Abstract
Multi-modal travel itineraries are based on traversing multiple legs using more than one mode of transportation. The more combinations of legs and modes, the more challenging it is for a traveler to identify a reliable itinerary. Transportation providers collect data that can increase transparency for reliable travel planning. However, this data has not been fully exploited yet, although it will likely form an important piece of future traveler information systems. Our paper takes an important step in this direction by analyzing and aggregating data from the operation of scheduled and unscheduled modes to create a reliability measure for multi-modal travel. We use a network search algorithm to evaluate itineraries that combine schedule-based long-distance travel with airlines with last-mile and first-mile drive times to efficiently identify the one with the highest reliability given a start time and travel-time budget. Our network search considers multiple origin and destination airports which impacts the first and last mile as well as the flight options. We use extensive historical datasets to create reliable itineraries and compare these with deterministic shortest travel-time itineraries. We investigate the amount of data that is required to create reliable multi-modal travel itineraries. Additionally, we highlight the benefits and costs of reliable travel itineraries and analyze their structure.










Similar content being viewed by others
References
Andreas A, Smith JC, Küçükyavuz S (2007) Branch-and-price-and-cut algorithms for solving the reliable h-paths problem. J Glob Optim 42:443–466
Antsfeld L, Walsh T (2012) Finding optimal paths in multi-modal public transportation networks using hub nodes and TRANSIT algorithm. Artif Intell Logist 2012:7–11
Bast H, Delling D, Goldberg A, Müller-Hannemann M, Pajor T, Sanders P, Wagner D, Werneck RF (2016) Route planning in transportation networks, in algorithm engineering. Springer, Berlin, pp 19–80
Böhmová K, Mihalák M, Pröger R Tobias, Srámek P Widmayer (2013) Robust routing in urban public transportation: how to find reliable journeys based on past observations. ATMOS 13:27–41
Chai T, Draxler RR (2014) Root mean square error (RMSE) or mean absolute error (MAE)?—arguments against avoiding RMSE in literature. Geoscie Model Dev 7:1247–1250
Chen BY, Lam WH, Sumalee A, Li Q, Shao H, Fang Z (2013) Finding reliable shortest paths in road networks under uncertainty. Netw Spat Econ 13:123–148
Cheng J, Lisser A (2015) Maximum probability shortest path problem. Discret Appl Math 192:40–48
Delling D, Dibbelt J, Pajor T, Wagner D, Werneck R (2013) Computing multimodal journeys in practice. In: International symposium on experimental algorithms, pp 260–271
Devarasetty P, Burris M, Shaw W (2012) Do travelers pay for managed-lane travel as they claimed they would? Before-and-after study of travelers on Katy Freeway, Houston, Texas. Transp Res Board J Transp Res Board 2297:58–65
Dibbelt J, Pajor T, Wagner D (2015) User-constrained multimodal route planning. J Exp Algorithmics 19:11–119
Duan Z, Sun S, Sun S, Li W (2015) Stochastic time-dependent vehicle routing problem: mathematical models and ant colony algorithm. Adv Mech Eng 7:1–16
Ehmke J, Campbell A (2014) Customer acceptance mechanisms for home deliveries in metropolitan areas. Eur J Oper Res 233:193–207
Ehreke I, Hess S, Weis C, Axhausen K (2015) Reliability in the German value of time study. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2495:14–22
Fleischmann B, Gietz M, Gnutzmann S (2004) Time-varying travel times in vehicle routing. Transp Sci 38:160–173
Gao S, Chabini I (2002) Best routing policy problem in stochastic time-dependent networks. Transp Res Rec 1783:188–196
GoogleMaps (2018). https://developers.google.com/maps/documentation/. Accessed 13 Dec 2018
Guessous Y, Aron M, Bhouri N, Cohen S (2014) Estimating travel time distribution under different traffic conditions. Transp Res Proced 3:339–348
Hess S, Adler T, Polak JW (2007) Modelling airport and airline choice behaviour with the use of stated preference survey data. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 43:221–233
Hickman M (2002) Robust passenger itinerary planning using transit AVL data. In: Proceedings of the IEEE 5th international conference on intelligent transportation systems, IEEE, pp 840–845
Hossan MS, Asgari H, Jin X (2016) Investigating prefernce heterogenieity in value of time (VOT) and value of reliability (VOR) estiamtion for managed lanes. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 94:638–649
