Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The role of passenger-centric innovation in the future of public transport

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Public Transport Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although hard factors such as availability, efficiency, safety, and comfort make up the core of the public transport quality of service, they are only a part of the bigger picture. This bigger picture is modified and shaped daily, where the increasing permeation of technology creates new possibilities for passengers to experience their journeys. Despite technology becoming ubiquitous in public transport, it has had only limited impact on how passengers connect affectively and symbolically with the service. This “affective gap” is at the core of what differentiates private and public transport. Being able to reduce this gap is therefore valuable to passengers and public transport service providers alike. In this paper, we build on existing and ongoing work to discuss the relevance of a passenger-centric approach to innovation in the field of public transport. This passenger-centric approach puts passengers at the centre of future solutions, where their evolving needs, desires, and values are used to guide how to enhance the existing core functionality of the service. To test our hypothesis that passenger-centric innovation is valuable to passengers and advantageous to service providers alike, we put forward a review on how innovation is being approached in both the aviation and car industries. This review is supported by our own insights, which have been based on data collected from urban rail commuters in Australia. We further support our argument by looking at particular examples of innovation in the field of public transport, and discussing the existing barriers and drivers that can, respectively, hinder or propel passenger-centric innovation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anable J, Gatersleben B (2005) All work and no play? The role of instrumental and affective factors in work and leisure journeys by different travel modes. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 39(2–3):163–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archer M, Paleti R, Konduri KC, Pendyala RM, Bhat CR (2013) Modeling the connection between activity-travel patterns and subjective well-being. Transp Res Record J Transp Res Board 2382(1):102–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (2014) Australian Social Trends, 2013. http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/4102.0Main+Features40July+2013. Accessed 21 Oct 2014

  • Bannon L (1991) From human factors to human actors: the role of psychology and human-computer interaction studies in system design. In: Greenbaum J, Kyng M (eds) Design at work: cooperative design of computer systems. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New Jersey, pp 25–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Beirao G, Cabral JS (2007) Understanding attitudes towards public transport and private car: a qualitative study. Transp Policy 14(6):478–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berry LL, Carbone PL, Haeckel HS (2002) Managing the total customer experience. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 43(3):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Binder S, Maknoon Y, Bierlaire M (2015) Passenger-oriented railway disposition timetables in case of severe disruptions. In: The 15th Swiss transportation research conference, Ascona

  • Blank S (2013) Why the lean start-up changes everything. Harvard Bus Rev 91(5):63–72

    Google Scholar 

  • BMW Australia (2014). BMW heads-up display—BMW Australia. http://www.bmw.com.au/com/en/newvehicles/x/x5/2013/showroom/driver_assistance/head_up_display.html. Accessed 5 Oct 2014

  • Bozeman B, Kingsley G (1998) Risk culture in public and private organizations. Publ Admin Rev 58(2):109–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budd L, Vorley T (2013) Airlines, apps, and business travel: a critical examination. Res Transp Bus Manag 9:41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns S, Sloman L, Newson C, Anable J, Kirkbride A, Goodwin P (2004) Smarter choices—changing the way we travel. Sustainable travel report. Department for Transport, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Camacho T, Foth M, Rakotonirainy A (2013) Pervasive technology and public transport: opportunities beyond telematics. IEEE Pervasive Comput 12(1):18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camacho T, Foth M, Rittenbruch M, Rakotonirainy A (2015) TrainYarn: Probing perceptions of social space in urban commuter trains. Proceedings of OzCHI—annual meeting of the Australian Special Interest Group for Computer Human Interaction, Melbourne, Australia. ACM, New York, pp 455–464

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Carreira R, Patrício L, Jorge RN, Magee C (2014) Understanding the travel experience and its impact on attitudes, emotions and loyalty towards the transportation provider—a quantitative study with mid-distance bus trips. Transp Policy 31:35–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cascajo R, Monzon A (2014) Assessment of innovative measures implemented in European bus systems using key performance indicators. Public Transp 6(3):257–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen CF (2008) Investigating structural relationships between service quality, perceived value, satisfaction, and behavioral intentions for air passengers: evidence from Taiwan. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 42(4):709–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox W, Duthion B (2001) Competition in urban public transport: a world view. In: The 7th international conference on competition and ownership of land passenger transport, Molde

  • Dziekan K, Kottenhoff K (2007) Dynamic at-stop real-time information displays for public transport: effects on customers. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 41(6):489–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eboli L, Mazzulla G (2008) A stated preference experiment for measuring service quality in public transport. Transp Plan Technol 31(5):509–523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eboli L, Mazzulla G (2015) Relationships between rail passengers’ satisfaction and service quality: a framework for identifying key service factors. Public Transp 7(2):185–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ElectronicsWeekly (2014) UK-designed and built heads-up display-prototype to production in six months. http://www.electronicsweekly.com/news/business/uk-designed-built-head-display-prototype-production-six-months-2014-10/. Accessed 6 Oct 2014

