Public Transport

, Volume 6, Issue 3, pp 185–213 | Cite as

A review of technological improvements in bus rapid transit (BRT) and buses with high level of service (BHLS)

  • Darío HidalgoEmail author
  • Juan Carlos Muñoz
Original Paper


Bus rapid transit BRT, and its European counterpart buses with high level of service BHLS, have been adopted by more than 160 cities around the world as a low cost, rapid implementation option for improved transit services. This paper summarizes some past advances of BRT and BHLS and presents some trends in vehicle guidance, propulsion technologies and information systems which are shaping the future of bus systems. We use the cities of Curitiba, Paris, Bogotá, Santiago, Istanbul, and Guangzhou to present relevant breakthroughs in bus system evolution. Thanks to the advances pioneered in these cities, BRT and BHLS became feasible alternatives to or complement metro and trams, and an integral part of integrated transit solutions, even in megacities like Mexico, Rio de Janeiro, Beijing, and New York. Evolution is ongoing; cities and providers are advancing technological components to enhance passenger experience and improve the technical, economic and environmental performance of BRT and BHLS.


BRT BHLS Running way guidance Vehicle propulsion technologies ITS Curitiba Paris Bogota Santiago Istanbul Guangzhou 



This research was supported by the Bus Rapid Transit Centre of Excellence ( funded by the Volvo Research and Educational Foundations (VREF). The authors also gratefully acknowledge the research support provided by CEDEUS, CONICYT/FONDAP 15110020. An abridged version of this paper was published by VREF (2011). The draft paper was presented in CASPT 12. Names of some manufacturers and system providers are mentioned in the paper with the purpose of illustration; this does not constitute endorsement of their products or services. We thank Dr. Robin King for revising the manuscript and we appreciate the comments from anonymous reviewers. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the views of their institutions or the funders.


