Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Spatial bus priority schemes, implementation challenges and needs: an overview and directions for future studies

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Public Transport Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Urban transit systems consist of multiple modes of transport of which cars and buses make up the largest portion, particularly in developing countries. Thus, theories on the best means of allocating existing road spaces for cars and buses in city-centers and suburban corridors in order to improve operational transport efficiency has become a frontier research topic. Today, bus priority (BP) methods, as one of the most widely used Public Transport Priority (PTP) strategies, are commonly recognized as effective in lowering traffic congestion and reducing bus travel times. PT authorities, urban planners/designers, and researchers dealing with PT issues (i.e. buses), need to investigate existing BP methods in detail and assess relevant research before setting about designing or implementing new policies. Of course, evaluating such studies is a time-consuming process. In order to address this constraint, the present study proposes a general typology of existing BP methods and evaluates the challenges and requirements regarding their implementation by conducting a comprehensive literature review of existing studies related to PTP. Academic papers (theoretical, analytical, and simulation-based), technical reports, and design manual/guidelines in the context of both developed and developing countries have been searched as part of the literature review process. The study concludes by proposing two comparative summary tables of all spatial bus priority schemes in terms of “min. requirements to justify BP schemes” and “advantages and disadvantages of time-based and spatial BP treatments”. These may provide engineers, urban planners or transit policy-makers with an accessible guide with which to refer in the evaluation stage. However, future research is recommended in order to bridge existing gaps concerning conditions required for the successful implementation of spatial bus priority strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price includes VAT (Finland)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. American Public Transportation Association.

References

  • Abdelfatah A, Abdulwahid AR (2017) Impact of exclusive bus lanes on traffic performance in Urban Areas. In: Proceedings of the 2nd World Congress on Civil, Structural, and Environmental Engineering (CSEE’17). Barcelona, Spain, pp 1–10

  • Al-Deek H, Sandt A, Alomari A, Hussain O (2017) A technical note on evaluating the effectiveness of bus rapid transit with transit signal priority. J Intell Transp Syst 21:227–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/15472450.2017.1286987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alpkokin P, Ergun M (2012) Istanbul Metrobus: first intercontinental bus rapid transit. J Transp Geogr 24:58–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • APTA (2008) Public transportation fact book, 59th edn. American Public Transportation Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Beirão G, Sarsfield Cabral JA (2007) Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: a qualitative study. Transp Policy 14:478–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.04.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benn HP (1995) TCRP Synthesis No. 10: bus route evaluation standards. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugg Z, Crisafi J, Lindstrom E, Ryus P (2016) Effect of transit preferential treatments on vehicle travel time. Transp Res Board 95th Annu Meet 1–17

  • Burinskienė M, Gusarovienė M, Gabrulevičiūtė-Skebienė K (2014) The impact of public transport lanes on the operating speed of buses. In: The 9th International Conference “Environmental Engineering 2014.” Vilnius Gediminas Technical University Press “Technika” 2014, Vilnius, Lithuania

  • Chen C, Varaiya P, Kwon J (2005) An empirical assessment of traffic operations. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on transportation and traffic theory. Elsevier, College Park, MD, pp 105–124

  • Chiabaut N, Xie X, Leclercq L (2012) Road capacity and travel times with bus lanes and intermittent priority activation. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2315:182–190. https://doi.org/10.3141/2315-19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie G, Lai H (2008) Intermittent and dynamic transit lanes: melbourne, Australia, experience. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2072:49–56. https://doi.org/10.3141/2072-06

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currie G, Sarvi M, Young B (2007) A new approach to evaluating on-road public transport priority projects: balancing the demand for limited road-space. Transportation (Amst) 34:413–428. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-006-9107-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Souza C, Hounsell NB, Shrestha BP (2012) Using automatic vehicle location (AVL) data for evaluation of bus priority at traffic signals. IET ITS Conf Road Transp Inf Control (RTIC 2012) 21–21. https://doi.org/10.1049/cp.2012.1550

  • Danaher AR (2010) TCRP synthesis No. 83: bus and rail transit preferential treatments in mixed traffic. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Duduta N, Adriazola C, Wass C, Hidalgo D, Lindau LA (2012) Traffic safety on bus corridors. EMBARQ, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Duerr P (2000) Dynamic right-of-way for transit vehicles: integrated modeling approach for optimizing signal control on mixed traffic arterials. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1731:31–39. https://doi.org/10.3141/1731-05

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eichler M (2005) Bus lane with intermittent priority: assessment and design. University of California, Berkeley. Master Thesis

