Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Welke karakteristieken van chirurgische patiënten verklaren hun klinische zorgvraag aan zorgprofessionals?

  • Hollandse nieuwe
  • Published:
Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Evidence Based Practice

Door toenemende behandelmogelijkheden en vergrijzing van de bevolking stijgt het aantal patiënten met multimorbiditeit. Hierdoor zal in de komende jaren de zorgbehoefte – of zorgvraag – door deze complexe patiëntengroep waarschijnlijk flink toenemen.1) Ook op algemeen chirurgische verpleegafdelingen van academische ziekenhuizen is deze trend merkbaar. Door toegenomen behandelmogelijkheden zowel op chirurgisch als anesthesiologisch vlak worden steeds meer (oudere) multimorbide patiënten opgenomen en behandeld met gevolgen voor de totale zorgvraag. Het is dan ook van belang een meetinstrument te hebben voor de (verwachte) zorgvraag van deze patiënten aan zorgprofessionals, zoals medici, paramedici en verpleegkundigen.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figuur 1

Literatuur

  1. Christensen K, Doblhammer G, Rau R, Vaupel JW. Ageing populations: the challenges ahead. The Lancet 2009; 374:1196–1208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Buchan J. Nurse workforce planning in the UK: a report for the Royal College of Nursing. London: Royal College of Nursing; 2007.

  3. Morris R, MacNeela P, Scott A, Treacy P, Hyde A. Reconsidering the conceptualization of nursing workload: literature review. J Adv Nurs 2007; 57:463–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brennan CW, Daly BJ. Patient acuity: a concept analysis. J Adv Nurs 2008; 65:1114–1126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bostrom JM. Impact of physician practice on nursing care. Nursing Economic$ 1994; 12:250–255.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. de Groot HA. Patient classification system evaluation. Part 1: Essential system elements. J Nurs Adm 1989; 19:30–35.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bostrom J, Mitchell M. Relationship of direct nursing care hours to DRG and severity of illness. Nursing Economic$ 1991; 9:105–111.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Campbell T, Taylor S, Callaghan S, Shuldham C. Case mix type as a predictor of nursing workload. J Nurs Manag 1997; 5:237–240.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Diers D, Bozzo J. Nursing resource definition in DRGs. RIMS/Nursing Acuity Project Group. Nursing Economic$ 1997; 15:124–130.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fagerström L, Rainio A, Rauhala A, Nojonen K. Validation of a new method for patient classification, the Oulu Patient Classification. J Adv Nurs 2000; 31:481–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Halloran EJ. Nursing workload, medical diagnosis related groups, and nursing diagnoses. Res Nurs Health 1985; 8:421–433.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Mion LC, McLaren CE, Frengley JD. The impact of patients’ severity of illness and age on nursing workload. Nurs Manage 1988; 19:26–8, 30, 32–3.

    Google Scholar 

  13. O’Brien-Pallas L, Tritchler D, Till J. Variability in nursing workload within CMGs (case mix groups). Healthcare Management Forum/ Canadian College of Health Service Executives 1989; 2:26–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. O’Brien-Pallas L, Irvine D, Peereboom E, Murray M. Measuring nursing workload: understanding the variability. Nursing Economic$ 1997; 15:171–182.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Sermeus W, Delesie LK, Diya L, Lesaffre E. Measuring the intensity of nursing care: making use of the Belgian Nursing Minimum Data Set. Int J Nurs Stud 2008; 45:1011–1021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Soeken KL, Prescott PA. Patient intensity for nursing index: the measurement model. Res Nurs Health 1991; 14:297–304.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fasoli DJR, Haddock KS. Results of an integrative review of patient classification systems. Annual Review Nursing Research 2010; 28:295–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Goossen WT, Epping PJ, van den Heuvel WJ, Feuth T, Frederiks CM, Hasman A. Development of the Nursing Minimum Data Set for the Netherlands (NMDSN): identification of categories and items. J Adv Nurs 2000; 31:536–547.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gijsen R, Hoeymans N, Schellevis FG, Ruwaard D, Satariano WA, van den Bos GAM. Causes and consequences of comorbidity: a review. J Clin Epidemiol 2001; 54:661–674.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. afdeling Kwaliteit en Procesinnovatie, AMC Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Catharina van Oostveen,  Hester Vermeulen &  Dirk Ubbink

  2. Amsterdam School of Health Professions, Hogeschool van Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Hester Vermeulen

Authors
  1. Catharina van Oostveen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hester Vermeulen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dirk Ubbink
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

promovenda

stafadviseur en senior onderzoeker

en lid lectoraat ebp

stafadviseur en senior onderzoeker

Dit artikel is gebaseerd op het recent verschenen Engelstalige artikel: van Oostveen CJ, Vermeulen H, Gouma DJ, Bakker PJ, Ubbink DT. Explaining the amount of care needed by hospitalised surgical patients: a prospective time and motion study. bmc Health Serv Res 2013; 13:42.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

van Oostveen, C., Vermeulen, H. & Ubbink, D. Welke karakteristieken van chirurgische patiënten verklaren hun klinische zorgvraag aan zorgprofessionals?. NED. TIJDS. EVID. PRACT. 11, 4–9 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12468-013-0022-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12468-013-0022-2

Search

Navigation