Skip to main content
Log in

Screening op type 2-diabetes mellitus: de heilige graal?

  • Published:
Tijdschrift voor Kindergeneeskunde

Samenvatting

Obesitas is een groeiend probleem in de westerse wereld. Ook bij kinderen wordt een sterke toename van het percentage overgewicht en obesitas gezien. Hiermee neemt het risico toe op comorbiditeit en complicaties, zoals type 2-diabetes mellitus en het metabool syndroom, met als gevolg micro- en macrovasculaire afwijkingen. Met de stijging van de incidentie en prevalentie van type 2-diabetes mellitus is de vraag ontstaan naar betrouwbare screening op de ziekte en haar voorlopers. Tot op heden wordt, op advies van de American Diabetes Association, gescreend door bepaling van nuchtere plasmaglucose. De vraag is echter of deze screeningsmethode afdoende is om alle patiënten met een verstoord glucosemetabolisme op te sporen.

In dit artikel hebben we verschillende onderzoeken vergeleken om de waarde van screening door bepaling van nuchtere plasmaglucose vast te stellen.We kunnen op basis van de literatuur concluderen dat deze screeningsmethode niet afdoende is, de maximale sensitiviteit die bereikt wordt is slechts 50%.We evalueerden daarom ook andere screeningsmarkers, waaronder HbA1c, nuchtere triglyceriden en het Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), een surrogaatmarker voor insulinegevoeligheid. Van deze markers is HOMA-IR de meest veelbelovende, aangezien hiermee een sensitiviteit van 72,2% gehaald wordt. Daarnaast identificeer je door middel van HOMA-IR ook patiënten met verminderde insulinegevoeligheid, een onderdeel van het metabool syndroom en een voorstadium van type 2-diabetes mellitus, dat vroegtijdige interventie rechtvaardigt.

Hoewel het toevoegen van HOMA-IR aan de screening naar type 2 diabetes mellitus en zijn voorlopers een grote verbetering van de screeningsresultaten geeft, is de heilige graal nog niet gevonden. Toekomstig onderzoek zal moeten uitwijzen wat de ideale screeningsmethode is voor het identificeren van risicopatiënten.

Summary

Obesity poses a major health problem in the western world. The alarming increase in obesity is not only seen in adults, but also in children and adolescents. Paralleled with this increasing incidence, the risk of obesity related complications and comorbidities increases, such as type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and the metabolic syndrome and, consequently, micro- and macrovascular disease. With the rise in incidence and prevalence of type 2 diabetes mellitus a need has emerged for adequate screening for the disease and its precursors. Up till now screening is performed by measurement of fasting plasma glucose, according to the guidelines of the American Diabetes Association. It is however questionable whether this screening is sufficient to detect all patients with altered glucose metabolism.

In this article we have compared several studies to establish the value of screening with fasting plasma glucose.We can conclude, based on the literature, that this screening is not sufficient as the maximal sensitivity acquired is only 50%. Therefore, we evaluated other possible markers for screening, namely HbA1c, fasting triglycerides and the Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), a surrogate marker for insulin sensitivity. Of these markers, HOMA-IR is the most promising one, as a sensitivity of 72.2% is achieved with this method. Furthermore, screening with HOMA-IR identifies patients with lowered insulin sensitivity, which is a part of the metabolic syndrome and a precursor of T2DM that justifies early intervention.

Although adding HOMA-IR to the screening for T2DM and its precursors greatly improves screening results, the holy grail has yet to be found. Future research is needed to find the ideal screening method to identify patients at risk.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Literatuur

  1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Defining overweight and obesity. www.cdc.gov/obesity/adult/defining.html.

  2. Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Kit BK, Flegal KM. Prevalence of obesity in the United States, 2009-2010. NCHS Data Brief. 2012;(82):1–8.

  3. Baken A van, Zantinge E. Neemt het aantal mensen met overgewicht toe of af ? Volksgezondheid Toekomst Verkenning, Nationaal Kompas Volksgezondheid; 2013.

  4. Schonbeck Y, Buuren S van. TNO factsheet Resultaten Vijfde Landelijke Groeistudie. 2010.

  5. CBO. Richtlijn Diagnostiek en behandeling van obesitas bij volwassenen en kinderen. Alphen aan den Rijn: Van Zuiden, 2008.

  6. Kelly AS, Barlow SE, Rao G, et al. Severe obesity in children and adolescents: identification, associated health risks, and treatment approaches: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2013;128:1689–712.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Alberti KG, Zimmet PZ. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Part 1: diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus provisional report of a WHO consultation. Diabet Med. 1998;15:539–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, et al. Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Circulation. 2009;120:1640–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Baan C, Poos M, Uiters E, et al. Hoe vaak komt diabetes mellitus voor en hoeveel mensen sterven eraan? Volksgezondheid Toekomst Verkenning, Nationaal Kompas Volksgezondheid; 2014.