  • Eichler M, Daganzo CF (2006) Bus lanes with intermittent priority: strategy formulae and an evaluation. Transp Res Part B Methodol 40:731–744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2005.10.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fadaei Oshyani M, Cats O (2016) Evaluatıng the performance and benefıts of bus prıorıty, operatıon and control measures. In: Proceedings of the 95th Transportation Research Board Annual Meeting. Transportation Research Record, Washington DC

  • Farid YZ, Christofa E, Collura J (2015) Dedicated bus and queue jumper lanes at signalized intersections with nearside bus stops. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2484:182–192. https://doi.org/10.3141/2484-20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng W, Figliozzi M, Bertini RL (2015) Empirical evaluation of transit signal priority through fusion of heterogeneous transit and traffic signal data and novel performance measures. Transp Res Board 94th Annu Meet 500: https://doi.org/10.3141/2488-03

  • FHWA (2006) Bus-only shoulders: a transit advantage. In: Minnesota Dep. Transp. http://www.dot.state.mn.us/metro/teamtransit/pdf/bosupdate.pdf

  • Furth P, Muller TH (2000) Conditional bus priority at signalized intersections: better service with less traffic disruption. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1731:23–30. https://doi.org/10.3141/1731-04

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. FWHA (2017) Active Demand Management. http://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/atdm/approaches/adm.htm. Accessed 5 Apr 2017

  • Gan A (2009) Design of transit signal priority at signalized intersections with queue jumper lanes. J Public Transp 12:117–132. https://doi.org/10.3141/1925-27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner K, Melhuish T, McKenna D, Rice T (2006) The benefits of bus priority within the central London congestion charging zone. Association for European Transport and contributors, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner K, D’Souza C, Hounsell N, Shrestha B, Bretherton D (2009) Interaction of buses and signals at road crossings—review of bus priority at traffic signals around the world, V2.0. International Association of Public Transport (UITP); Bus Committee, Belgium

  • Gu W, Cassidy MJ (2013) Maximizing bus discharge flows from multi-berth stops by regulating exit maneuvers. Transp Res Part B Methodol 56:254–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2013.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu W, Cassidy MJ, Gayah V, Ouyang Y (2013) Mitigating negative impacts of near-side bus stops on cars. Transp Res Part B Methodol 47:42–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2012.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gu W, Gayah VV, Cassidy MJ, Saade N (2014) On the impacts of bus stops near signalized intersections: models of car and bus delays. Transp Res Part B Methodol 68:123–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2014.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guler SI, Menendez M (2013) Empirical evaluation of bus and car delays at pre-signals. In: Proceedings of the 13th Swiss Transport Research Conference. Institute for Transport Planning and Systems, ETH Zurich, pp 1–14

  • Guler SI, Menendez M (2014) Analytical formulation and empirical evaluation of pre-signals for bus priority. Transp Res Part B Methodol 64:41–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2014.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guler SI, Menendez M (2015) Pre-signals for bus priority: basic guidelines for implementation. Public Transp 7:339–354. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-015-0104-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guler SI, Gayah VV, Menendez M (2016) Bus priority at signalized intersections with single-lane approaches: a novel pre-signal strategy. Transp Res Part C 63:51–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2015.12.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HCM (2000) Highway capacity manual. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • HCM (2010) Highway capacity manual: concepts, vol 1, 5th edn. Transportation Research Board, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • He H, Guler SI, Menendez M (2016) Adaptive control algorithm to provide bus priority with a pre-signal. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 64:28–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.01.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hensher DA (1998) The imbalance between car and public transport use in urban Australia: why does it exist? Transp Policy 5:193–204. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0967-070X(98)00022-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hensher DA, Waters WG (1994) Light rail and bus priority systems: choice or blind commitment? Res Transp Econ 3:139–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0739-8859(09)80008-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hounsell N, McDonald M (1988) Evaluation of bus lanes, TRRL Report No. 87. Transport and Road Research Labaratory, London

  • Hounsell N, Shrestha B (2005) AVL based bus priority at traffic signals: a review and case study of architectures. Eur J Transp Infrastruct Res 5:13–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra-Rojas OJ, Delgado F, Giesen R, Munoz JC (2015) Planning, operation, and control of bus transport systems: a literature review. Transp Res Part B Methodol 77:38–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2015.03.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacques KST, Levinson HS (1997) TCRP No. 26: operational analysis of bus lanes on arterials. Transportation Research Board, Washington, DC

  • Jaensirisaka S, Klungboonkrongb P, Udomsri R (2013) Development of bus rapid transit (BRT) in Khon Kaen, Thailand. In: Proceedings of Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies

  • Joskowicz IF (2012) Dynamic Bus Lane, Ph.D. Thesis. The University of Texas at Arlington

  • Kittelson & Assoc Inc., Parsons Brinckerhoff Inc., KFH Group Inc., Texas A&M Transportation Institute, Arup (2013) TCRP NO. 165: transit capacity and quality of service manual, 3rd edn. Transportation Research Board, Washington

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kwon J, Varaiya P (2008) Effectiveness of California’s high occupancy vehicle (HOV) system. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 16:98–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2007.06.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson H (2001) Bus transit in the 21st century: some perspectives and prospects. Transp Res Rec 1760:42–46. https://doi.org/10.3141/1760-06

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson H, Adams C, Hoey W (1975) TCRP No. 155: bus use of highways planning and design guidelines. Transportation Research Board, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson H, Zimmerman S, Clinger J, Rutherford G (2002) Bus rapid transit: an overview. J Public Transp 5:1–30. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.5.2.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson HS, Zimmerman S, Clinger J, Gast J (2003) Bus rapid transit: synthesis of case studies. Transp Res Rec. https://doi.org/10.3141/1841-01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y, Yang X, Zou N, Franz M (2015) Transit signal priority control at signalized intersections: a comprehensive review. Transp Lett 7:168–180. https://doi.org/10.1179/1942787514Y.0000000044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y, Yang X, Zou N (2017) Passive transit signal priority for high transit demand: model formulation and strategy selection. Transp Lett. https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2017.1295899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litman T (2015) When are bus lanes warranted? Considering economic efficiency, social equity and strategic planning goals. http://www.vtpi.org/blw.pdf

  • Lu B, Viegas J (2003) Improving bus movement on predicted bus message. IFAC Proc 36:191–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-6670(17)32418-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma W, Liu Y, Han B (2013) A rule-based model for integrated operation of bus priority signal timings and traveling speed. J Adv Transp 47:369–383. https://doi.org/10.1002/atr.1213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahendran A, Smith SF, Hebert M, Xie X-F (2014) Bus detection for adaptive traffic signal control. US DOT University Transportation Center, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin P, Levinson HS, Texas Transportation Institute (2012) TCRP No. 151: a guide for implementing bus on shoulder (BOS) systems. Transportation Research Board, Washington

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Menendez M, Daganzo CF (2007) Effects of HOV lanes on freeway bottlenecks. Transp Res Part B Methodol 41:809–822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2007.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller MA (2009) Bus lanes/bus rapid transit systems on highways: review of the literature, California PATH Working Paper UCB-ITS-PWP-2009-1. California, Berkeley

  • Mirchandani P, Lucas D (2004) Integrated transit priority and rail/emergency preemption in real-time traffic adaptive signal control. Intell Transp Syst 8:101–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/15472450490437799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundy D, Trompet M, Cohen JM, Graham DJ (2017) The identification and management of bus priority schemes (A study of international experiences and best practices). Centre for Transport Studies Imperial College London, London

    Google Scholar 

  • NACTO (2012) Urban street design guide. National Association of City Transportation Officials, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • NACTO (2016) Transit street design guide, 2nd edn. National Association of City Transportation Officials, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Neves J (2006) The impacts of bus lanes on urban traffic environment. University of Porto, Master Thesis

  • Olstam J, Habibovic A, Anund A (2015) Dynamic bus lanes in Sweden—a pre-study. Lund, Sweden

  • Princeton JF, Cohen S (2010) Simulation, implementation and evaluation of a dedicated lane on an Urban motorway. In: 12th World Conference for Transportation Research. Lisbon, Portugal, pp 1–14

  • PTV (2017) PTV VISSIM 10 user manual, vol 10. Las, PTV Planug Transport Verkehr AG

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman F, Sakamoto K, Kubota H (2007) Decision making process of traffic calming devices; a comparative study. IATSS Res 31:94–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0386-1112(14)60227-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakamoto K, Abhayantha C, Kubota H (2007) Effectiveness of bus priority lane as countermeasure for congestion. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2034:103–111. https://doi.org/10.3141/2034-12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skabardonis A (1998) Control strategies for transit priority. California PATH research report, Berkeley

  • Skabardonis A (2000) Control strategies for transit priority. Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 1727:20–26. https://doi.org/10.3141/1727-03

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith HR, Hemily B, Ivanovic M, Inc Gannett Fleming (2005) Transit signal priority: a planning and implementation handbook. ITS America Technology Transforming Transportation, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart R, Wong R (2013) Guidelines for planning and implementation of transit priority measures (TPM) in Urban Areas. Annual Conference of the Transportation Association of Canada. Transportation Association of Canada, Ottawa, pp 1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunkari SR, Beasley P, Urbanik T, Fambro D (1994) A model to evaluate the impact of bus priority on signalized intersection. In: 74th Annual Transportation Research Board Meeting. Transportation Research Board, Washington

