Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Commentaar op de arbeidsgeneeskundige aspecten van de richtlijn Mesothelioom van de Nederlandse vereniging van longartsen

  • COMMENTAAR
  • Published:
TBV – Tijdschrift voor Bedrijfs- en Verzekeringsgeneeskunde Aims and scope

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figuur 1
Figuur 2

Literatuur

  1. Segura O, Burdorf A, Looman C. Update of predictions of mortality from pleural mesothelioma in the Netherlands. Occup Environ Med 2003; 60(1): 50–55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lin RT, Takahashi K, Karjalainen A, et al. Ecological association between asbestos-related diseases and historical asbestos consumption: an international analysis. Lancet 2007; 369: 844–849.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ray M, Kindler HL. Malignant pleural mesothelioma, an update on biomarkers and treatment. Chest 2009; 136: 888–896.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. The National Lung Screening Trial Research Team. Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening. N Engl J Med 2011; 365: 395–409.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Paris C, Maurel M, Luc A, et al. CT scan screening is associated with increased distress among subjects of the APExS. BMC Publ Health 2010; 10: 647.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Burdorf A, Dahhan M, Swuste P. Occupational characteristics of cases with asbestos-related diseases in The Netherlands. Ann Occup Hyg 2003; 47: 485–492.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hodgson JT, Darnton A. The quantitative risks of mesothelioma and lung cancer in relation to asbestos exposure. Am Occup Hyg 2000; 44: 565–601.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hodgson JT, Darnton A.. The mesothelioma risk from chrysotile. Occup Environ Med 2010; 67: 432.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Bauer X, Schneider J, Woitowitz H-J. Kurzdarstellung der neuen S2k-Leitlinie mit Kommentierung und Fallbeispielen Diagnostik und Begutachtung asbestbedingter Berufskrankheiten (Diagnosing and expertizing asbestos-induced occupational diseases. New directive with commentaries and case reports.) Dtsch Med Wochenschr 2011; 136(45): 2319–2324.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Egilman D, Fehnel C, Bohme SR. Exposing the ‘myth’ of ABC, ‘anything but chrysotile’: a critique of the Canadian asbestos mining industry and McGill University chrysotile studies. Am J Ind Med 2003; 44: 540–557.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hagemeyer O, Otten H, Kraus T. Asbestos consumption, asbestos exposure and asbestos-related occupational diseases in Germany. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 2006.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Coronel Instituut voor Arbeid en Gezondheid, Academisch Medisch Centrum Amsterdam/Universiteit van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Gert van der Laan

Authors
  1. Gert van der Laan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

klinisch arbeidsgeneeskundige bij het NCvB

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van der Laan, G. Commentaar op de arbeidsgeneeskundige aspecten van de richtlijn Mesothelioom van de Nederlandse vereniging van longartsen. TIJDSCHRIFT VOOR BEDRIJFS- EN VERZEKERINGSGENEESKUNDE 20, 77–79 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12498-012-0042-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12498-012-0042-2

Search

Navigation