  1. APTS (2011) PHILEAS, a tram on tires. Visited 20 May 2011
  2. Ardila A (2004) Transit planning in Curitiba and Bogotá, roles in interaction, risk, and change. Dissertation (Ph.D. in Urban and Transportation Planning at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology), CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  3. Ardila A (2007) How public transportation’s past is haunting its future in Bogotá, Colombia. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2038, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., pp 9–15Google Scholar
  4. Ardila A, Rodriguez D (2010) How chaos does not destroy ridership: operations of an exclusive busway carrying more than 35,000 passengers per hour per direction. Transportation Research Record No. 1726, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., pp 1–7Google Scholar
  5. Bradley M (2010) Ultra-efficient bus rapid transit timetabling. Thesis, Curtin University of Technology, Faculty of Humanities, Curtin University Sustainability Policy Institute. Visited 3 March 2012
  6. Cervero R (1998) The transit metropolis: a global inquiry. Island Press, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  7. China Bus Rapid Transit (2011) Xiamen BRT, ITDP. Visited 17 May 2011
  8. China Bus Rapid Transit (2013) Guangzhou BRT, ITDP. Visited 16 May 2013
  9. Cidade Olimpica (2013) Transcarioca, Rio de Janeiro. Visited 17 May 2013
  10. Cipriani E, Gori S, Petrelli M (2009) Bus network design: procedure and application in large urban areas. The 11th international conference on advanced systems for public transport, Hong KongGoogle Scholar
  11. Cooper E, Arioli M, Carrigan A, Jain U (2012) Exhaust emissions of transit buses—working paper. EMBARQ. Visited 17 May 2013
  12. Global BRT Data (2013) Produced by ALC-BRT Center of Excellence and EMBARQ in partnership with International Energy Agency and SIBRT. Visited 14 May 2013
  13. Delgado F, Muñoz JC, Giesen R (2011) An integrated real time transit signal priority control for high frequency transit services. International conference series on competition and ownership in land passenger transport. Thredbo 12. DurbanGoogle Scholar
  14. Diaz RB, Hinebaugh D (eds) (2009) Characteristics of BRT for decision makers (CBRT), 2nd edn. Publication FTA-FL-26-7109.2009.1, Federal Transit Adminstration, United States Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  15. Dulac J (2013) Global land transport infrastructure requirements—estimating road and railway infrastructure capacity and costs to 2050. International Energy Agency. visited 17 May 2013
  16. Finn B, Heddebaut O, Kerkhof A, Rambaud F, Sbert-Lozano O, Soulas C (eds) (2011) Buses with high level of service: fundamental characteristics and recommendations for decision making and research. Cost Action TU0603, Final ReportGoogle Scholar
  17. Fjellstrom K (2010) Bus rapid transit in China. Built Environ 26(3):363–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gilbert A (2008) Bus rapid transit: is TransMilenio a miracle cure? Transp Rev 28(4):439–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Giro (2012) HASTUS—transit scheduling and operations. Visited 3 March 2012
  20. Goal Systems (2012) GoalBus, optimal timetabling, vehicle and driver scheduling in bus companies. Visited 3 March 2012
  21. Gutierrez L (2010) “TransMilenio alrededor del Mundo”, TransMilenio 10 años. TRANSMILENIO S.A, DiciembreGoogle Scholar
  22. Heddebaut O, Finn B, Rabuel S, Rambaud F (2010) The European bus with a high level of service (BHLS): concept and Practice. Built Environ 36(3):307–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hensher D (1999) A bus-based transitway or light rail? Continuing the saga on choice versus blind commitment. Road Transp Res 8(3)Google Scholar
  24. Hidalgo D (2009) Citywide transit integration in a large city: the Interligado system of São Paulo, Brazil. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, Issue Number: 2114, Developing Countries, pp 19–27Google Scholar
  25. Hidalgo D (2011) TransMilenio, ten years down the line. Visited 20 Dec 2011
  26. Hidalgo D, Carrigan A (2010) Modernizing public transportation, lessons learned from major bus improvements in Latin America and Asia. World Resources Institute, Washington, D.C. Visited 20 Dec 2011
  27. Hidalgo D, Gutierrez L (2013) BRT around the world: explosive growth, large positive impacts and many issues outstanding. Res Transp Econ 39(1):8–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hidalgo D, Lleras G, Hernández E (2013) Methodology for calculating passenger capacity in bus rapid transit systems: application to the TransMilenio system in Bogotá, Colombia. Res Transp Econ 39(1):139–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hodgson P, Potter S, Warren J, Gillingwater D (2011) Can bus really be the new tram? THREDBO 12, DurbanGoogle Scholar
  30. Hofman A (2008) Advanced network planning for bus rapid transit: the “Quickway” model as a modal alternative to “Light Rail Lite”. Federal Transit Administration, FTA-FL-26-7104.2007.4Google Scholar
  31. Hutchinson A (2010) TransMilenio, the good, the bus and the ugly. The City Fix. Visited 2 March 2012
  32. IEA (2012) Energy technology perspectives 2012—how to secure a clean energy future. International Energy Agency, ParisCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. IETT (2013) Istanbul Public Transport Authority, Istanbul Metropolitan Administration, Turkey. Visited 17 May 2013
  34. IPPUC (2011) Institute for Research and Urban Planning of Curitiba. Database (in Portuguese). Accessed 10 May 2011Google Scholar
  35. Larrain H, Giesen R, Munoz JC (2010) Choosing the right express services for bus corridor with capacity restrictions. Transp Res Rec 2197:63–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Leiva C, Muñoz JC, Giesen R, Larrain H (2010) Design of limited-stop services for an urban bus corridor with capacity constraints. Transp Res Part B Methodol 44(10):1186–1201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Levinson H, Zimmerman S, Clinger J, Rutherford S, Smith RL, Cranknell J, Soberman R (2003a) “Bus rapid transit—volume 1: case studies in bus rapid transit”. Transit Cooperative Research Program—Report 90, vol I. Transportation Research Board, National Academies, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  38. Levinson H, Zimmerman S, Clinger J, Gast J, Rutherford S, Bruhn E (2003b) Bus rapid transit—volume 2: implementation guidelines. Transit Cooperative Research Program—Report 90, vol II. Transportation Research Board, National Academies, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  39. Lindau LA, Senna LAS, Strambi O, Martins WC (2008) Alternative financing for bus rapid transit (BRT): the case of Porto Alegre, Brazil. Res Transp Econ 22(1):54–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lindau LA, Hidalgo D, Facchini D (2010) Curitiba, the Cradle of BRT. Built Environ 36(3):274–282CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. MIFARE (2012) MIFARE Milestones. Visited 3 March 2012
  42. Montezuma R (2009) Vehículos Eléctricos: El Transporte del Futuro. Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Artes, Centro de Extensión Académica, BogotáGoogle Scholar
  43. Motorola (2012) Tetra applications. Visited 3 March 2012
  44. Muñoz JC (2002) Driver-shift design for single-hub transit systems under uncertainty, Dissertation, University of California at Berkeley. Visited 3 March 2012
  45. Muñoz JC, Giesen R (2010) Optimization of public transportation systems. In: Cochran JJ (ed) Encyclopedia of operations research and management science, vol 6, pp 3886–3896Google Scholar
  46. Muñoz JC, Hidalgo D (2013) Workshop 2: bus rapid transit as part of enhanced service provision. THREDBO 12: recent developments in the reform of land passenger transport. Res Transp Econ 39(1):104–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Muñoz JC, Ortúzar J, de D, Gschwender A (2008) Transantiago: the fall and rise of a radical public transport intervention. In: Saleh and Sammer (eds) Travel demand management and road user pricing: success, failure and feasibility, chap 9. Ashgate Publishing Limited, UK, pp 151–172Google Scholar
  48. Octupus (2012) Our history, corporate profile, Octupus. Visited 3 March 2012
  49. Peak M (2004) Analysis of fuels and propulsion system options for BRT vehicles, FTA-CA-26-7044-2033, WestStart-CALSTART. Visited 20 May 2011
  50. Pessaro B, Van Nostrand C (2011) An evaluation of the Cleveland HealthLine Mechanical Guide Wheel, Report Number: FTA- FL- 26-7110.2011.2, NBRTI. Visited 20 May 2011
  51. Siemens (2010b) e-BRT®: the sustainable development solution for Bus Rapid Transit lines. Visited 20 May 2011
  52. Smart Card Alliance (2011) transit and contactless open payments: an emerging approach for fare collection. Visited 3 March 2012
  53. Smart Card Alliance (2012). Smart card FAQ. Visited 3 March 2012
  54. Smiler S (2011) Bus priority systems—special issue on kerb guided buses (O-Bahn). Visited 20 May 2011
  55. Suarez J (2011) Volvo México, Personal CommunicationGoogle Scholar
  56. Tirachini A, Hensher DA, Jara-Diaz S (2010) Comparing operator and users costs of light rail, heavy rail and bus rapid transit over a radial public transport network. Res Transp Econ 29(1):231–242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Topp HH (1999) Innovations in tram and light rail systems. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part F J Rail Rapid Transit 213(3):133–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. TRANSMILENIO S.A. (2011) Accessed 17 Jan 2012
  59. URBS—Urbanization Company of Curitiba. URBS Official Website (in Portuguese). Accessed 10 May 2011
  60. Venter C (2011) The lurch towards formalization: lessons from the implementation of BRT in Johannesburg, South Africa, THREDBO 12, DurbanGoogle Scholar
  61. Viegas JM (2011) Instituto Técnico Superior de Lisboa, Personal CommunicationGoogle Scholar
  62. VREF (2011) The future of urban transportGoogle Scholar
  63. Vuchic VR (2007) Urban transit systems and technology. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Wilbur Smith and Associates (1966) Under commission from American Automobile Manufacturers Association (H. S. Levinson, Principal Investigator). Transportation and Parking for Tomorrow’s Cities, New Haven, cited by Levinson et al. (2003b)Google Scholar
  65. Wren A, Rousseau JM (1993) Bus driver scheduling, an overview. University of Leeds, School of Computer Studies, Research Report Series, Report 93.31Google Scholar
  66. Wright L (ed) (2010) Bus rapid transit: a public transport renaissance. Built Environ 36(3)Google Scholar
  67. Wright L, Hook W (eds) (2007) Bus rapid transit planning guide, 3rd edn. Institute for Transportation and Development Policy, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.EMBARQ, the World Resources Institute (WRI) signature initiative for sustainable transport and urban developmentWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Department of Transport Engineering and Logistics, BRT Centre of ExcellencePontificia Universidad Católica de ChileSantiagoChile

Personalised recommendations