  • Thakuriah P, Metaxatos P, Mohammadian A (2014) Bus Riding on Shoulders. Illinois Center for Transportation Series No. 10-073

  • Todd M, Barth M, Eichler M, Daganzo CF, Shaheen SA (2006) Enhanced transit strategies: bus lanes with intermittent priority and ITS technology architectures for TOD enhancement. California, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Townes MS, Aoyagi G, Barnes L, Blair GL, Garber C, Hunter-zaworski K, Monroe D (1998) TCRP No. 33: transit-friendly streets: design and traffic management strategies to support livable communities. Transportation Research Board, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Truong LT, Currie G, Sarvi M (2017a) Analytical and simulation approaches to understand combined effects of transit signal priority and road-space priority measures. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 74:275–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.11.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Truong LT, Currie G, Wallace M, De Gruyter C (2017b) Does combining transit signal priority with dedicated bus lanes or queue jump lanes at multiple intersections create multiplier effects? Transp Res Rec J Transp Res Board 2647:80–92. https://doi.org/10.3141/2647-10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UK Department for Transport (2003) Traffic control system design for all purpose roads (compendium of examples). Crown, Hants

    Google Scholar 

  • Varaiya P, Kurzhanskiy A (2010) Active traffic management: approaches: active transportation and demand management—FHWA operations. In: FHWA. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/atdm/approaches/atm.htm. Accessed 05 Apr 2017

  • Viegas JMJ, Lu B (1997) Traffic control system with intermittent bus lanes. IFAC Transp Syst Proc. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-6670(17)43930-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viegas J, Lu B (2001) Widening the scope for bus priority with intermittent bus lanes. Transp Plan Technol 24:87–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/03081060108717662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viegas J, Lu B (2004) The intermittent bus lane signals setting within an area. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 12:453–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2004.07.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viegas J, Lu B, Vieira J, Roque R (2006) Demonstration of the intermittent bus lane in Lisbon. IFAC Proc 39:239–244. https://doi.org/10.3182/20060829-3-NL-2908.00042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein AA, Goldman T, Hannaford N (2013) Shared-use bus priority lanes on city streets: approaches to access and enforcement. J Public Transp 16:25–41. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.16.4.2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Hounsell N (1998) Bus priority using pre-signals. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 32:563–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(98)00008-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu D, Deng W, Song Y, Wang J, Kong D (2017) Evaluating operational effects of bus lane with intermittent priority under connected vehicle environments. Discret Dyn Nat Soc. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/1659176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie X, Chiabaut N, Leclercq L (2012) Improving bus transit in cities with appropriate dynamic lane allocating strategies. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 48:1472–1481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J, Liu Y (2016) Integrated signal optimization and non-traditional lane assignment for urban freeway off-ramp congestion mitigation. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 73:219–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.11.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou G, Gan A, Shen LD (2007) Optimization of adaptive transit signal priority using parallel genetic algorithm. Tsinghua Sci Technol 12:131–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1007-0214(07)70020-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu HB (2010) Numerical study of Urban traffic flow with dedicated bus lane and intermittent bus lane. Phys A 389:3134–3139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2010.03.040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zlatkovic M, Stevanovic A, Reza RMZ (2013) Effects of Queue Jumpers and Transit Signal Priority on Bus Rapid Transit. In: Transportation Research Board 92nd Annual Meeting. Transportation Research Board, Washington

  • Zyryanov V, Mironchuk A (2012) Simulation study of intermittent bus lane and bus signal priority strategy. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 48:1464–1471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.1122

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is part of the Ph.D. thesis of the corresponding author entitled “Effects of PT priority methods on adjacent mixed traffic”. The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their time, valuable comments and suggestions resulting in improving the quality of the present study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Graduate School of Science Engineering and Technology, Transportation Eng Ph.D. Program, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Nima Dadashzadeh

  2. Transportation Eng. Division, Civil Engineering Faculty, Istanbul Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey

    Murat Ergun

  3. Traffic Technical Institute, Faculty of Civil and Geodetic Engineering, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

    Nima Dadashzadeh

Authors
  1. Nima Dadashzadeh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Murat Ergun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nima Dadashzadeh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dadashzadeh, N., Ergun, M. Spatial bus priority schemes, implementation challenges and needs: an overview and directions for future studies. Public Transp 10, 545–570 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-018-0191-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-018-0191-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation