Skip to main content
Log in

Women and men with stable coronary artery disease: different risk factors but similar outcomes!

  • Editor's comment
  • Published:
Netherlands Heart Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Tan ES, van der Meer J, Jan de Kam P, et al. Worse clinical outcome but similar graft patency in women versus men one year after coronary artery bypass graft surgery owing to an excess of exposed risk factors in women. CABADAS. Research Group of the Interuniversity Cardiology Institute of the Netherlands. Coronary Artery Bypass graft occlusion by Aspirin, Dipyridamole and Acenocoumarol/phenoprocoumon Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1999;34:1760–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Roeters van Lennep JE, Westerveld HT, Erkelens DW, et al. Risk factors for coronary heart disease: implications of gender. Cardiovasc Res. 2002;53:538–49.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Engelfriet P, Mulder BJ. Gender differences in adult congenital heart disease. Neth Heart J. 2009;17:414–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Maas AH, Appelman YE. Gender differences in coronary heart disease. Neth Heart J. 2010;18:598–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ghani A, Maas AH, Delnoy PP, et al. Sex-based differences in cardiac arrhythmias, ICD utilisation and cardiac resynchronisation therapy. Neth Heart J. 2011;19:35–40.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. van der Wall EE, Heidendal GA, den Hollander W, et al. Metabolic myocardial imaging with 123I-labeled heptadecanoic acid in patients with angina pectoris. Eur J Nucl Med. 1981;6:391–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dong M, Guo F, Yang J, et al. Detrimental effects of endogenous oestrogens on primary acute myocardial infarction among postmenopausal women. Neth Heart J. 2012. doi:10.1007/s12471-012-0323-5 [Epub ahead of print].

  8. Matheijssen NA, Louwerenburg HW, van Rugge FP, et al. Comparison of ultrafast dipyridamole magnetic resonance imaging with dipyridamole SestaMIBI SPECT for detection of perfusion abnormalities in patients with one-vessel coronary artery disease: assessment by quantitative model fitting. Magn Reson Med. 1996;35:221–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Underwood SR, Bax JJ, vom Dahl J, et al. Study Group of the European Society of Cardiology. Imaging techniques for the assessment of myocardial hibernation. Report of a Study Group of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2004;25:815–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Braun J, van de Veire NR, Klautz RJ, et al. Restrictive mitral annuloplasty cures ischemic mitral regurgitation and heart failure. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;85:430–6. doi:10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.08.040.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Steendijk P, Tulner SA, Bax JJ, et al. Hemodynamic effects of long-term cardiac resynchronization therapy: analysis by pressure-volume loops. Circulation. 2006;113:1295–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Henneman MM, Chen J, Dibbets-Schneider P, et al. Can LV dyssynchrony as assessed with phase analysis on gated myocardial perfusion SPECT predict response to CRT? J Nucl Med. 2007;48:1104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Meijboom LJ, Timmermans J, Zwinderman AH, et al. Aortic root growth in men and women with the Marfan’s syndrome. Am J Cardiol. 2005;96:1441–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Van de Veire NR, Schuijf JD, De Sutter J, et al. Non-invasive visualization of the cardiac venous system in coronary artery disease patients using 64-slice computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48:1832–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Pundziute G, Schuijf JD, Jukema JW, et al. Gender influence on the diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice multislice computed tomography coronary angiography for detection of obstructive coronary artery disease. Heart. 2008;94:48–52.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. van der Hoeven BL, Liem SS, Jukema JW, et al. Sirolimus-eluting stents versus bare-metal stents in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: 9-month angiographic and intravascular ultrasound results and 12-month clinical outcome results from the MISSION! Intervention Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:618–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Breet NJ, Sluman MA, Berkel MA, et al. Effect of gender difference on platelet reactivity. Neth Heart J. 2011;19:451–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. van der Wall EE. Gender differences in diagnostic testing for suspected coronary artery disease? Neth Heart J. 2012;20:483–4. doi:10.1007/s12471-012-0332-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Steg PG, Greenlaw N, Tardif JC, et al. CLARIFY Registry Investigators. Women and men with stable coronary artery disease have similar clinical outcomes: insights from the international prospective CLARIFY registry. Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2831–40. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs289.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Swahn E. Stable or not, woman or man: is there a difference? Eur Heart J. 2012;33:2769–70. doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehs276.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. E. van der Wall.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van der Wall, E.E. Women and men with stable coronary artery disease: different risk factors but similar outcomes!. Neth Heart J 21, 111–112 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-013-0375-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12471-013-0375-1

Navigation