  • Ettema D, Friman M, Gärling T, Olsson LE, Fujii S (2012) How in-vehicle activities affect work commuters’ satisfaction with public transport. J Transp Geogr 24:215–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2014) Transport research and innovation in horizon 2020. http://ec.europa.eu/transport/themes/research/horizon2020_en.htm. Accessed 19 July 2016

  • Fiorio CV, Florio M, Perucca G (2013) User satisfaction and the organization of local public transport: evidence from European cities. Transp Policy 29:209–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foth M, Schroeter R, Ti J (2013) Opportunities of public transport experience enhancement with mobile services and urban screens. Int J Ambient Comput Intell 5(1):1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friman M (2004) The structure of affective reactions to critical incidents. J Econ Psychol 25(3):331–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrison WL, Levinson DM (2014) The transportation experience: policy, planning, and deployment. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman E (1959) The presentation of self in everyday life. Anchor, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg CI, Firestone IJ (1977) Compensatory responses to crowding: effects of personal space intrusion and privacy reduction. J Pers Soc Psychol 35(9):637

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gwilliam KM (2001) Competition in urban passenger transport in the developing world. J Transp Econ Policy 35(1):99–118

    Google Scholar 

  • Hale CA, Miller M (2013) Amenity and opportunity at rail stations. Aust Plan 50(1):44–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hao J, Wang L (2005) Improving urban air quality in China: Beijing case study. J Air Waste Manag Assoc 55(9):1298–1305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haselton T (2013) SubCulture.FM Wins AT&T and MTA App Quest Hackathon. http://www.technobuffalo.com/2013/05/06/subculture-fm-wins-appquest-hackathon/. Accessed 7 Oct 2014

  • Horden T (2014) Future transport services: challenges and opportunities. In: Gardner N, Haeusler MH, Mahar B (eds) INTERchanging: future designs for responsive transport environments. Art Architecture Design Research, Bamberg, pp 39–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Ian M, Macaulay LA, Wilby J, Ten YL, Zhao L, Theodoulidis B (2012) Case studies in service innovation. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Intel (2014). Driving in-vehicle innovation with the internet of things. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UTye-7t7ln4. Accessed 4 Oct 2014

  • Jain J, Lyons G (2008) The gift of travel time. J Transp Geogr 16(2):81–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jared T (2009) The social environment of public transport. Dissertation, University of Wellington

  • KLM (2014) Klm meet & seat. http://www.klm.com/travel/nl_en/prepare_for_travel/on_board/Your_seat_on_board/meet_and_seat.htm#richmedia. Accessed 5 July 2014

  • Korean Air (2014) Excellent boarding pass. https://www.koreanair.com/content/koreanair/global/en/offers-promotion.html#excellent-boarding-pass-program. Accessed 2 Oct 2014

  • Leap (2015) Leap—your commute. Redesigned. http://www.rideleap.com/. Accessed 2 Aug 2015

  • Loup (2015) Loup. http://loupapp.com/. Accessed 2 Aug 2015

  • Lucas K (2013) Qualitative methods in transport research: the ‘action research’ approach. In: Zmud J, Lee-Gosselin M, Carrasco JA (eds) Transport survey methods: best practices for decision making, 1st edn. Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, p 427

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusch RF, Vargo SL (2014) Service-dominant logic: premises, perspectives, possibilities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Lyft (2015). A ride whenever you need one—lyft. https://www.lyft.com/. Accessed 4 Aug 2015

  • Lyons G, Urry J (2005) Travel time use in the information age. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 39(2–3):257–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons G, Jain J, Holley D (2007) The use of travel time by rail passengers in Great Britain. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 41(1):107–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons G, Jain J, Susilo Y, Atkins S (2013) Comparing rail passengers’ travel time use in Great Britain between 2004 and 2010. Mobilities 8(4):560–579

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mack R (2013) A study on airline strategy: comparing Ryanair and Lufthansa to determine the best strategy in the industry. Bachelor Commer Best Bus Res Papers 7:49–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Mackenzie DA, Wajcman J (eds) (1999) The social shaping of technology, 2nd edn. Open University Press, Buckingham. ISBN 9780335199136

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumura K, Sumi Y (2014) CarCast: a framework for situated in-car conversation sharing. In: Proceedings of the 5th augmented human international conference, Kobe, p 17