  10. Fazeli Farsani S, Aa MP van der, Vorst MM van der, et al. Global trends in the incidence and prevalence of type 2 diabetes in children and adolescents: a systematic review and evaluation of methodological approaches. Diabetologia. 2013;56:1471–88.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Association AD. Screening for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(Suppl 1):S21–4.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Association AD. Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(Suppl 1): S64–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Binsbergen J van, Langens F, Dapper A, et al. NHG-Standaard Obesitas. Huisarts Wet. 2010; 53:609–25.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wilson JM, Jungner YG. Principles and practice of mass screening for disease [in het Spaans]. Bol Oficina Sanit Panam. 1968;65:281–393.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Aa MP van der, Fazeli Farsani S, Kromwijk LA, et al. How to screen obese children at risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus? Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2014;53: 337–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cambuli VM, Incani M, Pilia S, et al. Oral glucose tolerance test in Italian overweight/obese children and adolescents results in a very high prevalence of impaired fasting glycaemia, but not of diabetes. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2009;25:528–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Conwell LS, Batch JA. Oral glucose tolerance test in children and adolescents: positives and pitfalls. J Paediatr Child Health. 2004;40:620–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Love-Osborne K, Butler N, Gao D, Zeitler P. Elevated fasting triglycerides predict impaired glucose tolerance in adolescents at risk for type 2 diabetes. Pediatr Diabetes. 2006;7:205–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Tsay J, Pomeranz C, Hassoun A, et al. Screening markers of impaired glucose tolerance in the obese pediatric population. Horm Res Paediatr. 2010;73:102–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee JM, Gebremariam A, Wu EL, et al. Evaluation of nonfasting tests to screen for childhood and adolescent dysglycemia. Diabetes Care. 2011;34: 2597–602.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Morrison KM, Xu L, Tarnopolsky M, et al. Screening for dysglycemia in overweight youth presenting for weight management. Diabetes Care. 2012;35:711–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lee HS, Park HK, Hwang JS. HbA1c and glucose intolerance in obese children and adolescents. Diabet Med. 2012;29:e102–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Nowicka P, Santoro N, Liu H, et al. Utility of hemoglobin A(1c) for diagnosing prediabetes and diabetes in obese children and adolescents. Diabetes Care. 2011;34:1306–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Brar PC, Mengwall L, Franklin BH, et al. Screening obese children and adolescents for prediabetes and/or type 2 diabetes in pediatric practices: a validation study. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2014;53:771–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shah S, Kublaoui BM, Oden JD, et al. Screening for type 2 diabetes in obese youth. Pediatrics. 2009;124:573–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Morandi A, Maschio M, Marigliano M, et al. Screening for impaired glucose tolerance in obese children and adolescents: a validation and implementation study. Pediatr Obes. 2014;9:17–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Brown RJ, Yanovski JA. Estimation of insulin sensitivity in children: methods, measures and controversies. Pediatr Diabetes. 2014;15:151–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Levy-Marchal C, Arslanian S, Cutfield W, et al. Insulin resistance in children: consensus, perspective, and future directions. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010;95:5189–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Schwartz B, Jacobs DR, Moran A, et al. Measurement of insulin sensitivity in children: comparison between the euglycemic-hyperinsulinemic clamp and surrogate measures. Diabetes Care. 2008; 31:783–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Sinha R, Fisch G, Teague B, et al. Prevalence of impaired glucose tolerance among children and adolescents with marked obesity. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:802–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Nsiah-Kumi PA, Lasley S, Whiting M, et al. Diabetes, pre-diabetes and insulin resistance screening in Native American children and youth. Int J Obes (Lond). 2013;37:540–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen H, Sullivan G, Quon MJ. Assessing the predictive accuracy of QUICKI as a surrogate index for insulin sensitivity using a calibration model. Diabetes. 2005;54:1914–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kim SH, Abbasi F, Reaven GM. Impact of degree of obesity on surrogate estimates of insulin resistance. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:1998–2002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M.A.J. Elst.

Additional information

Auteurs

Mw. M.A.J. Elst MD, mw. M.P. van der Aa MD en mw. dr. M.M.J. van der Vorst, afdeling Kindergeneeskunde, St. Antonius Ziekenhuis, Nieuwegein. Dhr. dr. E.G.A.H. van Mil, afdeling Kindergeneeskunde, Jeroen Bosch Ziekenhuis, ’s-Hertogenbosch. Correspondentieadres: Dr. M.M.J. van der Vorst, afdeling Kindergeneeskunde, St. Antonius Ziekenhuis, Koekoekslaan 1, 3435 CM Nieuwegein, m.van.der.vorst@antoniusziekenhuis.nl.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Elst, M., van der Aa, M., van Mil, E. et al. Screening op type 2-diabetes mellitus: de heilige graal?. Tijdschr Kindergeneeskd 83, 27–35 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12456-015-0006-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12456-015-0006-4

Navigation