Jones R (2013) 1000 Largest US Cities by population with geographic coordinates. https://gist.github.com/Miserlou/c5cd8364bf9b2420bb29. Accessed 13 Dec 2018
Keyhani MH, Schnee M, Weihe K, Zorn HP (2012) Reliability and delay distributions of train connections. In: OASIcs-OpenAccess series in informatics, Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik, vol 25, pp 35–46
Kou W, Chen X, Yu L, Qi Y, Wang Y (2017) Urban commuters’ valuation of travel time reliability based on stated preference survey: a case study of Beijing. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 95:372–380
Liu Y, Blandin S, Samaranayake S (2019) Stochastic on-time arrival problem in transit networks. Transp Res Part B Methodol 119:122–138
Maan M (2018) Rome2Rio launches all-new app for iOS. https://www.rome2rio.com/blog/2018/06/12/new-rome2rio-app/. Accessed 13 Dec 2018
McCoy K, Andrew J, Glynn R, Lyons W et al (2018) Integratingshared mobility into multimodal transportation planning: improving regional performance to meet public goals. Technical report, UnitedStates. Federal Highway Administration. Office of Planning
Miller-Hooks ED, Mahmassani HS (2000) Least expected time paths in stochastic, time-varying transportation networks. Transp Sci 34:198–215
Musulin K (2018) Coord unveils routing API to support multimodal trip planning. https://www.smartcitiesdive.com/news/coord-routing-api-multimodal-trip-planning/524525/. Accessed 13 Dec 2018
Nie Y, Wu X (2009) Shortest path problem considering on-time arrival probability. Transp Res Part B 43:597–613
Niknami M, Samaranayake S (2016) Tractable pathfinding for the stochastic on-time arrival problem. In: International symposium on experimental algorithms. Springer, pp 231–245
Redmond M, Campbell AM, Ehmke JF (2019) The most reliable flight itinerary problem. Networks 73:325–343
Smirnov N (1948) Table for estimating the goodness of fit of empirical distributions. Ann Math Stat 19:279–281
Spero J (2019) Flight delays in Europe more than double. Financial Times
Tu Y, Ball M, Jank W (2008) Estimating flight departure delay distributions—a statistical approach with long-term trend and short-term pattern. J Am Stat Assoc 103:112–125
UberTechnologies (2018) https://movement.uber.com. Accessed 13 Dec 2018
Ulloa L, Lehoux-Lebacque V, Roulland F (2017) Trip planning within a multimodal urban mobility. IET Intel Transp Syst 12:87–92
Wang L, Yang L, Gao Z (2016) The constrained shortest path problem with stochastic correlated link travel times. Eur J Oper Res 255:43–57
Wong Y, Hensher D, Mulley C (2017) Emerging transport technologies and the modal efficiency framework: a case for mobility as a service (MaaS). In: International conference on competition and ownership of land passenger transport, pp 13–17
Zhang Y, Tang J (2018) A robust optimization approach for itinerary planning with deadline. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 113:56–74
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
1.1 OD pairs
Table 9 examines key statistics from each of the OD pairs considered in the experiments from Sect. 6. SP #_Flights and MRI #_Flights is the average number of flights on itineraries between these cities. For example, New York to Los Angeles always chooses direct flights while Bozeman, MT to Panama City, FL averages more than 3 flights. The reliability for each stage of the SP and MRI itineraries are also displayed. This OD summary table can help trace which cities have reliability loss at different stages and how to use this to plan more reliable itineraries.
1.2 K–S test statistic
Figure 11 is similar to the analysis in Sect. 5.1. We compared the predicted and actual distributions using the two-sample Kolmogorov–Smirnov (K–S) Test Statistic (Smirnov 1948) to evaluate similarity between distributions. A value closer to 0 means the distributions are more similar, while a value close to 1 signifies greater differences. As Fig. 11 shows, when comparing predicted and actual distributions over 4 months of data (April, July, October, December), the average K–S statistic tends to drop the more historical observations are present. The larger k-statistic with observations that only have a small number of distributions shows that the predicted and actual distributions for a small number of observations is not as predictive. As shown in Fig. 11, at around 15–25 observations, the K–S statistic levels out.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Redmond, M., Campbell, A.M. & Ehmke, J.F. Data-driven planning of reliable itineraries in multi-modal transit networks. Public Transp 12, 171–205 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-019-00221-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-019-00221-0