  • Matthews T (2014) The Virgin America brand. http://matthewsonmarketing.com/2014/04/09/the-virgin-america-brand/. Accessed 1 Oct 2014

  • Maxwell JA (2004) Using qualitative methods for causal explanation. Field Methods 16(3):243–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell JA (2005) Qualitative research design: an interactive approach, Applied Social Research Methods Series, vol 41, 2nd edn. SAGE Publications Ltd, California

  • MBTA (2012). Mbta.com > transit police. http://www.mbta.com/transitpolice/see_something_say_something/. Accessed 21 Aug 2012

  • Meyer C, Schwager A (2007) Understanding customer experience. Harvard Bus Rev 85(2):116

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller E, Byrd R, Kriger D (1999) Transit cooperative research program: a handbook for measuring customer satisfaction and service quality. National Academy Press, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miziko I (2004) Personal portable pedestrian: lessons from Japanese mobile phone use. In: The 2004 international conference on mobile communication, Seoul

  • Mokhtarian P (2005) Travel as a desired end, not just a means. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 39(2–3):93–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nawal TK (2011) The passenger has gone digital and mobile: accessing and connecting through information and technology. Ashgate Publishing Limited, Surrey

    Google Scholar 

  • NFCWorld (2009) Air France tests NFC Boarding passes at Nice Airport. http://www.ier.com/~/uk/market/air-transportation/~/uk/press_release/pass-fly-a-new-way-to-go-through-boarding/. Accessed 5 Oct 2014

  • Nordahl D (2012) Making transit fun! How to entice motorists from their cars. Island Press, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman DA (2013) The design of everyday things: revised and expanded edition. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Norman DA, Verganti R (2014) Incremental and radical innovation: design research vs. technology and meaning change. Design Issues 30(1):78–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohmori N, Harata N (2008) How different are activities while commuting by train? A case in Tokyo. Tijdschrift voor economische en sociale geografie 99(5):547–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson LE, Friman M, Pareigis J, Edvardsson B (2012) Measuring service experience: applying the satisfaction with travel scale in public transport. J Retail Consum Services 19(4):413–418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ory DT, Mokhtarian PL (2005) When is getting there half the fun? Modeling the liking for travel. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 39(2–3):97–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pine BJ, Gilmore JH (1998) Welcome to the experience economy. Harvard Bus Rev 76(4):97–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Pine BJ, Gilmore JH (1999) The experience economy. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter ME, Millar VE (1985) How information gives you competitive advantage. Harvard Bus Rev 63(4):149–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Prahalad CK, Ramaswamy V (2004) Co-creating unique value with customers. Strategy Leadership 32(3):4–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajé F (2007) Using q methodology to develop more perceptive insights on transport and social inclusion. Transp Policy 14(6):467–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rakotonirainy A, Feller F, Haworth N (2009) In-vehicle avatars to elicit social response and change driving behaviour. Int J Technol Human Interact 5(4):80–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redman L, Friman M, Gärling T, Hartig T (2013) Quality attributes of public transport that attract car users: a research review. Transp Policy 25:119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Royal College of Art (2012). Canopy. http://www.amritakulkarni.com/Canopy. Accessed 18 March 2014

  • Russell JA (2003) Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychol Rev 110(1):145–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schroeter R, Rakotonirainy A (2012) The future shape of digital cars. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Australasian road safety research, policing and education conference, Wellington

  • Schroeter R, Soro A, Rakotonirainy A (2013) Social cars: sensing, gathering, sharing and conveying social cues to road users. In: Guo B, Riboni D, Hu P (eds) Creating personal, social, and urban awareness through pervasive computing. IGI Global, Pennsylvania, pp 176–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwieterman JP, Fischer LA (2011) Privacy invades public space: the growing use of portable electronic technology on intercity buses, trains and planes between 2009 and 2010. Technical report, Chaddick Institute for Metropolitan Development, DePaul University, Chicago

  • Schwieterman JP, Fischer LA, Schulz M (2012) Staying connected en route: the growing use of tablets and other portable electronic devices on intercity buses, trains and planes. Technical report, Chaddick Institute for Metropolitan Development, DePaul University, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Serrels M (2012) Queensland rail bans games and gaming websites from its wi-fi service. http://www.kotaku.com.au/2012/10/queensland-rail-bans-games-and-gaming-website-from-its-wi-fi-service/2012/10/queensland-rail-bans-games-and-gaming-website-from-its-wi-fi-service/. Accessed 5 Oct 2014

  • Smart P (2014) Rethink the airline boarding pass. http://petesmart.co.uk/rethink-the-airline-boarding-pass/. Accessed 2 Oct 2014

  • Steg L (2005) Car use: lust and must. Instrumental, symbolic and affective motives for car use. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 39(2–3):147–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stellin S (2014) Yes! download that airline app. http://www.nytimes.com/2012/03/04/travel/airline-apps-that-check-you-in-map-airports-and-follow-luggage.html?_r=0. Accessed 2 Oct 2014

  • Stradling S, Carreno M, Rye T, Noble A (2007a) Passenger perceptions and the ideal urban bus journey experience. Transp Policy 14(4):283–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stradling SG, Anable J, Carreno M (2007b) Performance, importance and user disgruntlement: a six-step method for measuring satisfaction with travel modes. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 41(1):98–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang S, Lo HK (2008) The impact of public transport policy on the viability and sustainability of mass railway transit—the Hong Kong experience. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 42(4):563–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang S, Lo H (2010) On the financial viability of mass transit development: the case of Hong Kong. Transportation 37(2):299–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang L, Thakuriah P (2012) Ridership effects of real-time bus information system: a case study in the city of Chicago. Transp Res Part C Emerg Technol 22:146–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolpa E (2012) Measuring customer expectations of service quality: case airline industry. Dissertation, Aalto University

  • Tompson T(2014) Reframing public transport: what is and what ifs. In: Gardner N, Haeusler MH, Mahar B (eds) INTERchanging: future designs for responsive transport environments, art architecture design research, Bamberg, pp 33–38

  • Toprak C, Platt J, Ho HY, Mueller F (2013) Cart-load-o-fun: designing digital games for trams. In: CHI’13 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems, Paris, pp 2877–2878

  • Transportation Research Board (1999) A handbook for measuring customer satisfaction and service quality, Technical report. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Transportation Research Board (2013) Transit capacity and quality of service manual, Technical report, 3rd edn. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Tyrinopoulos Y, Antoniou C (2008) Public transit user satisfaction: variability and policy implications. Transp Policy 15(4):260–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uber (2015). Uber. http://www.uber.com/. Accessed 2 Aug 2015

  • Van den Besselaar P, Heimeriks G (2001) Disciplinary, multidisciplinary, interdisciplinary: concepts and indicators. In: 8th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics, Sydney, pp 705–716

  • Van Sack J (2012) Shop til you board. http://bostonherald.com/business/technology/general/view.bg?articleid=1061164583&position=0. Accessed 2 Oct 2012

  • Wagner CS, Roessner JD, Bobb K, Klein JT, Boyack KW, Keyton J, Rafols I, Börner K (2011) Approaches to understanding and measuring interdisciplinary scientific research (idr): a review of the literature. J Informetr 5(1):14–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodcock J, Edwards P, Tonne C, Armstrong BG, Ashiru O, Banister D, Beevers S, Chalabi Z, Chowdhury Z, Cohen A, Franco OH, Haines A, Hickman R, Lindsay G, Mittal I, Mohan D, Tiwari G, Woodward A, Roberts I (2009) Public health benefits of strategies to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions: urban land transport. Lancet 374(9705):1930–1943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wyld DC, Jones MA, Totten JW (2005) Where is my suitcase? RFID and airline customer service. Mark Intell Plan 23(4):382–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yaya LHP, Fortià MF, Canals CS et al (2015) Service quality assessment of public transport and the implication role of demographic characteristics. Public Transp 7(3):409–428. doi:10.1007/s12469-014-0099-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zomerdijk LG, Voss CA (2010) Service design for experience-centric services. J Serv Res 13(1):67–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank our study participants as well as the CRC for Rail Innovation (established and supported under the Australian Government’s Cooperative Research Centres Program) for the co-funding of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Urban Informatics Research Lab, School of Design, Creative Industries Faculty, Brisbane, Australia

    Tiago Camacho, Marcus Foth & Markus Rittenbruch

  2. Centre for Accident Research and Road Safety Queensland (CARRS-Q), Faculty of Health, Brisbane, Australia

    Andry Rakotonirainy

  3. School of Civil Engineering and The Built Environment, Science and Engineering Faculty, Brisbane, Australia

    Jonathan Bunker

  4. Queensland University of Technology, GPO Box 2434, Brisbane, QLD, 4001, Australia

    Tiago Camacho, Marcus Foth, Andry Rakotonirainy, Markus Rittenbruch & Jonathan Bunker

Authors
  1. Tiago Camacho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Marcus Foth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andry Rakotonirainy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Markus Rittenbruch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jonathan Bunker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcus Foth.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Camacho, T., Foth, M., Rakotonirainy, A. et al. The role of passenger-centric innovation in the future of public transport. Public Transp 8, 453–475 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-016-0148-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-016-0148-5

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation