leven te hebben. Stimulerend werk en sociale activiteiten zijn voor patiënten wellicht belangrijker dan het meten van de bloeddruk of bloedsuikercontrole. Dankzij interventies die tegemoetkomen aan hun behoeften in ruime zin zouden chronisch zieke patiënten zelf hun welzijn moeten kunnen managen en een achteruitgang in welzijn moeten kunnen voorkomen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figuur 1

Literatuur

  1. Cramm JM, Adams SA, Walters BH, et al. The role of disease management programs in de health behavior of chronically ill patients. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;95:137–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cramm JM, Nieboer AP. Disease management: the need for a focus on broader self-management abilities and quality of life. Popul Health Manag. 2015;18(4):246–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cramm JM, Tsiachristas A, Adams SA. et al. Evaluating disease management programmes in the Netherlands. Rotterdam: Sociaal-Medische Wetenschappen; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hung DY, Rundall TG, Tallia AF, et al. Rethinking prevention in primary care: applying the chronic care model to address health risk behaviors. Milbank Q. 2007;85:69–91.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Barr VJ, Robinson S, Marin-Link B, et al. The expanded Chronic Care Model: an integration of concepts and strategies from population health promotion and the Chronic Care Model. Hosp Q. 2003;7:73–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nieboer AP. Houdbare zorg en ondersteuning in tijden van crisis. Oratie. Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit; 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lindenberg SM. Continuities in the theory of social production functions. In: Lindenberg SM, Ganzeboom HBG (redactie). Verklarende sociologie: opstellen voor Reinhard Wippler. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers; 1996. pag. 169–84.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Nieboer AP, Koolman X, Stolk EA. Preferences for long-term care services: willingness to pay estimates derived from a discrete choice experiment. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70:1317–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ormel J, Lindenberg SM, Steverink N, Von Korff M. Quality of life and social production functions: a framework for understanding health effects. Soc Sci Med. 1997;45:1051–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nieboer A, Lindenberg S, Boomsma A, Van Bruggen AC. Dimensions of well-being and their measurement: the SPF-IL scale. Soc Indic Res. 2005;73:313–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Nieboer A, Lindenberg S. Substitution, buffers and subjective well-being: a hierarchical approach. In: Gullone E, Cummins RA (redactie). The universality of subjective well-being indicators. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2002. pag. 175–89.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Nieboer AP. Life-events and well-being: a prospective study on changes in well-being of elderly people due to a serious illness event or death of the spouse. Amsterdam: Thesis Publishers; 1997.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Nieboer AP, Schulz R, Matthews KA, et al. Spousal caregivers’ activity restriction and depression: a model for changes over time. Soc Sci Med. 1998;47:1361–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Layton JB. Social relationships and mortality risk: a meta-analytic review. PLOS Med. 2010;7(7):e1000316.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Cramm JM, Nieboer AP. Chronically ill patients’ self-management abilities to maintain overall well-being: what is needed to take the next step in the primary care setting? Herziene aanbieding bij BMC Fam Pract. 2015;16:123.

  16. Cramm JM, Nieboer AP. Self-management abilities, physical health and depressive symptoms among patients with cardiovascular diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and diabetes. Patient Educ Couns. 2012;87:411–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Steverink N, Lindenberg S, Slaets JPJ. How to understand and improve older people’s self-management of wellbeing. Eur J Ageing. 2005;2:235–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Cramm JM, Hartgerink JM, Steyerberg EW, et al. Understanding older patients’ self-management abilities: functional loss, self-management, and well-being. Qual Life Res. 2013;22:85–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Cramm JM, Hartgerink JM, Vreede PL de, et al. The role of self-management abilities in the achievement and maintenance of well-being, prevention of depression and successful ageing. Eur J Ageing. 2012;9(4):353–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Cramm JM, Strating MMH, Vreede PL de, Steverink N, Nieboer AP. Development and validation of a short version of the Self-Management Ability Scale (SMAS). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2012;10:9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Gerteis M, Edgman-Levitan S, Daley J, Delbanco TL. Through the patients’ eyes: understanding and promoting patient-centered care. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gerteis M, Edgman-Levitan S, Walker JD. What patients really want. Health Manage Q. 1993;15:2–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Elissen A, Nolte E, Knai C, et al. Is Europe putting theory into practice? A qualitative study of the level of self-management support in chronic care management approaches. BMC Health Serv Res. 2013;13:117.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centredness: a conceptual framework and review of the empirical literature. Soc Sci Med. 2000;51:1087–110.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm. A new health system for the 21st century. Washington DC: National Academy Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Berwick DM. What patient-centered should mean: confessions of an extremist. Health Aff. 2009;28:555–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rathert C, Wyrwich MD, Boren SA. Patient-centered care and outcomes: a systematic review of the literature. Med Care Res Rev. 2013;70:351–79.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Greene SM, Tuzzio L, Cherkin D. A framework for making patient-centered care front and center. Perm J. 2012;16:49–53.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Skochelak S. A decade of reports calling for change in medical education: what do they say? Acad Med. 2010;85:26–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Towle A, Godolphin W. The neglect of chronic disease self-management in medical education: involving patients as educators. Acad Med. 2011;86:1350.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Cramm JM, Nieboer AP: Is ‘disease management’ the answer to our problems? No! Population health management and (disease) prevention require ‘management of overall well-being’. BMC Health Serv Res 2016;16:500.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Instituut Beleid & Management Gezondheidszorg (iBMG), Erasmus Universiteit, Rotterdam, Nederland

    Anna Petra Nieboer & Jane Murray Cramm

Authors
  1. Anna Petra Nieboer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jane Murray Cramm
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anna Petra Nieboer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nieboer, A.P., Cramm, J.M. ‘Diseasemanagement’ of ‘welzijnsmanagement’ als oplossing voor onze problemen?. Tijdschr Gezondheidswet 95, 18–21 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12508-017-0010-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12508-017-0010-4

Search

Navigation