Abstract
In a public transport network, a more intense integration between lines generally involves, on one hand, the reduction in the number of direct links, which forces users to perform more transfers, and on the other hand, the possibility of achieving a greater number of rides with the same whole mileage. Thus, the move towards feeder-trunk schemes produces both negative and positive effects on accessibility and on the quality of service perceived by users. That implies the need to evaluate accessibility realized on a territory by transit service patterns characterized by different levels of line integration. This research was focused on the development of an accessibility model able to estimate an equivalent travel time and to consider the discomfort resulting from possible transfers between vehicles and the benefits arising from available transit rides. As reported in this paper, the proposed model, that measures accessibility through an equivalent travel time, determines the latter as a function, in addition to the time spent inside the vehicle, also of the time and discomfort consequent to the transfers as well as of the number of supplied rides. With reference to the regional public transport, the values obtained by the calibration of the constants show how the waiting time has a weight for the user twice as much compared to the time spent on the vehicle, whilst the time required for the transfer has about a one and a half weight. Finally, the discomfort caused by each transfer is evaluated by the user as an increase to the overall travel time of about 3 and a half minutes. The calibrated model has been applied to a real case, in order to validate it and highlight benefits and limitations resulting from feeder-trunk supply patterns. The developed tool is useful in the design of a public transport service, especially in areas with weak demand, allowing to compare, in terms of produced accessibility, supply schemes with different levels of line integration, variable from direct-link type (also called point to point) to that feeder-trunk.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abrantes P, Wardman M (2011) Meta-analysis of U.K. values of time: an update. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 45(1):1–17
Barton-Ashman Associates (1993) Estimation, calibration, and validation of the Houston mode choice model. Technical Report. Prepared for the Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Houston, TX
Cattan N (1992) Air and rail accessibilities and attractivities on European Metropolis, 6th world conference on transport research, Lyon, June 29–July 3rd
Chowdhury S, Ceder A (2013) Definition of planned and unplanned transfer of public transport service and user decisions to use routes with transfers. J Public Transp 16(2):1–20
Chowdhury S, Hadas Y, Gonzalez VA, Schot B (2018) Public transport users’ and policy makers’ perceptions of integrated public transport systems. Transp Policy 61:75–83
Dalvi M, Martin KM (1976) The measurement of accessibility: some preliminary results. Transportation 5:17–42
Douglas NJ, Jones M (2013). Estimating transfer penalties and standardised income values of time by stated preference survey. In: Australian Transport Research Forum
Fan Y, Guthrie A, Levinson D (2016) Waiting time perceptions at transit stops and stations: effects of basic amenities, gender, and security. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 88:251–264
Gschwender A, Jara-Díaz S, Bravo C (2016) Feeder-trunk or direct lines? Economies of density, transfer costs and transit structure in an urban context. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 88:209–222
Guihaire V, Hao J-K (2008) Transit network design and scheduling: a global review. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 42(10):1251–1273
Horowitz A (1981) Subjective value of time in bus transit travel. Transportation 10:149–164
Iseki H, Taylor BD (2009) Not all transfers are created equal: towards a framework relating transfer connectivity to travel behaviour. Transp Rev 29(6):777–800
Jara-Díaz SR, Gschwender A, Ortega M (2012) Is public transport based on transfers optimal? A theoretical investigation. Transp Res Part B Methodol 46:808–816
Kindlmann P, Burel F (2008) Connectivity measures: a review. Landsc Ecol 8(23):879–890
Mishraa S, Welch TF, Jha MK (2012) Performance indicators for public transit connectivity in multi-modal transportation networks. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 46(7):1066–1085
Murray AT, Wu X (2003) Accessibility tradeoffs in public transit planning. J Geogr Syst 5(1):93–107
Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas Inc. (1998) Cleveland regional travel demand forecasting model documentation report. Prepared for the Greater Cleveland Regional Transit Authority and the Northeast Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency
Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas Inc. (1999) Travel demand model development methodology report. North Illinois Regional Commuter Railroad Corporation (METRA)
Sivakumaran K, Li Y, Cassidy MJ, Madanat S (2012) Cost-saving properties of schedule coordination in a simple trunk-and-feeder transit system. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 46:131–139
Vasconcelos S, Farias TL (2012) Evaluation of urban accessibility indicators based on internal and external environmental costs. Transp Res Part D Transp Environ 17(6):433–441
Wallis I, Lawrence A, Douglas N (2013) Economic appraisal of public transport service enhancement. Research Report 533, New Zealand Transport Agency
Wardman M (1998) A review of British evidence on the valuations of time and service quality. Working Paper 525, Department of the Environment, Transport and the Regions, Leeds
Wardman M (2001a) Public transport values of time. Working paper 564, Leeds: Institute of Transport Studies, University of Leeds
Wardman M (2001b) A review of British evidence on time and service quality valuations. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 37(2–3):107–128
Wardman M (2004) Public transport values of time. Transp Policy 11(4):363–377
Wardman M (2013) Value of time multipliers: a review and meta-analysis of European-wide evidence. In: TRB 92nd annual meeting compendium of papers. Transportation research board, Washington, DC, 13–17 January, pp 1–18
Wardman M, Hine J, Stradling S (2001) Interchange and travel choice, vol 1. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive Central Research Unit
Acknowledgements
The research was carried out with the financial contribution of the National Bank of Communications Foundation, Via di Villa Albani, 20, 00198 Rome, which mostly financed the research grant for the project ‘High efficiency and effectiveness networks for the local public bus transport’.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Petruccelli, U., Racina, A. Feeder-trunk and direct-link schemes for public transit: a model to evaluate the produced accessibility. Public Transp 13, 301–323 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-021-00262-4
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-021-00262-4